Dr. Octopus
Footballguy
I was hoping to take that for romantic gesture - guess it's off the board now.Khan is the one where checkov gets that slug in his ear right?
I was hoping to take that for romantic gesture - guess it's off the board now.Khan is the one where checkov gets that slug in his ear right?
I was hoping to take that for romantic gesture - guess it's off the board now.Khan is the one where checkov gets that slug in his ear right?

'Aerial Assault said:Yup, still hating the series rule. I get the reasons behind it, too! Still hate it.
Stupid rules are part of the charm.Screw you both.It's the best Trek movie and about the 12th best Outer Space movie. You'll like it!I am trying to mentally calculate how many times we have agreed on a movie to figure out the odds of me enjoying this one.You owe it to yourself to see Wrath of Khan. Like Yankee always says, it's much more than just a Trek movie. It's one of the best movies ever period.Watch the original episode Space Seed first though.Sadly, I don't think I've seen a Star Trek movie besides 4 and pretty sure I still haven't seen a full Bond movie.
![]()
![]()

Not sure if this is shtick or not, but as it happens I kind of agree. Both of the films chosen so far deserve to be on any "outer space" list, but neither deserves, IMO, anywhere close to the top half of that list.It's the best Trek movie and about the 12th best Outer Space movie. You'll like it!
I'm sure we all know which movies you would consider in the top half of the sci-fi list. The artsy, fartsy, and dull ones.I'm not picking for anyone's pleasure but mine.Not sure if this is shtick or not, but as it happens I kind of agree. Both of the films chosen so far deserve to be on any "outer space" list, but neither deserves, IMO, anywhere close to the top half of that list.It's the best Trek movie and about the 12th best Outer Space movie. You'll like it!
At the end of this I would be interested in seeing your top 12 space movies if Empire doesn't belong toward the top of the list. You think it hasn't aged well, wasn't that good to begin with, something else?Not sure if this is shtick or not, but as it happens I kind of agree. Both of the films chosen so far deserve to be on any "outer space" list, but neither deserves, IMO, anywhere close to the top half of that list.It's the best Trek movie and about the 12th best Outer Space movie. You'll like it!
....zero.....point.....zero..../deanwermerI am trying to mentally calculate how many times we have agreed on a movie to figure out the odds of me enjoying this one.You owe it to yourself to see Wrath of Khan. Like Yankee always says, it's much more than just a Trek movie. It's one of the best movies ever period.Watch the original episode Space Seed first though.Sadly, I don't think I've seen a Star Trek movie besides 4 and pretty sure I still haven't seen a full Bond movie.
![]()
![]()
Well, and Yankee's right? And don't try to pigeonhole me. You have no idea of my movie tastes. (You will, though.)I'm sure we all know which movies you would consider in the top half of the sci-fi list. The artsy, fartsy, and dull ones.I'm not picking for anyone's pleasure but mine.Not sure if this is shtick or not, but as it happens I kind of agree. Both of the films chosen so far deserve to be on any "outer space" list, but neither deserves, IMO, anywhere close to the top half of that list.It's the best Trek movie and about the 12th best Outer Space movie. You'll like it!
Screw you both.It's the best Trek movie and about the 12th best Outer Space movie. You'll like it!I am trying to mentally calculate how many times we have agreed on a movie to figure out the odds of me enjoying this one.You owe it to yourself to see Wrath of Khan. Like Yankee always says, it's much more than just a Trek movie. It's one of the best movies ever period.Watch the original episode Space Seed first though.Sadly, I don't think I've seen a Star Trek movie besides 4 and pretty sure I still haven't seen a full Bond movie.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Oh I don't know. I love Empire, and Khan as well. They're not the first few I think of. I'm glad I won't be judging the category.At the end of this I would be interested in seeing your top 12 space movies if Empire doesn't belong toward the top of the list. You think it hasn't aged well, wasn't that good to begin with, something else?Not sure if this is shtick or not, but as it happens I kind of agree. Both of the films chosen so far deserve to be on any "outer space" list, but neither deserves, IMO, anywhere close to the top half of that list.It's the best Trek movie and about the 12th best Outer Space movie. You'll like it!
No. Your rule forces people's hands into this type of pick. Since we only get one pick per franchise, I thought I'd pick the best representation of, depending on your point of view, the first or second most popular Sci-Fi franchise in all of movie history.Well, and Yankee's right?I'm not picking for anyone's pleasure but mine.
I know I enjoy a good fartsy movie.I'm sure we all know which movies you would consider in the top half of the sci-fi list. The artsy, fartsy, and dull ones.I'm not picking for anyone's pleasure but mine.Not sure if this is shtick or not, but as it happens I kind of agree. Both of the films chosen so far deserve to be on any "outer space" list, but neither deserves, IMO, anywhere close to the top half of that list.It's the best Trek movie and about the 12th best Outer Space movie. You'll like it!

