This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
We have stats about what happens at our borders. We have been ill-prepared at the borders for a really long time. That's how we get this backlog of 5-6-7-8 years. That doesn't happen overnight. The answers ARE easy, especially at our southern border. All the problems point back to a lack of allocated resources. Every single one. We create an immigration process then don't provide the resources to implement it. It's the definition of insanity.
This is true. Nobody figured on the amount of people coming in (though we should have; the USA bears a good amount of responsibility for the destabilization of the nations these people are fleeing from.)
No I am wrong sometimes. In this case I have shown very clearly that I am dead in accurate as to where homelessness came into the thread and it wasn’t from you. It has nothing to do with liking to argue...but you started the crap trying to call me out and say I was wrong and that I couldn’t read the thread...doing that was BS especially since you were just flat out incorrect as I clearly showed.
He has also worked to actually limit legal immigration. And his administration is responsible for the treatment of those at the border and the separation.
As simple as it sounds I think that perception from many Americans has lead to some of the homeless in some states. In Colorado, jobs and legal marijuana lead to a homeless boom. People came, but there really was no place for them live.
You would think that wouldn't you. I have met lots who are willing to live in their vehicles to live here. Most will find a place in time, just to be replaced by someone else.
![[scooter]](/data/avatars/m/22/22287.jpg?1659477690){kind=avatar}
The article did say one reason he took issue with it is because congressional leaders left off billions of dollars in emergency funding President Donald Trump seeks for handling the inflow of immigrants at the U.S.-Mexico border.
That money Trump is seeking is specifically for the wall, and it has nothing to do with disaster relief. The bill was already held up for months for this reason and also because Trump didn’t want to help Puerto Rico. But the Democrats refused to give in. All of this had already been negotiated.
Shame on him and scary that Jordan and Meadows have been in the room so much with Trump. He really likes to surround himself with the worst people.
Whoever the Democratic candidate is in 2020 needs to point out that, whatever Trump has promised, he has rarely if ever gone against the Freedom Caucus. Every action he has taken or refused to take as President has been with the blessing of Mark Meadows.
This one guy = Chip Roy. He's Ted Cruz's former chief of staff and he's terrible. Also, he beat a FAR better candidate in Joseph Kopser because Texas.
He surrounds himself with terrible people who are also using him but he's too stupid to know that.
"Published April 19th"
I know when it was published. I found it interesting about the behind the scenes actions that took place.
As long as you realize it took place a month ago. Not sure why Fox "News" regurgitated it today. Well, I'm pretty sure why...
It was published April 19th. Has nothing to do with Chip Roy blocking this legislation
Should he "lighten up"?Scooter being ScooterJust can't help yourself.
No Tim, it wasn't purposefully deceptive. Enough of your crap trying to generalize my thoughts. I found the piece to be interesting considering what took place today and it was part of the events leading up to where we are at with trying to get a bill passed. I wasn't snarky with the articles. You guys are not a friendly bunch at all and wonder why this place is called a liberal echo chamber. Anything posted here that you don't agree with is treated with snark and crap like you just posted again.
Again, I will repeat myself
No that is not the case. What is the case is that people who post stuff that is deceptive or dishonest are called out for it. Sorry if that bothers you.
There was nothing deceptive or dishonest about what I posted and you need to back off of this stance Tim. I edited my one post to clarify my position and then I posted a piece that I thought fit into some background of how we got to today regarding trying to get the disaster aid bill passed.
Especially when it was first posted in the Fox thread pointing out the absurdity of Fox posting it today.Just another unfortunate coincidence guys....nothing to see here. Clearly you are fools for not being able to read minds and instead use logic to piece things together...how short sighted of you
