FUBAR
Footballguy
??? Huh ???I'm going to wait until this Collie/Garcon situation is clarified before running the final numbers.

??? Huh ???I'm going to wait until this Collie/Garcon situation is clarified before running the final numbers.
All yesterday, Collie was listed at 131 yards and Garcon at 75. Now some sites are showing Collie at 163 yards and Garcon at 43. Others still have 131 and 75.Assuming 163 and 43 (which I think is correct), the cut would be 125.90.??? Huh ???I'm going to wait until this Collie/Garcon situation is clarified before running the final numbers.the suspense is killing me! I have Garcon here and Collie in other leagues and somehow I missed this situation.
Since the sim is based on the player stats projections, it will only be as close as the projections. Obviously making such detailed player by player projections is not an exact science, so where the projections turn out incorrect, the subsequent rankings will be incorrect. Look at it as the stock market. No one can predict every stock exactly, but can get close on most of them, however sometimes in any given week some major differences from projections to reality can occur.Philosophical question: does the fact that your sims had me ranked as just under the 6000th place team and I scored over 200 points motivate you to change the simulation algorithms? I have a 18 man roster / all studs and the simulation results had me perturbed, lol. Entry 101289.I'm going to wait until this Collie/Garcon situation is clarified before running the final numbers.
NFL.com has him at 11 rec 163 yards and 1 TD. FGB championship legues have him at 10 rec 130 yards and 1 TDAll yesterday, Collie was listed at 131 yards and Garcon at 75. Now some sites are showing Collie at 163 yards and Garcon at 43. Others still have 131 and 75.Assuming 163 and 43 (which I think is correct), the cut would be 125.90.??? Huh ???I'm going to wait until this Collie/Garcon situation is clarified before running the final numbers.the suspense is killing me! I have Garcon here and Collie in other leagues and somehow I missed this situation.
since OC and I won't be live scoring this year, one easier option for at least some people is to use the MFL gameday stats available to anyone using myfantasyleague.com. I think you will find most leagues scoring is pretty close to the contest scoring, or easy enough to adjust, and it will get you an idea of your players scores. Just use the top performers tab and hunt for your players by position. It's pretty easy to make a spreadsheet to tally things up after that.Just put together a very quick spreadsheet for entering stats and keeping track of things.If cutoff is 125.9 I'm safe. Scored 172.25 this week.
I think the ideal route to go is still 2 QBs, but if you are going to go with two, you can't pick Roethlisberger. Essentially, you're going with one for 5 weeks.It's also worth noting that the first place winner had two elite level QBs. I'm not necessarily sure that Roethlisberger qualifies as fantasy "elite." Maybe he does. Personally, QB was the hardest position to fill for me. I had settled on a Rivers/Flacco/Anderson combination, but changed on the last day to Schaub/Rivers (same $$). Ultimately, I felt more comfortable with Schaub during Rivers week 10 bye if I am lucky enough to get there.I will never take more than 2 QBs. It's too much money tied up that can be a starter elsewhere. Sucks if one of your QBs go down, but you have to get lucky with injuries anyway.I actually wanted to take 4 QBs, but ran out of room on my roster.note to self: Always take 3 QBs... It doesn't matter that the winner last year got by w/ 2.... take 3... even if the 3rd is Derrek Anderson :(I gambled and only took 2 with Schaub and Roethlisberger, and only yesterday did I truly realize how risky that is. I should make it to the 2nd week (at 150+) thanks to Foster and Welker but not sure I can survive another 10 point game by Schaub.
