What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Yet another Pitt Bull attack (1 Viewer)

Last edited by a moderator:
God willing.
Wow, hoping my family dies because the type of dog i own on Christmas?? and pit-bill owners are the dregs of our society right?? I'm going to assume i am misinterpreting your comment here, but honestly you can suck a #### either way for even hinting at my family deserving to die. You sound like a miserable piece of #### anyway, so it doesn't bother me too much. 

i hope the rest of the anti pit-bull crowd in here can see the company they are with..

 
Wow, hoping my family dies because the type of dog i own on Christmas?? and pit-bill owners are the dregs of our society right?? I'm going to assume i am misinterpreting your comment here, but honestly you can suck a #### either way for even hinting at my family deserving to die. You sound like a miserable piece of #### anyway, so it doesn't bother me too much. 

i hope the rest of the anti pit-bull crowd in here can see the company they are with..
Its an emotional response against people willing to risk all their neighbors and fellow citizens because they have to have a certain breed of dog.

We know what "company" people are within.

 
Its an emotional response against people willing to risk all their neighbors and fellow citizens because they have to have a certain breed of dog.

We know what "company" people are within.
you are all truly insane. if my dog ever case close to looking like she would attack anybody maybe i would listen. Sorry, i take the hard data from the last 10 years that my dog is ok. i don't think anyone on here is saying every single pit-bull in America is fine, but assuming all are something they are completely not is willfully ignorant. keep living in this created world, believe my neighbors are not deathly afraid of my dog like some of you in here

 
####, i replied to soon. just had a casualty in my house. My ##### Rottweiller mix just grabbed one of daughter's little booties and started to play with it. Just a matter of time before he goes to attack our Christmas cookies. Ban all Rottweillers!!!!!!

 
you are all truly insane. if my dog ever case close to looking like she would attack anybody maybe i would listen. Sorry, i take the hard data from the last 10 years that my dog is ok. i don't think anyone on here is saying every single pit-bull in America is fine, but assuming all are something they are completely not is willfully ignorant. keep living in this created world, believe my neighbors are not deathly afraid of my dog like some of you in here
Yeah, the people killed on christmas eve by another pit attack was just about your dog.

####ing brilliant.

 
####, i replied to soon. just had a casualty in my house. My ##### Rottweiller mix just grabbed one of daughter's little booties and started to play with it. Just a matter of time before he goes to attack our Christmas cookies. Ban all Rottweillers!!!!!!
yeah, you better go the sarcasm route. :yes:

 
Yeah, the people killed on christmas eve by another pit attack was just about your dog.

####ing brilliant.
i am not taking any position about all dogs in America and their owners you goofballs. There is a stance in this thread that all pitbulls should be killed/outlawed. I have a pitbull, and i disagree. 

 
i am not taking any position about all dogs in America and their owners you goofballs. There is a stance in this thread that all pitbulls should be killed/outlawed. I have a pitbull, and i disagree. 
there are all kinds of instances where people own dangerous (and some illegal) stuff and nobody ever gets hurts from those either. 

 
there are all kinds of instances where people own dangerous (and some illegal) stuff and nobody ever gets hurts from those either. 
let's just remember i popped in here today because someone in here hoped my family died because of the breed of dog i have. just let that sink in

 
i am not taking any position about all dogs in America and their owners you goofballs. There is a stance in this thread that all pitbulls should be killed/outlawed. I have a pitbull, and i disagree. 
Why couldn’t you get a different dog?

 
I’m really into collecting stuff.  It’s my hobby.  I just LOVE collecting. I consider myself a collecting person.  And really, we collecting people, we’re sort of in our own little clique.  Like, we get each other.

Anyway, the other day I went to the collecting shop.  Was wondering what I might buy to add to my collection.  I actually went in there so stoked to find a really nice Pepsi Cola sign from the 50s.  These are great collectors pieces.  There was also an old six-shooter Smith & Wesson that apparently belonged to one of Doc Holliday’s guys.  Really tempted to buy that, had an awesome inscription on it too.

