Random
Footballguy
Joe emails me mine.Bump.bumpOtis said:Are you all calculating your own scores? I didn't see the post this week where that guy posts the scorers for guys who have played so far. Did I miss it?
Joe emails me mine.Bump.bumpOtis said:Are you all calculating your own scores? I didn't see the post this week where that guy posts the scorers for guys who have played so far. Did I miss it?
Calculator works just fine.Bump.bumpOtis said:Are you all calculating your own scores? I didn't see the post this week where that guy posts the scorers for guys who have played so far. Did I miss it?
We don't all have the assistance of a Higher Power when performing mathmatical operations.Is it that difficult to calculate your own scores?Otis said:Are you all calculating your own scores? I didn't see the post this week where that guy posts the scorers for guys who have played so far. Did I miss it?
You don't have a calculator?We don't all have the assistance of a Higher Power when performing mathmatical operations.Is it that difficult to calculate your own scores?Otis said:Are you all calculating your own scores? I didn't see the post this week where that guy posts the scorers for guys who have played so far. Did I miss it?
Now the Minny D - I'd love them to hang up another 20 for me-QG
Cutting it close myself--I'm at 101.7, and have MinnD (-4), and whatever Ben Watson scores with Cooley on bye. It's the tightest I've been to the cutoff so far....
Here's one for you: Gore 12/111/0, 2/9/0 - 14 pointsCan't someone post the cacadoodie scores?
I'll gladly post two of the cacadoodie scores: Delhomme 6.5 (with Kitna on bye) Keyshawn 2.9.I think I'm around 100 points. I'm at work and can't spend lots of time calculating exactly.Can't someone post the cacadoodie scores? What kind of free contest is this if people don't provide me with timely updates on my progress?![]()
-QG
I'm pretty good at math, especially geometry and trigonometry using pie and whatnot...comes in handy when calculating who is offering the best deal.We don't all have the assistance of a Higher Power when performing mathmatical operations.Is it that difficult to calculate your own scores?Otis said:Are you all calculating your own scores? I didn't see the post this week where that guy posts the scorers for guys who have played so far. Did I miss it?
I'm a big fan.I'm pretty good at math, especially geometry and trigonometry using pie and whatnot...comes in handy when calculating who is offering the best deal.We don't all have the assistance of a Higher Power when performing mathmatical operations.Is it that difficult to calculate your own scores?Otis said:Are you all calculating your own scores? I didn't see the post this week where that guy posts the scorers for guys who have played so far. Did I miss it?
Here's hoping the ONLY one on that list with a decent day is the NEP defense.....102.1 + (NEP D -0)Synthesizer said:There's a few players tonight who appear on quite a few rosters. So there's some potential to increase the cut depending on how these guys do......B.Watson on 2700 rostersT.Williamson on 1600 rostersD.Gabriel on 1200 rostersGostkowski on 1000 rostersL.Maroney on 720 rostersC.Taylor on 400 rostersVikings D on 400 rostersPatriots D on 400 rostersSabertooth said:So how much of a bump can we expect tonight? Two decent defenses out there. I am sitting at 106.9 with Ben Watson to go. Hopefully I can get to around 115 or so and make the cut!
Big games from any of the top 5 on that list will really move the line as they are on such a high % of rosters.Me too. Love me some pie. But when calculating the circumfrence of said pie I tend to use Pi.I'm a big fan.I'm pretty good at math, especially geometry and trigonometry using pie and whatnot...comes in handy when calculating who is offering the best deal.We don't all have the assistance of a Higher Power when performing mathmatical operations.Is it that difficult to calculate your own scores?Otis said:Are you all calculating your own scores? I didn't see the post this week where that guy posts the scorers for guys who have played so far. Did I miss it?![]()
But that's just me....Well, you cant find out the area of A Pie without Pi. Right?FWIW, I am at about 140 this week so looks like this is the only fantasy league I still have any hope of winning.Me too. Love me some pie. But when calculating the circumfrence of said pie I tend to use Pi.I'm a big fan.I'm pretty good at math, especially geometry and trigonometry using pie and whatnot...comes in handy when calculating who is offering the best deal.We don't all have the assistance of a Higher Power when performing mathmatical operations.Is it that difficult to calculate your own scores?Otis said:Are you all calculating your own scores? I didn't see the post this week where that guy posts the scorers for guys who have played so far. Did I miss it?![]()
But that's just me....