Not really. If you're not a Trek fan, you'll find ST: The Motion Picture to be really dull.Space Seed is in Season 1/Episode 22![]()
So, do you not suggest watching the first movie before this one? what season, etc. would I find that episode you suggested?
I think based on your statement, everybody else is glad you aren't as well.Oh I don't know. I love Empire, and Khan as well. They're not the first few I think of. I'm glad I won't be judging the category.At the end of this I would be interested in seeing your top 12 space movies if Empire doesn't belong toward the top of the list. You think it hasn't aged well, wasn't that good to begin with, something else?Not sure if this is shtick or not, but as it happens I kind of agree. Both of the films chosen so far deserve to be on any "outer space" list, but neither deserves, IMO, anywhere close to the top half of that list.It's the best Trek movie and about the 12th best Outer Space movie. You'll like it!

You don't have to see the first Trek to enjoy Kahn. I don't think you really need to see the Kahn episode of the TV show either. If you aren't a Trek fan, the quirk of the TV show may skew what you think of the film. Don't get me wrong Andy, I love me some Kahn. I was exaggerating a bit but there are several movies I would place higher in the category.Screw you both.It's the best Trek movie and about the 12th best Outer Space movie. You'll like it!I am trying to mentally calculate how many times we have agreed on a movie to figure out the odds of me enjoying this one.You owe it to yourself to see Wrath of Khan. Like Yankee always says, it's much more than just a Trek movie. It's one of the best movies ever period.Watch the original episode Space Seed first though.Sadly, I don't think I've seen a Star Trek movie besides 4 and pretty sure I still haven't seen a full Bond movie.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
So, do you not suggest watching the first movie before this one? what season, etc. would I find that episode you suggested?
Eh, and I think it would likely be reasonable to do so. Khan is just my favorite SciFi movie. Yes, even above the Star Wars movies.Don't get me wrong Andy, I love me some Kahn. I was exaggerating a bit but there are several movies I would place higher in the category.
My rule did not force your hand. Would you truly have waited because there were more Star Trek films available? I can see the argument for Empire with regard to my rule- both Star Wars and Empire are excellent films and one of them would surely have been drafted quickly- but how many Star Trek films measure up to Khan or even come close? None. The only one that remotely comes close, IMO, is the most recent one that came out 3 years ago.No. Your rule forces people's hands into this type of pick. Since we only get one pick per franchise, I thought I'd pick the best representation of, depending on your point of view, the first or second most popular Sci-Fi franchise in all of movie history.Well, and Yankee's right?I'm not picking for anyone's pleasure but mine.
The more I think about it, Khan and Empire probably would both make my top 5.Don't get me wrong Andy, I love me some Kahn. I was exaggerating a bit but there are several movies I would place higher in the category.
This post makes me believe that you need some medical attention.Not sure if this is shtick or not, but as it happens I kind of agree. Both of the films chosen so far deserve to be on any "outer space" list, but neither deserves, IMO, anywhere close to the top half of that list.It's the best Trek movie and about the 12th best Outer Space movie. You'll like it!
You've been reading my posts for years- you just figured that out?This post makes me believe that you need some medical attention.Not sure if this is shtick or not, but as it happens I kind of agree. Both of the films chosen so far deserve to be on any "outer space" list, but neither deserves, IMO, anywhere close to the top half of that list.It's the best Trek movie and about the 12th best Outer Space movie. You'll like it!
I meant like immediate, call 911 because you've fallen and can't get up type of attention. I assume you are off your meds as a starting point.You've been reading my posts for years- you just figured that out?This post makes me believe that you need some medical attention.Not sure if this is shtick or not, but as it happens I kind of agree. Both of the films chosen so far deserve to be on any "outer space" list, but neither deserves, IMO, anywhere close to the top half of that list.It's the best Trek movie and about the 12th best Outer Space movie. You'll like it!
Exactly, this pick was entirely because of the rule limitation. I understand wanting to broaden horizons and whatnot and not just have this be the same old same old top 25 movie type thing, but the rule is probably too restrictive. As a result, especially given that the entire Star Wars franchise disappeared already, we wanted (needed to some extent) to have the Star Trek franchise as represented in what we both consider not just the best sci-fi movie of all time, but a top 10 overall movie of all time. I can think of a whole host of other things that should have been picked first in the categories because some are really really top heavy, but with the rule in place and our personal biases, this had to be the pick, and we didn't even need to PM each other to know it.No. Your rule forces people's hands into this type of pick. Since we only get one pick per franchise, I thought I'd pick the best representation of, depending on your point of view, the first or second most popular Sci-Fi franchise in all of movie history.Well, and Yankee's right?I'm not picking for anyone's pleasure but mine.
Even I knew this was going to be the pick.we didn't even need to PM each other to know it.

