What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

timdraft #4: Movie Category Draft (1 Viewer)

Sadly, I don't think I've seen a Star Trek movie besides 4 and pretty sure I still haven't seen a full Bond movie.

:unsure:
You owe it to yourself to see Wrath of Khan. Like Yankee always says, it's much more than just a Trek movie. It's one of the best movies ever period.Watch the original episode Space Seed first though.
I am trying to mentally calculate how many times we have agreed on a movie to figure out the odds of me enjoying this one. ;)
It's the best Trek movie and about the 12th best Outer Space movie. You'll like it!
Screw you both. :angry: :rant: :boxing:
 
It's the best Trek movie and about the 12th best Outer Space movie. You'll like it!
Not sure if this is shtick or not, but as it happens I kind of agree. Both of the films chosen so far deserve to be on any "outer space" list, but neither deserves, IMO, anywhere close to the top half of that list.
 
It's the best Trek movie and about the 12th best Outer Space movie. You'll like it!
Not sure if this is shtick or not, but as it happens I kind of agree. Both of the films chosen so far deserve to be on any "outer space" list, but neither deserves, IMO, anywhere close to the top half of that list.
I'm sure we all know which movies you would consider in the top half of the sci-fi list. The artsy, fartsy, and dull ones.I'm not picking for anyone's pleasure but mine.
 
It's the best Trek movie and about the 12th best Outer Space movie. You'll like it!
Not sure if this is shtick or not, but as it happens I kind of agree. Both of the films chosen so far deserve to be on any "outer space" list, but neither deserves, IMO, anywhere close to the top half of that list.
At the end of this I would be interested in seeing your top 12 space movies if Empire doesn't belong toward the top of the list. You think it hasn't aged well, wasn't that good to begin with, something else?
 
Sadly, I don't think I've seen a Star Trek movie besides 4 and pretty sure I still haven't seen a full Bond movie.

:unsure:
You owe it to yourself to see Wrath of Khan. Like Yankee always says, it's much more than just a Trek movie. It's one of the best movies ever period.Watch the original episode Space Seed first though.
I am trying to mentally calculate how many times we have agreed on a movie to figure out the odds of me enjoying this one. ;)
....zero.....point.....zero..../deanwermer

 
It's the best Trek movie and about the 12th best Outer Space movie. You'll like it!
Not sure if this is shtick or not, but as it happens I kind of agree. Both of the films chosen so far deserve to be on any "outer space" list, but neither deserves, IMO, anywhere close to the top half of that list.
I'm sure we all know which movies you would consider in the top half of the sci-fi list. The artsy, fartsy, and dull ones.I'm not picking for anyone's pleasure but mine.
Well, and Yankee's right? And don't try to pigeonhole me. You have no idea of my movie tastes. (You will, though.)

 
Sadly, I don't think I've seen a Star Trek movie besides 4 and pretty sure I still haven't seen a full Bond movie.

:unsure:
You owe it to yourself to see Wrath of Khan. Like Yankee always says, it's much more than just a Trek movie. It's one of the best movies ever period.Watch the original episode Space Seed first though.
I am trying to mentally calculate how many times we have agreed on a movie to figure out the odds of me enjoying this one. ;)
It's the best Trek movie and about the 12th best Outer Space movie. You'll like it!
Screw you both. :angry: :rant: :boxing:
:D

So, do you not suggest watching the first movie before this one? what season, etc. would I find that episode you suggested?

 
It's the best Trek movie and about the 12th best Outer Space movie. You'll like it!
Not sure if this is shtick or not, but as it happens I kind of agree. Both of the films chosen so far deserve to be on any "outer space" list, but neither deserves, IMO, anywhere close to the top half of that list.
At the end of this I would be interested in seeing your top 12 space movies if Empire doesn't belong toward the top of the list. You think it hasn't aged well, wasn't that good to begin with, something else?
Oh I don't know. I love Empire, and Khan as well. They're not the first few I think of. I'm glad I won't be judging the category.
 
