FUBAR
Footballguy
Is that you Daddy?!?!VY has more upside and more risk to completely bust, McNabb should be drafted first though, and he certainly does have risk.your picks:VY, Warner / LeinartFUBAR said:Those are solid sleepers, but on;y McNabb, Chambers and maybe Watson meet the "high risk" part. The rest of those guys are hardly any risk, aside from using roster space.ratbast said:QB- McNabby, PRivers, TJackson
RB- CBrown, PThomas, MBush
WR- Chambers, DBennett, JJones
TE- Watson, DLee, Pope
Chris Henry (RB)
Bowe, Holmes
Scheffler
perhaps I read the thread wrong fubar, but after I saw yours I was inclined to go the route I did. Since I would take most of my guys before your picks doesn't that justify my post as being valuable to this thread?
VY, Warner / Leinart vs. McNabby, PRivers, TJackson
(thats a wash, but I would say McNabb is the biggest risk for where he'll go, I want Rivers and Jackson on my roster, isn't that overpaying?)
Chris Henry (RB) vs. CBrown, PThomas, MBush
(I might take all 3 before your choice, I win that one son)
Bowe, Holmes vs. Chambers, DBennett, JJones
(You win this position, you would have to take your choices much earlier)
Scheffler vs. Watson, DLee, Pope
(blahhh, so many TEs so little time)
So we have a wash? Doesn't a "sleeper" and a "guy you'll overpay for" really mean the same thing in this context?
You might take all 3 over Henry, I wouldn't (Brown is a good choice though), he was basically a joke along with "Chris Henry (WR)" from the OP.
You can call it a wash, but you included a lot more late picks than I did, except Henry which was partially a joke.