Oops, he struck out 2 today, not the side, my bad. He also struck out 2 last night after loading the bases. He's only given up 3 runs in 21 IP this year (counting today), striking out 29 and 8 walks. He sure looks like the closer of the future to me.he didn't strike out the side and he looked shaky last night giving up 3 straight hits to open up the inning, but he certainly looks like he could be the closer of the future there.
His minor league numbers doesn't indicate he's that wild. Not a great K/BB ratio 438/194, but I've seen a lot worse.His minor league stats say no, his "stuff" says maybe...He may just be a little too wild...
His minor league stats say no, his "stuff" says maybe...
He may just be a little too wild...
I guess he came in as a hitter...http://www.thebaseballcube.com/players/M/Carlos-Marmol.shtml
And at 3.38 WRA with a 1.01 WHIP, Dempster hasn't really done anything to deserve losing his closer job.Marmol is still to raw to be a regular closer. And sometimes it takes him a dozen pitches to get the feel for his slider. Closers don't have that kind of time.
Yup. He's fashionable to pick on, but he's been doing a decent job. And as a manager, the big problem with changing closers is that you'd better be right.And at 3.38 WRA with a 1.01 WHIP, Dempster hasn't really done anything to deserve losing his closer job.Marmol is still to raw to be a regular closer. And sometimes it takes him a dozen pitches to get the feel for his slider. Closers don't have that kind of time.
I agree, but if Marmol is lights out while Dumpster is on the DL, the manager may be inclined not to change.Yup. He's fashionable to pick on, but he's been doing a decent job. And as a manager, the big problem with changing closers is that you'd better be right.And at 3.38 WRA with a 1.01 WHIP, Dempster hasn't really done anything to deserve losing his closer job.Marmol is still to raw to be a regular closer. And sometimes it takes him a dozen pitches to get the feel for his slider. Closers don't have that kind of time.
I love Marmol. In fact, I'm going to Wrigley next month and I am going to get a Marmol jersey if I can find one. I completely agree with you that he's the closer of the future but Dempster's a vet and he's been good this year. He'll have the job when he gets back. If he starts to fail, then Marmol could get a shot.I agree, but if Marmol is lights out while Dumpster is on the DL, the manager may be inclined not to change.Yup. He's fashionable to pick on, but he's been doing a decent job. And as a manager, the big problem with changing closers is that you'd better be right.And at 3.38 WRA with a 1.01 WHIP, Dempster hasn't really done anything to deserve losing his closer job.Marmol is still to raw to be a regular closer. And sometimes it takes him a dozen pitches to get the feel for his slider. Closers don't have that kind of time.
One thing to look at is if Marmol does well, then Dempster could be moved at the deadline. Houston, perhaps?I love Marmol. In fact, I'm going to Wrigley next month and I am going to get a Marmol jersey if I can find one. I completely agree with you that he's the closer of the future but Dempster's a vet and he's been good this year. He'll have the job when he gets back. If he starts to fail, then Marmol could get a shot.I agree, but if Marmol is lights out while Dumpster is on the DL, the manager may be inclined not to change.Yup. He's fashionable to pick on, but he's been doing a decent job. And as a manager, the big problem with changing closers is that you'd better be right.And at 3.38 WRA with a 1.01 WHIP, Dempster hasn't really done anything to deserve losing his closer job.Marmol is still to raw to be a regular closer. And sometimes it takes him a dozen pitches to get the feel for his slider. Closers don't have that kind of time.
Marmol actually has movement on his fastball.I doubt he takes over the closer role this year, but down the line it will probably happen.Guy sounds like LaTroy Hawkins, who also had great stuff, and was back in the day 'the closer of the future' guy.
Doesn't make sense at all to me. Cubs are playing themselves back into a playoff race, and Houston's going nowhere.Why would the Cubs (or Astros) do this?One thing to look at is if Marmol does well, then Dempster could be moved at the deadline. Houston, perhaps?
Major league teams don't think in terms of fantasy implications. The better Marmol does, the better the Cubs bullpen is. That's a very important asset to a team trying to make a playoff run.One thing to look at is if Marmol does well, then Dempster could be moved at the deadline. Houston, perhaps?I love Marmol. In fact, I'm going to Wrigley next month and I am going to get a Marmol jersey if I can find one. I completely agree with you that he's the closer of the future but Dempster's a vet and he's been good this year. He'll have the job when he gets back. If he starts to fail, then Marmol could get a shot.I agree, but if Marmol is lights out while Dumpster is on the DL, the manager may be inclined not to change.Yup. He's fashionable to pick on, but he's been doing a decent job. And as a manager, the big problem with changing closers is that you'd better be right.And at 3.38 WRA with a 1.01 WHIP, Dempster hasn't really done anything to deserve losing his closer job.Marmol is still to raw to be a regular closer. And sometimes it takes him a dozen pitches to get the feel for his slider. Closers don't have that kind of time.
I thought the word was, if Marmol could handle the job, the Cubs want Dempster in the rotation.Da Beers said:Doesn't make sense at all to me. Cubs are playing themselves back into a playoff race, and Houston's going nowhere.Why would the Cubs (or Astros) do this?One thing to look at is if Marmol does well, then Dempster could be moved at the deadline. Houston, perhaps?
That was before Marhsall came back. Now Dempster says he wants to close the rest of the season. Who knows whats going on with that.I thought the word was, if Marmol could handle the job, the Cubs want Dempster in the rotation.Da Beers said:Doesn't make sense at all to me. Cubs are playing themselves back into a playoff race, and Houston's going nowhere.Why would the Cubs (or Astros) do this?One thing to look at is if Marmol does well, then Dempster could be moved at the deadline. Houston, perhaps?
Absolutely 0% chance.I think Marmol will have the job sometime in the future (as others have said). His stuff is electric. He has two very good pitches and that is all a closer needs. BUt for now, it's Dempster's job and he won't give it up this season, barring injury.Marmol's exciting and some day he might be one of the Cubs top closers in recent history. BUt for now, he's an 6th, 7th, 8th inning guy.One thing to look at is if Marmol does well, then Dempster could be moved at the deadline. Houston, perhaps?I love Marmol. In fact, I'm going to Wrigley next month and I am going to get a Marmol jersey if I can find one. I completely agree with you that he's the closer of the future but Dempster's a vet and he's been good this year. He'll have the job when he gets back. If he starts to fail, then Marmol could get a shot.I agree, but if Marmol is lights out while Dumpster is on the DL, the manager may be inclined not to change.Yup. He's fashionable to pick on, but he's been doing a decent job. And as a manager, the big problem with changing closers is that you'd better be right.And at 3.38 WRA with a 1.01 WHIP, Dempster hasn't really done anything to deserve losing his closer job.Marmol is still to raw to be a regular closer. And sometimes it takes him a dozen pitches to get the feel for his slider. Closers don't have that kind of time.