He could sit out 6 weeks. Or whatever. Just because you and I consider it stupid doesn’t make it unlikely or impossible.See, I don’t see sitting out as a realistic outcome. Aiyuk stands to lose millions of dollars. That’s not leverage, that’s stupidity.If Aiyuk can choose to sit out, then by definition he has some leverage. Which means the 49ers don’t “literally have all the leverage.” Do they have most of it? Sure, I guess.Sometimes that’s true. In this case, all it means is that the 49ers hold all the leverage.contracts ain't worth the paper they're printed on the NFL. as a result you get situations like these. if i was aiyuk i'd be prepared to hold out all year. 14m is nothing when 100m or more in guarantees is awaiting you on the next contract. why risk that going away if you take a bad shot to the knee this year trying to help your team win. owners run their teams like a business and players have the right to make what business decisions they can. aiyuk has more leverage than people think. and SF will trade him to get some compensation. it's best for both sides of the businessThe 49ers have the only leverage in the situation. Brandon Ayuk is under contract.i wouldn't call it cute and cheap. methodical is a better choice of word. SF doesn't have as much leverage as some people think. they know it and other teams know it. SF has been preparing to trade him for a while. we heard it at the draft and the draft telegraphed them moving on. they have the purdy extension looming and have already paid other guys. aiyuk was left holding an empty bag as a result. the market exploding just takes away any semblance of leverage SF had. sure, they'd love aiyuk to play on the cheap in an attempt to win this year. but that's not gonna happen. and nor should aiyuk be expected to go along with that and risk injury and millions upon millions of dollars. they will trade him. just not quickly. they won't get two 1sts but they'll try to maximize what they can get then move on. i expected one 1st and some lower round swaps
They do not have to trade him.
The pressure is on Brandon whether he wants to play for $14 million, or for $26 million, or to sit out the season. That’s it. Those are his options.
The 49ers literally have all of the leverage.
The idea that contracts are meaningless more applies to ownership than the player
Brandon Ayuk’s only option besides getting paid is to sit out.
The 49ers could still trade him. But they are under no obligation to do so, and clearly in no hurry either.
Also, if he’s fighting over a couple of million dollars difference, it wouldn’t make a lot of sense to lose many more millions than that by sitting out.He could sit out 6 weeks. Or whatever. Just because you and I consider it stupid doesn’t make it unlikely or impossible.See, I don’t see sitting out as a realistic outcome. Aiyuk stands to lose millions of dollars. That’s not leverage, that’s stupidity.If Aiyuk can choose to sit out, then by definition he has some leverage. Which means the 49ers don’t “literally have all the leverage.” Do they have most of it? Sure, I guess.Sometimes that’s true. In this case, all it means is that the 49ers hold all the leverage.contracts ain't worth the paper they're printed on the NFL. as a result you get situations like these. if i was aiyuk i'd be prepared to hold out all year. 14m is nothing when 100m or more in guarantees is awaiting you on the next contract. why risk that going away if you take a bad shot to the knee this year trying to help your team win. owners run their teams like a business and players have the right to make what business decisions they can. aiyuk has more leverage than people think. and SF will trade him to get some compensation. it's best for both sides of the businessThe 49ers have the only leverage in the situation. Brandon Ayuk is under contract.i wouldn't call it cute and cheap. methodical is a better choice of word. SF doesn't have as much leverage as some people think. they know it and other teams know it. SF has been preparing to trade him for a while. we heard it at the draft and the draft telegraphed them moving on. they have the purdy extension looming and have already paid other guys. aiyuk was left holding an empty bag as a result. the market exploding just takes away any semblance of leverage SF had. sure, they'd love aiyuk to play on the cheap in an attempt to win this year. but that's not gonna happen. and nor should aiyuk be expected to go along with that and risk injury and millions upon millions of dollars. they will trade him. just not quickly. they won't get two 1sts but they'll try to maximize what they can get then move on. i expected one 1st and some lower round swaps
They do not have to trade him.
The pressure is on Brandon whether he wants to play for $14 million, or for $26 million, or to sit out the season. That’s it. Those are his options.
The 49ers literally have all of the leverage.
The idea that contracts are meaningless more applies to ownership than the player
Brandon Ayuk’s only option besides getting paid is to sit out.
The 49ers could still trade him. But they are under no obligation to do so, and clearly in no hurry either.
