sho nuff
Footballguy
You were saying?Can't see urbanhack getting up from that knockdown.
You were saying?Can't see urbanhack getting up from that knockdown.
LmaoAs quoted where? Since there was no actual link. And where has it come out of Warrens mouth? Again, since there was no link provided.
They do have an edit feature here.I dod and there is only one link to the CEO and its an article talking about a Veritas thing...excise me that i dint take what Okeefe says or an article about and Okeefe produces as anything factual.
In addition when you make a claim about something with a quite, its expected you would actually link to where it came from. When people don't, usually its because they are trying to hide that they got it from what amounts to a bogus source like Okeefe.
I disagree with this and it’s just the flip side of Trump who wants to do the same thing..a regulatory plan aimed at breaking up some of America’s largest tech companies, including Amazon, Google, Apple and Facebook.
That is Gennai's version. She didnt deny saying it. Called the video edited and said the context was wrong.James O’Keefe deleted the YouTube clip, that’s why you can’t find it. Here’s the Daily Mail on it.
This is Gennai’s explanation of the background and context.
I’m just glad I got to see the TKO because I’ve had that poster on ignore for a while. I should report him for a personal attack, god knows all us have had vacations for far less.Can't see urbanhack getting up from that knockdown.
Personal attack? Also, may want to read past favreco’s premature declaration of a knockdown. Things dont go so well for that post or the quote given.I’m just glad I got to see the TKO because I’ve had that poster on ignore for a while. I should report him for a personal attack, god knows all us have had vacations for far less.
So you're using her quote to prop up your argument, but then dismissing her words when she states that the video was edited and presented her opinion out of context.That is Gennai's version. She didnt deny saying it. Called the video edited and said the context was wrong.
I guess people can come to their own conclusions.
No one named FavreCo posted. We shouldn't be making up nicknames for other posters. Be better.Personal attack? Also, may want to read past favreco’s premature declaration of a knockdown. Things dont go so well for that post or the quote given.
Scroll up for a knockdown... https://forums.footballguys.com/forum/topic/776645-trump-2020-hq-the-great-place/?do=findComment&comment=21994238Can't see urbanhack getting up from that knockdown.
I’m kind of curious about something. In the Fox thread you implied that Fox isn’t held to any kind of standard of objectivity, and actually I kind of agree. Free speech and all that. But tv licenses after all are technically bound by a public commitment to factual reporting and decency. I don’t think internet is bound by such regulations, but why do you (or any Trump supporters (not that you are, no idea)) think that Google or FB or other tech giants should be held to an equal or higher standard than Fox which is? TIA.That is Gennai's version. She didnt deny saying it. Called the video edited and said the context was wrong.
I guess people can come to their own conclusions.
Getting owned by the likes of SiD drove me to stop day-drinking.I’m kind of curious about something. In the Fox thread you implied that Fox isn’t held to any kind of standard of objectivity, and actually I kind of agree. Free speech and all that. But tv licenses after all are technically bound by a public commitment to factual reporting and decency. I don’t think internet is bound by such regulations, but why do you (or any Trump supporters (not that you are, no idea)) think that Google or FB or other tech giants should be held to an equal or higher standard than Fox which is? TIA.
I know you’re trying to be sarcastic here but you actually raise a great point which I’ve made for years: leftists like Warren have a knee jerk attitude against all corporations, and they fail to recognize the tremendous power such corporations have to do positive change.What’s the deal with Liz Warren wanting to bust up all the big tech companies? Doesn’t she know these people are actively shadow banning, censuring and deplatforming people on the other side who are disagree with her? This seems like a very bizarre way to treat people who are helping you.
2008 says HI, Tim!leftists like Warren have a knee jerk attitude against all corporations, and they fail to recognize the tremendous power such corporations have to do positive change.
Awesome.So your using her quote to prop up your argument, but then dismissing her words when she states that the video was edited and presented her opinion out of context.
Sho, any more spelling errors and you'll have me thinking this is actually a Trump account used as anti Trump propaganda. Proof reading is your friend.I dod and there is only one link to the CEO and its an article talking about a Veritas thing...excise me that i dint take what Okeefe says or an article about and Okeefe produces as anything factual.
"Twenty-five years ago, Facebook, Google, and Amazon didn’t exist. Now they are among the most valuable and well-known companies in the world," Warren wrote in a post on the blogging platform Medium. "It’s a great story — but also one that highlights why the government must break up monopolies and promote competitive markets."
Sure thing.Sho, any more spelling errors and you'll have me thinking this is actually a Trump account used as anti Trump propaganda. Proof reading is your friend.
Trust me I hate to be that guy, I’m probably the worst speller on the board ( I know it’s not a spelling thing just making a point) but a few of your posts are brutal.Sure thing.