It's the best Trek movie and about the 12th best Outer Space movie. You'll like it!
Not sure if this is shtick or not, but as it happens I kind of agree. Both of the films chosen so far deserve to be on any "outer space" list, but neither deserves, IMO, anywhere close to the top half of that list.
I'm sure we all know which movies you would consider in the top half of the sci-fi list. The artsy, fartsy, and dull ones.I'm not picking for anyone's pleasure but mine.
I know I enjoy a good fartsy movie. :popcorn:
 
It's the best Trek movie and about the 12th best Outer Space movie. You'll like it!
Not sure if this is shtick or not, but as it happens I kind of agree. Both of the films chosen so far deserve to be on any "outer space" list, but neither deserves, IMO, anywhere close to the top half of that list.
At the end of this I would be interested in seeing your top 12 space movies if Empire doesn't belong toward the top of the list. You think it hasn't aged well, wasn't that good to begin with, something else?
Oh I don't know. I love Empire, and Khan as well. They're not the first few I think of. I'm glad I won't be judging the category.
I think based on your statement, everybody else is glad you aren't as well. ;)
 
Sadly, I don't think I've seen a Star Trek movie besides 4 and pretty sure I still haven't seen a full Bond movie.

:unsure:
You owe it to yourself to see Wrath of Khan. Like Yankee always says, it's much more than just a Trek movie. It's one of the best movies ever period.Watch the original episode Space Seed first though.
I am trying to mentally calculate how many times we have agreed on a movie to figure out the odds of me enjoying this one. ;)
It's the best Trek movie and about the 12th best Outer Space movie. You'll like it!
Screw you both. :angry: :rant: :boxing:
:D

So, do you not suggest watching the first movie before this one? what season, etc. would I find that episode you suggested?
You don't have to see the first Trek to enjoy Kahn. I don't think you really need to see the Kahn episode of the TV show either. If you aren't a Trek fan, the quirk of the TV show may skew what you think of the film. Don't get me wrong Andy, I love me some Kahn. I was exaggerating a bit but there are several movies I would place higher in the category.

 
I'm not picking for anyone's pleasure but mine.
Well, and Yankee's right?
No. Your rule forces people's hands into this type of pick. Since we only get one pick per franchise, I thought I'd pick the best representation of, depending on your point of view, the first or second most popular Sci-Fi franchise in all of movie history.
My rule did not force your hand. Would you truly have waited because there were more Star Trek films available? I can see the argument for Empire with regard to my rule- both Star Wars and Empire are excellent films and one of them would surely have been drafted quickly- but how many Star Trek films measure up to Khan or even come close? None. The only one that remotely comes close, IMO, is the most recent one that came out 3 years ago.
 
It's the best Trek movie and about the 12th best Outer Space movie. You'll like it!
Not sure if this is shtick or not, but as it happens I kind of agree. Both of the films chosen so far deserve to be on any "outer space" list, but neither deserves, IMO, anywhere close to the top half of that list.
This post makes me believe that you need some medical attention.
You've been reading my posts for years- you just figured that out?
 
It's the best Trek movie and about the 12th best Outer Space movie. You'll like it!
Not sure if this is shtick or not, but as it happens I kind of agree. Both of the films chosen so far deserve to be on any "outer space" list, but neither deserves, IMO, anywhere close to the top half of that list.
This post makes me believe that you need some medical attention.
You've been reading my posts for years- you just figured that out?
I meant like immediate, call 911 because you've fallen and can't get up type of attention. I assume you are off your meds as a starting point. :thumbup:
 
I'm not picking for anyone's pleasure but mine.
Well, and Yankee's right?
No. Your rule forces people's hands into this type of pick. Since we only get one pick per franchise, I thought I'd pick the best representation of, depending on your point of view, the first or second most popular Sci-Fi franchise in all of movie history.
Exactly, this pick was entirely because of the rule limitation. I understand wanting to broaden horizons and whatnot and not just have this be the same old same old top 25 movie type thing, but the rule is probably too restrictive. As a result, especially given that the entire Star Wars franchise disappeared already, we wanted (needed to some extent) to have the Star Trek franchise as represented in what we both consider not just the best sci-fi movie of all time, but a top 10 overall movie of all time. I can think of a whole host of other things that should have been picked first in the categories because some are really really top heavy, but with the rule in place and our personal biases, this had to be the pick, and we didn't even need to PM each other to know it.

