What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

WR Puka Nacua LAR (1 Viewer)

IF Kupp is able to return Week 5-6-7, whenever....
IF Kupp is able to return to anything like his previous levels...
Then I think folks in redraft need to have a come to reality meeting that both Puka Nacua and Tutu Atwell, (one of the best tandem names of starting WRs ever), their targets are about to take a hit and if you think otherwise you are living in fantasy land.

-It's so easy right now to keep shooting up with Puka and TuTu on Sundays, but eventually you are going to be strung out

If Kupp cannot return or cannot play in the way we are used to watching...then this takes on a different arc, all together.
"This takes on a different arc"
-Airplane!
Thanks Leslie
Hold up. You mean, Kupp is better than these jokers and I'm JUST NOW HEARING THIS!?!? ;)
 
Jacob Gibbs
The Colts have used Cover-3 on 67% of defensive plays in 2023.
The league average is 36%, and the second-highest rate is 57%.
Cover-3 usually leads to more targets for opposing WR1.
Here's Matthew Stafford's target distribution on 49 attempts vs. Cover-3:
37.5% -- Puka Nacua
20.8% -- Kyren Williams
18.8% -- Tutu Atwell
14.6% -- Tyler Higbee
4.2% -- Van Jefferson
Feels like another Puka week!
 
Jacob Gibbs
The Colts have used Cover-3 on 67% of defensive plays in 2023.
The league average is 36%, and the second-highest rate is 57%.
Cover-3 usually leads to more targets for opposing WR1.
Here's Matthew Stafford's target distribution on 49 attempts vs. Cover-3:
37.5% -- Puka Nacua
20.8% -- Kyren Williams
18.8% -- Tutu Atwell
14.6% -- Tyler Higbee
4.2% -- Van Jefferson
Feels like another Puka week!

Does this guy do analysis like this on other defenses as well?
 
Jacob Gibbs
The Colts have used Cover-3 on 67% of defensive plays in 2023.
The league average is 36%, and the second-highest rate is 57%.
Cover-3 usually leads to more targets for opposing WR1.
Here's Matthew Stafford's target distribution on 49 attempts vs. Cover-3:
37.5% -- Puka Nacua
20.8% -- Kyren Williams
18.8% -- Tutu Atwell
14.6% -- Tyler Higbee
4.2% -- Van Jefferson
Feels like another Puka week!

Does this guy do analysis like this on other defenses as well?

His Twitter feed is full of this type of analysis
 
Put me in the camp that most players can't handle getting tackled 10 to 15 times a game. That's like RB usage, granted less violent collisions.

A guy who catches 120 passes is taking approximately double the tackles as a guy who catches 60 passes. Does that double the injury risk? I would say so.


I think he's a sell high. Especially with Cooper Kupp coming back. I think he's doing the kid a favor because Stafford will throw to this kid until he doesn't get up. It's just a lot of catches. Similar to Michael Thomas, I think those few HIGH VOLUME seasons shortened his prime and destroyed his lower body.
 
I grabbed Puka off waivers after Week 1. Figured he is either a Frisman Jackson or a Anquan Boldin. Kid is Boldin easily. I recall one highlight where he got knocked out of bounds near the goal line. That would have been big points for a long TD. May have had other plays called back due to penalty or similar so this kid could easily be the #1 WR over Jefferson and Hill in most leagues. Cupp's return can only help him since he is getting the top attention right now from defenses. He also plays on the outside so its not like he is just filling a role for Cupp while he is out. Plus...we think Cupp is going to stay healthy after this hammy/nerve issue? Nah
 
I have Tutu in dynasty and Puka in redraft. I'm curious about the workload when Kupp comes back. I think Kupp eats into Puka's floor and ceiling quite a bit and Tutu remains a boom/bust flex option. I think McVay will continue to scheme 4-5 touches for Tutu based off how dynamic he is with his speed and strong hands. If Kupp can't get healthy, Puka's role as a possession chain mover should continue.
Don’t Tutu and Kupp both play the slot? How do you see that working out?
Correct. I feel like people consistently miss this detail. They see Rams #1 and think it's Kupp's spot. It's not. Puka and Kupp play different roles.

Puka is going to be the old Woods role when Kupp returns. Tutu has the most to lose (and is possibly benefitting more from defenses now focusing on Puka, which will flip to Puka's benefit once Kupp is back). Another thing to consider is Tutu has been on the team since 2021 and was never really a world beater in that time.
 