That said, I agree that it would be stupid.
i know exactly what aiyuk is thinking. the same as the other big time wrs holding in. he wants to get paid and have guarantees in the amounts. threatening to lose 14m by holding out is nothing in the long run when you have 100m or more and like 70-80m in guarantees waiting for you. a knee injury playing on the cheap is too risky to sacrifice the big payday. plus, he's in a position to go where he wants. playing on his current contract would be the stupid moveAlso, if he’s fighting over a couple of million dollars difference, it wouldn’t make a lot of sense to lose many more millions than that by sitting out.He could sit out 6 weeks. Or whatever. Just because you and I consider it stupid doesn’t make it unlikely or impossible.See, I don’t see sitting out as a realistic outcome. Aiyuk stands to lose millions of dollars. That’s not leverage, that’s stupidity.If Aiyuk can choose to sit out, then by definition he has some leverage. Which means the 49ers don’t “literally have all the leverage.” Do they have most of it? Sure, I guess.Sometimes that’s true. In this case, all it means is that the 49ers hold all the leverage.contracts ain't worth the paper they're printed on the NFL. as a result you get situations like these. if i was aiyuk i'd be prepared to hold out all year. 14m is nothing when 100m or more in guarantees is awaiting you on the next contract. why risk that going away if you take a bad shot to the knee this year trying to help your team win. owners run their teams like a business and players have the right to make what business decisions they can. aiyuk has more leverage than people think. and SF will trade him to get some compensation. it's best for both sides of the businessThe 49ers have the only leverage in the situation. Brandon Ayuk is under contract.i wouldn't call it cute and cheap. methodical is a better choice of word. SF doesn't have as much leverage as some people think. they know it and other teams know it. SF has been preparing to trade him for a while. we heard it at the draft and the draft telegraphed them moving on. they have the purdy extension looming and have already paid other guys. aiyuk was left holding an empty bag as a result. the market exploding just takes away any semblance of leverage SF had. sure, they'd love aiyuk to play on the cheap in an attempt to win this year. but that's not gonna happen. and nor should aiyuk be expected to go along with that and risk injury and millions upon millions of dollars. they will trade him. just not quickly. they won't get two 1sts but they'll try to maximize what they can get then move on. i expected one 1st and some lower round swaps
They do not have to trade him.
The pressure is on Brandon whether he wants to play for $14 million, or for $26 million, or to sit out the season. That’s it. Those are his options.
The 49ers literally have all of the leverage.
The idea that contracts are meaningless more applies to ownership than the player
Brandon Ayuk’s only option besides getting paid is to sit out.
The 49ers could still trade him. But they are under no obligation to do so, and clearly in no hurry either.
That said, I agree that it would be stupid.
But you’re right… We have no idea what Brandon Aiyuk is thinking here.
Also not paying a player what they want does not mean a team is cheap. It likely means they'd just rather spend that money elsewhere.I just want to point out to people who do want to bash the 49'ers for being cheap that they are 4th in the league in actual cash spending on players. $21M behind the leader(Eagles) and a whopping $100M over the team in last, which is not a team people associate with cheap-at least not until this off-season.just as valid as anyone bashing the 49ers org. for being rich yet cheap
Bingo. They’ve made it abundantly clear that they see Fred Warner, CMC, Trent Williams, George Kittle, and Deebo Samuel as higher priorities.Also not paying a player what they want does not mean a team is cheap. It likely means they'd just rather spend that money elsewhere.I just want to point out to people who do want to bash the 49'ers for being cheap that they are 4th in the league in actual cash spending on players. $21M behind the leader(Eagles) and a whopping $100M over the team in last, which is not a team people associate with cheap-at least not until this off-season.just as valid as anyone bashing the 49ers org. for being rich yet cheap
14 miill divided by 18 weeks=$777,777 weekly paychecks.Also, if he’s fighting over a couple of million dollars difference, it wouldn’t make a lot of sense to lose many more millions than that by sitting out.
Funny, I thought the last two Lombardi trophies found their way to Kansas City. But I don't watch much football these days.As the best Team in the NFL.