But THEN I saw this awesome bad ### un-spent 1965 nuclear warhead.  And I HAD to have it.  Because that is so rad bro.   Everyone will come over my house and I’ll be like “yo dude, check out my nuke.”  

That said, I’m a responsible collector.  So I’ll keep the nuke safely.  So my neighbors don’t have anything to worry about.

Ammiright??

 
I agree. ####ty owner and a dog that is capable of severe damage is a bad combination.
Almost all dog owners are bad owners. Then when they get their hands on a dog bred to bite and hold no matter what the consequences are. What do you think is going to happen? 

Oh wait, no need to think. Just need to read about it every other week in the paper. 

Pit bull apologist excuses in 3,2,1...

 
you are all truly insane. if my dog ever case close to looking like she would attack anybody maybe i would listen. Sorry, i take the hard data from the last 10 years that my dog is ok. i don't think anyone on here is saying every single pit-bull in America is fine, but assuming all are something they are completely not is willfully ignorant. keep living in this created world, believe my neighbors are not deathly afraid of my dog like some of you in here
So you are saying something like your dog would only attack with kisses? Never heard that stupid crap before. Oh wait, just read the same ridiculous stuff in an article about a pit bull killing.

 
I get that if you’ve had a pit bull for 10 years and it’s never shown any sign of aggression, that you can be comfortable that it’s not a safety risk.  But what I don’t get is that same owner at some point didn’t have 10 years of data. At some point, they only had 2 years of data, or one year, or six months. Surely, you couldn’t have been as comfortable then as you are now. And I guess what I find difficult to understand is bringing a dog that you don’t quite know into your home that has such destructive power.  In that regard, I would think that anyone adopting a pit from a rescue would be taking a really big risk. Sure, in ten years, you might be able to comfortably argue that your dog is fantastic and no danger to anyone, as some have in this thread. But there have had to be some years early on that you were less sure, right?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I get that if you’ve had a pit bull for 10 years and it’s never shown any sign of aggression, that you can be comfortable that it’s not a safety risk.  But what I don’t get is that same owner at some point didn’t have 10 years of data. At some point, they only had 2 years of data, or one year, or six months. Surely, you couldn’t have been as comfortable then as you are now. And I guess what I find difficult to understand is bringing a dog that you don’t quite know into your home that has such destructive power.  In that regard, I would think that anyone adopting a pit from a rescue would be taking a really big risk. Sure, in ten years, you might be able to comfortably argue that your dog is fantastic and no danger to anyone, as some have in this thread. But there have had to be some years early on that you were less sure, right?
Hell, let’s go back prior to the “years early on that you were less sure.”  Let’s go right to the part where you and Mrs. Doglover and Jr. Doglover are all standing around around at your local PetCo looking at all the dogs and one of you says “oh, what about that pit bull.  Because that seems like a great idea.”

I’d love to understand how that happens, right there at the beginning.  Forget about the decades thereafter of convincing themselves that their pit bull would never harm a fly.  At least it’s human nature to rationalize like that once you’re in the predicament. 

 
Almost all dog owners are bad owners. Then when they get their hands on a dog bred to bite and hold no matter what the consequences are. What do you think is going to happen? 

Oh wait, no need to think. Just need to read about it every other week in the paper. 

Pit bull apologist excuses in 3,2,1...
Should we ban other large dog breeds capable of severe damage as well?

Wouldn't harsher penalties on the owners of all dogs that attack and permits/licenses/registrations/etc for the larger breeds be a better solution?

 
It’s like we keep having the same conversation.

Probably we’ll make a breakthrough any moment now. 
It's a logical solution but the majority of the anti-pitbull crowd is so gun-ho on eliminating the breed they aren't offering any other solutions.

 
It's a logical solution but the majority of the anti-pitbull crowd is so gun-ho on eliminating the breed they aren't offering any other solutions.
I haven't seen anyone say eliminate the breed. We dont eliminate other animals that are unfit as pets.