Using the FBG projections in Draft Dominator, Roethlisberger projects to nearly as many points from week 6 on as any other QB. Because of the suspension, you can get the same points down the stretch for $14 as you would for $25 (or more). The downside, of course, is no production until Week 6. I paired him with Rodgers, knowing it's a risk, but hoping Rodgers alone can get me through Week 5. If he gets hurt or has a bad week, I may lose the gamble. If not, then down the stretch I have two stud QB's cheap. You don't win the contest by playing safe.I think the ideal route to go is still 2 QBs, but if you are going to go with two, you can't pick Roethlisberger. Essentially, you're going with one for 5 weeks.It's also worth noting that the first place winner had two elite level QBs. I'm not necessarily sure that Roethlisberger qualifies as fantasy "elite." Maybe he does. Personally, QB was the hardest position to fill for me. I had settled on a Rivers/Flacco/Anderson combination, but changed on the last day to Schaub/Rivers (same $$). Ultimately, I felt more comfortable with Schaub during Rivers week 10 bye if I am lucky enough to get there.I will never take more than 2 QBs. It's too much money tied up that can be a starter elsewhere. Sucks if one of your QBs go down, but you have to get lucky with injuries anyway.I actually wanted to take 4 QBs, but ran out of room on my roster.note to self: Always take 3 QBs... It doesn't matter that the winner last year got by w/ 2.... take 3... even if the 3rd is Derrek Anderson![]()
I gambled and only took 2 with Schaub and Roethlisberger, and only yesterday did I truly realize how risky that is. I should make it to the 2nd week (at 150+) thanks to Foster and Welker but not sure I can survive another 10 point game by Schaub.
I went with a Schaub/Roethlisberger combo and no others. I don't think it will be a problem since the cuts will be so low for the first 5 weeks. If the rest of your roster isn't strong enough to handle the early weeks with only one QB, you don't have much of a chance anyway, IMO. I scored 188 with Schaub's 10 pt effort...and in fact his was the lowest score from any position included in my final numbers....followed closely by Finley.I like clearing the hurdle with that much ease and getting next to nothing from two high scoring positions....Schaub and Roeth will be a great combo down the stretch for the money....now if only Spiller shows up sometime this year, I should be OK.I think the ideal route to go is still 2 QBs, but if you are going to go with two, you can't pick Roethlisberger. Essentially, you're going with one for 5 weeks.It's also worth noting that the first place winner had two elite level QBs. I'm not necessarily sure that Roethlisberger qualifies as fantasy "elite." Maybe he does. Personally, QB was the hardest position to fill for me. I had settled on a Rivers/Flacco/Anderson combination, but changed on the last day to Schaub/Rivers (same $$). Ultimately, I felt more comfortable with Schaub during Rivers week 10 bye if I am lucky enough to get there.I will never take more than 2 QBs. It's too much money tied up that can be a starter elsewhere. Sucks if one of your QBs go down, but you have to get lucky with injuries anyway.I actually wanted to take 4 QBs, but ran out of room on my roster.note to self: Always take 3 QBs... It doesn't matter that the winner last year got by w/ 2.... take 3... even if the 3rd is Derrek Anderson![]()
I gambled and only took 2 with Schaub and Roethlisberger, and only yesterday did I truly realize how risky that is. I should make it to the 2nd week (at 150+) thanks to Foster and Welker but not sure I can survive another 10 point game by Schaub.
Earler this morning, Doug posted that he was going to wait to see how the Colts WR scoring issue got resolved before putting them up.Where are the scores?
Ahhhh....thanks.Earler this morning, Doug posted that he was going to wait to see how the Colts WR scoring issue got resolved before putting them up.Where are the scores?
New rules made it too difficult to do again this year.Most guys are just calculating their own scores with spreadsheets.Just curious where those that posted their scores (or estimates) are getting the info. I remember the past few years there was someone who had a site that updated them after each game, but I don't have the link. Is that up again this year?
Everybody in the NFL offices is too busy watching video of the female reporter allegedly harrassed by the Jets. She was looking pretty harrassable on the Today Show this morning.Is it that tough to watch a recording and count how many passes a guy caught? With all of the fantasy football guys out there, surely the number of catches a guy has isn't that difficult. Its not like we are talking targets or assisted tackles here.
