Everyone talks about the assists, but I'm just happy to have the contemptuous glares at his teammates back. Love that haughty p***k.What a beast. Just please keep that hammy loose

Someone's going to sit, but hell if I know.
Can't really recall a time when the US had so many players in form. Let alone playing in big leagues. Qatar can't get here soon enough.
It seems like sacrilege, but it's a good question with the way everyone else is playing.At what point does the coach have to consider Pulisic in a super-sub role?
Dude is a beast crashing that box on set pieces. Elevation, strength, finishing, and knows how to time his jump perfectly.
So we have guys playing CL today from Chelsea, Milan, Juve, Dortmund and Celtic - anybody I’m missing?
I don't think he played today but John Brooks signed with Benfica last week.So we have guys playing CL today from Chelsea, Milan, Juve, Dortmund and Celtic - anybody I’m missing?

Can't remember if it was Nation's League or Gold Cup, but he straight beasted on set pieces. Scored one or two and was just consistently winning the first ball.I sometimes fantasize about Weston dominating in the air on set pieces in the World Cup, but then I remember we don't have anyone who's very good at taking them.
Can't remember if it was Nation's League or Gold Cup, but he straight beasted on set pieces. Scored one or two and was just consistently winning the first ball.I sometimes fantasize about Weston dominating in the air on set pieces in the World Cup, but then I remember we don't have anyone who's very good at taking them.
I got roasted on this very thread for suggesting this waaaaaay back during the last round of WCQ games earlier this year. About time everyone caught up to me.It seems like sacrilege, but it's a good question with the way everyone else is playing.At what point does the coach have to consider Pulisic in a super-sub role?
I got roasted on this very thread for suggesting this waaaaaay back during the last round of WCQ games earlier this year. About time everyone caught up to me.It seems like sacrilege, but it's a good question with the way everyone else is playing.At what point does the coach have to consider Pulisic in a super-sub role?
Can't hurt. Good chance the new coach either plays him more or loans him out. Worst case, things remain the same.Will the Tuchel firing be good for CP? Can’t see it hurting much more.
Someone's going to sit, but hell if I know.
Can't really recall a time when the US had so many players in form. Let alone playing in big leagues. Qatar can't get here soon enough.
At what point does the coach have to consider Pulisic in a super-sub role?
I got roasted on this very thread for suggesting this waaaaaay back during the last round of WCQ games earlier this year. About time everyone caught up to me.It seems like sacrilege, but it's a good question with the way everyone else is playing.At what point does the coach have to consider Pulisic in a super-sub role?
At least I'll have company.
Someone's going to sit, but hell if I know.
Can't really recall a time when the US had so many players in form. Let alone playing in big leagues. Qatar can't get here soon enough.
At what point does the coach have to consider Pulisic in a super-sub role?
At the point he wants repeatedly smash his thumb with a hammer and then be fired.
I got roasted on this very thread for suggesting this waaaaaay back during the last round of WCQ games earlier this year. About time everyone caught up to me.It seems like sacrilege, but it's a good question with the way everyone else is playing.At what point does the coach have to consider Pulisic in a super-sub role?
You should have been roasted then and broiled now.
Can't hurt. Good chance the new coach either plays him more or loans him out. Worst case, things remain the same.Will the Tuchel firing be good for CP? Can’t see it hurting much more.
Seems a bit off to let your manager spend a gazillion dollars and then fire him a couple of games into the season. I get you don't want a start to be so bad you can't recover from it but this does not seem like good team management from the front office/owner IMO.
??? I don't get the shoulder presses comment.
CP and Gio have been doing some extra shoulder presses in the gym
I don't know whether he's sincerely saying that he's impressed with their physiques in the picture or whether he believes (as I do) that they badly photoshopped the heads onto different bodies in the picture. Gio in particular looks wrong to me.??? I don't get the shoulder presses comment.
CP and Gio have been doing some extra shoulder presses in the gym
??? I don't get the shoulder presses comment.
CP and Gio have been doing some extra shoulder presses in the gym
Add fondness for old movies and homoerotic jokes to the ways in which we are uncannily compatible.I'm definitely an admirer of their physiques though. /WetDream
Add fondness for old movies and homoerotic jokes to the ways in which we are uncannily compatible.I'm definitely an admirer of their physiques though. /WetDream
welp....at least they are playingBoth Sands and Tillman starting for Rangers today vs Ajax
welp....at least they are playingBoth Sands and Tillman starting for Rangers today vs Ajax
The talking heads ((Dempsey, Henry etc) discussing Pulisic and his situation. Some fair points made I think
I guess my only question is what does it mean to be "good enough for Chelsea?" I'm not sure Pulisic is good enough for Chelsea, but I'm also not sure that Chelsea has any attacker that is good enough for Chelsea. Maybe Sterling. Certainly not Havertz or Ziyech. Mount has looked it at times, but he's as hot and cold as Pulisic. Since Hazard left Tammy Abraham, Timo Werner, and Romelu Lukaku have all been deemed "not good enough for Chelsea." But aside from the CL run, there's not a ton of evidence that Chelsea has really consistently been a higher caliber team than Inter Milan or even Leipzig (I'll grant they've been better than Roma for the most part).The talking heads ((Dempsey, Henry etc) discussing Pulisic and his situation. Some fair points made I think
1. It's the end of the fiscal year so he's spending the excess money in the budget.Is GGG contractually obligated to do this stuff? He has been making the rounds like crazy the last 3 months
I wouldn’t be surprised if he was expected to drum up interest in the USMNT by doing stuff like this, sure.Is GGG contractually obligated to do this stuff? He has been making the rounds like crazy the last 3 months
I guess my only question is what does it mean to be "good enough for Chelsea?" I'm not sure Pulisic is good enough for Chelsea, but I'm also not sure that Chelsea has any attacker that is good enough for Chelsea. Maybe Sterling. Certainly not Havertz or Ziyech. Mount has looked it at times, but he's as hot and cold as Pulisic. Since Hazard left Tammy Abraham, Timo Werner, and Romelu Lukaku have all been deemed "not good enough for Chelsea." But aside from the CL run, there's not a ton of evidence that Chelsea has really consistently been a higher caliber team than Inter Milan or even Leipzig (I'll grant they've been better than Roma for the most part).The talking heads ((Dempsey, Henry etc) discussing Pulisic and his situation. Some fair points made I think
For all that, Chelsea has still scored more goals in Tuchel's last 50 games in charge than they did in his first 50. The big difference is the defense has been much worse, in part because Mendy has stopped looking like a candidate for the best keeper in the world.