You use an absolute ton of strawmen and red herrings.

 
I get that if you’ve had a pit bull for 10 years and it’s never shown any sign of aggression, that you can be comfortable that it’s not a safety risk.  But what I don’t get is that same owner at some point didn’t have 10 years of data. At some point, they only had 2 years of data, or one year, or six months. Surely, you couldn’t have been as comfortable then as you are now. And I guess what I find difficult to understand is bringing a dog that you don’t quite know into your home that has such destructive power.  In that regard, I would think that anyone adopting a pit from a rescue would be taking a really big risk. Sure, in ten years, you might be able to comfortably argue that your dog is fantastic and no danger to anyone, as some have in this thread. But there have had to be some years early on that you were less sure, right?
Don’t be silly. It’s only the horrible, POS pit bull owners that are at risk of being mauled to death. 

 
Yeah! Maybe we shouldn’t be so quick to judge. There could have been another animal. Maybe it was a werewolf that attacked her and the dogs ripped her up trying to protect her from the werewolf! Or aliens. Can’t rule out aliens as the attackers...
Wild pack of Corgis probably

 
Should we ban other large dog breeds capable of severe damage as well?

Wouldn't harsher penalties on the owners of all dogs that attack and permits/licenses/registrations/etc for the larger breeds be a better solution?
No, although after we start with pit bulls I’d be open to looking at other breeds.

I’m in favor of banning the breed and would be fine with harsher penalties for owners.

 
Right - if it’s not a pit bull then I’m not talking about that in hear.  Fee free to start a thread about Labs and their attacks and I’ll maybe post in it.
:confused:

You just brought up labs and I linked an article on them?

You guys are running some grade A schtick in here....it's gotta be shtick.

:shrug:

 
:confused:

You just brought up labs and I linked an article on them?

You guys are running some grade A schtick in here....it's gotta be shtick.

:shrug:
My reply is about pit bull defenders constantly saying stupid #### like “should we ban all large breeds?” or “what about labs??!? - look at this link I found that proves my assanine point!”.  This thread is about pit bulls and the unfortunate fact that they are in the news somewhat regularly where they maul someone to death.  

 
Should we ban other large dog breeds capable of severe damage as well?

Wouldn't harsher penalties on the owners of all dogs that attack and permits/licenses/registrations/etc for the larger breeds be a better solution?
There is a big difference between "capable of" and "bred for". I dont know why you keep bringing up other dogs. It does nothing to disprove the fact that pit bulls were bred for a pretty sick purpose and have a built in ability to inflict a lot of harm. No other dog breed has any effect on that. 

 
pit bull defenders constantly saying stupid ####
I think that the "pit bull defenders" have produced real data and logical points, along with some pretty cool personal stories. On the other hand, I think other men in the thread are afraid of imaginary monsters and are on a witch hunt.

 
pit bulls were bred for a pretty sick purpose
Okay. Well why don't you tell us. That way we can all get on the same page about what we're arguing about. Because when you say they "were bred to hold onto a bull's snout that has had hot pepper put in its nostrils to enrage it" I don't know what that means. And honestly, it sounds like something out of a demented Disney movie.

 
Okay. Well why don't you tell us. That way we can all get on the same page about what we're arguing about. Because when you say they "were bred to hold onto a bull's snout that has had hot pepper put in its nostrils to enrage it" I don't know what that means. And honestly, it sounds like something out of a demented Disney movie.
You seriously haven't ever read about bull baiting? 

Pit bulls were bred to be able to grab onto a bull's snout and hold on as long as possible. To piss the bulls off, they used to put hot pepper in the bull's nostrils. The sickos that went to these events found it wildly entertaining when a good pit bull would latch on and get slammed onto the ground repeatedly by the furious bull.

 
Anytime you wash over an entire population of anything and reduce it to one stereotype it should raise some red flags in your brain. It's a very narrow-minded way to think. I am more arguing against that concept than I am for pit bulls. But I like to think I harbor some sort of empathy and intelligence. And it's a situation that parallels so many other situations we face in society. If I harbored such an "us versus them mentality" I would want someone to point that out to me. That mentality is stems from fear, and I'm just trying to tell you you don't have anything to be afraid of.

