dparker713
Footballguy
They really need to implement replay review and suspensions after the game.If they red carded every time a guy faked injury, the problem would go away. Or mandatory 10 min substitution
They really need to implement replay review and suspensions after the game.If they red carded every time a guy faked injury, the problem would go away. Or mandatory 10 min substitution
IMO the NFL needs to adopt the soccer stretcher and keep the game moving when guys get hurt. No reason to stop the clock -- just get them off the field. And +1 to your idea too -- if you leave the field injured, you're out for 10 (game) minutes. Kellen Winslow abused the #### out of this loophole back in the day.If they red carded every time a guy faked injury, the problem would go away. Or mandatory 10 min substitution
They might need a different stretcher type and a few more carriers.IMO the NFL needs to adopt the soccer stretcher and keep the game moving when guys get hurt. No reason to stop the clock -- just get them off the field. And +1 to your idea too -- if you leave the field injured, you're out for 10 (game) minutes. Kellen Winslow abused the #### out of this loophole back in the day.
That's another obvious one that will never happenThey really need to implement replay review and suspensions after the game.
watIMO the NFL needs to adopt the soccer stretcher and keep the game moving when guys get hurt. No reason to stop the clock -- just get them off the field. And +1 to your idea too -- if you leave the field injured, you're out for 10 (game) minutes. Kellen Winslow abused the #### out of this loophole back in the day.
The narrative for Ireland fluctuated widely in this tournament just as it often does for the US. They had a bad pre-tourney friendly loss to Belarus. They probably deserved something against Sweden, but were thoroughly curb-stomped by Belgium. At that point, the press were out for blood and Roy Keane was publically ******* on the players for the team he was an assistant manager of. It wasn't pretty. But one win against a Italy team with nothing to play for changed the entire narrative (reinforced by a feisty first half against France).It's funny. Ireland will surely be celebrating their Euro performance. Singing and dancing knowing they over achieved. Meanwhile we are bemoaning a 4th place finish. 4th place in a tournament with those teams is a huge overachievment for us. We need to accept our place as a mid major of sorts. Lets beat our rivals win our conference and hope celebrate the occasional upsets over the big boys.
I think he's just trying to speed up the turtle like NFL games.
he retired, guy <_<But the main reason I want to see it is I want to see BJ Raji go off on a stretcher
Them make it Aaron Rodgershe retired, guy <_<
The drunk Irish guys at the pub at 6AM couldn't have put it any better.The narrative for Ireland fluctuated widely in this tournament just as it often does for the US. They had a bad pre-tourney friendly loss to Belarus. They probably deserved something against Sweden, but were thoroughly curb-stomped by Belgium. At that point, the press were out for blood and Roy Keane was publically ******* on the players for the team he was an assistant manager of. It wasn't pretty. But one win against a Italy team with nothing to play for changed the entire narrative (reinforced by a feisty first half against France).
Overreactions by the press come with the territory of being a country taking this stuff seriously. For the US, they legitimately played poorly against Argentina, but Argentina has also played really well for most of this tournament. The US has beaten elite teams before, but we've never beaten an elite team that played up to
i don't find this funny at allThem make it Aaron Rodgers
And instead of a stretcher make it a hearse
That was totally the point where I passed out.The drunk Irish guys at the pub at 6AM couldn't have put it any better.
That AVIThat was totally the point where I passed out.
'Huge overachievement" overstates it imo. Considering that Brasil sent a B team and deserved to go out when they did, how many of the 11 teams that dropped out in the quarters or before can claim they deserved better than the US? Mexico, maybe Venezuela and Peru can say they are on our level if not a bit stronger, but I don't think that means the US is way over its head finishing 4th in this tournament.It's funny. Ireland will surely be celebrating their Euro performance. Singing and dancing knowing they over achieved. Meanwhile we are bemoaning a 4th place finish. 4th place in a tournament with those teams is a huge overachievment for us. We need to accept our place as a mid major of sorts. Lets beat our rivals win our conference and hope celebrate the occasional upsets over the big boys.
I don't think the US overachieved, but I think it's a decent statement to say that they performed like a team that would challenge for qualification out of COMNEBOL. I really can't remember a time where I felt the US played better than average in four out of six competitive games and only played legitimately badly in one game (against a legitimately terrific opponent).'Huge overachievement" overstates it imo. Considering that Brasil sent a B team and deserved to go out when they did, how many of the 11 teams that dropped out in the quarters or before can claim they deserved better than the US? Mexico, maybe Venezuela and Peru can say they are on our level if not a bit stronger, but I don't think that means the US is way over its head finishing 4th in this tournament.
When is the last time Bradley put in an inspired performance? Seems like he has been pretty inconsistent for a while, but that may just be faulty memory on my part. I thought we were just chalking that up to Klinsmann playing him out of position.I don't think the US overachieved, but I think it's a decent statement to say that they performed like a team that would challenge for qualification out of COMNEBOL. I really can't remember a time where I felt the US played better than average in four out of six competitive games and only played legitimately badly in one game (against a legitimately terrific opponent).
That they did so while their most consistent player had kind of a stinker of a tournament is kind of doubly surprising. Add in the fact that Pulisic did enough to make us feel good about keeping him with the senior team going forward, and it was an encouraging tournament.
He had good games defensively in the middle of this tournament, but still gave the ball away too much. Great motor, nice instincts for winning the ball, but not enough technical skill to match up with better players. Hard to figure out what to do with a guy like that.When is the last time Bradley put in an inspired performance? Seems like he has been pretty inconsistent for a while, but that may just be faulty memory on my part. I thought we were just chalking that up to Klinsmann playing him out of position.