If you were the 49ers, and the only thing being offered were pics, wouldn’t you ask for two first round picks?Wanting 2 first round picks for Brandon Ayuk is bad faith?Brandon Aiyuk trade rumors: Steelers in mix for 49ers WR; San Francisco asking for two No. 1 picks, per report
The Patriots, meanwhile, are no longer pursuing the disgruntled star wideoutwww.cbssports.com
If this is true then this is negotiating in bad faith.
I’m confused by that. Can you explain?
Let's say that link is true. (I don't know if it is or not) You can't tell your player to go find a team and negotiate a contract if your asking price is so high that no one will make the trade even if he does agree to a deal.
That is why I said IF this story is true then the 49ers are negotiating in bad faith.
I don't see a season long hold out but, like others have mentioned, maybe the 6 weeks he can and his neck injury, or whatever it is, lingers. I don't blame him for trying to maximize his return. It's easy for us to say it's only a couple of million difference but it's a couple of million difference!!!See, I don’t see sitting out as a realistic outcome. Aiyuk stands to lose millions of dollars. That’s not leverage, that’s stupidity.If Aiyuk can choose to sit out, then by definition he has some leverage. Which means the 49ers don’t “literally have all the leverage.” Do they have most of it? Sure, I guess.Sometimes that’s true. In this case, all it means is that the 49ers hold all the leverage.contracts ain't worth the paper they're printed on the NFL. as a result you get situations like these. if i was aiyuk i'd be prepared to hold out all year. 14m is nothing when 100m or more in guarantees is awaiting you on the next contract. why risk that going away if you take a bad shot to the knee this year trying to help your team win. owners run their teams like a business and players have the right to make what business decisions they can. aiyuk has more leverage than people think. and SF will trade him to get some compensation. it's best for both sides of the businessThe 49ers have the only leverage in the situation. Brandon Ayuk is under contract.i wouldn't call it cute and cheap. methodical is a better choice of word. SF doesn't have as much leverage as some people think. they know it and other teams know it. SF has been preparing to trade him for a while. we heard it at the draft and the draft telegraphed them moving on. they have the purdy extension looming and have already paid other guys. aiyuk was left holding an empty bag as a result. the market exploding just takes away any semblance of leverage SF had. sure, they'd love aiyuk to play on the cheap in an attempt to win this year. but that's not gonna happen. and nor should aiyuk be expected to go along with that and risk injury and millions upon millions of dollars. they will trade him. just not quickly. they won't get two 1sts but they'll try to maximize what they can get then move on. i expected one 1st and some lower round swaps
They do not have to trade him.
The pressure is on Brandon whether he wants to play for $14 million, or for $26 million, or to sit out the season. That’s it. Those are his options.
The 49ers literally have all of the leverage.
The idea that contracts are meaningless more applies to ownership than the player
Brandon Ayuk’s only option besides getting paid is to sit out.
The 49ers could still trade him. But they are under no obligation to do so, and clearly in no hurry either.
See, I didn’t mean it in the context of “it’s only a couple of million dollars”I don't see a season long hold out but, like others have mentioned, maybe the 6 weeks he can and his neck injury, or whatever it is, lingers. I don't blame him for trying to maximize his return. It's easy for us to say it's only a couple of million difference but it's a couple of million difference!!!See, I don’t see sitting out as a realistic outcome. Aiyuk stands to lose millions of dollars. That’s not leverage, that’s stupidity.If Aiyuk can choose to sit out, then by definition he has some leverage. Which means the 49ers don’t “literally have all the leverage.” Do they have most of it? Sure, I guess.Sometimes that’s true. In this case, all it means is that the 49ers hold all the leverage.contracts ain't worth the paper they're printed on the NFL. as a result you get situations like these. if i was aiyuk i'd be prepared to hold out all year. 14m is nothing when 100m or more in guarantees is awaiting you on the next contract. why risk that going away if you take a bad shot to the knee this year trying to help your team win. owners run their teams like a business and players have the right to make what business decisions they can. aiyuk has more leverage than people think. and SF will trade him to get some compensation. it's best for both sides of the businessThe 49ers have the only leverage in the situation. Brandon Ayuk is under contract.i wouldn't call it cute and cheap. methodical is a better choice of word. SF doesn't have as much leverage as some people think. they know it and other teams know it. SF has been preparing to trade him for a while. we heard it at the draft and the draft telegraphed them moving on. they have the purdy extension looming and have already paid other guys. aiyuk was left holding an empty bag as a result. the market exploding just takes away any semblance of leverage SF had. sure, they'd love aiyuk to play on the cheap in an attempt to win this year. but that's not gonna happen. and nor should aiyuk be expected to go along with that and risk injury and millions upon millions of dollars. they will trade him. just not quickly. they won't get two 1sts but they'll try to maximize what they can get then move on. i expected one 1st and some lower round swaps
They do not have to trade him.