 
I think that the "pit bull defenders" have produced real data and logical points, along with some pretty cool personal stories. On the other hand, I think other men in the thread are afraid of imaginary monsters and are on a witch hunt.
What real data do you think has been presented by the pro-pit folks? Because the only data I see doesn't look great for your side:

34 U.S. dog bite-related fatalities occurred in 2015. Despite being regulated in Military Housing areas and over 700 U.S. cities, pit bulls contributed to 82% (28) of these deaths. Pit bulls make up about 6.6% of the total U.S. dog population.
https://www.dogsbite.org/dog-bite-statistics-fatalities-2015.php

And a 2011 study from the Annals of Surgery revealed that "attacks by pit bulls are associated with higher morbidity rates, higher hospital charges and a higher risk of death than are attacks by other breeds of dogs."
https://www.livescience.com/27145-are-pit-bulls-dangerous.html

In the United States, pit bull-type dogs and rottweilers were involved in more than half of 238 dog-attack deaths; they were followed by German shepherds, husky-type dogs, and malamutes in the number of deaths caused
In 1990, Winnipeg was the first major Canadian jurisdiction among several to ban pit bull (terrier)-type dogs. Ontario adopted a province-wide ban on pit bulls in 2005. Edmonton requires that vicious dogs be muzzled in public and that the American Staffordshire terrier and Staffordshire bull terrier (breeds often included under pit bull-types) be automatically considered vicious...The American Staffordshire terrier, the most widely legislated breed in Canada in the period under study, caused 1 fatality
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2387261/

 
For the love of christ....92 pages and people still referring to pit bull as a breed (its not).  This thread makes me sad. 

 
What real data do you think has been presented by the pro-pit folks?
Well, that's a lot you just put on my plate. I'll take a look at it, but right off the bat I can tell you that the woman who made that dogsbite website, Colleen Lynn, has no professional credentials in statistics, epidemiology, or animal behavior, and neither do the sources she frequently relies on. And before her dog bite injury that prompted her to start the website she maintained a fortune-telling web site.

 
You seriously haven't ever read about bull baiting? 

Pit bulls were bred to be able to grab onto a bull's snout and hold on as long as possible. To piss the bulls off, they used to put hot pepper in the bull's nostrils. The sickos that went to these events found it wildly entertaining when a good pit bull would latch on and get slammed onto the ground repeatedly by the furious bull.
It is this ability to hold onto something no matter what is happening around it that gave the pit bull the false reputation of having a locking jaw or some sort of insane bite strength. Their raw bite strength or physical construction of their jaw has almost nothing to do with it. Tons of dogs are physically strong enough and have teeth big enough that if they had the same disposition as a pit bull they would be able to hold on. For most it just becomes instinct when they are being hit, kicked, slammed, etc to let go and protect themselves. A pit bull was bred differently. 

 
There is a big difference between "capable of" and "bred for". I dont know why you keep bringing up other dogs. It does nothing to disprove the fact that pit bulls were bred for a pretty sick purpose and have a built in ability to inflict a lot of harm. No other dog breed has any effect on that. 
So no other dog was bred for fighting? 

Sure about that, buddy?

Once again, it wasn't that long ago when Rottweilers were the #1 breed people wanted to ban/eliminate/restrict.

 
It is this ability to hold onto something no matter what is happening around it that gave the pit bull the false reputation of having a locking jaw or some sort of insane bite strength. Their raw bite strength or physical construction of their jaw has almost nothing to do with it. Tons of dogs are physically strong enough and have teeth big enough that if they had the same disposition as a pit bull they would be able to hold on. For most it just becomes instinct when they are being hit, kicked, slammed, etc to let go and protect themselves. A pit bull was bred differently. 
Wow, with that kind of power, how do humans even survive? !?!?!?!?!?!1!?!?11

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top