What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

timdraft #4: Movie Category Draft (1 Viewer)

Seriously? I tried to edit my post, and that happened. Not to complain AGAIN, but what'd I do wrong?
Yea, the new board is a wee bit wonky - I tried to make my links just the words "part 1" and "part 2" - wouldn't let me.
>

Seriously? I tried to edit my post, and that happened. Not to complain AGAIN, but what'd I do wrong?
Yea, the new board is a wee bit wonky - I tried to make my links just the words "part 1" and "part 2" - wouldn't let me.
Seriously? I tried to edit my post, and that happened. Not to complain AGAIN, but what'd I do wrong?
Yea, the new board is a wee bit wonky - I tried to make my links just the words "part 1" and "part 2" - wouldn't let me.
Highlight the words you want to link before you open the dialogue box (which only asks for the URL, not the text like it used to). Or after you close the URL dialogue box, just go into the post and edit the underlined text that is linked (if that makes sense).

Part 1
Thx. But I did that (and it worked), then I changed the wording (which made the link go away), but then it wouldn't let me just redo it. I deleted it, tried to do it again, etc.

Whatever, it'll get worked out I'm sure.

 
Sorry everyone, I am really tied up at work and won't be able to update the OPs for several hours. Please bear with me. In the event that I come up for a pick before I am free, please skip me.

 
Ok I dislike Tom Cruise as much as the next guy, but this is one of those movies that I'll always stop and watch whenever it's on (and it seems to be on a whole lot), especially if it's close to this scene:

1.20 A Few Good Men - Courtroom scene

"You Can't Handle the Truth"

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ok I dislike Tom Cruise as much as the next guy, but this is one of those movies that I'll always stop and watch whenever it's on (and it seems to be on a whole lot), especially if it's close to this scene:

1.20 A Few Good Men - Courtroom scene

:wall: 4 picks.

 
Ok I dislike Tom Cruise as much as the next guy, but this is one of those movies that I'll always stop and watch whenever it's on (and it seems to be on a whole lot), especially if it's close to this scene:

1.20 A Few Good Men - Courtroom scene

...There are people that don't like Tom Cruise?!

 
Last edited by a moderator:
21. John Madden's Lunchbox OTC til 2:31 est and PMed22. Kumerica- On Deck and PMed23. Tremendous Upside- In the Hole. PM going out now

24. AcerFC25. Usual21

 
Seriously? I tried to edit my post, and that happened. Not to complain AGAIN, but what'd I do wrong?
Yea, the new board is a wee bit wonky - I tried to make my links just the words "part 1" and "part 2" - wouldn't let me.
>

Seriously? I tried to edit my post, and that happened. Not to complain AGAIN, but what'd I do wrong?
Yea, the new board is a wee bit wonky - I tried to make my links just the words "part 1" and "part 2" - wouldn't let me.
Seriously? I tried to edit my post, and that happened. Not to complain AGAIN, but what'd I do wrong?
Yea, the new board is a wee bit wonky - I tried to make my links just the words "part 1" and "part 2" - wouldn't let me.
Highlight the words you want to link before you open the dialogue box (which only asks for the URL, not the text like it used to). Or after you close the URL dialogue box, just go into the post and edit the underlined text that is linked (if that makes sense).

Part 1

ETA: holy ####### #### this thing is wonky! WTH happened here?

:lol:
Except that all I did was add a sentence at the bottom.

 
Ok I dislike Tom Cruise as much as the next guy, but this is one of those movies that I'll always stop and watch whenever it's on (and it seems to be on a whole lot), especially if it's close to this scene:

1.20 A Few Good Men - Courtroom scene

Reminds me...

I never noticed until I saw this tumblr

:lmao:

 
Can someone take a PM for my next pick? I'm not feeling too spiff, and I may be asleep at the wheel.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I like Tom Cruise movies. :shrug:

Question - In the category "multiple performances in a movie" are we talking about someone playing completely different characters or can it be the same character in disguise, per se.

 
SUPERHEROES JUDGING CRITERIA

- The movie should be enjoyable, which doesn't mean it can't be very serious, but it needs to have some entertainment value to score highly. This is probably obvious but I felt the need to state it for the record.

- Drafters need to be having some issues or complaints with the new board functions. If everyone is working smoothly for you with the crisp new setup, you won't score well.

- Plot and dialogue are what make movies for me, not just fight scenes and action sequences, no matter how good.