The pressure is on Brandon whether he wants to play for $14 million, or for $26 million, or to sit out the season. That’s it. Those are his options.
The 49ers literally have all of the leverage.
The idea that contracts are meaningless more applies to ownership than the player
Brandon Ayuk’s only option besides getting paid is to sit out.
The 49ers could still trade him. But they are under no obligation to do so, and clearly in no hurry either.
What does he feel like having for dinner tonight?i know exactly what aiyuk is thinking.
Maybe his accountant is telling him that getting the bigger signing bonus will allow him to make up that difference quickly.I don't see a season long hold out but, like others have mentioned, maybe the 6 weeks he can and his neck injury, or whatever it is, lingers. I don't blame him for trying to maximize his return. It's easy for us to say it's only a couple of million difference but it's a couple of million difference!!!See, I don’t see sitting out as a realistic outcome. Aiyuk stands to lose millions of dollars. That’s not leverage, that’s stupidity.If Aiyuk can choose to sit out, then by definition he has some leverage. Which means the 49ers don’t “literally have all the leverage.” Do they have most of it? Sure, I guess.Sometimes that’s true. In this case, all it means is that the 49ers hold all the leverage.contracts ain't worth the paper they're printed on the NFL. as a result you get situations like these. if i was aiyuk i'd be prepared to hold out all year. 14m is nothing when 100m or more in guarantees is awaiting you on the next contract. why risk that going away if you take a bad shot to the knee this year trying to help your team win. owners run their teams like a business and players have the right to make what business decisions they can. aiyuk has more leverage than people think. and SF will trade him to get some compensation. it's best for both sides of the businessThe 49ers have the only leverage in the situation. Brandon Ayuk is under contract.i wouldn't call it cute and cheap. methodical is a better choice of word. SF doesn't have as much leverage as some people think. they know it and other teams know it. SF has been preparing to trade him for a while. we heard it at the draft and the draft telegraphed them moving on. they have the purdy extension looming and have already paid other guys. aiyuk was left holding an empty bag as a result. the market exploding just takes away any semblance of leverage SF had. sure, they'd love aiyuk to play on the cheap in an attempt to win this year. but that's not gonna happen. and nor should aiyuk be expected to go along with that and risk injury and millions upon millions of dollars. they will trade him. just not quickly. they won't get two 1sts but they'll try to maximize what they can get then move on. i expected one 1st and some lower round swaps
They do not have to trade him.
The pressure is on Brandon whether he wants to play for $14 million, or for $26 million, or to sit out the season. That’s it. Those are his options.
The 49ers literally have all of the leverage.
The idea that contracts are meaningless more applies to ownership than the player
Brandon Ayuk’s only option besides getting paid is to sit out.
The 49ers could still trade him. But they are under no obligation to do so, and clearly in no hurry either.
They paid a 1st (well, a very early 2nd) and he’s put up WR1 numbers. Why would his value drop from when they drafted him?Two 1st rounders isn't bad faith, it's stupid. If that's what San Fran wants, he can stay.
They should be happy to get one 1st rounder.
You literally answered your own question. He is worth a 1st. Not two. Sorry.They paid a 1st (well, a very early 2nd) and he’s put up WR1 numbers. Why would his value drop from when they drafted him?Two 1st rounders isn't bad faith, it's stupid. If that's what San Fran wants, he can stay.
They should be happy to get one 1st rounder.
Do you make deals like that in FF?
Actually, yes, I did. I would not accept the same price that I paid for a player who has ascended since I drafted or purchased him.You literally answered your own question. He is worth a 1st. Not two. Sorry.They paid a 1st (well, a very early 2nd) and he’s put up WR1 numbers. Why would his value drop from when they drafted him?Two 1st rounders isn't bad faith, it's stupid. If that's what San Fran wants, he can stay.
They should be happy to get one 1st rounder.
Do you make deals like that in FF?
I would be shocked if any team gave up that much.
