What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

US Men's National Team (21 Viewers)

Yea hex has to be above anything. 

Any guesses on if we continue participation in the Copa going forward? It's pretty exciting to be in a big tournament for once.
This is not our first time in the Copa.

we have played in the following over the years

1993: Came in 4th in group with 1 point

1995: Made semi finals and lost in 3rd place game.  Won group stage

2007: Lost all 3 games as the US sent a B squad to the tournament

 
The US would have to be invited to participate. CONMEBOL has 10 members so they traditionally invite 2 teams to fill out the brackets. Mexico seems to almost always get an invite, but the US has participated in the past. In the years where Copa is running in the same summer as the Gold Cup, USSoccer's MO has been to focus on the Gold. The next scheduled Copa is 2019 in Brazil.
Mexico's record in the Copa is very good.  Better than I remembered in fact.

2007: Made semi's and came in 3rd

2004: Won group but lost in quarters to Brazil

2001: Lost in finals

1999: Made semis and came in 3rd

1997: Made semis and came in 3rd

1993: Lost in finals

 
This is not our first time in the Copa.

we have played in the following over the years

1993: Came in 4th in group with 1 point

1995: Made semi finals and lost in 3rd place game.  Won group stage

2007: Lost all 3 games as the US sent a B squad to the tournament
It's my first time. 

 
Here is what JK said about Bradley's positioning.  It certainly sounds like RHE said in that JK does not want Bradley to have to cover James all game.

=============================

“It depends on opponents, it depends how people play against us and who they are,” Klinsmann told reporters on Tuesday evening, when asked how Bradley was doing in his deeper role. “I think if other teams – like has happened now in two games – play a similar formation, then he’s not challenged into one-against-one situations when they maybe have a traditional playmaker, a No. 10 or something like that.

“The key for him always is, if he’s playing a 6 or an 8, I always ask him to stagger a little bit higher to receive the ball and don’t receive the ball from your center backs in the same line. I think he can play either role, there’s absolutely no problem. If he’s in a good spirit, if he’s full of energy, then he’s a difference-maker.”

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mexico's record in the Copa is very good.  Better than I remembered in fact.

2007: Made semi's and came in 3rd

2004: Won group but lost in quarters to Brazil

2001: Lost in finals

1999: Made semis and came in 3rd

1997: Made semis and came in 3rd

1993: Lost in finals
They've had a bad run lately though, last in their group in '15 and '11, zero games won. 

 
They've had a bad run lately though, last in their group in '15 and '11, zero games won. 
Let's hope that recent trend continues. As a fan of the USMNT I just can't root for our #1 arch rival. I know, I know I should be rooting for all CONCACAF teams to do well. I've tried in the past but rooting for Mexico just isn't something that's in my DNA. All other CONCACAF teams I'll be pulling for to win (with the obvious exception of Costa Rica on 6/7  ;) ).

 
Mexico's record in the Copa is very good.  Better than I remembered in fact.

2007: Made semi's and came in 3rd

2004: Won group but lost in quarters to Brazil

2001: Lost in finals

1999: Made semis and came in 3rd

1997: Made semis and came in 3rd

1993: Lost in finals
IOW, 6 of the last 8 times Mexico or the US sent real teams to the COPA they finished 2nd or 3rd.

Remind me how we have no chance playing at home again?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Let's hope that recent trend continues. As a fan of the USMNT I just can't root for our #1 arch rival. I know, I know I should be rooting for all CONCACAF teams to do well. I've tried in the past but rooting for Mexico just isn't something that's in my DNA. All other CONCACAF teams I'll be pulling for to win (with the obvious exception of Costa Rica on 6/7  ;) ).
I don't see it continuing for this tournament.  Mexico is going to have ENORMOUS support where ever they play and their group is not that hard.  They should be the favorites on a neutral field to both Jamaica and Venezuela.  I expect that they will come out of this group into the quarters at least with the way they have been playing.

 
I don't see it continuing for this tournament.  Mexico is going to have ENORMOUS support where ever they play and their group is not that hard.  They should be the favorites on a neutral field to both Jamaica and Venezuela.  I expect that they will come out of this group into the quarters at least with the way they have been playing.
Yeah, I agree with you. I think getting out of the group is almost a foregone conclusion and in fact they could make a deep run. I'm just saying I'm not going to pulling for El Tri and every opportunity will be rooting for whoever they play,

 
IOW, 6 of the last 8 times Mexico or the US sent real teams to the COPA they finished 2nd or 3rd.

Remind me how we have no chance playing at home again?
Top to bottom, Mexico might be the second most talented team in the tourney. 