My assessment of low 120's was based on the fact that there was decent scoring, similar to week 3 which had the 75% cut in the high 120's, as well as 4 teams on bye. The rest of my arguement showed that other than that week, the numbers were much lower. Figuring the talent level of the teams is a bit better that it was in week 3, low 120's didn't seem out of the question. With pre MNF cut at 101, I would now think it could finish over 110, but unlikely above 115. When I ran the cut analysis with the full data set a few years ago, it was not as unusual as you'd think to have it bump 10-15 points during the MNF game. I haven't looked to see how "popular" tonite's players are, but if they are widely held (and I'm thinking not so much actually), the cut can move pretty far.People wrongly assume that because there were many high scoring athletes that there will be high scores here. Thing is, percentage-wise, people are not going to own all these top guys on any kind of level...Unofficial and preliminary: pre-MNF cut would be 101.1@ all of the 125-130 will be the cut posts.
I think we can all pretty much assume that everyone and their dog has Watson going tonight128.5 with Watson going tonight.![]()
WOW....I'm sitting at 101.4 with Watson, B.Johnson-22.0 (won't happen), Gostkowski-2.0, Minnesota defense -2.0gonna be interesting, no big games tonight and a decent game by Watson and Minny defense should get me over that mark.Unofficial and preliminary: pre-MNF cut would be 101.1
Week 7 results posted
Percent Ownership:
%OWN = percentage of still-alive rosters that have the given player.Code:33.6 percent of all entries are still alive.
%LIVE = percentage of all rosters with the given player that are still alive.
Player price %OWN %LIVE
----------------------------------------
Ben Watson 9 68.5 38.9
I use pie...like pizza pie...Me too. Love me some pie. But when calculating the circumfrence of said pie I tend to use Pi.I'm a big fan.I'm pretty good at math, especially geometry and trigonometry using pie and whatnot...comes in handy when calculating who is offering the best deal.We don't all have the assistance of a Higher Power when performing mathmatical operations.Is it that difficult to calculate your own scores?Are you all calculating your own scores? I didn't see the post this week where that guy posts the scorers for guys who have played so far. Did I miss it?![]()
But that's just me....

Ben Watson is not helping keep the curve down...I still think the cutoff is going to be north of 130...

Didn't see Drinen's post...101, eh? Well last week he posted a number and it was north of that by about 10 at the end of the MNF game...Watson is on too many rosters for that number not to move a little closer to at least 110 or so. You watch.Ben Watson is not helping keep the curve down...I still think the cutoff is going to be north of 130...![]()
![]()
Cut was 93 last week finished at 101.3Cut is at 101 this week, will probably finish at 110 or so110 does not = 130 last time I checked.Didn't see Drinen's post...101, eh? Well last week he posted a number and it was north of that by about 10 at the end of the MNF game...Watson is on too many rosters for that number not to move a little closer to at least 110 or so. You watch.Ben Watson is not helping keep the curve down...I still think the cutoff is going to be north of 130...![]()
![]()
I didn't say it did...I didn't see Drinen's post on page 44, and you are agreeing that the line will move up, so we agree, thanks.Cut was 93 last week finished at 101.3Cut is at 101 this week, will probably finish at 110 or so110 does not = 130 last time I checked.Didn't see Drinen's post...101, eh? Well last week he posted a number and it was north of that by about 10 at the end of the MNF game...Watson is on too many rosters for that number not to move a little closer to at least 110 or so. You watch.Ben Watson is not helping keep the curve down...I still think the cutoff is going to be north of 130...![]()
![]()