Thanks for the heads up.... I like the 82% odds...hopefully it's rightI don't think it's been posted, but the link works.did I miss the week 11 sim being posted?TheChairman said:Wow, #1 in sim only has 93.2 survival %![]()

Thanks for the heads up.... I like the 82% odds...hopefully it's rightI don't think it's been posted, but the link works.did I miss the week 11 sim being posted?TheChairman said:Wow, #1 in sim only has 93.2 survival %![]()
I'm usually not this dumb, but I've searched everywhere I can think to find a link to either the SIM, and/or how to figure out how many people have certain players left. I'm just not seeing it anywhere on the contest pages.Can anyone point a brother in the right direction?I don't think it's been posted, but the link works.did I miss the week 11 sim being posted?TheChairman said:Wow, #1 in sim only has 93.2 survival %![]()
Go to the weekly content pages, and it's in the upper right hand corner of the releases for the week.I'm usually not this dumb, but I've searched everywhere I can think to find a link to either the SIM, and/or how to figure out how many people have certain players left. I'm just not seeing it anywhere on the contest pages.Can anyone point a brother in the right direction?I don't think it's been posted, but the link works.did I miss the week 11 sim being posted?TheChairman said:Wow, #1 in sim only has 93.2 survival %![]()
Not is there not the sim, but where there is Sim week of the 11.The Week 11 Sim is not there is it?
I couldn't find it either. I found the url for week 10 and changed the "10" to "11"Week 11 SimThe Week 11 Sim is not there is it?
Thank You.I couldn't find it either. I found the url for week 10 and changed the "10" to "11"Week 11 SimThe Week 11 Sim is not there is it?
Power Rankings
Thanks. I'm the only team alive with Rodgers, Gore, Nicks and Andre Johnson. Not that it means much, but I was curious about that, so thanks.Go to the weekly content pages, and it's in the upper right hand corner of the releases for the week.I'm usually not this dumb, but I've searched everywhere I can think to find a link to either the SIM, and/or how to figure out how many people have certain players left. I'm just not seeing it anywhere on the contest pages.Can anyone point a brother in the right direction?I don't think it's been posted, but the link works.did I miss the week 11 sim being posted?TheChairman said:Wow, #1 in sim only has 93.2 survival %![]()
Things do not look good for me. Less than 50% chance of moving on and I think that might be generous.I couldn't find it either. I found the url for week 10 and changed the "10" to "11"Week 11 SimThe Week 11 Sim is not there is it?
Power Rankings
This is actually a pretty good roster.18 WR Guy!!!Side note - this entry has had the most WRs the entire way.
STILL IN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!![]()
Awesome stuff MD!A crude attempt at combining likelihood of getting into the top 250 and avg 3 weeks score in a power rankings, (Score = the rank of getting into top 250 + rank of Avg 3 week score, so lower is better)
Code:1 105076 7 222 110146 8 223 108122 10 204 100086 11 305 100205 16 286 101754 17 217 107775 30 308 100189 31 239 100492 32 2510 102003 32 1811 108047 33 1812 103802 34 3013 108757 35 2214 102584 36 2515 107622 39 2116 102992 43 2217 108226 43 1918 105017 51 2019 101771 52 2820 100634 56 2421 100679 57 2122 101483 64 2223 103970 66 2324 107044 66 3025 107528 66 2526 101087 69 2227 111098 70 2928 103771 74 1829 109213 77 1930 100244 79 2131 100257 80 2632 101690 82 2933 101170 87 2634 104745 105 2635 102206 107 1836 100927 109 2237 109798 109 2338 100201 118 1839 105620 118 1840 100433 120 2341 107908 121 2942 108703 123 1843 107241 127 1944 107036 132 2145 104832 133 1846 109773 134 2247 101473 136 2448 103276 136 2449 101539 139 2450 109578 139 28
Yes it is...now imagine he had gone with Vick instead of DA...This is actually a pretty good roster.18 WR Guy!!!Side note - this entry has had the most WRs the entire way.
STILL IN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!![]()
I have not been paying too much attention to the contest on purpose, and now I see that I'm in the top 10 of your power rankings.crap, things just got real.I couldn't find it either. I found the url for week 10 and changed the "10" to "11"Week 11 SimThe Week 11 Sim is not there is it?
Power Rankings
You're just tempting the Turk to call for your playbook. Was nice to see you if only for a week.I have not been paying too much attention to the contest on purpose, and now I see that I'm in the top 10 of your power rankings.crap, things just got real.I couldn't find it either. I found the url for week 10 and changed the "10" to "11"Week 11 SimThe Week 11 Sim is not there is it?
Power Rankings
it seems like a reasonable guess to me. The 176 average above seems a bit high to me. (no statistical analysis done, just going off my hunch)My team hasn't been below 170 yet thus far, whch means I'm sure the cut will be above 170, and my team will not....I would say the cut line for this week will be around 155. Just a guess though
While that's certainly possible, I think thats definitely toward the low end of the spectrum considering the last 4 weeks the 1000th highest score has been 161.9, 180.25, 167.45 and 169.9.I would say the cut line for this week will be around 155. Just a guess though
I agree that it seemed high to me too, but I think its more likely to be closer to 176 than 155. My hunch is that it'll be in the 165-168 range.it seems like a reasonable guess to me. The 176 average above seems a bit high to me. (no statistical analysis done, just going off my hunch)My team hasn't been below 170 yet thus far, whch means I'm sure the cut will be above 170, and my team will not....I would say the cut line for this week will be around 155. Just a guess though![]()
I think the correlation between cut line and Foster's score is much stronger when he does well compared to if he does poorly. Meaning a good score by Foster will move the cut line up move than an equally bad score by Foster would shift it downward.The cut line will go with Foster's score.
