ChuckLiddell said:
Id be pissed if my team gave up two firsts for him. And I am a Dolphins fan. And a Wilson fan. And a Phish fan.
Its not the picks that are the problem. Paying one player that large of a percentage of your salary cap is crippling. The teams that win Super Bowls seem to be for the most part teams with QBS on rookie deals, or a team where the star QB takes a very team-friendly deal. We know Brady does, and I think Brees does too (although I dont know that for sure). Stafford and Rodgers are making bank, and they arent even taking their teams to the playoffs. Probably because they cannot afford to build a team around them with so much money tied to one player.
Super bowl QBs and cap % since 2011 CBA:
2011/2012: Eli Manning (11.61%), Tom Brady (10.19%)
2012/2013: Joe Flacco (6.63%), Colin Kaepernick (0.97%)
2013/2014: Russell Wilson (0.49%), Peyton Manning (12.42%)
2014/2015: Tom Brady (10.64%), Russell Wilson (0.60%)
2015/2016: Peyton Manning (11.66%), Cam Newton (8.70%)
2016/2017: Tom Brady (8.62%), Matt Ryan (14.96%)
2017/2018: Nick Foles (0.91%), Tom Brady (8.36%)
2018/2019: Tom Brady (12.21%), Jared Goff (4.20%)
4 out of 16 of these QBs were on rookie contracts. 6 of 16 were typical high QB contracts (10+%). The remaining 4 were veterans on "team friendly" contracts (<10%).
If we focus on winners, 4 of 8 were typical high QB contracts, 3 were team friendly veteran contracts, and 1 was a rookie contract
Paying typical high QB money is not necessarily crippling your team in terms of chances to win or participate in a Superbowl. I would argue paying the
wrong QB big money certainly is, however. Personally, I think Russell Wilson has proven he deserves and is worth a hefty contract.