I agree. Im not arguing with you. I know in my haste I sometimes don't catch things.Trust me I hate to be that guy, I’m probably the worst speller on the board ( I know it’s not a spelling thing just making a point) but a few of your posts are brutal.
I have no idea why he doesn’t know how to use the edit feature.Trust me I hate to be that guy, I’m probably the worst speller on the board ( I know it’s not a spelling thing just making a point) but a few of your posts are brutal.
It’s not hard to read what you wrote....why the haste?I agree. Im not arguing with you. I know in my haste I sometimes don't catch things.
Too...many....posts I don't....agree...with!!!!I agree. Im not arguing with you. I know in my haste I sometimes don't catch things.
Loving the new pic!
Cool avatar, you.
I think you're a low water mark.The story behind it is even better!!!
i have no idea why you keep obsessing with sho nuffI have no idea why he doesn’t know how to use the edit feature.
I have no idea why you keep obsessing about replying to sho nuff.i have no idea why you keep obsessing with sho nuff
What rule is he breaking responding to you?Same as he has always been...odd how those who complain about moderation say nothing about that.
I just thought this deserved a full quote:Without looking at the study details, I would guess that has more to do with predilections of who chooses to go to the parades,rather than being brainwashed by them.
But here is your 4th of July trivia; the following from the article has some fallacies.. Adams wrote that about July 2 being a day of celebration.. The vote on the Declaration of Independence was on July 2nd, with adoption taking place on the 4th. Document was signed in August.
----> On July 3, 1776, he wrote that the Fourth "ought to be solemnized with pomp and parade, with shows, games, sports, guns, bells, bonfires, and illuminations, from one end of this continent to the other, from this time forward, forevermore."
John Adams, to his wife.But on the other Hand, the Delay of this Declaration to this Time, has many great Advantages attending it. -- The Hopes of Reconciliation, which were fondly entertained by Multitudes of honest and well meaning tho weak and mistaken People, have been gradually and at last totally extinguished. -- Time has been given for the whole People, maturely to consider the great Question of Independence and to ripen their judgments, dissipate their Fears, and allure their Hopes, by discussing it in News Papers and Pamphletts, by debating it, in Assemblies, Conventions, Committees of Safety and Inspection, in Town and County Meetings, as well as in private Conversations, so that the whole People in every Colony of the 13, have now adopted it, as their own Act. -- This will cement the Union, and avoid those Heats and perhaps Convulsions which might have been occasioned, by such a Declaration Six Months ago.
But the Day is past. The Second Day of July 1776, will be the most memorable Epocha, in the History of America.
I am apt to believe that it will be celebrated, by succeeding Generations, as the great anniversary Festival. It ought to be commemorated, as the Day of Deliverance by solemn Acts of Devotion to God Almighty. It ought to be solemnized with Pomp and Parade, with Shews, Games, Sports, Guns, Bells, Bonfires and Illuminations from one End of this Continent to the other from this Time forward forever more.
You will think me transported with Enthusiasm but I am not. -- I am well aware of the Toil and Blood and Treasure, that it will cost Us to maintain this Declaration, and support and defend these States. -- Yet through all the Gloom I can see the Rays of ravishing Light and Glory. I can see that the End is more than worth all the Means. And that Posterity will tryumph in that Days Transaction, even altho We should rue it, which I trust in God We shall not.
Shaking them down for campaign donations. Once they give, the issue goes away.What’s the deal with Liz Warren wanting to bust up all the big tech companies? Doesn’t she know these people are actively shadow banning, censuring and deplatforming people on the other side who are disagree with her? This seems like a very bizarre way to treat people who are helping you.
Can you explain?Shaking them down for campaign donations. Once they give, the issue goes away.
That’s your interpretation. To me it’s Politics 101.I believe he’s implying blackmail
https://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/cnns-fareed-zakaria-says-trump-was-right-about-asylum-system-pains-me-to-sayFareed Zakaria, the CNN anchor, on Sunday said it “pains” him to admit it, but President Trump was correct that the U.S. finds itself in a crisis with asylum system and the number of new arrivals.
The host of “Fareed Zakaria GPS,” was also critical of asylum rules that he called “vague, laxed and being gamed.” Zakaria said asylum was initially intended for a small number of people in the most extreme circumstances, not as a process of immigration in itself. He said the rules need to be “substantially tightened."
I'm volunteering at Independence Mall later today, so have been trying to refresh my knowledge. Happy 4th!
Very cool. Happy 4th!I'm volunteering at Independence Mall later today, so have been trying to refresh my knowledge. Happy 4th!
ie blackmail.That’s your interpretation. To me it’s Politics 101.
