I feel like I’m in the third rail of politics here, but I’m dumbfounded at the constant modern outrage over the ever-familiar. I mean people got upset over Licorice Pizza and that relationship (haven’t seen it). There’s a weird Puritanism since about 2012-3 that I’ve noticed in America. I don’t really have too strong an opinion about said Puritanical impulses nor do I have strong opinions about May-December stuff other than to groan like I always have, but it’s a marked change from even what I grew up with. I’m just surprised everybody forgets so quickly
your way off base here if your referring to my post. I mean I don't think it's prudish to question a relationship between a man in his mid 40s and a 16 year old girl and wonder why it's not even addressed as "off" - I mean it's literally a crime if the relationship is sexual in nature.
Not necessarily a crime. Age of consents vary.
It isn’t prudish and I never said that. I said that the concept of agency is much different now.
Stat rape laws are a Progressive Era invention. They didn’t exist before because society was much different about things like men/teenagers.
If people don’t know that then they don’t know their history and no amount of chastising the messenger and talking about how it is a modern-day crime is going to change that. Stat rape laws came about the same time Prohibition did and they come from the same reformist impulse to stop men from going after young girls without consequences. They were passed mainly at the behest of religionists and progressive feminist women who hated that anybody anywhere was partaking in vice. That’s how the era went. They generally raised the age of consent from 10 (!) to 14-18, depending. But there is no doubt when and where they began.
I don’t even like Woody nor really like nor even ever can remember pulling for one of these relationships (they’re often ugly), but when people get all in a huff about his fictional relationships, their history is often inaccurate. It’s a part of our lesser selves that we need these laws, but they exist for a reason, they come from puritanical elements similar to the temperance movements, and they’re relatively new and actually quite broad in scope compared to the rest of history.