Gr00vus
Footballguy
It's funny, after I wrote my previous response I thought, it's not like Tombstone or The Good The Bad and The Ugly or other previous westerns, so if that's what you're hoping for it's going to be a let down. The setting is very basic, dirty, gritty, etc. - to your point about the look and feel of it. But you'll also note it changes a bit over the 3 seasons as it becomes less a camp and more a town, actual houses going up, etc.I think I’m about 6 in now and enjoying it outside of the aforementioned gratuitous language. The writing, acting, and dialogue are great. I can see why it’s revered.If you're not into it 2 episodes in (or one season in for that matter) it's not the show for you.I guess this doesn't change? Not sure I've got the monogamy for that.I think the bolded and "c----sucker" make up about 1/4 of the dialogue.I don't typically mind coarse language, but they're throwing the F-bomb around pretty egregiously. It's practically a comma. Takes me out of the show.I just started Season 2 and am kind of in the same boat. I will probably continue but it has been a few weeks since I watched it as it isn't too interesting to me.I have started Deadwood. Two episodes in and it’s not grabbing me. Obviously a period piece western, but it still seems “dated.” I assume it gets better as I know it’s highly recommended?![]()
I don't really understand the dated comment though. It's a stylized take on how a community organically forms from an 1870's mining camp despite being composed of a bunch of opportunist loners initially out for themselves and in no way looking to build a community. Were you expecting laser beams and fighter jets or something?
Maybe dated wasn’t the right word?
If I watch Tombstone now, which is a few years older than Deadwood, yet set in a similar time period I don’t get that feeling. Maybe it’s a budget thing? Or could just be that the set pieces and feel of the town (and the people) is “prettier” in Tombstone.
Last edited:


