jdoggydogg
Footballguy
This is true, and it's the reason why I picked Gronkowski.So no cuts for the first 2 weeks. Gordon looks like a bargain for sure.
This is true, and it's the reason why I picked Gronkowski.So no cuts for the first 2 weeks. Gordon looks like a bargain for sure.
BothShocked Julian Thomas is only 28%. I would say anybody who doesn't have him and Thompkins isn't paying attention. Only about 3300 have both.
Yeah, but how did you know the number of entries before the contest closed?This is true, and it's the reason why I picked Gronkowski.So no cuts for the first 2 weeks. Gordon looks like a bargain for sure.
Count me in for one who paid attention to those guys...now, the other schmucks I have on my team...I may have fell asleep on.Shocked Julian Thomas is only 28%. I would say anybody who doesn't have him and Thompkins isn't paying attention. Only about 3300 have both.
I'm assuming jdog took a guess. Just about every year in this thing at least the first week has been a free pass for everyone due to low number of entries.Yeah, but how did you know the number of entries before the contest closed?
Thanks..everyone advances 2 weeks. No adjusting.
then you realized 100% of the non-thomas owners are also moving on to week 2...I came here today to talk about how bittersweet it was to see my Julius Thomas pick go off and how it's a shame that everyone else in the contest has him too...Then I saw that it was only 28% of you have him....sweet.
Well here's hoping it lasts.then you realized 100% of the non-thomas owners are also moving on to week 2...I came here today to talk about how bittersweet it was to see my Julius Thomas pick go off and how it's a shame that everyone else in the contest has him too...Then I saw that it was only 28% of you have him....sweet.
I also would of thought more people would have taken him also. For 2 bucks seems the best bang for your buck..Well here's hoping it lasts.then you realized 100% of the non-thomas owners are also moving on to week 2...I came here today to talk about how bittersweet it was to see my Julius Thomas pick go off and how it's a shame that everyone else in the contest has him too...Then I saw that it was only 28% of you have him....sweet.
Price was considered high by many. I think the presence of White probably tamped some of the enthusiasm for him down.Julio Jones - 5.6%. Wha?
Am I missing something?
Agreed. Wish I would have read the rules this year. I picked based on memory from last season.I know the historical results show smaller rosters have fair well in the past but with the addition of 2nd flex poistion this wil put more pressure on the smaller rosters. Believe we'll see a changing trend of larger rosters performing better.
They took away 1 WR spot to create that 2nd flex though.Agreed. Wish I would have read the rules this year. I picked based on memory from last season.I know the historical results show smaller rosters have fair well in the past but with the addition of 2nd flex poistion this wil put more pressure on the smaller rosters. Believe we'll see a changing trend of larger rosters performing better.
I think the opposite is true. This is my first year going with a smaller roster, and it was due to the 2nd flex replacing the 3rd WR.I know the historical results show smaller rosters have fair well in the past but with the addition of 2nd flex poistion this wil put more pressure on the smaller rosters. Believe we'll see a changing trend of larger rosters performing better.
Agreed... I think historically results have shown larger rosters to do better (specifically during the elimination rounds) and then it is arguable whether results have shown any true indication that smaller rosters do better in the final 3 weeks.I think the opposite is true. This is my first year going with a smaller roster, and it was due to the 2nd flex replacing the 3rd WR.I know the historical results show smaller rosters have fair well in the past but with the addition of 2nd flex poistion this wil put more pressure on the smaller rosters. Believe we'll see a changing trend of larger rosters performing better.
The owners of the Jets, Raiders, Jaguars and some guy named Duncan selected Luck, RGIII and Russell Wilson a year too late.
How do you know? Did you have to go through every entry??Well, my team is unique at least...
No one has the same top four RBs
No one has the same top four WRs
No one has the same top four TEs
Wilson/Bradford
Charles/Rice/R Bush/Gio
Andre/Garcon/Shorts/G Tate
Cook/Allen/J Thomas/Fasano
http://subscribers.footballguys.com/apps/contest_querier_form.phpHow do you know? Did you have to go through every entry??Well, my team is unique at least...
No one has the same top four RBs
No one has the same top four WRs
No one has the same top four TEs
Wilson/Bradford
Charles/Rice/R Bush/Gio
Andre/Garcon/Shorts/G Tate
Cook/Allen/J Thomas/Fasano
I had a hard time getting a read on this. Eventually I decided the flex-effect really had no bearing on the large vs small debate.I think the opposite is true. This is my first year going with a smaller roster, and it was due to the 2nd flex replacing the 3rd WR.I know the historical results show smaller rosters have fair well in the past but with the addition of 2nd flex poistion this wil put more pressure on the smaller rosters. Believe we'll see a changing trend of larger rosters performing better.
You have to be fairly unlucky to get knocked out in the first three weeks of this contest. That's why it made it easy for me to choose Gronk.Yeah, but how did you know the number of entries before the contest closed?This is true, and it's the reason why I picked Gronkowski.So no cuts for the first 2 weeks. Gordon looks like a bargain for sure.
The higher the player value, the lower the ownership. I have Foster on one of my two teams, and his high cost makes his ownership a lot lower than guys like Lacy, Bernard, and Wilson.Julio Jones - 5.6%. Wha?
Am I missing something?
You'll find that, on the whole, the people in this thread take the contest more seriously than those who aren't and spend more time in the forums. They're more likely to recognize the hyped players like Julian's brother Julius.Why does every team posted here have Julian Thomas but only 28% hold him in the game?
Will be interesting to see how you fair week 10. With the flex you need 7 players to score from the RB/WR/TE positions. You'll only have 8 from those positions going that week and two of those are Blount and Polk. And Brady will be sitting as well.bleachercreacher said:I decided to go all studs with a shorter roster. Week 10 is going to be rough for me, but I figured that I only need 1 player to have a great week and I have the firepower for it. I will also need to avoid any injuries late. I finished 5th last year, and without looking back I think I used a similar strategy. We'll see what happens, should be fun.
QB: Tom Brady, EJ Manuel
RB: Adrian Peterson, Trent Richardson, Chris Johnson, LaGarrette Blount, Chris Polk
WR: Calvin Johnson, Dez Bryant, Danny Amendola, Golden Tate, Kenbrell Thompkins
TE: Rob Gronkowski, Julius Thomas
K: Greg Zuerlein, Josh Brown
DEF: New England Patriots, Cincinnati Bengals
Clicked on the first guys team. Does he know something I don't know? Like if you have more than 5 kickers you can combine them all each week and use as a WR?