- My category is one of those most affected by THE RULE, and I'm assuming that the judges have some input as to how to interpret it, so this is my attempt to do so, which hopefully will spark no tiresome controversy:

- Different iterations of the same character are not the same for purposes of THE RULE. For example, the Keaton Batman series is a different franchise than the Nolan trilogy, and a pick in one of them does not block other picks in the other.

- The Marvel Cinematic Universe that began with the Iron Man films and has extended into The Avengers is one franchise. Any selection of any of the films in that group, including "The Avengers," prevents selections of any other movies in that group. Yeah, I know, it doesn't make much sense, does it? However, this is THE RULE in action.

- The X-Men trilogy DOES prevent a selection of "First Class," and vice versa, and the Wolverine film as well.

- Better selections will be those films that have value outside of the genre, as in, they are good films, not just superhero films.

- Because of THE RULE, some innvoation will be needed to get to 25 selections, and that's, of course, the purported genius of the statute. Accordingly, creative ways to evade the ridiculous provision will be rewarded. For example, superheroes do not have to be superpowered, nor do they have to be based on comic books or on traditional characters.

I will be happy to take additional questions via PM.

/fin

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I like Tom Cruise movies. :shrug:

Question - In the category "multiple performances in a movie" are we talking about someone playing completely different characters or can it be the same character in disguise, per se.
Pretty sure we've all thought of the two you have in mind. In one, a guy is taking on a different persona to get a job. That's not a multiple performance IMO. In another that readily comes to mind, the actor is pretending to be someone else so he can gain access to people. Again, it's not a multiple performance.

Both are examples of the same movie character wearing a disguise. The audience isn't asked to suspend disbelief that they really are distinct characters - it's an inside joke the audience is in on, but they're not different characters.

:2cents:

 
If I take a movie, then it's off the board for movies, scenes, and portrayals, right? And vice versa, and vice versa, etc.?

 
I, Aerial Assault, can be skipped at any time in this draft. So if I don't post within about 15 minutes of my pick coming up, skip me. Thanks much.

 
School is over. Someone else needs to keep the picks and PMs going.

TU > A PM after you go would be awesome so I could jump on and pick

See you tomorrow

 
I like Tom Cruise movies. :shrug:

Question - In the category "multiple performances in a movie" are we talking about someone playing completely different characters or can it be the same character in disguise, per se.
Pretty sure we've all thought of the two you have in mind. In one, a guy is taking on a different persona to get a job. That's not a multiple performance IMO. In another that readily comes to mind, the actor is pretending to be someone else so he can gain access to people. Again, it's not a multiple performance.

Both are examples of the same movie character wearing a disguise. The audience isn't asked to suspend disbelief that they really are distinct characters - it's an inside joke the audience is in on, but they're not different characters.

:2cents:
Are there actually 25 examples of multiple roles in all of movie history? :confused:

 
I like Tom Cruise movies. :shrug:

Question - In the category "multiple performances in a movie" are we talking about someone playing completely different characters or can it be the same character in disguise, per se.
Pretty sure we've all thought of the two you have in mind. In one, a guy is taking on a different persona to get a job. That's not a multiple performance IMO. In another that readily comes to mind, the actor is pretending to be someone else so he can gain access to people. Again, it's not a multiple performance.

Both are examples of the same movie character wearing a disguise. The audience isn't asked to suspend disbelief that they really are distinct characters - it's an inside joke the audience is in on, but they're not different characters.

:2cents:
Are there actually 25 examples of multiple roles in all of movie history? :confused:
Have we identified a scapegoat for SUCKY categories?

HEY WHAT IS THAT TAG THING??!!!

I noticed a few posts have tags. We could use tags for faux subtitles, no? I realize the idea is to tag common themes/categories like a blog or a hashtag on twitter, but instead of the lengthy title timschochet could just make up tags

  • Clock starts Monday, April 1
  • Judging has begun
  • etc
Why the hell did my font change? GAWD I am hating this.

 
DREAM SEQUENCES JUDGING CRITERIA

- How well does the dream sequence fit into the plot of the film? Cheap attempts to shock the audience will score relatively poorly compared to those sequences that are somewhat more profound.

- Was it obvious that the sequence was a dream? If so, it's not a dealbreaker, but if not, then extra points will likely be awarded.

- Is the dream sequence amusing, entertaining, scary, or of some intrinsic value in and of itself, so that it retains some sort of resonance even after it is clear that the character experiencing it is back to reality?

