That's the way I view it too. I know you need to be different to win, but not having what could be the top producing TE for a cheap price does not seem to be the way to win. You are basically betting everyone is wrong. We could be, but right now Watson looks to be the #1 target in a good passing offense. That is huge for a TE.That argument can go either way because if he blows up week 1 and you don't have him .... BYE BYEMy team is gunning for yours LHUCKS!!exactly...in the end you want a different team IMHO. A down week from Watson is more advantageous(if you don't have him and everybody else does) than a good week from Watson(If everybody has him)The other side to the question you posed is Watson bombs and the guy that 2% of people took does well that week. Big reward for that 2%.
A ton of people took him.
shoulda got on yesterday and changed it