This is not our first time in the Copa.Yea hex has to be above anything.
Any guesses on if we continue participation in the Copa going forward? It's pretty exciting to be in a big tournament for once.
Mexico's record in the Copa is very good. Better than I remembered in fact.The US would have to be invited to participate. CONMEBOL has 10 members so they traditionally invite 2 teams to fill out the brackets. Mexico seems to almost always get an invite, but the US has participated in the past. In the years where Copa is running in the same summer as the Gold Cup, USSoccer's MO has been to focus on the Gold. The next scheduled Copa is 2019 in Brazil.
It's my first time.This is not our first time in the Copa.
we have played in the following over the years
1993: Came in 4th in group with 1 point
1995: Made semi finals and lost in 3rd place game. Won group stage
2007: Lost all 3 games as the US sent a B squad to the tournament
Don't worry, Floppo and NewlyRetired will be gentle with you. They really do love you and they will call you after.It's my first time.
Oh I've been watching the NT since 1994, but not to the extent where I was following things like the Copa.Don't worry, Floppo and NewlyRetired will be gentle with you. They really do love you and they will call you after.
Please, oh lord, say it ain't so. Put the young buck up there and let Zardoz come off the bench for the final 20mins.gooseman
yeti, cam, brooks, fab
...... caillou
Germany, bedoya
zardoz woods
....... doose.
They've had a bad run lately though, last in their group in '15 and '11, zero games won.Mexico's record in the Copa is very good. Better than I remembered in fact.
2007: Made semi's and came in 3rd
2004: Won group but lost in quarters to Brazil
2001: Lost in finals
1999: Made semis and came in 3rd
1997: Made semis and came in 3rd
1993: Lost in finals
Let's hope that recent trend continues. As a fan of the USMNT I just can't root for our #1 arch rival. I know, I know I should be rooting for all CONCACAF teams to do well. I've tried in the past but rooting for Mexico just isn't something that's in my DNA. All other CONCACAF teams I'll be pulling for to win (with the obvious exception of Costa Rica on 6/7They've had a bad run lately though, last in their group in '15 and '11, zero games won.
).IOW, 6 of the last 8 times Mexico or the US sent real teams to the COPA they finished 2nd or 3rd.Mexico's record in the Copa is very good. Better than I remembered in fact.
2007: Made semi's and came in 3rd
2004: Won group but lost in quarters to Brazil
2001: Lost in finals
1999: Made semis and came in 3rd
1997: Made semis and came in 3rd
1993: Lost in finals
I don't see it continuing for this tournament. Mexico is going to have ENORMOUS support where ever they play and their group is not that hard. They should be the favorites on a neutral field to both Jamaica and Venezuela. I expect that they will come out of this group into the quarters at least with the way they have been playing.Let's hope that recent trend continues. As a fan of the USMNT I just can't root for our #1 arch rival. I know, I know I should be rooting for all CONCACAF teams to do well. I've tried in the past but rooting for Mexico just isn't something that's in my DNA. All other CONCACAF teams I'll be pulling for to win (with the obvious exception of Costa Rica on 6/7).
Yeah, I agree with you. I think getting out of the group is almost a foregone conclusion and in fact they could make a deep run. I'm just saying I'm not going to pulling for El Tri and every opportunity will be rooting for whoever they play,I don't see it continuing for this tournament. Mexico is going to have ENORMOUS support where ever they play and their group is not that hard. They should be the favorites on a neutral field to both Jamaica and Venezuela. I expect that they will come out of this group into the quarters at least with the way they have been playing.
Top to bottom, Mexico might be the second most talented team in the tourney.IOW, 6 of the last 8 times Mexico or the US sent real teams to the COPA they finished 2nd or 3rd.
Remind me how we have no chance playing at home again?
The difference though is that Mexico did not send a full team to either '15 or '11 because of the Gold Cup.They've had a bad run lately though, last in their group in '15 and '11, zero games won.
I wish I could claim that knowledge when I said 6 of 8 times they took tournament seriously, but... well...The difference though is that Mexico did not send a full team to either '15 or '11 because of the Gold Cup.
In 2015 Mexico sent vets, but were missing almost every important player including Chicharito, Guardardo, Dos Santos brothers, Vela, Herrera, Ochoa and many other first team players were not on the team.