- Innovation is encouraged. The word "dream" has several meanings, and while, for the most part, this category shouid be about people having visions while they sleep, out-of-the-box selections will be considered for their thoughtfulness. They may even be rewarded for it. However, don't pick a scene with a bunch of a guys in a diner talking about their "dreams" in life. That's not what I mean. The rest is up to you.

- Chances hover at somewhat around 30-40% that I have not seen your movie and/or do not retain immediate command of all of the material in the sequence in question. ALL DRAFTERS ARE STRONGLY ENCOURAGED TO LINK ME TO THE SCENE IN SOME MANNER. If you don't have time when you pick because of clock pressure, you can always go back and edit the post at some later point to include such a link. Ignore this suggestion at your peril.

Thanks, dreamies.

 
I like Tom Cruise movies. :shrug:

Question - In the category "multiple performances in a movie" are we talking about someone playing completely different characters or can it be the same character in disguise, per se.
Pretty sure we've all thought of the two you have in mind. In one, a guy is taking on a different persona to get a job. That's not a multiple performance IMO. In another that readily comes to mind, the actor is pretending to be someone else so he can gain access to people. Again, it's not a multiple performance.

Both are examples of the same movie character wearing a disguise. The audience isn't asked to suspend disbelief that they really are distinct characters - it's an inside joke the audience is in on, but they're not different characters.

:2cents:
Are there actually 25 examples of multiple roles in all of movie history? :confused:
Sadly, yes.

 
I like Tom Cruise movies. :shrug:

Question - In the category "multiple performances in a movie" are we talking about someone playing completely different characters or can it be the same character in disguise, per se.
Pretty sure we've all thought of the two you have in mind. In one, a guy is taking on a different persona to get a job. That's not a multiple performance IMO. In another that readily comes to mind, the actor is pretending to be someone else so he can gain access to people. Again, it's not a multiple performance.

Both are examples of the same movie character wearing a disguise. The audience isn't asked to suspend disbelief that they really are distinct characters - it's an inside joke the audience is in on, but they're not different characters.

:2cents:
Since they aren't elligible, what were the movies you were talking about?

 
I like Tom Cruise movies. :shrug:

Question - In the category "multiple performances in a movie" are we talking about someone playing completely different characters or can it be the same character in disguise, per se.
Pretty sure we've all thought of the two you have in mind. In one, a guy is taking on a different persona to get a job. That's not a multiple performance IMO. In another that readily comes to mind, the actor is pretending to be someone else so he can gain access to people. Again, it's not a multiple performance.

Both are examples of the same movie character wearing a disguise. The audience isn't asked to suspend disbelief that they really are distinct characters - it's an inside joke the audience is in on, but they're not different characters.

:2cents:
Are there actually 25 examples of multiple roles in all of movie history? :confused:
There's hundreds. I can send you a wiki link that contains a list of a good deal of them, though it is still missing some.

 
DREAM SEQUENCES JUDGING CRITERIA

- How well does the dream sequence fit into the plot of the film? Cheap attempts to shock the audience will score relatively poorly compared to those sequences that are somewhat more profound.

- Was it obvious that the sequence was a dream? If so, it's not a dealbreaker, but if not, then extra points will likely be awarded.

- Is the dream sequence amusing, entertaining, scary, or of some intrinsic value in and of itself, so that it retains some sort of resonance even after it is clear that the character experiencing it is back to reality?

- Innovation is encouraged. The word "dream" has several meanings, and while, for the most part, this category shouid be about people having visions while they sleep, out-of-the-box selections will be considered for their thoughtfulness. They may even be rewarded for it. However, don't pick a scene with a bunch of a guys in a diner talking about their "dreams" in life. That's not what I mean. The rest is up to you.

- Chances hover at somewhat around 30-40% that I have not seen your movie and/or do not retain immediate command of all of the material in the sequence in question. ALL DRAFTERS ARE STRONGLY ENCOURAGED TO LINK ME TO THE SCENE IN SOME MANNER. If you don't have time when you pick because of clock pressure, you can always go back and edit the post at some later point to include such a link. Ignore this suggestion at your peril.

Thanks, dreamies.
does the person have to be asleep? can't be a fantasy, daydream, hallucination, etc.? just checking.

 
Dr. Octopus, also see the following from my original post:

Because of THE RULE, some innvoation will be needed to get to 25 selections, and that's, of course, the purported genius of the statute. Accordingly, creative ways to evade the ridiculous provision will be rewarded. For example, superheroes do not have to be superpowered, nor do they have to be based on comic books or on traditional characters.

 
DREAM SEQUENCES JUDGING CRITERIA

- How well does the dream sequence fit into the plot of the film? Cheap attempts to shock the audience will score relatively poorly compared to those sequences that are somewhat more profound.