Opinions of the US's prospects are delightfully mixed.  I'm reading people like Pro Soccer Talk picking them fourth in the group.  And Wynalda is picking them to beat Colombia and get to the semis.  And both outcomes seem plausible to me.  It's hard to know.  I actually think the team is as strong as it's ever been under JK, but the sample size supporting that conclusion is small.  And we just don't know how seriously the South American teams are taking this tournament. 

 
On the even of the tournament, odds of each team winning (using Oddschecker):

ARG    33.7%
BRA    15.5%
CHI    10.3%
USA     9.3%
URU     8.4%
MEX     7.7%
COL     7.7%
ECU     2.6%
CR     1.1%
PER     1.1%
PAR     0.9%
VEN     0.5%
BOL     0.4%
PAN     0.4%
JAM     0.3%
HAI     0.1%


Huh.  Looks like only 2 teams have a significantly better chance of winning it than the US.  Even if you think the British oddsmakers are somehow influenced by (non-existent) US bettors, those aren't going to be wildly off.

 
They've had a bad run lately though, last in their group in '15 and '11, zero games won. 
The difference though is that Mexico did not send a full team to either '15 or '11 because of the Gold Cup.

In 2015 Mexico sent vets, but were missing almost every important player including Chicharito, Guardardo, Dos Santos brothers, Vela, Herrera, Ochoa and many other first team players were not on the team.

In 2011 Mexico sent an almost entire U22 team (with most players under U20) with the exception of a couple of older players who did not make the Gold Cup squad

 
The difference though is that Mexico did not send a full team to either '15 or '11 because of the Gold Cup.

In 2015 Mexico sent vets, but were missing almost every important player including Chicharito, Guardardo, Dos Santos brothers, Vela, Herrera, Ochoa and many other first team players were not on the team.

In 2011 Mexico sent an almost entire U22 team (with most players under U20) with the exception of a couple of older players who did not make the Gold Cup squad
I wish I could claim that knowledge when I said 6 of 8 times they took tournament seriously, but... well...

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Top to bottom, Mexico might be the second most talented team in the tourney. 

Opinions of the US's prospects are delightfully mixed.  I'm reading people like Pro Soccer Talk picking them fourth in the group.  And Wynalda is picking them to beat Colombia and get to the semis.  And both outcomes seem plausible to me.  It's hard to know.  I actually think the team is as strong as it's ever been under JK, but the sample size supporting that conclusion is small.  And we just don't know how seriously the South American teams are taking this tournament. 
I really love the feel of the team right now. With Fab at left back and Bradley at the 6, it finally feels a bit balanced and having most players playing in their correct positions.

Look at our starting back line

Starter in EPL.......Starter in EPL.......Starter in Bundesliga.........Starter in Bundlesliga

I don't think we have ever had this type of club level pedigree ever across our back 4.

But we have played no one yet to really tell one way or another.  PR is the only team who basically showed up in the friendlies, so it is really hard to judge.

Which is what makes the Copa pretty cool, as it should give us a MUCH better indication going into the fall qualifiers and eventually into the hex next year.

 
Top to bottom, Mexico might be the second most talented team in the tourney. 

Opinions of the US's prospects are delightfully mixed.  I'm reading people like Pro Soccer Talk picking them fourth in the group.  And Wynalda is picking them to beat Colombia and get to the semis.  And both outcomes seem plausible to me.  It's hard to know.  I actually think the team is as strong as it's ever been under JK, but the sample size supporting that conclusion is small.  And we just don't know how seriously the South American teams are taking this tournament. 
Absolutely agree with the bolded comment above. I'm pretty happy where the USMNT is at this point (esp considering where we were after the last Gold Cup). Regarding "how seriously the South American teams are taking this tournament"...I think they are taking this tourney VERY seriously.

 
On the even of the tournament, odds of each team winning (using Oddschecker):

ARG    33.7%
BRA    15.5%
CHI    10.3%
USA     9.3%
URU     8.4%
MEX     7.7%
COL     7.7%
ECU     2.6%
CR     1.1%
PER     1.1%
PAR     0.9%
VEN     0.5%
BOL     0.4%
PAN     0.4%
JAM     0.3%
HAI     0.1%


Huh.  Looks like only 2 teams have a significantly better chance of winning it than the US.  Even if you think the British oddsmakers are somehow influenced by (non-existent) US bettors, those aren't going to be wildly off.
Wow. As much as I'd like to believe those are realistic odds there is no way IMO the US chances of winning are better than Mexico's.

 
On the even of the tournament, odds of each team winning (using Oddschecker):

ARG    33.7%
BRA    15.5%
CHI    10.3%
USA     9.3%
URU     8.4%
MEX     7.7%
COL     7.7%
ECU     2.6%
CR     1.1%
PER     1.1%
PAR     0.9%
VEN     0.5%
BOL     0.4%
PAN     0.4%
JAM     0.3%
HAI     0.1%


Huh.  Looks like only 2 teams have a significantly better chance of winning it than the US.  Even if you think the British oddsmakers are somehow influenced by (non-existent) US bettors, those aren't going to be wildly off.
Mexico looks like the best play to me from these odds.

