I would rather have Ryan. He was very good week one. I think he is going to have a terrific season.
He's essentially a better fantasy version of Vick.I'd also rather have Eli, Stafford, Vick, and Newton.I'd definitely put him in the bottom of the top 10 though, he's a QB1.
I think RG3 was drafted late it most leagues, I got him in the 9th. He seems like this year's version of Newton. Could win a lot of leagues.Wasn't impressed late in the game. The throw to Davis too low and short throw to Morgan, but Morgan screwed up too.He needs to improve on 4th quarter play but looked good again. Thought Russell Wilson and Luck looked good too.Rather have Cam and maybe Eli lin the 5th round than RG3 early. It's only game 2, he's still a rookie but he looks good so far.
Not too sure about that. I know RG is a good QB, don't get me wrong.. but he played the Rams, and Vick put up great numbers again vs the Ravens this week. I know you only play the teams on your schedule, but I have to weigh that a little bit. I don't think RG puts up the same numbers vs Baltimore that Vick did.He's essentially a better fantasy version of Vick.I'd also rather have Eli, Stafford, Vick, and Newton.I'd definitely put him in the bottom of the top 10 though, he's a QB1.
Stafford threw for 150 yds more against the Rams. How exactly did RG3 light them up more than Stafford?Stafford is/was considered top 5 and he didn't do what RG3 just did to the Rams. And the Rams were at home today too so even more impressive for RG3. Nobody is giving the Rams D any credit and RG3 just lit them up. Welcome to Studville Mr. Griffin.
Yeah but Stafford threw a ton of picks. RG3 didn't force many balls and took what the defense gave him. He is a legit threat as a passer and as a rusher.Stafford threw for 150 yds more against the Rams. How exactly did RG3 light them up more than Stafford?Stafford is/was considered top 5 and he didn't do what RG3 just did to the Rams. And the Rams were at home today too so even more impressive for RG3. Nobody is giving the Rams D any credit and RG3 just lit them up. Welcome to Studville Mr. Griffin.
How did he light them up?Matt Stafford vs Rams: 32/48 355 yards 1 TD 3 IntsRobert Griffin vs Rams: 20/29 206 yards 1 TD 1 Ints and 11 for 82 and 2 TDs on the ground.Now look at those statlines and tell me which QB had the better game. 150 yards less on 19 less passing attempts? Please. RG3 is better than I hoped he would be when I drafted him in the 9th round.Stafford threw for 150 yds more against the Rams. How exactly did RG3 light them up more than Stafford?Stafford is/was considered top 5 and he didn't do what RG3 just did to the Rams. And the Rams were at home today too so even more impressive for RG3. Nobody is giving the Rams D any credit and RG3 just lit them up. Welcome to Studville Mr. Griffin.
That depends greatly on your scoring system. None the less, do you really expect 3 picks to be a norm for Stafford?fantasy points - RG3 had a much better game - Stafford also threw 3 picks.
And he was missing his #1 WR.How did he light them up?Matt Stafford vs Rams: 32/48 355 yards 1 TD 3 IntsRobert Griffin vs Rams: 20/29 206 yards 1 TD 1 Ints and 11 for 82 and 2 TDs on the ground.Now look at those statlines and tell me which QB had the better game. 150 yards less on 19 less passing attempts? Please. RG3 is better than I hoped he would be when I drafted him in the 9th round.Stafford threw for 150 yds more against the Rams. How exactly did RG3 light them up more than Stafford?Stafford is/was considered top 5 and he didn't do what RG3 just did to the Rams. And the Rams were at home today too so even more impressive for RG3. Nobody is giving the Rams D any credit and RG3 just lit them up. Welcome to Studville Mr. Griffin.
