What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Week 2-17: Who has more value? (1 Viewer)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Magnum

Footballguy
Obviously Barlow started slow and is being pushed by Gore. Parker looked amazing, but may be RBBC with Staley & Bettis. Anderson banged up at the moment and being pushed by Bell & Dayne. Big picture (15 more games)......I'm thinking:AndersonParkerBarlow (bad offense man, bad offense)

 
Barlow -- #### each and every week. Get him out of the picture. Nothing has changed. Looked like the same tentative crap from 2004.Parker -- already given more value than Barlow will the entire year. Rather have a guy lead me to 1 victory than mediocrity for 16 weeks.Mike Anderson -- I'd probably give him the nod for the whole year. At very very worst, he will be the goalline back.

 
I rank the top 10 like this:AndersonAndersonAndersonAndersonAndersonAndersonAndersonAndersonAndersonFast Willie Parker

 
]Nicely disgused trade thread :rolleyes:

To the ACF with this crap
Blow me you freaken ###CLOWN!! Trolls like yourself, who think they are the forum police, make me laugh. Now slap your paper hat on and get your butt to work!
 
,Sep 14 2005, 02:32 PM]Nicely disgused trade thread :rolleyes:

To the ACF with this crap
Blow me you freaken ###CLOWN!! Trolls like yourself, who think they are the forum police, make me laugh. Now slap your paper hat on and get your butt to work!
:eek: :no:

 
,Sep 14 2005, 02:32 PM]Nicely disgused trade thread :rolleyes:

To the ACF with this crap
Blow me you freaken ###CLOWN!! Trolls like yourself, who think they are the forum police, make me laugh. Now slap your paper hat on and get your butt to work!
And so it ends..... you do realize you just killed your own thread.
 
,Sep 14 2005, 02:32 PM]Nicely disgused trade thread  :rolleyes:

To the ACF with this crap
Blow me you freaken ###CLOWN!! Trolls like yourself, who think they are the forum police, make me laugh. Now slap your paper hat on and get your butt to work!
Dude, ease up. This is not how to get serious responses. Why do this? Why?
 
,Sep 14 2005, 02:32 PM]Nicely disgused trade thread :rolleyes:

To the ACF with this crap
Blow me you freaken ###CLOWN!! Trolls like yourself, who think they are the forum police, make me laugh. Now slap your paper hat on and get your butt to work!
Have a great season, guy! :thumbup: Edited to add:

IBTM

IBTL

IBTB

And when it's all said and done and he is complaining and making excuses about the injustice,

:ptts:

 
Last edited by a moderator:
,Sep 14 2005, 02:32 PM]Nicely disgused trade thread  :rolleyes:

To the ACF with this crap
Blow me you freaken ###CLOWN!! Trolls like yourself, who think they are the forum police, make me laugh. Now slap your paper hat on and get your butt to work!
What's an ###CLOWN!! ? :confused:
 
"I didn't get the advice I needed because my thread got locked when I went off and called someone an ###CLOWN." :ptts:

 
I think the name calling was an overreaction but I'm also tired of everybody jumping in to act as the board police. The question may have been a cleverly disguised who should I trade for but it WAS disguised in vague enough terms to be helpful to others. Many a posters here need to get off their high horses. I own two of the mentioned backs and am interested in opinions.

 
,Sep 14 2005, 02:32 PM]Nicely disgused trade thread  :rolleyes:

To the ACF with this crap
Blow me you freaken ###CLOWN!! Trolls like yourself, who think they are the forum police, make me laugh. Now slap your paper hat on and get your butt to work!
What's an ###CLOWN!! ? :confused:
ask bankerguy, then tell him to :ptts:
So I'm thinking... number number number clown... clowns are funny... three funny numbers? Or maybe it has something to do with a circus, with three rings. Man, I give up. The dude's an ###clown anyways... :ph34r:
 
I think the name calling was an overreaction but I'm also tired of everybody jumping in to act as the board police. The question may have been a cleverly disguised who should I trade for but it WAS disguised in vague enough terms to be helpful to others.

Many a posters here need to get off their high horses. I own two of the mentioned backs and am interested in opinions.
we need more board police. this place is beginning to look like FFToday.
 
I think the name calling was an overreaction but I'm also tired of everybody jumping in to act as the board police.  The question may have been a cleverly disguised who should I trade for but it WAS disguised in vague enough terms to be helpful to others. 

Many a posters here need to get off their high horses.  I own two of the mentioned backs and am interested in opinions.
we need more board police. this place is beginning to look like FFToday.
Fine, get some more mods. Of if somebody goes completely off the deep end or posts a direct WDIS thread you can attack them. I don't think the original question was that bad and if nobody had acted like a little whiny bugger it would have died a quiet death. What is everybody, three years old? It seems too many people here are in the tattle tale mentality. Get over yourselves already. :yucky:

The original question though, I'm in a keeper league so I think I'd go with FWP, MA then Barlow. You have to balance upside with current production and I think Parker has the most upside of the bunch. MA is still the starter for Denver and Barlow is quickly becoming garbage.

 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top