In 2011 Mexico sent an almost entire U22 team (with most players under U20) with the exception of a couple of older players who did not make the Gold Cup squad
Maybe, but when was the last time they had half the chance as Argentina of winning a major tournament? Suspect it's normally more like 25-30% for both?I think the oddsmakers are significantly overrating Brazil. At least this Brazil team.
They are Brazil. And I agree.I think the oddsmakers are significantly overrating Brazil. At least this Brazil team.
I really love the feel of the team right now. With Fab at left back and Bradley at the 6, it finally feels a bit balanced and having most players playing in their correct positions.Top to bottom, Mexico might be the second most talented team in the tourney.
Opinions of the US's prospects are delightfully mixed. I'm reading people like Pro Soccer Talk picking them fourth in the group. And Wynalda is picking them to beat Colombia and get to the semis. And both outcomes seem plausible to me. It's hard to know. I actually think the team is as strong as it's ever been under JK, but the sample size supporting that conclusion is small. And we just don't know how seriously the South American teams are taking this tournament.
Absolutely agree with the bolded comment above. I'm pretty happy where the USMNT is at this point (esp considering where we were after the last Gold Cup). Regarding "how seriously the South American teams are taking this tournament"...I think they are taking this tourney VERY seriously.Top to bottom, Mexico might be the second most talented team in the tourney.
Opinions of the US's prospects are delightfully mixed. I'm reading people like Pro Soccer Talk picking them fourth in the group. And Wynalda is picking them to beat Colombia and get to the semis. And both outcomes seem plausible to me. It's hard to know. I actually think the team is as strong as it's ever been under JK, but the sample size supporting that conclusion is small. And we just don't know how seriously the South American teams are taking this tournament.
Wow. As much as I'd like to believe those are realistic odds there is no way IMO the US chances of winning are better than Mexico's.On the even of the tournament, odds of each team winning (using Oddschecker):
ARG 33.7%
BRA 15.5%
CHI 10.3%
USA 9.3%
URU 8.4%
MEX 7.7%
COL 7.7%
ECU 2.6%
CR 1.1%
PER 1.1%
PAR 0.9%
VEN 0.5%
BOL 0.4%
PAN 0.4%
JAM 0.3%
HAI 0.1%
Huh. Looks like only 2 teams have a significantly better chance of winning it than the US. Even if you think the British oddsmakers are somehow influenced by (non-existent) US bettors, those aren't going to be wildly off.
Mexico looks like the best play to me from these odds.On the even of the tournament, odds of each team winning (using Oddschecker):
ARG 33.7%
BRA 15.5%
CHI 10.3%
USA 9.3%
URU 8.4%
MEX 7.7%
COL 7.7%
ECU 2.6%
CR 1.1%
PER 1.1%
PAR 0.9%
VEN 0.5%
BOL 0.4%
PAN 0.4%
JAM 0.3%
HAI 0.1%
Huh. Looks like only 2 teams have a significantly better chance of winning it than the US. Even if you think the British oddsmakers are somehow influenced by (non-existent) US bettors, those aren't going to be wildly off.
So excited for this!Mexico looks like the best play to me from these odds.
The US chances are very much tied to Friday night imo. If they can win Friday night they are going to be in great shape to win the group which gives them a VERY winnable quarterfinal game against likely Ecuador or Peru.
But if the US loses on Friday night, they are probably a long shot to win the group and at best can come in second and get ed to Brazil in the quarterfinals.
Huge opening game IMO.
I'm liking those odds on Bacca and Chicharito.Lionel Messi – 5/1 (6.0) @WilliamHill
Sergio Aguero – 7/1 (8.0) @bet365
Gonzalo Higuain – 9/1 (10.0) @Betfair
Luis Suarez – 10/1 (11.0) @bet365
Alexis Sanchez – 12/1 (13.0) @bet365
Edinson Cavani – 12/1 (13.0) @WilliamHill
Jonas – 16/1 (17.0) @bet365
Hulk – 16/1 (17.0) @Betfair
Carlos Bacca – 25/1 (26.0) @bet365
Javier Hernandez – 28/1 (29.0) @Betfair
Clint Dempsey – 33/1 (34.0) @bet365
Oribe Peralta – 40/1 (41.0) @bet365
The formation is very fluid because of Dempsey's playing style.btw... is this thing we're doing really a 4-3-3, or more like 4-1-4-1? With Bradley in-between the lines? I know there's not a ton of difference between that and either 4-3-3 or 4-5-1, but I feel like (intuition only) that we're playing with more of a LM and RM than a LW and RW. Or are they really pressing up that high?
