WTF is going on here. Have people really forgotten how good Murray was in college. I remember going back and forth on this board with people about how he was a stud and one of the best RBs to come out of college in a while. Then, he had several bad knee injuries and things cooled on him considerably. There was a fear, I mistakenly shared it, that he would never be the same post injury. That he had lost his burst, wiggle and agility. How we are comparing him and Crowell from a talent standpoint is beyond me. Crowell was never in the same realm as Murray. Murray dropped in the draft because of these injury concerns. Here's a major difference though, he was still drafted. In the 3rd round no less. Crowell wasn't drafted at all. So, fine you want to say Crowell fell because of character concers. I'm on board with that to an extent. However, I'm in no way on board with it being the reason he wasn't drafted at all. There are plenty of examples of players with character concerns, many worse than Crowell, that still get drafted. Hell, one such player was drafted at his same position this year.
I don't think Murray went in the 3rd just because of injury concerns. There were questions about his vision, running style and ability to run through contact. He may have fallen because he looked less impressive at times, particularly his last year in college - which would mean there were questions about his talent. But it's certainly possible that his less than impressive moments may have been due to lingering injuries rather than deficiencies in skill or talent. Wasn't that the exact question with Marquise Lee this last year? Guy looks great at times, but then not so much at others. Is that inconsistency proof of a lack of elite talent, the impact of nagging injuries or instead immaturity and lack of consistent effort?
But we don't know really. So many will hedge and let someone drop a bit. Unless you're the Raiders or Josh McDaniels.
So that's why I say there's an element of hindsight being 20/20 when it comes to Murray. He's producing, so it had to be injuries, right? But he wasn't universally considered a can't miss prospect, much like the guy in front of him, Felix Jones, who was also supposedly long on speed and receiving skill.
But you don't have the benefit of hindsight with Crowell yet. So then why the rush to pigeon hole him in a talent evaluation when his character issues so obviously muddy the water?
Crowell didn't fall from grace at Georgia due to a lack of talent. And for all we know he didn't do better at Alabama State because he thought he was too big for the program and was just biding him time until he could make a run at the NFL. If people want to bang on him for his character concerns, be my guest. But his problem hasn't been a lack of talent.
And I think being the anti-Rudy is something that coaches do not like at all. Who wants a talented guy that dogs it and will pull himself out of games, completely depriving you of his talent, when he gets a bump or bruise? We think of those guys as being soft or having no heart or loyalty. We don't really like those kind of guys, right? Crowell's ASU coaches weren't really singing his praises when he left. Remember that. I think that's what hurt him so much. He gets kicked out of Georgia and then rather than getting scared straight, he thinks he's too cool for small school. Who wants to buy that headache? But that has little to do with his talent.