Oh yeah I forgot all about that... I bet Garcon becomes a difference maker in that game too.And he was missing his #1 WR.How did he light them up?Matt Stafford vs Rams: 32/48 355 yards 1 TD 3 IntsRobert Griffin vs Rams: 20/29 206 yards 1 TD 1 Ints and 11 for 82 and 2 TDs on the ground.Now look at those statlines and tell me which QB had the better game. 150 yards less on 19 less passing attempts? Please. RG3 is better than I hoped he would be when I drafted him in the 9th round.Stafford threw for 150 yds more against the Rams. How exactly did RG3 light them up more than Stafford?Stafford is/was considered top 5 and he didn't do what RG3 just did to the Rams. And the Rams were at home today too so even more impressive for RG3. Nobody is giving the Rams D any credit and RG3 just lit them up. Welcome to Studville Mr. Griffin.
was just comparing the two against a common opponent. I like RG3's chances.That depends greatly on your scoring system. None the less, do you really expect 3 picks to be a norm for Stafford?fantasy points - RG3 had a much better game - Stafford also threw 3 picks.
Stafford had 11.5 points in my league and RG3 had 32.44. Scoring systems ain't going to change the lopsidedness THAT much. This is a FF site we are on right now, isn't it? The rushing numbers are HUGE for FF. Unless your league doesn't give the QB points for rushing stats, this isn't even worth wasting my keystrokes on to argue about anymore.How did he light them up?Matt Stafford vs Rams: 32/48 355 yards 1 TD 3 IntsRobert Griffin vs Rams: 20/29 206 yards 1 TD 1 Ints and 11 for 82 and 2 TDs on the ground.Now look at those statlines and tell me which QB had the better game. 150 yards less on 19 less passing attempts? Please. RG3 is better than I hoped he would be when I drafted him in the 9th round.Stafford threw for 150 yds more against the Rams. How exactly did RG3 light them up more than Stafford?Stafford is/was considered top 5 and he didn't do what RG3 just did to the Rams. And the Rams were at home today too so even more impressive for RG3. Nobody is giving the Rams D any credit and RG3 just lit them up. Welcome to Studville Mr. Griffin.
It changes a great deal if you get bonus points beyond 300 yds passing.Stafford had 11.5 points in my league and RG3 had 32.44. Scoring systems ain't going to change the lopsidedness THAT much. This is a FF site we are on right now, isn't it? The rushing numbers are HUGE for FF. Unless your league doesn't give the QB points for rushing stats, this isn't even worth wasting my keystrokes on to argue about anymore.How did he light them up?Matt Stafford vs Rams: 32/48 355 yards 1 TD 3 IntsRobert Griffin vs Rams: 20/29 206 yards 1 TD 1 Ints and 11 for 82 and 2 TDs on the ground.Now look at those statlines and tell me which QB had the better game. 150 yards less on 19 less passing attempts? Please. RG3 is better than I hoped he would be when I drafted him in the 9th round.Stafford threw for 150 yds more against the Rams. How exactly did RG3 light them up more than Stafford?Stafford is/was considered top 5 and he didn't do what RG3 just did to the Rams. And the Rams were at home today too so even more impressive for RG3. Nobody is giving the Rams D any credit and RG3 just lit them up. Welcome to Studville Mr. Griffin.
So was Cam last yearI'd still rather have Stafford or Vick. Sorry. He's a rookie.
I'd have started Stafford over Cam last year too.So was Cam last yearI'd still rather have Stafford or Vick. Sorry. He's a rookie.![]()
Vick was much better today. The fumble was on the rookie RB...not Vick. Similarly, one of the picks bounced off Celek's hands.Vick also played against Cleveland and has numerous turnovers.
I'm sorry but Stafford looks bad right now. I'll take RG3.I'd have started Stafford over Cam last year too.So was Cam last yearI'd still rather have Stafford or Vick. Sorry. He's a rookie.![]()
There wasn't any Lions player within 15 feet of the last INTthe next post will be "it's against the 49ers" - but I get your point - it's two mediocre efforts in a row.
1 game (for Stafford)I'm sorry but Stafford looks bad right now. I'll take RG3.I'd have started Stafford over Cam last year too.So was Cam last yearI'd still rather have Stafford or Vick. Sorry. He's a rookie.![]()
After this week I would definitely start RG3 over Stafford, I stand by my other picks ahead of him though. I'd have RG3 7th or 8th.'two_dollars said:1 game (for Stafford)'ponchsox said:I'm sorry but Stafford looks bad right now. I'll take RG3.'two_dollars said:I'd have started Stafford over Cam last year too.'ponchsox said:So was Cam last year'two_dollars said:I'd still rather have Stafford or Vick. Sorry. He's a rookie.![]()