See, tim. See what you force people to do?Of course, as soon as Andy picks Tom Hanks letting Wilson drown in the ocean as a romantic gesture, I'm probably bowing out, but for now this is fun.Even I knew this was going to be the pick.we didn't even need to PM each other to know it.![]()
It's "outer space", not "Sci-fi" although to the judge it could be samey same.Do we have an outer space judge yet?Wondering if these movies must take place in space, or can be about getting there, getting visitors from there, 1/2 and 1/2, etc...
Yes, but Tim doesn't care about his category as long as there's nazis in it in some form. We could still be going to outer space or have only 1/2 the movie set there, etc.. Just curious if the whole film needed to take place off the planet earth is all.It's "outer space", not "Sci-fi" although to the judge it could be samey same.Do we have an outer space judge yet?Wondering if these movies must take place in space, or can be about getting there, getting visitors from there, 1/2 and 1/2, etc...
I think that if it involves people from outer space who are here on Earth, that's fine. But they need to be featured. If, for example, only 30 seconds of a film were devoted to "Jews in Space" that wouldn't fare so well. Just to piss off And and Yankee, I nominate krista4 to judge this category.

Any joke I could make could possibly spotlight an actual pick.I think that if it involves people from outer space who are here on Earth, that's fine. But they need to be featured. If, for example, only 30 seconds of a film were devoted to "Jews in Space" that wouldn't fare so well. Just to piss off Andy and Yankee, I nominate krista4 to judge this category.

I'm not really serious about this, one of the reasons I didn't join as a drafter. I just think your examples are self defeating. I'd say, with very rare exceptions, that we would know if something is a series or not. Nothing you've posted about Pixar would convince me that they're par tof a series, simply the same world.'John Maddens Lunchbox said:Why so serious?'Mrs. Rannous said:There is no case for Pixar movies being in the same universe. Those references aren't part of the story. They are there just for fun.Alfred Hitchcock makes a cameo appearance in most of his films. Are they somehow all set in the same universe? That's just ridiculous.'John Maddens Lunchbox said:You can make a clear case for some, not all though.Pixar has cross references in EVERY movie'Tiananmen Tank said:You made a much better case than I would have thought when I asked. Tenuous, as you said, but pretty good!Clearly we need to treat Tarantino movies the same.'John Maddens Lunchbox said:It goes on and on. Now they are obvious cartoonist/In jokes, but they are all part of the Pixar universe and an argument can be made that they are part of a seriesI'll quit running circles around this. If Tim decides that Pixar movies are part of a series it's one and done, same with ANYTHING else. Tims choice, not a clear rule.
There has already been a few "Bond" Examples
What about the Carry on Movies? Are they a series or individual movies? The actors are generally the same, but they play different characters and different styles. With a category about England THAT is a very relevant question.
We could play this game all day, some are clearly not part of a series (Hitchcock, Tarantino)
Some are spurious examples of a series at best (Pixar)
Others not so well defined. I'm just worried (not really) that at some stage, this is going to explode in our faces when someone tries to take a movie or scene and this stupid rule stops good category choices.
Where are all these slackers?Wheeeeee!!!!!! This is fun.