You're good.I am not too worried about my chances this week:
QB: Derek Anderson (over Shaub and Henne) - 297 yards, 1 Td, 1 fumble
RB1: Chris Johnson - 142 yards, 2 TD. 4 receptions for 8 yards
RB2: Arian Foster - 231 yards. 3 TD. 1 reception for 7 yards
Flex: Ronnie Brown - 65 yards, 1 TD, 2 receptions for 20 yardsd
WR1: Wes Welker - 8 receptions for 64 yards, 2 TD
WR2: Jabar Gaffney - 3 receptions, for 34 yards, 1 TD
WR3: Devery Henderson or Deion Branch - 2 receptions for 38 yards, 1 TD
TE1: Todd Heap (over Celek) - 6 receptions for 72 yards
K: Rob Bironas - 43 yard FG, 5 XP
Def: Titans - 4 sacks. 1 Fumble, 1 INT, 13 points allowed
I just want to know for sure that I made the cut and start worrying about next week!![]()
Good call, also the Foster owners that took Grant are going to run into probelms if they didn't take Jackson.Will $4 Brandon Jackson be this year's gamechanger?
Was just thinking that was the best $4 I spent.Will $4 Brandon Jackson be this year's gamechanger?
748 teams had Grant. Only 48 of those also had Jackson. That's a major hit to 700 teams.Good call, also the Foster owners that took Grant are going to run into probelms if they didn't take Jackson.Will $4 Brandon Jackson be this year's gamechanger?
4% owned.517 entries.Green Bay could bring in someone else. I hope Brandon takes the lead though. I watched the game and he looked a little hesitant running towards the line. Time will tell.Was just thinking that was the best $4 I spent.Will $4 Brandon Jackson be this year's gamechanger?
Me too. Now I've got plenty of strength at RB. Wish I could trade for a WR.Was just thinking that was the best $4 I spent.Will $4 Brandon Jackson be this year's gamechanger?
And those teams will be disproportionately smaller rosters; Grant was $27, so the 30-man teams don't have him.748 teams had Grant. Only 48 of those also had Jackson. That's a major hit to 700 teams.Good call, also the Foster owners that took Grant are going to run into probelms if they didn't take Jackson.Will $4 Brandon Jackson be this year's gamechanger?
I think Starks takes over when he gets back.Will $4 Brandon Jackson be this year's gamechanger?
They can't access the rosters this year as it violates the TOS here at FBG. At least that's the story. I think it sucks that I can't pay $2 or whatever it was for someone to calculate my squad. But they are doing all the players (or at least most of them) so you can check to see what your guys did. Some players are missing like Arian Foster, Graham Gano, and Louis Murphy. Probably missing more, but these were guys on my squad that I had to calculate myself...Just curious where those that posted their scores (or estimates) are getting the info. I remember the past few years there was someone who had a site that updated them after each game, but I don't have the link. Is that up again this year?
4% owned.517 entries.Green Bay could bring in someone else. I hope Brandon takes the lead though. I watched the game and he looked a little hesitant running towards the line. Time will tell.Was just thinking that was the best $4 I spent.Will $4 Brandon Jackson be this year's gamechanger?
Assuming 163 and 43 (which I think is correct), the cut would be 125.90.
It's not impossible. I have 28 players and I spent $27 on Best plus another $27 on Roddy White.100331And those teams will be disproportionately smaller rosters; Grant was $27, so the 30-man teams don't have him.
Probably the 1st wave of Foster owners that could be gone.apalmer said:748 teams had Grant. Only 48 of those also had Jackson. That's a major hit to 700 teams.Ministry of Pain said:Good call, also the Foster owners that took Grant are going to run into probelms if they didn't take Jackson.Ignoratio Elenchi said:Will $4 Brandon Jackson be this year's gamechanger?
Yeah, I'm one of the unlucky ones who picked up Grant without Jackson. The prices did not make it easy for me to pickup a handcuff. Oh well, with four more decent RBs left I think it would be a lot worse if I lost one of my two starting QBs. 22 Players left, not expecting much this year though.CalBear said:And those teams will be disproportionately smaller rosters; Grant was $27, so the 30-man teams don't have him.apalmer said:748 teams had Grant. Only 48 of those also had Jackson. That's a major hit to 700 teams.Ministry of Pain said:Good call, also the Foster owners that took Grant are going to run into probelms if they didn't take Jackson.Ignoratio Elenchi said:Will $4 Brandon Jackson be this year's gamechanger?
96 out of 1152 - that's a 91.67% survival rate. Slightly below average.-QGHow many Jermichael Finley/Aaron Rodgers teams were eliminated?