Jimmy is finishing his route and Wilson is facing the other EZ.I guess I haven't really watched him play much this year since I just haven't seen Seahawks games but it seems like they only target him in the red zone. He isn't gonna be as athletic as he was when he was putting up 80-1200-10 or whatever but he should still easily be a mismatch against LBs and smaller safety's in the middle of the field but Seattle just doesn't target him there
The Seattle Times' Bob Condotta passes along word that impending free agent Jimmy Graham is "generally considered really unlikely" to re-sign with the Seahawks.
Graham is 31 and headed toward free agency for the first time in his career. He scored 10 touchdowns this season, but Graham's usage has long been odd since being acquired from the Saints a few years ago. Graham and Russell Wilson are extremely good friends, which could help Seattle keep Graham -- if they even want to -- but he surely is going to test the market. Perhaps a return to the Saints could work out if New Orleans cuts its losses with Coby Fleener.
Source: Seattle Times
Jan 1 - 9:39 PM
As a Graham owner I would look to sell if he went back to the Saints. People may be thinking this will bring back results as in previous years with the Saints but with Graham being older and the offense converting more to the run, I don't see this as a good thing.He's outta there. Probably back to NO on a 2 year deal.
I see it as making them more dangerous on offense. he might actually catch passes outside the redzone 10 yard line.As a Graham owner I would look to sell if he went back to the Saints. People may be thinking this will bring back results as in previous years with the Saints but with Graham being older and the offense converting more to the run, I don't see this as a good thing.
Yep. looks like Hooper isn't getting it done although it seems 3 years is the rule for most TEs.Falcons could also be an interesting destination
Speaking at his season-ending press conference, Seahawks coach Pete Carroll said he would "love" to re-sign impending free agent Jimmy Graham.
Carroll said that's been communicated to Graham. Graham's usage has often been baffling in Seattle, but he's coming off his first 10-touchdown season since 2014. Now 31, Graham did see his yards per catch slip to an ugly 9.12, however. The Seattle Times has reported Graham is unlikely to remain in Seattle.
Source: Bob Condotta on Twitter
Jan 2 - 2:53 PM
Yeah buddy. Keep talking. Graham ain't listening to your bull####. You don't have a clue how to get him the ball.Seahawks coach Pete Carroll said he would "love" to re-sign impending free agent Jimmy Graham
 . Would not surprise me if Kraft went all in. ESPN's Dianna Russini reports talks between the Saints and free agent Jimmy Graham have "stalled."
Per Russini, both sides remain hopeful of getting a deal done. The Packers reportedly maintain interest. Graham should be signing on someone's dotted line by Wednesday evening.
Related: Saints
Source: Dianna Marie Russini on Twitter
Mar 13 - 2:09 PM
Packers signed TE Jimmy Graham, formerly of the Seahawks, to a three-year contract.
Graham appeared headed for a reunion with the Saints, but the sides couldn't figure out the financials. Graham is coming off his first double-digit touchdown campaign since 2014 but saw his yards per catch crater from 14.2 to 9.1 last season. The drop off came even as Graham was another year removed from his devastating knee injury. Now 31, he required frequent maintenance days in Seattle. Despite his advancing age and seeming loss of a step, Graham is an intriguing pairing with a quarterback who at one point coaxed an eight-score season out of Richard Rodgers.
Related: Seahawks
Source: Adam Schefter on Twitter
Mar 13 - 4:15 PM
Generally agree with this. Top 5 might be a little too high, but certainly in the conversation. I think GBs follow up personnel moves will play a major role in valuing Graham.Top five in dynasty in the next couple of years? Too high of ranking? I could see him motivated with a stud throwing him the rock.
I've received a couple of offers for him since the trade. One involving Olsen, who before this I would have put slightly ahead of Graham.Generally agree with this. Top 5 might be a little too high, but certainly in the conversation. I think GBs follow up personnel moves will play a major role in valuing Graham.
Right now- the WR cupboard is bare. Adams, Cobb, Allison.....
Seattle's offensive line was crap as was the playcalling at times. wilson is great, but it seemed like him and graham never really meshed well together.SaintsInDome2006 said:I think this is going to work out rather well, presuming McCarthy uses him properly. Graham is a QB's best friend. I don't know really what the deal was in Seattle, besides injury, but I think it just had more to do with the focus on the run and the tendency of Wilson to roll out. Honestly Rodgers needs him and I think he will inevitably lean on him. Brees was lobbying hard to get him back in NO, so I think Graham has been told or believes he will be extensively used in GB.
But Rodgers is not a TE's best friend.SaintsInDome2006 said:Graham is a QB's best friend.
I'd swap Graham for Olsen without a second thought.skycriesmary said:I've received a couple of offers for him since the trade. One involving Olsen, who before this I would have put slightly ahead of Graham.
If you mean mid/late 1st I wouldn't take that this year. I'd rather take a future first next year. This draft class is not great. I see 2 elite prospects and 4 good ones and that's it.I just got offered a mid late for him. Seriously considering it.
I'm not so sure about that. Jordy has been there and has been Rodger's security blanket and red zone target for quite awhile, and still the TE's were fairly decent in stretches. Without Jordy, Graham could really turn into his new security blanket/red zone target. We'll see, but that seems like a great, natural role for him.But Rodgers is not a TE's best friend.
We've all been getting hyped up for some new GB TE every year for what seems like forever. It's true Graham is probably the best of them (although he's certainly not the same Jimmy Graham he was 3 years ago), but it seems like they've been getting progressively more talented players in there while getting progressively worse results.
Most of the recent GB TEs have been better outside of GB than they were in GB, yet we still treat this as a situation where we expect them to be better in GB than they were elsewhere.
I think Graham will be solid, but I'm not expecting much more out of him than he was delivering in Seattle, which probably makes him a sell for me.
Easy decisionI just got offered a mid late for him. Seriously considering it.
I think Graham is going to be huge in GB. Wilsons big plays are all after everything breaks down and he is running around...good for WRs..not so good for Graham. With Rodgers and the GB passing attack welcome back to the Saint days.What's everybody taking over/under 8.5 TDs this season?
Over if he’s healthy.What's everybody taking over/under 8.5 TDs this season?
Finley's best year ever was 767 yards and 8 TDs. Is an aging Graham likely to do better? Why?I think Graham is going to be huge in GB. Wilsons big plays are all after everything breaks down and he is running around...good for WRs..not so good for Graham. With Rodgers and the GB passing attack welcome back to the Saint days.
Because he’s better than Finley ever was even at this point in his career?Finley's best year ever was 767 yards and 8 TDs. Is an aging Graham likely to do better? Why?
My best year was 0 yards and 0 TDs. Is an aging Graham likely to do better? Why?Finley's best year ever was 767 yards and 8 TDs. Is an aging Graham likely to do better? Why?