 
Do we have an outer space judge yet?

Wondering if these movies must take place in space, or can be about getting there, getting visitors from there, 1/2 and 1/2, etc...

 
Do we have an outer space judge yet?Wondering if these movies must take place in space, or can be about getting there, getting visitors from there, 1/2 and 1/2, etc...
It's "outer space", not "Sci-fi" although to the judge it could be samey same.
Yes, but Tim doesn't care about his category as long as there's nazis in it in some form. We could still be going to outer space or have only 1/2 the movie set there, etc.. Just curious if the whole film needed to take place off the planet earth is all.
 
I think that if it involves people from outer space who are here on Earth, that's fine. But they need to be featured. If, for example, only 30 seconds of a film were devoted to "Jews in Space" that wouldn't fare so well.

Just to piss off Andy and Yankee, I nominate krista4 to judge this category.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think that if it involves people from outer space who are here on Earth, that's fine. But they need to be featured. If, for example, only 30 seconds of a film were devoted to "Jews in Space" that wouldn't fare so well. Just to piss off And and Yankee, I nominate krista4 to judge this category.
:lol:
 
I think that if it involves people from outer space who are here on Earth, that's fine. But they need to be featured. If, for example, only 30 seconds of a film were devoted to "Jews in Space" that wouldn't fare so well. Just to piss off Andy and Yankee, I nominate krista4 to judge this category.
Any joke I could make could possibly spotlight an actual pick. :kicksrock:
 
'John Maddens Lunchbox said:
'Mrs. Rannous said:
'John Maddens Lunchbox said:
'Tiananmen Tank said:
'John Maddens Lunchbox said:
It goes on and on. Now they are obvious cartoonist/In jokes, but they are all part of the Pixar universe and an argument can be made that they are part of a series
You made a much better case than I would have thought when I asked. Tenuous, as you said, but pretty good!Clearly we need to treat Tarantino movies the same.
You can make a clear case for some, not all though.Pixar has cross references in EVERY movie
There is no case for Pixar movies being in the same universe. Those references aren't part of the story. They are there just for fun.Alfred Hitchcock makes a cameo appearance in most of his films. Are they somehow all set in the same universe? That's just ridiculous.
Why so serious? :shrug: I'll quit running circles around this. If Tim decides that Pixar movies are part of a series it's one and done, same with ANYTHING else. Tims choice, not a clear rule.

There has already been a few "Bond" Examples

What about the Carry on Movies? Are they a series or individual movies? The actors are generally the same, but they play different characters and different styles. With a category about England THAT is a very relevant question.

We could play this game all day, some are clearly not part of a series (Hitchcock, Tarantino)

Some are spurious examples of a series at best (Pixar)

Others not so well defined. I'm just worried (not really) that at some stage, this is going to explode in our faces when someone tries to take a movie or scene and this stupid rule stops good category choices.
I'm not really serious about this, one of the reasons I didn't join as a drafter. I just think your examples are self defeating. I'd say, with very rare exceptions, that we would know if something is a series or not. Nothing you've posted about Pixar would convince me that they're par tof a series, simply the same world.
 
Judge assignments (most) and judging criteria would be nice before we draft. Just sayin'...
I think for classroom scene, I would like it to take place in a classroom. I am still debating some of my other criteria. It may be something like

75% did it happen in a classroom

12.5% was it a good scene

12.5% would this ever have happened to me in my 14 years in the classroom

Of course, this could all change by the time I sit down to judge.

 
So we're just skipping Mister CIA already? The clock hasn't even started and we're still at the very beginning of the first round, seems like an inopportune to start skipping people.. :unsure:

Also, I'm surprised at how many people are against the 1 movie per series rule. You guys are really that adamant about wanting to see Star Wars, James Bond, and Superhero franchise films fill out their respective categories?