Germany friendly, Dutch friendly come to mind. But I think he's been largely good in many games people have complained about him. Even in this tournament, his positioning really helped the team. But his passing from deep positions was inconsistent and we needed him to be a metronome. He was also a bit tentative in the tackle. Maybe he was trying to avoid cards or maybe he was dinged. Tough to know. We found out only later that he played the entire 2014 World Cup with nerve damage in his foot. In any case, he was clearly outplayed by Jones and probably by Bedoya. I can't remember the last time I thought Bradley was our worst player in the center of the pitch.When is the last time Bradley put in an inspired performance? Seems like he has been pretty inconsistent for a while, but that may just be faulty memory on my part. I thought we were just chalking that up to Klinsmann playing him out of position.
Isn't that sort of the definition of inconsistent?He had good games defensively in the middle of this tournament, but still gave the ball away too much. Great motor, nice instincts for winning the ball, but not enough technical skill to match up with better players. Hard to figure out what to do with a guy like that.
In that epic article on Pulisic that NR posted (IIRC) a few weeks ago Pulisic said his dream is to be the US #10. He thinks that's his ultimate role, and the one he wants to play. Here's hoping.Isn't that sort of the definition of inconsistent?
We don't currently seem to have a viable option for the playmaker role, so its not that he is keeping anyone out of the lineup, though I'd like to see more of Nagbe. Maybe leave Bradley as the DM/holding MF and find a new playmaker. I wonder if Pulisic can play a #10 role in the future, rather than out wide?
MLS is already doing this. Every week they hand out suspensions after video review.That's another obvious one that will never happen
Did you see the stats I posted earlier about US performance via the elite teams? It was kind of interesting in some what a meaningless way because of the small sample size..The US has beaten elite teams before, but we've never beaten an elite team that played up to
I think it is a bit overstated as well.'Huge overachievement" overstates it imo. Considering that Brasil sent a B team and deserved to go out when they did, how many of the 11 teams that dropped out in the quarters or before can claim they deserved better than the US? Mexico, maybe Venezuela and Peru can say they are on our level if not a bit stronger, but I don't think that means the US is way over its head finishing 4th in this tournament.
If England can do it...I bet if you look at confederation tournaments all over the world, the likelihood of the host country making the semi finals is fairly high.
Who would you replace him with?Bradley hasn't been great since before Brazil...he had a few terrible games in Brazil.
Hopefully JK has a plan to replace him.
Not sure. But any of our midfielders would have been better than what he did in a few of those games. He was awful.Who would you replace him with?
Not the point. Replace Ireland with Hungary then.The narrative for Ireland fluctuated widely in this tournament just as it often does for the US. They had a bad pre-tourney friendly loss to Belarus. They probably deserved something against Sweden, but were thoroughly curb-stomped by Belgium. At that point, the press were out for blood and Roy Keane was publically ******* on the players for the team he was an assistant manager of. It wasn't pretty. But one win against a Italy team with nothing to play for changed the entire narrative (reinforced by a feisty first half against France).
Overreactions by the press come with the territory of being a country taking this stuff seriously. For the US, they legitimately played poorly against Argentina, but Argentina has also played really well for most of this tournament. The US has beaten elite teams before, but we've never beaten an elite team that played up to
Dissagree. Brazil anomaly aside, every team in this hemisphere wanted to win this thing. It's the Euros/Cup of Nations, whatever the ####. It's important. List every team/country in the hemisphere and put USA 4th. It's above us. We over achieved. Kudos. See you in 4 years (hopefully).'Huge overachievement" overstates it imo. Considering that Brasil sent a B team and deserved to go out when they did, how many of the 11 teams that dropped out in the quarters or before can claim they deserved better than the US? Mexico, maybe Venezuela and Peru can say they are on our level if not a bit stronger, but I don't think that means the US is way over its head finishing 4th in this tournament.
I would try Danny Williams or see what Perry Kitchen can do.Who would you replace him with?
Danny Williams hopefully.
Williams is already 27, plays for a bottom-third Championship team, and hasn't even featured as a member of the 23 lately. What am I missing? (Seriously, not snark.)I would try Danny Williams
I was answering for who I would try not for who I think JK would try. It is clear that JK does not rate him as a player.Williams is already 27, plays for a bottom-third Championship team, and hasn't even featured as a member of the 23 lately.
Sounds like he's a natural fit for our midfield!but Reading fans will be asking themselves if they are really that fussed to see him go.
Aside from the odd-spectacular long-range strikes and runs from midfield, the German-born midfielder has a rather poor touch, and takes a fair few pot-shots due to a lack of invention in the final third.
This is very true, but it is still worth acknowledging that Mikey should not be a lock starter any more.Yeah, doing some detailed and in-depth research and analysis in the last five minutes has left me with the impression that this is backup QB syndrome -- where the guy not playing is always preferred to the mediocre guy you already know.
FYP.When you look at the skill of our players that were in the starting XI versus those on the other teams I believe this was a very successful tournament for the US.
it's not like this is Brazil or Germany where guys with long, great careers ahead of them are waiting in the wings but can't crack the roster because they're behind legends
Two pointsit's not like this is Brazil or Germany where guys with long, great careers ahead of them are waiting in the wings but can't crack the roster because they're behind legends.
in this analogy is Bedoya Burt Favre and Pulisic Mark Brunell, Aaron Brooks, Doug Pedersen or Ty Demter?There isn't a legend keeping Pulisic on the bench.
It's Alejandro Bedoya
in this analogy is Bedoya Burt Favre and Pulisic Mark Brunell, Aaron Brooks, Doug Pedersen or Ty Demter?
hockey?He's DiMaggio to Pulisic's Mantle.
If DiMaggio wasn't that good
Exactly
There isn't a legend keeping Pulisic on the bench.
It'sAlejandro BedoyaJurgen Klinsmann