Is Suarez out for good or is he still on the roster trying to heel in time for later games?Copa Golden Boot odds
I'm liking those odds on Bacca and Chicharito.
EDIT:
These must be old if Suarez is still listed. Have to figure Cavani's odds have shortened.
I thought he was out, but what do I know? I guess he's still on the roster and has travelled. I guess they hope he "heels."Is Suarez out for good or is he still on the roster trying to heel in time for later games?
Ok, I've got it completely wrong. Was looking at something like this:The formation is very fluid because of Dempsey's playing style.
Heck at times you could easily see it being a 4-1-1-4 because Dempsey drops so far back to collect the ball. He is not playing the position as a "loan" target striker IMO.
https://league-mp7static.mlsdigital.net/images/Screen Shot 2016-05-28 at 10.33.37 PM.png?nullOk, I've got it completely wrong. Was looking at something like this:
---------------------Wood/Dempsey
Pulisic--Jones/Nagbe--Dempsey/Bedoya--Zardes
Missed Dempsey playing aloan
I think that has a chance to be the formation/lineup for the last two games but JK has seemed to indicate that he does not want Mikey at the 6 against Colombia. We will know by tomorrow.
Seems sensible to me as well. Spend some of those old vet legs early in a game against a better team that you want to keep buttoned up, then move to a more attacking/younger lineup after.Here is ESPN's projected lineup for Friday. Seems reasonable given JK's comments this week about Bradley
http://a.espncdn.com/combiner/i/?img=/graphics/2015/0320/insider_carruslineup_md_576x324.jpg&w=738&site=espnfc
Meh. He has issues (the out of position thing and lack of consistency for sure), but his results are in line with our other coaches. Hopefully we'll look back at the last couple years as being down to a changing of the guard. If not, he'll be out.Guardian hit piece on JK - I can't say I disagree with the general sentiment
https://www.theguardian.com/sport/blog/2016/jun/02/jurgen-klinsmann-usa-coach-copa-america
I agree his results are in line with our other coaches but IMO he was not hired (and more specifically paid more than every other coach in history combined) to repeat the results.Meh. He has issues (the out of position thing and lack of consistency for sure), but his results are in line with our other coaches. Hopefully we'll look back at the last couple years as being down to a changing of the guard. If not, he'll be out.
I feel like Zardes is going to be the easiest to replace, whether it be Pulisic, or Bacon, or Rubin, we do have some better technial choices that should be available in the hex.I think its fair to make fun of certain JK quotes, but I don't think you can hold a coach to them unless you think he's squandered a player pool capable of delivering that type of soccer. I don't think we've had that player pool. JK has made plenty of individual decisions I disagree with. In most cases, I understand the reasoning behind them, but we can certainly take issue with them. That's part of the job.
With players like Nagbe and Pulisic in the fold, and with center backs with good distribution skills in Brooks and Cam, we can start to really test JKs commitment to the type of soccer he wants to play. In the preferred lineup we really only have two players (Yedlin and Zardes) who aren't up to snuff technically in the top 13 or so outfield players. That's pretty unique for this team.
Jurgen's approach to this game will be telling. Most would agree a draw is a great result.Mexico looks like the best play to me from these odds.
The US chances are very much tied to Friday night imo. If they can win Friday night they are going to be in great shape to win the group which gives them a VERY winnable quarterfinal game against likely Ecuador or Peru.
But if the US loses on Friday night, they are probably a long shot to win the group and at best can come in second and get fed to Brazil in the quarterfinals.
Huge opening game IMO.
If we play well, I would be happy with a draw. I think that would still give us a good chance of advancing.Jurgen's approach to this game will be telling. Most would agree a draw is a great result.
I was surprised nobody else griped about this more when discussing potential lineups.I really don't want to see Fabian at LB. the guy is a difference maker in the midfield for a Bundesliga team. A team that would beat us. Give him that sot on our team and leave LB to A.Body if necessary. Don't get cute. Play him where he plays. rabblarabblerabble..... #fireJK