Does anybody else find the BA weighting a little odd?
- 20% Appearance
- 20% Smell
- 40% Taste
- 10% Mouthfeel
- 10% Drinkability
The one that I don't get is 20% for appearance. Don't get me wrong, I like a beer that looks good in the glass. But is it really as important as the aroma?
For appearance, you have color (light/dark), clarity (clear/hazy), head/retention, and that's about it.
When I'm smelling a beer, I consider hops (floral, citrus, pine, spice), malt (caramel, bread/toast, nuts, roasted/burnt), yeast (clove, fruity, woody, mineral), alcohol, and possible process/fermentation flaws (buttery, cooked vegetable, bad phenolics).
There's just a great deal more complexity and variation in aroma than there is in appearance. I find myself deliberately scoring beers low on appearance, just because I don't want a beer that looks perfect but has average aroma to outscore one that maybe is a bit hazy, but the aroma is just phenomenal.
Compare it to the weighting used by judges in most major professional and homebrew competitions:
- 6% Appearance
- 24% Smell
- 40% Taste
- 10% Mouthfeel
- 20% Overall impression (~ drinkability)
Anyway, my

rant for the day.
ETA: I usually use the latter scale initially, and adjust my BA values as needed to get roughly the same number.