I think for classroom scene, I would like it to take place in a classroom. I am still debating some of my other criteria. It may be something likeJudge assignments (most) and judging criteria would be nice before we draft. Just sayin'...
Dude said it was okay to skip him.So we're just skipping Mister CIA already? The clock hasn't even started and we're still at the very beginning of the first round, seems like an inopportune to start skipping people..![]()
I still don't mind being skipped. I've been building my list and thus far it's composed of relatively snipe-free material. ... Of course I'm avoiding a few picks that Tim expects to be ranked super-elite highly (a Nazi flick leaps immediately to mind).Why don't we just wait? Clock's not even on 'til Monday. No reason to go to a skip already. We're a patient sort.Just checking in and noticed I am up at 1.02. No idea what I want to draft first, so skip me for now and I'll pick sometime tonight.

It's no given that would occur, not even close. I liked all six SW films but most people sure didn't. No one would draft the latter three or ROTJ, most likely. But the sweeping nature of the rule means that "Star Wars" will now not be drafted, which is silly.So we're just skipping Mister CIA already? The clock hasn't even started and we're still at the very beginning of the first round, seems like an inopportune to start skipping people..Also, I'm surprised at how many people are against the 1 movie per series rule. You guys are really that adamant about wanting to see Star Wars, James Bond, and Superhero franchise films fill out their respective categories?
Heaven forbid if our movie draft, which includes categories like best superhero movie and best car chase, produces silly results!I think the movie draft will survive just fine without the presence of 'Star Wars' myself, it's not like there's isn't hundreds of thousands of other movies that can be drafted.It's no given that would occur, not even close. I liked all six SW films but most people sure didn't. No one would draft the latter three or ROTJ, most likely. But the sweeping nature of the rule means that "Star Wars" will now not be drafted, which is silly.So we're just skipping Mister CIA already? The clock hasn't even started and we're still at the very beginning of the first round, seems like an inopportune to start skipping people..![]()
Also, I'm surprised at how many people are against the 1 movie per series rule. You guys are really that adamant about wanting to see Star Wars, James Bond, and Superhero franchise films fill out their respective categories?
I think the movie draft will survive just fine without the presence of 'Star Wars' myself, it's not like there's isn't hundreds of thousands of other movies that can be drafted.
It's actually really pathetic that we're having this discussion.I feel the same way about every thread regarding politics and religionI think the movie draft will survive just fine without the presence of 'Star Wars' myself, it's not like there's isn't hundreds of thousands of other movies that can be drafted.It's actually really pathetic that we're having this discussion.
Not really, I've seen far too many a Tim Draft be derailed by arguments about rules that should be clear from the outset. Whether Tim gets off on the chaos I don't know (well I do and he does).I think it's just JML making a big deal of it because that's his shtick.'Dr. Octopus said:If the argument over that rule is going to dominate the thread, maybe we should just do away with it. With 25 drafters it's unlikely any "series" is going to dominate a category (or the draft). How many actual good James Bond movies are there anyway? When I judged live albums in one of the past drafts I had two Talking Heads, Records, two Dylan records and two Band records and it really didn't take much away from it. I think people will natuarally shy away from taking the 5th best Bond Movie and I'm sure we don't need to worry about the Phantom Menace getting any love.
I understand what you are saying about it probably being naturally policed, but we have put similar limitations on music drafts as well - only x # of songs per artist. Sure there was this type of silly debate - if I take a Neil Young song does that count for a Neil Young and Crazy Horse song too, blah, blah... In the long run I think it helped those drafts - sure some of the heavy hitter songs/albums didn't get picked but it did make us dig a little deeper and made drafters plan a little more. That is all this rule is trying to do - let's just complaining and roll with it. If it completely sucks, we will learn for the next time. On the flip side of your argument that it will be naturally kept in check - this rule probably only effects 3 of the 30 categories anyway: space, superhero, spies. Shouldn't be a big deal.