Edit: Hill is WAYYYYY better and received this. I just don't see two 1st rounders.
Hill was traded to Miami for five draft picks — 2022 first-, second-, and fourth-round picks as well as 2023 fourth- and sixth-round picks
They paid a 1st (well, a very early 2nd) and he’s put up WR1 numbers. Why would his value drop from when they drafted him?Two 1st rounders isn't bad faith, it's stupid. If that's what San Fran wants, he can stay.
They should be happy to get one 1st rounder.
Do you make deals like that in FF?
Doesn't mean it won't happen. See Bell, Le'Veon.See, I don’t see sitting out as a realistic outcome. Aiyuk stands to lose millions of dollars. That’s not leverage, that’s stupidity.If Aiyuk can choose to sit out, then by definition he has some leverage. Which means the 49ers don’t “literally have all the leverage.” Do they have most of it? Sure, I guess.Sometimes that’s true. In this case, all it means is that the 49ers hold all the leverage.contracts ain't worth the paper they're printed on the NFL. as a result you get situations like these. if i was aiyuk i'd be prepared to hold out all year. 14m is nothing when 100m or more in guarantees is awaiting you on the next contract. why risk that going away if you take a bad shot to the knee this year trying to help your team win. owners run their teams like a business and players have the right to make what business decisions they can. aiyuk has more leverage than people think. and SF will trade him to get some compensation. it's best for both sides of the businessThe 49ers have the only leverage in the situation. Brandon Ayuk is under contract.i wouldn't call it cute and cheap. methodical is a better choice of word. SF doesn't have as much leverage as some people think. they know it and other teams know it. SF has been preparing to trade him for a while. we heard it at the draft and the draft telegraphed them moving on. they have the purdy extension looming and have already paid other guys. aiyuk was left holding an empty bag as a result. the market exploding just takes away any semblance of leverage SF had. sure, they'd love aiyuk to play on the cheap in an attempt to win this year. but that's not gonna happen. and nor should aiyuk be expected to go along with that and risk injury and millions upon millions of dollars. they will trade him. just not quickly. they won't get two 1sts but they'll try to maximize what they can get then move on. i expected one 1st and some lower round swaps
They do not have to trade him.
The pressure is on Brandon whether he wants to play for $14 million, or for $26 million, or to sit out the season. That’s it. Those are his options.
The 49ers literally have all of the leverage.
The idea that contracts are meaningless more applies to ownership than the player
Brandon Ayuk’s only option besides getting paid is to sit out.
The 49ers could still trade him. But they are under no obligation to do so, and clearly in no hurry either.
This isn't Fantasy Football. You get the value the market determines if you don't want to pony up for that 2nd contract. If BA stays a 49er and holds out, the chances of him being franchised in 2025 are nil and the 49ers get absolutely nothing of value for him.Actually, yes, I did. I would not accept the same price that I paid for a player who has ascended since I drafted or purchased him.You literally answered your own question. He is worth a 1st. Not two. Sorry.They paid a 1st (well, a very early 2nd) and he’s put up WR1 numbers. Why would his value drop from when they drafted him?Two 1st rounders isn't bad faith, it's stupid. If that's what San Fran wants, he can stay.
They should be happy to get one 1st rounder.
Do you make deals like that in FF?
I would be shocked if any team gave up that much.
Edit: Hill is WAYYYYY better and received this. I just don't see two 1st rounders.
Hill was traded to Miami for five draft picks — 2022 first-, second-, and fourth-round picks as well as 2023 fourth- and sixth-round picks
As with any trade, the 49ers want to turn a profit on their investment. They drafted a guy who then out performed his draft position. Sort of like taking Puca in the fifth round, and dealing him a year later for the 1.0 one or 102 in super flex.
I think Brandon Aiyuk is worth more than a random first. Especially if there’s no player coming back as compensation. I don’t see that is particularly outrageous.
We can agree to disagree on Brandon ‘s value, though. Certainly in the eye of the beholder.
True, but that was a very different time. Certainly possible, but I think it’s unlikely.Doesn't mean it won't happen. See Bell, Le'Veon.
For sure. I don’t disagree with that. That said, if I’m the 49ers, I’m going to ask for two first round picks. And then I’ll wait to see what Pittsburgh counters with.This isn't Fantasy Football. You get the value the market determines if you don't want to pony up for that 2nd contract. If BA stays a 49er and holds out, the chances of him being franchised in 2025 are nil and the 49ers get absolutely nothing of value for him.