 
Just checking in and noticed I am up at 1.02. No idea what I want to draft first, so skip me for now and I'll pick sometime tonight.
Why don't we just wait? Clock's not even on 'til Monday. No reason to go to a skip already. We're a patient sort.
I still don't mind being skipped. I've been building my list and thus far it's composed of relatively snipe-free material. ... Of course I'm avoiding a few picks that Tim expects to be ranked super-elite highly (a Nazi flick leaps immediately to mind).
:popcorn:
 
So we're just skipping Mister CIA already? The clock hasn't even started and we're still at the very beginning of the first round, seems like an inopportune to start skipping people..:unsure:Also, I'm surprised at how many people are against the 1 movie per series rule. You guys are really that adamant about wanting to see Star Wars, James Bond, and Superhero franchise films fill out their respective categories?
It's no given that would occur, not even close. I liked all six SW films but most people sure didn't. No one would draft the latter three or ROTJ, most likely. But the sweeping nature of the rule means that "Star Wars" will now not be drafted, which is silly.
 
So we're just skipping Mister CIA already? The clock hasn't even started and we're still at the very beginning of the first round, seems like an inopportune to start skipping people.. :unsure:

Also, I'm surprised at how many people are against the 1 movie per series rule. You guys are really that adamant about wanting to see Star Wars, James Bond, and Superhero franchise films fill out their respective categories?
It's no given that would occur, not even close. I liked all six SW films but most people sure didn't. No one would draft the latter three or ROTJ, most likely. But the sweeping nature of the rule means that "Star Wars" will now not be drafted, which is silly.
Heaven forbid if our movie draft, which includes categories like best superhero movie and best car chase, produces silly results!I think the movie draft will survive just fine without the presence of 'Star Wars' myself, it's not like there's isn't hundreds of thousands of other movies that can be drafted.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I've been thinking about this morning which film I like better, Empire or Khan. Empire has more action- in fact, like Star Wars, it's a non-stop action space opera. I think it's better than Star Wars because the two most interesting characters, Solo and Vader have larger roles. Also the action scenes, particularly involving the Millennium Falcon, are better than Star Wars IMO.

Khan has more overacting (Shatner and Montalban in particular) but it is probably the best appearance by Spock in the franchise. Khan has much less action, but perhaps because of this, the action scenes are more intense, and featuring a series of chess moves which lives up to the best of the Star Trek tradition. Also, unlike Empire, Khan offers a philosophical theme- cheesy, but poignant even so.

Both movies touch on lost father-son relationships. Both films feature an emotional ending, with the loss (death) of a main character- but IMO Spock's death is handled much better than Solo's freezing.

For all of the incredible special effects that Empire offers (far more impressive than Khan), Khan is a better, more thoughtful story. And ultimately this trumps presentation.

Give me Khan.

 
'Dr. Octopus said:
If the argument over that rule is going to dominate the thread, maybe we should just do away with it. With 25 drafters it's unlikely any "series" is going to dominate a category (or the draft). How many actual good James Bond movies are there anyway? When I judged live albums in one of the past drafts I had two Talking Heads, Records, two Dylan records and two Band records and it really didn't take much away from it. I think people will natuarally shy away from taking the 5th best Bond Movie and I'm sure we don't need to worry about the Phantom Menace getting any love.
I think it's just JML making a big deal of it because that's his shtick.

I understand what you are saying about it probably being naturally policed, but we have put similar limitations on music drafts as well - only x # of songs per artist. Sure there was this type of silly debate - if I take a Neil Young song does that count for a Neil Young and Crazy Horse song too, blah, blah... In the long run I think it helped those drafts - sure some of the heavy hitter songs/albums didn't get picked but it did make us dig a little deeper and made drafters plan a little more. That is all this rule is trying to do - let's just complaining and roll with it. If it completely sucks, we will learn for the next time. On the flip side of your argument that it will be naturally kept in check - this rule probably only effects 3 of the 30 categories anyway: space, superhero, spies. Shouldn't be a big deal.
Not really, I've seen far too many a Tim Draft be derailed by arguments about rules that should be clear from the outset. Whether Tim gets off on the chaos I don't know (well I do and he does).
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top