What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

WR T.Holt "OUT" Today (1 Viewer)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cunning Linguist
  • Start date Start date
:wall: No Julious.....

:wall: No Holt......

:bag: :bag: In go Lloyd and Barlow.....
no Julius and no Holt means Driver and Travis Taylor for me :bag: Although, come to think of it I may play Faulk instead of Taylor. I already have Jackson in there, but with Holt out maybe Faulk gets more action today :shrug:

 
Just a sleeper thought for y'all - Faulk should get targets from the slot with this many WRs out for STL.

Good luck. I'm stuck with Finneran or Peerless Price now without Holt.
Regarding Faulk, that's exactly what was reported by the Rams coach on TV just now.
 
QB Martin is not very good IMO... I have McDonald but am going to start Troy Williamson over him ...to go with my other WR Antonio Bryant........UGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHI would avoid most Rams even though the matchup against the Saints is excellent..Smart ?? Probably not.. I have been snakebitten all year

 
Rams | Week 7 Inactives

Sun, 23 Oct 2005 09:13:31 -0700

The St. Louis Rams have declared RB Aveion Cason, WR Isaac Bruce, TE Jeff Robinson, QB Jeff Smoker, DL Leonard Little, QB Marc Bulger, OG Rex Tucker, WR Torry Holt inactive for Week 7.

:cry:

 
QB Martin is not very good IMO... I have McDonald but am going to start Troy Williamson over him ...to go with my other WR Antonio Bryant........UGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHI would avoid most Rams even though the matchup against the Saints is excellent..Smart ?? Probably not.. I have been snakebitten all year

 
No Holt, no Bulger, no Bruce and no Martz.  This is just lovely for the Rams and Stephen Jackson owners.
See, I told you this was lovely. Holt, Bulger, Bruce and Martz are the problem in St. Louis.
I think playing vs. New Orleans probably had something to do with it. Shoot, Green Bay scored 52 on them.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top