Yes, that’s exactly what I was doing. I thought that was obvious.They paid a 1st (well, a very early 2nd) and he’s put up WR1 numbers. Why would his value drop from when they drafted him?Two 1st rounders isn't bad faith, it's stupid. If that's what San Fran wants, he can stay.
They should be happy to get one 1st rounder.
Do you make deals like that in FF?
That isn't the way the NFL works. You are comping fantasy football to real life football.
How are they supposed to get a first rounder in return if they don't ask for more in their initial salvo?
...and this is pure real-world business acumen, not Fantasy Football-specific.
Few and far between are the people I've negotiated anything with, that came with an initial offer that was 'first offer, best offer' or didn't expect to negotiate down from more than what they were expecting, that's for sure.
I think Brandon Aiyuk is worth more than a random first.
I do believe the 49ers would prefer to get more than they paid for an asset that is appreciated in value.
Oh, I’m not missing it. I’m well aware of his demands.I think Brandon Aiyuk is worth more than a random first.I do believe the 49ers would prefer to get more than they paid for an asset that is appreciated in value.
The problem with your line of thought here is that the contract he's demanding now is ten times the price of the contract they acquired when drafting him. The appreciation in value you are asserting is true for the player, but the monstrous additional salary-capital allocation makes up for a large portion, if not all of it, and some could argue even more - as in he's a good WR, but not $30 MM+ per year good. They are trading for the contract, not just the player - that nuance is what you seem to be missing.
Do we know what the Steelers countered with? Do we know that it’s a fact that the 49ers asked for two first round picks?How are they supposed to get a first rounder in return if they don't ask for more in their initial salvo?
...and this is pure real-world business acumen, not Fantasy Football-specific.
Few and far between are the people I've negotiated anything with, that came with an initial offer that was 'first offer, best offer' or didn't expect to negotiate down from more than what they were expecting, that's for sure.
Because there is a huge difference between a ridiculous ask like two firsts and coming in with an offer in your favor and settling in the middle.
The artist formerly known as Robbie?They signed Chosen, who is most certainly not a camp body, and most certainly is a perfect replacement for BA. Checkmate.
The immortal and illustrious.The artist formerly known as Robbie?They signed Chosen, who is most certainly not a camp body, and most certainly is a perfect replacement for BA. Checkmate.
Also formerly known as Robby.The artist formerly known as Robbie?They signed Chosen, who is most certainly not a camp body, and most certainly is a perfect replacement for BA. Checkmate.
I mean, he could be out of the league and nobody would care. This signing could mean nothing.They signed Chosen, who is most certainly not a camp body, and most certainly is a perfect replacement for BA. Checkmate.
You mean the guy that caught 4 passes in Miami last year and spent most of the season on the practice squad? That performance somehow exempts him from being a camp body?They signed Chosen, who is most certainly not a camp body, and most certainly is a perfect replacement for BA. Checkmate.
I ain't even seen a link to rumorDo we know that it’s a fact that the 49ers asked for two first round picks?
16.6% of his targets were 60+ yard bombs for TDs. Who wouldn't want that?You mean the guy that caught 4 passes in Miami last year and spent most of the season on the practice squad? That performance somehow exempts him from being a camp body?They signed Chosen, who is most certainly not a camp body, and most certainly is a perfect replacement for BA. Checkmate.
I just wish this was over and I don’t have any Aiyuk shares. I’m a fan of his play however.16.6% of his targets were 60+ yard bombs for TDs. Who wouldn't want that?You mean the guy that caught 4 passes in Miami last year and spent most of the season on the practice squad? That performance somehow exempts him from being a camp body?They signed Chosen, who is most certainly not a camp body, and most certainly is a perfect replacement for BA. Checkmate.
The Athletic’s Dianna Russini reports, “The 49ers, to this point, haven’t been satisfied with the Steelers’ offers” for Brandon Aiyuk.