I'm not sure I totally understand the question. I saw this late last night (for me) and was hoping to get a clearer take on it this morning.I’m kind of curious about something. In the Fox thread you implied that Fox isn’t held to any kind of standard of objectivity, and actually I kind of agree. Free speech and all that. But tv licenses after all are technically bound by a public commitment to factual reporting and decency. I don’t think internet is bound by such regulations, but why do you (or any Trump supporters (not that you are, no idea)) think that Google or FB or other tech giants should be held to an equal or higher standard than Fox which is? TIA.
I think you do recall this correctly and it led to years long Russia conspiracy excuses........interesting that after all that now the left doesn't want them regulated?I'm not sure I totally understand the question. I saw this late last night (for me) and was hoping to get a clearer take on it this morning.
I don't think Google or Facebook should be held to a higher standard. They are companies that can do what they want. If I recall correctly the Dem party was the one upset with Facebook for not regulating itself.
Now I would absolutely hate for Google to take a political side and I'm not sure they have. I will say they wield more power than most people can comprehend. It is scary to think what they could do if they ever choose to.
What has people like me on edge is that we've seen liberal politics begin to creep up in places like Twitter and YouTube already. I dont know everything that people say and why some get banned over others, but there are some clear examples of inconsistent moderation on those platforms.
Joe Rogan had the Twitter CEO and some conservative activist on his show at the same time. The. Conservative came with facts and examples of these inconsistencies for over an hour with the Twitter CEO never giving a real answer. Sticking to one or two company lines for each response. Anyone watching that exchange objectively would come away with the conclusion that Twitter moderation is inconsistent at best and most likely slanted to the left.
A recent example is following the Antifa attacks on Ngo, there is a liberal activist saying it was a good thing and people should continue to milkshake all facists. It is a terms of service violation to promote violence yet Twitter doesnt take action.
To address the fox news comment I made yesterday. I was only saying a comedy based show was able to laugh at itself for how they take on each situation depending who it is about. CNN on the other hand doesnt own up to that thing as evidenced in the Don Lemon and Don Jr conspiracy theory
It doesn't matter if it's a Fox comedy show or a pundit show (and frankly I think Gutfeld & Co hone closer to reality than say Hannity, Ingraham, or Carlson) or if it's pure news. The reality is they are indeed subject to FCC regulation.I'm not sure I totally understand the question. I saw this late last night (for me) and was hoping to get a clearer take on it this morning.
I don't think Google or Facebook should be held to a higher standard. They are companies that can do what they want. If I recall correctly the Dem party was the one upset with Facebook for not regulating itself.
Now I would absolutely hate for Google to take a political side and I'm not sure they have. I will say they wield more power than most people can comprehend. It is scary to think what they could do if they ever choose to.
What has people like me on edge is that we've seen liberal politics begin to creep up in places like Twitter and YouTube already. I dont know everything that people say and why some get banned over others, but there are some clear examples of inconsistent moderation on those platforms.
Joe Rogan had the Twitter CEO and some conservative activist on his show at the same time. The. Conservative came with facts and examples of these inconsistencies for over an hour with the Twitter CEO never giving a real answer. Sticking to one or two company lines for each response. Anyone watching that exchange objectively would come away with the conclusion that Twitter moderation is inconsistent at best and most likely slanted to the left.
A recent example is following the Antifa attacks on Ngo, there is a liberal activist saying it was a good thing and people should continue to milkshake all facists. It is a terms of service violation to promote violence yet Twitter doesnt take action.
To address the fox news comment I made yesterday. I was only saying a comedy based show was able to laugh at itself for how they take on each situation depending who it is about. CNN on the other hand doesnt own up to that thing as evidenced in the Don Lemon and Don Jr conspiracy theory
Somewhere someone made the point that Warren is advocating that Google and FB be regulated via antitrust. Trump has been pushing the same thing.interesting that after all that now the left doesn't want them regulated?
After lurking for a bit, I've read the past 5-6 pages and this is the comment that needs to be highlighted.Or the democrat debate thread where trump supporters complain about how we will pay for things but never bat an eye about how Trump pay for his things (or care about how much debt we are racking up in a good economy).
If I recall correctly the Dem party was the one upset with Facebook for not regulating itself.
I think you're a little confused. At best you can claim that Mueller found that the campaign-state coordination/conspiracy claims went unproven.I think you do recall this correctly and it led to years long Russia conspiracy excuses
I think you know.FF Ninja said:One of my few pro-Trump friends self-imposed the word (was the first I'd heard of it). But he's pretty self-deprecating, so I don't actually have a feel for how the rest of them take it.
It seems clear now, but I'm sure they're glad we're all avoiding discussing the real issue here. I'm honestly not sure which side has more snowflakes.I think you know.