- Was it obvious that the sequence was a dream? If so, it's not a dealbreaker, but if not, then extra points will likely be awarded.

- Is the dream sequence amusing, entertaining, scary, or of some intrinsic value in and of itself, so that it retains some sort of resonance even after it is clear that the character experiencing it is back to reality?

- Innovation is encouraged. The word "dream" has several meanings, and while, for the most part, this category shouid be about people having visions while they sleep, out-of-the-box selections will be considered for their thoughtfulness. They may even be rewarded for it. However, don't pick a scene with a bunch of a guys in a diner talking about their "dreams" in life. That's not what I mean. The rest is up to you.

- Chances hover at somewhat around 30-40% that I have not seen your movie and/or do not retain immediate command of all of the material in the sequence in question. ALL DRAFTERS ARE STRONGLY ENCOURAGED TO LINK ME TO THE SCENE IN SOME MANNER. If you don't have time when you pick because of clock pressure, you can always go back and edit the post at some later point to include such a link. Ignore this suggestion at your peril.

Thanks, dreamies.
does the person have to be asleep? can't be a fantasy, daydream, hallucination, etc.? just checking.
You hit on exactly what I was trying to say. A classic "dream sequence" would mean the character was asleep, but fantasies, daydreams, and hallucinations will all be good selections here, and may even be rewarded depending on their innovation and the other criteria I mentioned. Nice question.

I do want to stress again that I like clever dialogue in movies. You don't have to cater to my whims and I think my judging efforts in the recent timdraft: songs edition illustrated that I can set aside personal preferences as much as most people while judging, but at the same time, just throwing that out there about the dialogue.

 
Dr. Octopus, also see the following from my original post:

Because of THE RULE, some innvoation will be needed to get to 25 selections, and that's, of course, the purported genius of the statute. Accordingly, creative ways to evade the ridiculous provision will be rewarded. For example, superheroes do not have to be superpowered, nor do they have to be based on comic books or on traditional characters.
Thanks. I deleted my post after re-reading. Guess we'll make do.

 
1.22 Casino Royale (2006), Movie About Spies

My favorite Bond film and an excellent reboot of the biggest spy film franchise in the world. And I want the franchise.

 
Are there actually 25 examples of multiple roles in all of movie history? :confused:
There's hundreds. I can send you a wiki link that contains a list of a good deal of them, though it is still missing some.
That statement was mostly rhetorical because I really meant "good ones".

I think it'd be more fun if you could pick people that had the same character masquerading, but whatever.

 
For Joffer

1.16 Downfall - nazi movie

someone PM Krista, I have to teach for a bit
Whoa. I missed that this was picked. This was one of two movies I was considering for my Nazi pick.

A masterpiece and one of my favorite movies.
:hifive:

i went through each category and saw which scene, movie, portrayal was the first to pop into my mind. this and the Goodfellas long take were the only ones where #1 to me was so clear. This movie was amazing to me. instead of a good movie with Nazis in it, its a Nazi movie.

 
Dr. Octopus, also see the following from my original post:

Because of THE RULE, some innvoation will be needed to get to 25 selections, and that's, of course, the purported genius of the statute. Accordingly, creative ways to evade the ridiculous provision will be rewarded. For example, superheroes do not have to be superpowered, nor do they have to be based on comic books or on traditional characters.
Thanks. I deleted my post after re-reading. Guess we'll make do.
Sure. I deleted mine as well. My comments just included more tiresome whining about THE RULE anyway. This is the category that is worst affected by it, but I think creative drafting will get around it, and then the RULE's advocates can clap themselves on the back for their genius. Who knows? They might even end up being right. :)

 
For Joffer

1.16 Downfall - nazi movie

someone PM Krista, I have to teach for a bit
Whoa. I missed that this was picked. This was one of two movies I was considering for my Nazi pick.

A masterpiece and one of my favorite movies.
:hifive:

i went through each category and saw which scene, movie, portrayal was the first to pop into my mind. this and the Goodfellas long take were the only ones where #1 to me was so clear. This movie was amazing to me. instead of a good movie with Nazis in it, its a Nazi movie.
The two lines that still haunt me are:

Magda Goebbels: I could not live in a world without National Socialism.

and

Adolph Hitler: It wasn't just for Germany.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks TK.

1.24 Tunnel scene in Willie Wonka, scene that scared me as a kid

Can someone PM Usual. I'll check back in an hour or so

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top