According to Russini, the 49ers “would like a receiver in return for Aiyuk” but “are open to players at other positions.” As it stands right now, the Steelers seem like the most likely team to acquire the star receiver, especially with the Patriots now appearing out of the sweepstakes. However, this negotiation appears far from over for the time being. The 49ers have little ground to negotiate a more favorable trade at this time. Their relationship with Aiyuk appears frayed beyond repair at this point, and the downside to keeping him on the roster this season could mean another year of trade/contract negotiations next offseason when they would have to franchise tag him to keep him on the roster. We’ll likely know in the near future if the Steelers are willing to up their current offer or if they prefer to move on from trade discussions
Do we know what the Steelers countered with? Do we know that it’s a fact that the 49ers asked for two first round picks?How are they supposed to get a first rounder in return if they don't ask for more in their initial salvo?
...and this is pure real-world business acumen, not Fantasy Football-specific.
Few and far between are the people I've negotiated anything with, that came with an initial offer that was 'first offer, best offer' or didn't expect to negotiate down from more than what they were expecting, that's for sure.
Because there is a huge difference between a ridiculous ask like two firsts and coming in with an offer in your favor and settling in the middle.
I’m not sure I’ve seen confirmation of either of those things.
2 1sts?
They're likely not even getting 1. Maybe. Probably not.
The Athletic’s Dianna Russini reports, “The 49ers, to this point, haven’t been satisfied with the Steelers’ offers” for Brandon Aiyuk.
According to Russini, the 49ers “would like a receiver in return for Aiyuk” but “are open to players at other positions.” As it stands right now, the Steelers seem like the most likely team to acquire the star receiver, especially with the Patriots now appearing out of the sweepstakes. However, this negotiation appears far from over for the time being. The 49ers have little ground to negotiate a more favorable trade at this time. Their relationship with Aiyuk appears frayed beyond repair at this point, and the downside to keeping him on the roster this season could mean another year of trade/contract negotiations next offseason when they would have to franchise tag him to keep him on the roster. We’ll likely know in the near future if the Steelers are willing to up their current offer or if they prefer to move on from trade discussions
Sorry, I’m on the road. Driving to Portland for a hot sauce expo. Just checking my phone at gas and urination stops.Do we know what the Steelers countered with? Do we know that it’s a fact that the 49ers asked for two first round picks?How are they supposed to get a first rounder in return if they don't ask for more in their initial salvo?
...and this is pure real-world business acumen, not Fantasy Football-specific.
Few and far between are the people I've negotiated anything with, that came with an initial offer that was 'first offer, best offer' or didn't expect to negotiate down from more than what they were expecting, that's for sure.
Because there is a huge difference between a ridiculous ask like two firsts and coming in with an offer in your favor and settling in the middle.
I’m not sure I’ve seen confirmation of either of those things.
What kind of confirmation are you looking for? Is Lynch and the 49er front office going to come out and say it. I highly doubt it, but that link I sent said they were asking for two firsts.
I thought a trade was significantly more realistic when there were three teams involved. Now that it’s just down allegedly to the Steelers, that really hurts the return the 49ers can get. To me, that pretty much kills any chance of a trade… But I guess we’ll see soon. Or maybe we won’t. Lol.Omar Khan infamously nicknamed the con artist. In my opinion will not fleece the 9'ers like he did the Bears. Nor grab Russell Wilson for next to nothing. I envision him circling his prey waiting them out. Problem is the 9'ers are better off with BA. BA is under contract and then next year he can be franchised. Although not ideal for BA could become disgruntled and sit out x amount of games this season.
If your the Steelers your trying to get BA on a discount trade. Steelers are better off developing their own WR via the draft which they are known for. Paying 30 million while not having an established QB under contract for 2 years doesn't make sense. Which has been mentioned HSG and others.
Could the infatuation with BA be because he looks like Mike Tomlin.
Another Steeler fan that knows how the Steelers operate.Omar Khan infamously nicknamed the con artist. In my opinion will not fleece the 9'ers like he did the Bears. Nor grab Russell Wilson for next to nothing. I envision him circling his prey waiting them out. Problem is the 9'ers are better off with BA. BA is under contract and then next year he can be franchised. Although not ideal for BA could become disgruntled and sit out x amount of games this season.
If your the Steelers your trying to get BA on a discount trade. Steelers are better off developing their own WR via the draft which they are known for. Paying 30 million while not having an established QB under contract for 2 years doesn't make sense. Which has been mentioned HSG and others.
Could the infatuation with BA be because he looks like Mike Tomlin.