The US chances are very much tied to Friday night imo.  If they can win Friday night they are going to be in great shape to win the group which gives them a VERY winnable quarterfinal game against likely Ecuador or Peru.

But if the US loses on Friday night, they are probably a long shot to win the group and at best can come in second and get fed to Brazil in the quarterfinals.

Huge opening game IMO.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
In a 3-game tournament I think you have to trust your eyes more than the scoreboard.  But yeah... the pieces sure look like they fit together and we have legit players across most of the field right now.

 
Mexico looks like the best play to me from these odds.

The US chances are very much tied to Friday night imo.  If they can win Friday night they are going to be in great shape to win the group which gives them a VERY winnable quarterfinal game against likely Ecuador or Peru.

But if the US loses on Friday night, they are probably a long shot to win the group and at best can come in second and get ed to Brazil in the quarterfinals.

Huge opening game IMO.
So excited for this!

 
btw... is this thing we're doing really a 4-3-3, or more like 4-1-4-1?  With Bradley in-between the lines?  I know there's not a ton of difference between that and either 4-3-3 or 4-5-1, but I feel like (intuition only) we're playing with more of a LM and RM than a LW and RW.  Or are they really pressing up that high?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Copa Golden Boot odds

Lionel Messi – 5/1 (6.0) @WilliamHill
Sergio Aguero – 7/1 (8.0) @bet365
Gonzalo Higuain – 9/1 (10.0) @Betfair
Luis Suarez – 10/1 (11.0) @bet365
Alexis Sanchez – 12/1 (13.0) @bet365
Edinson Cavani – 12/1 (13.0) @WilliamHill
Jonas – 16/1 (17.0) @bet365
Hulk – 16/1 (17.0) @Betfair
Carlos Bacca – 25/1 (26.0) @bet365
Javier Hernandez – 28/1 (29.0) @Betfair
Clint Dempsey – 33/1 (34.0) @bet365
Oribe Peralta – 40/1 (41.0) @bet365
I'm liking those odds on Bacca and Chicharito.

EDIT: 

These must be old if Suarez is still listed.  Have to figure Cavani's odds have shortened.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
btw... is this thing we're doing really a 4-3-3, or more like 4-1-4-1?  With Bradley in-between the lines?  I know there's not a ton of difference between that and either 4-3-3 or 4-5-1, but I feel like (intuition only) that we're playing with more of a LM and RM than a LW and RW.  Or are they really pressing up that high?
The formation is very fluid because of Dempsey's playing style.

Heck at times you could easily see it being a 4-1-1-4 because Dempsey drops so far back to collect the ball.  He is not playing the position as a "loan" target striker IMO.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Well, it's clearly a 4-5-1 without the ball.

With the ball, it's often a false nine 4-3-3.  Particularly when Zardes is on the right.  He's often playing higher than Deuce and Wood is looking for space in behind. 

 
The formation is very fluid because of Dempsey's playing style.

Heck at times you could easily see it being a 4-1-1-4 because Dempsey drops so far back to collect the ball.  He is not playing the position as a "loan" target striker IMO.
Ok, I've got it completely wrong.  Was looking at something like this:

---------------------Wood/Dempsey

Pulisic--Jones/Nagbe--Dempsey/Bedoya--Zardes

Missed Dempsey playing aloan

 
Meh.  He has issues (the out of position thing and lack of consistency for sure), but his results are in line with our other coaches.  Hopefully we'll look back at the last couple years as being down to a changing of the guard.  If not, he'll be out.
I agree his results are in line with our other coaches but IMO he was not hired (and more specifically paid more than every other coach in history combined) to repeat the results. 

I think he is almost certainly staying through when ever the 2018 cycle ends for the US.  If he was not fired after the Gold Cup, he would need to lose like 4 in a row to start the Hex to get fired and I don't think any of us see that happening.

Every team has to start cycling players eventually.  This appears to be the start of it (I hope).  Dempsey, Becks, Howard, Jones, Wondo and others need to be pushed out of their spots for the betterment of the team.

 
I think its fair to make fun of certain JK quotes, but I don't think you can hold a coach to them unless you think he's squandered a player pool capable of delivering that type of soccer.  I don't think we've had that player pool.  JK has made plenty of individual decisions I disagree with.   In most cases, I understand the reasoning behind them, but we can certainly take issue with them.  That's part of the job. 