A guy who catches 120 passes is taking approximately double the tackles as a guy who catches 60 passes. Does that double the injury risk? I would say so.
I will take the guy catching 120 passes with 2x the injury risk over the guy catching 60 passes. 👍🏻

It's the right move because there's no guarantee the bottom falls out short term. It's more of a long-term concern. Like Kupp's historic season, even if he's injury prone during the rest of his playing days... he was a league winner the year of his insane volume.

"I don't need him to produce 5 years from now. I need him to produce now." But also, keep in mind you're more likely going to need to handcuff / have depth behind these high volume cats. I am a huge believer in wear and tear. Catching 10 passes a game is cool until all those hits add up just in time for him to get hurt for fantasy playoffs.


It could be coincidence, but I think Cooper Kupp put 2-3 years of wear on his body during his historic season. He's only 30 but all that wear and injury puts him at like 32-33 in my book.
 
A guy who catches 120 passes is taking approximately double the tackles as a guy who catches 60 passes. Does that double the injury risk? I would say so.
I will take the guy catching 120 passes with 2x the injury risk over the guy catching 60 passes. 👍🏻
Not to mention, it would likely be more like squaring the likelihood that he does not get injured. Not the same as doubling. Though, given the fact that each catch is additional wear, it could be somewhere between what I said and double. Not any kind of expert on medicine.
 
If puka doesn't trip to come back for the ball Stafford threw in the 4th its a TD walking in. They will come.
That ball was underthrown - he didn’t trip, he had to come back for it and slid awkwardly to the ground to make the catch. Woulda been an easy 6 with a better throw.
 
A guy who catches 120 passes is taking approximately double the tackles as a guy who catches 60 passes. Does that double the injury risk? I would say so.
I will take the guy catching 120 passes with 2x the injury risk over the guy catching 60 passes. 👍🏻
Not to mention, it would likely be more like squaring the likelihood that he does not get injured. Not the same as doubling. Though, given the fact that each catch is additional wear, it could be somewhere between what I said and double. Not any kind of expert on medicine.

I just figured that if I bought 2 lottery tickets instead of 1, that doubles my chance.

Each tackle doesn't have a fixed rate of potential injury, so that is not a direct correlation. However, the "opportunity" for injury is approximately double.


It's the difference of a guy getting gently pushed out of bounds vs blown up over the middle that makes any type of distinction tough, but in my book if I touch the ball twice as much as you, I have twice as much opportunity to get hurt. The rest would come down to body composition, toughness, etc.

For instance, my likelihood of getting injured on 1 catch is more likely than any of these guys getting tackled on 500 catches and then it scales from there. Lbs. :lol:



You'd need some kind of supercomputer to quantify it.
 
A guy who catches 120 passes is taking approximately double the tackles as a guy who catches 60 passes. Does that double the injury risk? I would say so.
I will take the guy catching 120 passes with 2x the injury risk over the guy catching 60 passes. 👍🏻
Not to mention, it would likely be more like squaring the likelihood that he does not get injured. Not the same as doubling. Though, given the fact that each catch is additional wear, it could be somewhere between what I said and double. Not any kind of expert on medicine.

I just figured that if I bought 2 lottery tickets instead of 1, that doubles my chance.

Each tackle doesn't have a fixed rate of potential injury, so that is not a direct correlation. However, the "opportunity" for injury is approximately double.


It's the difference of a guy getting gently pushed out of bounds vs blown up over the middle that makes any type of distinction tough, but in my book if I touch the ball twice as much as you, I have twice as much opportunity to get hurt. The rest would come down to body composition, toughness, etc.

For instance, my likelihood of getting injured on 1 catch is more likely than any of these guys getting tackled on 500 catches and then it scales from there. Lbs. :lol:



You'd need some kind of supercomputer to quantify it.
All makes sense. I guess all I can say is, mathematically, suppose we do have the "probability of survival without significant injury" p(1), p(2), ... p(n)for each individual play (we don't know those numbers, but we know they exist). The probability that he does not get injured in those n plays is p(1)*p(2)*...*p(n).

If you suppose the plays overall have a geometrical mean of 1/200 probability of injury (making that number up), then for 60 plays, the probability of survival is around 74% (i.e., 26% injury). For 120 plays, probability of survival is around 55% (i.e., 45% injury). Even if what I'm saying is right, that's not far off from double anyway in this somewhat realistic model 🤷‍♂️ (Sorry to get off topic, always enjoy an opportunity to do some math when it's within the scope that I actually understand.)

