modogg
Footballguy
You can add the undefeated Saints after they beat Cowboys by 30+, without AJ and some other pieces. The Bengals game was also when the Bengals began turning things around. Easiest schedules are always so funny to me, most have no idea what they are even looking at. Take for example (these are hypothetical):Wait...what? Eagles easily handled both Pittsburgh and Baltimore. Was far from an "easy schedule"Knock yourself out. The Chiefs didn’t play any starters, had nothing to play for, and made no effort to win. If you want to compare those as similar situations, have at it. WAS had 5 turnovers and still won.Against playoff teams . . .
PHI: 8-2, +7.9 point differential/gm, +27.2 yds/gm
KCC: 9-1, +5.4 point differential/gm, +0.8 yds/gm (not including Week 18 vs. DEN)
If we're excluding the DEN game from your calculations, I'd like to exclude the 2nd WAS game as well since Hurts got injured on the 11th play. So effectively, he didn't play the final 3.5 quarters.
Don't bother. They're doing this on purpose.
This is totally obnoxious, this thread. It's like every other Philadelphia thread. Man, I hope the Chiefs are up to it. So many salty ham tears around here for a team that managed to slip by with an easy schedule in a lousy conference.
Going into these games let's say each is at the .500 for strength of schedule. Next 3 games:
Eagles beat Giants 35-7
Eagles beat Bengals 34-14
Eagles beat Falcons 28-7
So after a few game schedule, Eagles all of a sudden have the easiest strength of schedule because they waxed the teams they beat. The 3 losers fall more into a tougher schedule because the Eagles won these 3 games.
TLDR: strength of schedule is a fun thing to look at, but it is like grades for draft picks immediately after the draft. More of a fun entertaining activity, but doesn't hold a ton of weight on the surface