The cut line will go with Foster's score.
Ok lets just take the average of the 2 then. 165.5 it isI agree that it seemed high to me too, but I think its more likely to be closer to 176 than 155. My hunch is that it'll be in the 165-168 range.it seems like a reasonable guess to me. The 176 average above seems a bit high to me. (no statistical analysis done, just going off my hunch)My team hasn't been below 170 yet thus far, whch means I'm sure the cut will be above 170, and my team will not....I would say the cut line for this week will be around 155. Just a guess though![]()
Ok lets just take the average of the 2 then. 165.5 it isI agree that it seemed high to me too, but I think its more likely to be closer to 176 than 155. My hunch is that it'll be in the 165-168 range.it seems like a reasonable guess to me. The 176 average above seems a bit high to me. (no statistical analysis done, just going off my hunch)My team hasn't been below 170 yet thus far, whch means I'm sure the cut will be above 170, and my team will not....I would say the cut line for this week will be around 155. Just a guess though![]()
Last year's week 11 cut line at 1000 was 159.5. As far as 2010 goes, what are you looking for is not the top 1000 from other weeks, but the top 62.5 percent in that week, as that is the group that will be moving on (1000 our of 1600 remaining). If we look at the other 2010 non-3 byes weeks , weeks 1 to 3, the top 62.5 percent was at between 157 and 161. Yes we've flushed some weaker teams out since then, but we also have more roster spots occupied with important players out for the year. So while 155 is probably too low to expect, 170 is probably too high to expect.While that's certainly possible, I think thats definitely toward the low end of the spectrum considering the last 4 weeks the 1000th highest score has been 161.9, 180.25, 167.45 and 169.9.I would say the cut line for this week will be around 155. Just a guess though
I don't think losing Spiller and DeAngelo will be a dealbreaker for anyone still in it.Yes we've flushed some weaker teams out since then, but we also have more roster spots occupied with important players out for the year.
Back in weeks 1 -3, guys like Finley and Romo were still playing.I don't think losing Spiller and DeAngelo will be a dealbreaker for anyone still in it.Yes we've flushed some weaker teams out since then, but we also have more roster spots occupied with important players out for the year.
I meant from the beginning of the year. Plenty of remaining rosters contain Finley, Clark, Stafford, Mark Clayton, etc., though probably not more than a couple each. BTW, the top 62.5 percent cut from last week was in the 149s.I don't think losing Spiller and DeAngelo will be a dealbreaker for anyone still in it.Yes we've flushed some weaker teams out since then, but we also have more roster spots occupied with important players out for the year.
I hope you're right. Nevertheless, as mentioned with Foster above, as we get in the final weeks of elimination, the cut line becomes more of a function of how the most highly owned players performed that week.Last year's week 11 cut line at 1000 was 159.5. As far as 2010 goes, what are you looking for is not the top 1000 from other weeks, but the top 62.5 percent in that week, as that is the group that will be moving on (1000 our of 1600 remaining). If we look at the other 2010 non-3 byes weeks , weeks 1 to 3, the top 62.5 percent was at between 157 and 161. Yes we've flushed some weaker teams out since then, but we also have more roster spots occupied with important players out for the year. So while 155 is probably too low to expect, 170 is probably too high to expect.While that's certainly possible, I think thats definitely toward the low end of the spectrum considering the last 4 weeks the 1000th highest score has been 161.9, 180.25, 167.45 and 169.9.I would say the cut line for this week will be around 155. Just a guess though
wut? I wathed the game, I didn't think they said anything about out for the year...For fantasy purposes, Brandon Marshall is done for the year. 86 owners left with Marshall.
He is saying that with the Dolphins QB situation he will not do much.wut? I wathed the game, I didn't think they said anything about out for the year...For fantasy purposes, Brandon Marshall is done for the year. 86 owners left with Marshall.
He was on pace for 6 catches for 82 yards tonight before getting hurt. I'd take those numbers for my WR in this contest.Nice to see Forte finally have a decent game. Losing DeAngelo at RB leaves me with Forte, Foster, Leon, and Thomas Jones so I really need Forte to step it up.He is saying that with the Dolphins QB situation he will not do much.wut? I wathed the game, I didn't think they said anything about out for the year...For fantasy purposes, Brandon Marshall is done for the year. 86 owners left with Marshall.
Nopers, just the 8.0, but that's at least okay to have as a floor at Defense to start off with.-QGnothing for a shutout?![]()
No, I am saying the hamstring pop is a bad one. He needed the cart to get to the locker room. If you have ever had a hammy pop, then you know what is going on right now with Marshall. If not, you are probably holding out some sort of hope that will be deflated soon.Most fantasy contests do not include week 17 and he popped it in week 11. I bet he could return in week 16 or 17, but probably will not if the season is out of reach.He is saying that with the Dolphins QB situation he will not do much.wut? I wathed the game, I didn't think they said anything about out for the year...For fantasy purposes, Brandon Marshall is done for the year. 86 owners left with Marshall.
Doesnt look like they're going to punish him for now. Unless the urine sample comes back not clean, I don't think he see's any punishment from the team or the league.Mike Williams missing the game could move the cutline downward a bit...he's heavily owned