With players like Nagbe and Pulisic in the fold, and with center backs with good distribution skills in Brooks and Cam, we can start to really test JKs commitment to the type of soccer he wants to play.  In the preferred lineup we really only have two players (Yedlin and Zardes) who aren't up to snuff technically in the top 13 or so outfield players.  That's pretty unique for this team. 

 
I think its fair to make fun of certain JK quotes, but I don't think you can hold a coach to them unless you think he's squandered a player pool capable of delivering that type of soccer.  I don't think we've had that player pool.  JK has made plenty of individual decisions I disagree with.   In most cases, I understand the reasoning behind them, but we can certainly take issue with them.  That's part of the job. 

With players like Nagbe and Pulisic in the fold, and with center backs with good distribution skills in Brooks and Cam, we can start to really test JKs commitment to the type of soccer he wants to play.  In the preferred lineup we really only have two players (Yedlin and Zardes) who aren't up to snuff technically in the top 13 or so outfield players.  That's pretty unique for this team. 
 I feel like Zardes is going to be the easiest to replace, whether it be Pulisic, or Bacon, or Rubin, we do have some better technial choices that should be available in the hex.

Yedlin is worth sticking with as his upside offers more than Zardes imo.

 
Figuring out where Pulisic would fit best and whether he can provide the type of 90 minute two-way effort we need from a wing position is part of what the next months and years will be about.  I sincerely hope that Zardes improves technically (it's unlikely but there are still late bloomers).  Because he has some very intriguing attributes.  He's an opportunistic goal scorer and physical presence with good workrate.  His place might still be as a striker.  Particularly if we ever want to play some 4-4-2 (which is a decent option against a lot of CONCACAF opposition). 

But we'll still need piano movers.  We just want the piano movers to be able to play a little bit too.  Bradley is the template IMO.  To say that he's good technically isn't to say that he's Toni Kroos.  It's to say that he has a very clear idea of his strengths and weaknesses and plays in such a way as to maximize his strengths while still working on his weaknesses.   Yes, I want Gyasi to be able to make a productive first touch when the ball is played to his feet.  But I also don't want to lose him throwing himself into center backs and getting assists with his back, shoulder, ###, or whatever.   Sometimes, we need that. 

 
Looks like Sunil might have a spot at the table in the latest FIFA scandal.

Simon Evans ‎@sgevans

The recording at the centre of the Infantino affair included Sunil Gulati talking about trying to get reformer Scala to quit.

12:58 PM - 2 Jun 2016

=================


Simon Evans ‎@sgevans


Not clear from the German media reports exactly why Gulati was trying to persuade Scala to resign. Curious episode.
 
ESPN writers predict lineup. 

Carlisle: (4-3-3) Guzan; Yedlin, Brooks, Cameron, Johnson; Jones, Bradley, Bedoya; Wood, Dempsey, Zardes
McIntyre: (4-3-3): Guzan; Yedlin, Cameron, Brooks, Johnson; Bedoya, Bradley, Jones; Wood, Dempsey, Zardes
J. Davis: (4-3-3) Guzan; Yedlin, Cameron, Brooks, Johnson; Jones, Bradley, Nagbe; Pulisic, Wood, Bedoya
Parker: (4-3-3) Guzan; Johnson, Brooks, Cameron, Yedlin; Jones,Beckerman, Bradley; Wood, Dempsey, Zardes
N. Davis: (4-3-3) Howard; Yedlin, Cameron, Brooks, Johnson; Bedoya, Bradley, Jones; Nagbe, Dempsey, Wood


 
Mexico looks like the best play to me from these odds.

The US chances are very much tied to Friday night imo.  If they can win Friday night they are going to be in great shape to win the group which gives them a VERY winnable quarterfinal game against likely Ecuador or Peru.

But if the US loses on Friday night, they are probably a long shot to win the group and at best can come in second and get fed to Brazil in the quarterfinals.

Huge opening game IMO.
Jurgen's approach to this game will be telling. Most would agree a draw is a great result.

 
Jurgen's approach to this game will be telling. Most would agree a draw is a great result.
If we play well, I would be happy with a draw. I think that would still give us a good chance of advancing.

Colombia is one of the great Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde teams.  Tons of raw talent but the quality difference of the full team from tournament to tournament varies a ton.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I really don't want to see Fabian at LB. the guy is a difference maker in the midfield for a Bundesliga team. A team that would beat us. Give him that sot on our team and leave LB to A.Body if necessary. Don't get cute. Play him where he plays. rabblarabblerabble..... #fireJK 

 
I really don't want to see Fabian at LB. the guy is a difference maker in the midfield for a Bundesliga team. A team that would beat us. Give him that sot on our team and leave LB to A.Body if necessary. Don't get cute. Play him where he plays. rabblarabblerabble..... #fireJK 
I was surprised nobody else griped about this more when discussing potential lineups.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top