I have Engram, so I am going with him, but I doubt there are many options otherwise that would make me sit him.According to Fantasy Labs (never heard of them), Graham is not on final injury report. To play Thursday
Anyone benching??? Not sure how serious his injury is. Held out Monday and Tuesday practices, but probably because of the short week I imagine.
I'm likely starting... can't afford a healthy bench right now with other byes.
Almost the same. I have fleener and derby too but Jimmy starts.starting him. my only other option is Gerald Everett
I'm starting him in one along with Engram. 10 starters, 2 flexI have Engram, so I am going with him, but I doubt there are many options otherwise that would make me sit him.
In fairness, this loosely applies to anyone not named Kelce, Ertz or Gronk...Without a few big 4th quarters, Graham would be approaching WW status.
It's borderline amazing how wrong you are on a routine basis.davearm said:Mulling an offer of Gronk for my Howard and Graham. My RBs would be a shambles without Howard.
Very tempted nonetheless.
Without a few big 4th quarters, Graham would be approaching WW status.
Hopefully from a better team. TDs are up and down year to year. The yardage is brutal in Seattle. They don't use him downfield and the way Wilson runs around, the fast little guys are better able to get open on those plays. They rarely even run a deep pattern to Graham.Jimmy is getting himself a new big contract in the off season
That's awesome. I started with Graham and Fitz last night in my big money league.Have Graham, Opponent has Baldwin. Doug down to the 2, Graham tuddy.![]()
Yeah I agree. He may be tough to defend in the end zone but he used to look uncoverable everywhere. That part of his game hasn't returned.He still looks bad running to me but if he's going to get that many redzone looks he's a top 4ish TE every week.
Doesn't matter when he gets pts, just keep getting them Jimmydavearm said:Mulling an offer of Gronk for my Howard and Graham. My RBs would be a shambles without Howard.
Very tempted nonetheless.
Without a few big 4th quarters, Graham would be approaching WW status.
Shoutout to the FBG Data Dominator, it's excellent.It's borderline amazing how wrong you are on a routine basis.
Is your avatar Graham punching you in the face?benching him for henry...Not liking Seattle in this game....just a hunch, but I always ride my hunches.
LOL!Is your avatar Graham punching you in the face?![]()
No it's always better to be lucky than smartLOL!
actually i traded henry and had to play him...oops. I love it that SEA cannot run the ball at all...from here on out Graham could be epic.
That being said, baldwin getting tackled on the goal line was lucky...sometimes better lucky than smart (sometimes).
not when i bench him for engram, i don't.Got to love all the red zone targets. WOW!
That's just a really hard call. I probably would have gone with Graham but I can't blame you for going Engram.....not when i bench him for engram, i don't.
Jimmy Graham (ankle) is questionable for Week 12 against the 49ers.
He didn't practice on Wednesday or Thursday, though that's not unusual for him. Graham has been scorching hot, collecting seven touchdowns over his last six games. He'll be a no-brainer TE1 if he gets the green light Sunday at San Francisco. That games kicks off at 4:05 PM ET.
Source: Tim Booth on Twitter
Nov 24 - 4:45 PM
Definitely. However, this is also why I think he is on the all-bust team next year. TDs are hard to reproduce year in and year out, at least from what I've seen (I could be very wrong). The guy is a huge end zone threat and I'm thrilled to have him on my team this year now (I definitely wasn't over the first month or so!) But without those TDs, he's not even startable. Many other TEs get targets plus occasional TDs. I'd rather have a TE targeted heavily on a regular basis than one like Graham who is a huge red zone threat and that's about itHe seems to be a real threat to score multiple TDS every game. Not many players can give you that.
I suppose he is averaging over 7 targets a game this year. Hard to argue with that. Just frustrating to see 3/35 for 3 quarters and then suddenly 5/80/1. He very well may be an exception to the rule. I believe his contract is up after this season? That was more where my thoughts were with his TDs year after year. If he moves on from Seattle would he be used the same way as he is now? Seems like Seattle just now has figured it out. Maybe they bring him back. I would probably draft him reluctantly like I did this year because the top 2-3 were gone^ TD’s are indeed difficult to reproduce year-after-year.... unless you’re a 6’ 7” b-ball playing baller. In this anomalous case, it could also be a major positive since he doesn’t need his 20’s health to run like a stallion years into the future - he only needs to be able to “jump ball” in the end zone.
There are exceptions to many rules and Graham is one of them....
Although Cook is working out like a dream in Oakland I can't imagine what Carr would do for Graham. GB could be in the market for a TE next offseason, although they were stung so bad by Bennett I can't see them going back to FA for that. No way. Ted's going to say, "see! that is what happens when you spend in FA (Bennett)"Hoping he gets outta there. This guy should be catching big passes down the seam but Russell Wilson has already turned his back to the defense preparing to run around like a chicken with his head cut off. Once that happens big Jimmy Graham is out of the picture and the small quick WRs are the targets because they can more easily create separation when Wilson is running around. Any OC worth a crap should see the ease at which he scores in the redzone and mimic that part. Please go back to Drew Brees. All the other pieces are in place for a 2019 run.
Jimmy Graham caught 1-of-3 targets for -1 yards in the Seahawks' Week 15 loss to the Rams.
Graham and Doug Baldwin were both complete non-factors in the humiliating defeat, and Graham watched as No. 2 TE Luke Willson scored a 26-yard touchdown in the final quarter. Graham should rebound next week at Dallas.
I guess I haven't really watched him play much this year since I just haven't seen Seahawks games but it seems like they only target him in the red zone. He isn't gonna be as athletic as he was when he was putting up 80-1200-10 or whatever but he should still easily be a mismatch against LBs and smaller safety's in the middle of the field but Seattle just doesn't target him thereI've heard a lot of mixed reviews on Graham. My buddy who is a seahawks fan says they grossly under utilize him.
Some of the footballguys articles imply he's looking much slower.
I'm guessing it's a combination. Thoughts?