Eta: I guess an n in ( ) becomes a 👎
 
I had considered A Cooper over him this week before the Watson news. That made it an easy decision and Im damn happy. This kid is so good but taking a beating which is what is worrying me.
 
The sample size and output are starting to reach that convincing level of value for dynasty purposes. Not saying sky-high, yet, but he'd be worth a pretty penny to me at this point.
The real test will be once Kupp returns but it sure seems kind of undeniable now
But Kupp plays the slot. Puka plays outside. Kupp drawing coverage could even (gasp) make Puka better.
 
The sample size and output are starting to reach that convincing level of value for dynasty purposes. Not saying sky-high, yet, but he'd be worth a pretty penny to me at this point.
The real test will be once Kupp returns but it sure seems kind of undeniable now
But Kupp plays the slot. Puka plays outside. Kupp drawing coverage could even (gasp) make Puka better.
Could be but the offense is about to add a guy who usually gets like 8-16 targets a game. Those will come at someone’s expense, right?
 
The sample size and output are starting to reach that convincing level of value for dynasty purposes. Not saying sky-high, yet, but he'd be worth a pretty penny to me at this point.
The real test will be once Kupp returns but it sure seems kind of undeniable now
But Kupp plays the slot. Puka plays outside. Kupp drawing coverage could even (gasp) make Puka better.
Could be but the offense is about to add a guy who usually gets like 8-16 targets a game. Those will come at someone’s expense, right?
Yes - the opposing defense.

Also Tutu.
 
The sample size and output are starting to reach that convincing level of value for dynasty purposes. Not saying sky-high, yet, but he'd be worth a pretty penny to me at this point.
The real test will be once Kupp returns but it sure seems kind of undeniable now
But Kupp plays the slot. Puka plays outside. Kupp drawing coverage could even (gasp) make Puka better.
Could be but the offense is about to add a guy who usually gets like 8-16 targets a game. Those will come at someone’s expense, right?
Yes - the opposing defense.

Also Tutu.
Perhaps but we don’t know yet, it remains to be seen how it plays out
 
What kind of offer is needed to get Puka in a dynasty superflex?
higher than the ones offered last week just like the weeks before. i have a lot of puka. no one is offering enough for me to let go. people trying to trade for him prolly think kupp's potential return is a good reason to not pay alot. maybe right or wrong but it means it's not enough.
 
What kind of offer is needed to get Puka in a dynasty superflex?
higher than the ones offered last week just like the weeks before. i have a lot of puka. no one is offering enough for me to let go. people trying to trade for him prolly think kupp's potential return is a good reason to not pay alot. maybe right or wrong but it means it's not enough.
The allure of the unknown upside…
 
What kind of offer is needed to get Puka in a dynasty superflex?
I doubt a mid-1st gets it done

I'd wait for Kupp to return to buy high or wait altogether. It's ambitious to try and buy high on guys like Puka or Achane right now.

Yeah. At this point you'd need to offer multiple firsts. Borderline untradeable. No guarantee either of those first turn into half of what Puka is doing.


"Oh, I don't want a younger, better Cooper Kupp."
 
What kind of offer is needed to get Puka in a dynasty superflex?
I doubt a mid-1st gets it done

I'd wait for Kupp to return to buy high or wait altogether. It's ambitious to try and buy high on guys like Puka or Achane right now.

Yeah. At this point you'd need to offer multiple firsts. Borderline untradeable. No guarantee either of those first turn into half of what Puka is doing.


"Oh, I don't want a younger, better Cooper Kupp."
I can't disagree. I've bailed early on ASB, Ekeler, Diggs, and I'm sure others too early over the years.
 
Puka Nacua is currently outpacing the two best receiving yard seasons in NFL history through 4 games
  • ('23) Puka Nacua - 501 Rec Yds
  • ('21) Cooper Kupp - 431
  • ('12) Calvin Johnson - 423
 
What kind of offer is needed to get Puka in a dynasty superflex?
higher than the ones offered last week just like the weeks before. i have a lot of puka. no one is offering enough for me to let go. people trying to trade for him prolly think kupp's potential return is a good reason to not pay alot. maybe right or wrong but it means it's not enough.
The allure of the unknown upside…
The allure of proven upside
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top