Most heavily owned on Dolphins were Ajayi and Parker. Ajayi is now on bye with the Eagles. Landry is only on 27 rosters. Funchess on 68. Brady 145 (though most likely have another QB score counting already). James White 145. Cooks 200. Gronk 173. Newton 299 (but again most have a QB score already). McCaffrey at 878 and D. Parker at 932 are the two guys with the ability to move the cut line the most. All of you guys on the fence should be praying they put up duds. That being said I think the cut line ends up right around 120121 will not be enough, imo
I think it will be close to 130 - but I don't know the ownership stats of the teams left. But I think there will be a lot of Miami players - since they had the week 1 Bye. Not sure who is heavily owned on Patriots (other than Hogan who is out), Broncos or Panthers
Lol I like your thought process and optimism for my 121.1 I missed the cut by less than a point last week maybe I can do it again? After this week I have very little byes and still key injurys but not taking any more zeros. I'm not gonna hold my breath but you gave me hope that mccaffree and Parker both get ejected for mooning the crowd in warmups lol:Most heavily owned on Dolphins were Ajayi and Parker. Ajayi is now on bye with the Eagles. Landry is only on 27 rosters. Funchess on 68. Brady 145 (though most likely have another QB score counting already). James White 145. Cooks 200. Gronk 173. Newton 299 (but again most have a QB score already). McCaffrey at 878 and D. Parker at 932 are the two guys with the ability to move the cut line the most. All of you guys on the fence should be praying they put up duds. That being said I think the cut line ends up right around 120
I need mccafery witch means odds of said pregame moon just went upLol I like your thought process and optimism for my 121.1 I missed the cut by less than a point last week maybe I can do it again? After this week I have very little byes and still key injurys but not taking any more zeros. I'm not gonna hold my breath but you gave me hope that mccaffree and Parker both get ejected for mooning the crowd in warmups lol:
Goff: 30.05QB: Winston hurt, Wentz bye, Goff active
RB: DJ and Sproles hurt, D Washington bye, CMC and Cohen active
WR: Hill bye, Evans suspended, Hogan questionable, Zay Jones, Robbie Anderson, Wright and Goodwin active. The fact that I needed to specify first names here doesn't bode well.
TE: Olsen and Kittle hurt, Ertz bye, Graham active
That means everyone above that's active WILL be my counting players this week. My only variability is at PK (Dawson, Walsh) and DEF (CAR, DET, TEN).
It was a run.
Goodwin, Wright and Anderson saving my ###, who'da thunk it?wow very nice
Thanks for link. I somehow survived with 143 plus McCaffrey. I think i have a good chance to make a run!Would be awesome if this could be pinned to top thread: http://calcomatic.com/EntryLive/103581
I'm without Hunt, Hill, Ertz, Tucker and Chiefs D due to byes. Without Dalvin Cook, Corey Coleman and Chris Hogan due to injury. Assume I get Clay back.
I've pretty much assumed for past few weeks that if I made it this far this would be the week I go. Still likely, but Jimmy Grahams day sure helped but it also helped over 400 other teams. Good luck.
well andersons been good for like 5 weeks in a row now. but yeah you picked a good time for goodwins only catch of the year lol.Goodwin, Wright and Anderson saving my ###, who'da thunk it?
lol nope cut is flying up. Think we are gonna see 125 min and could see 130's with how fast it went in the first.Lol I like your thought process and optimism for my 121.1 I missed the cut by less than a point last week maybe I can do it again? After this week I have very little byes and still key injurys but not taking any more zeros. I'm not gonna hold my breath but you gave me hope that mccaffree and Parker both get ejected for mooning the crowd in warmups lol:
You're a little iffy on your counting. The line was 106.7 before the NE kickoff. It's now 111.05 -- hardly "flying up".Foxer2373 said:lol nope cut is flying up. Think we are gonna see 125 min and could see 130's with how fast it went in the first.
guess it would seem like its flying up if your sitting at 121.You're a little iffy on your counting. The line was 106.7 before the NE kickoff. It's now 111.05 -- hardly "flying up".
Nah. 29 points in the 1st half should have pushed it up more. But the scoring is a little weird. I have a feeling Bill is going to be happy grinding it out in the 2nd half if his defense can hold off the Osweiller attack. If there was ever a team and a coach who can't afford a QB injury it's the Pats and Belichick.guess it would seem like its flying up if your sitting at 121.
Green Bay says hi.Nah. 29 points in the 1st half should have pushed it up more. But the scoring is a little weird. I have a feeling Bill is going to be happy grinding it out in the 2nd half if his defense can hold off the Osweiller attack. If there was ever a team and a coach who can't afford a QB injury it's the Pats and Belichick.
GB didn't just trade away a very viable backup 2 weeks ago.Green Bay says hi.
Because they don't have a viable backup. I'd take Belichick and Hoyer over McCarthy and Hundley.GB didn't just trade away a very viable backup 2 weeks ago.
But NE had the personnel to handle a Brady injury 2 weeks ago. Now they don't, by choice not circumstances. Bill gambled mightily on Brady staying healthy. He had as good a fall-back as anyone in the NFL had. Now he doesn't, again, by choice.Because they don't have a viable backup. I'd take Belichick and Hoyer over McCarthy and Hundley.
totally disagree, no they didnt. i think youre drastically overstating the situation. if they lose brady for any length of time theyre done. jimmy g wasnt going to save them. you kinda sound like all the pats fans around here (i live in ct) who think hes the savior and are mad that new england 'only' got the #33ish pick for their backup qb.But NE had the personnel to handle a Brady injury 2 weeks ago. Now they don't, by choice not circumstances. Bill gambled mightily on Brady staying healthy. He had as good a fall-back as anyone in the NFL had. Now he doesn't, again, by choice.
I guess I just figure Belichick would find a way to be more competitive with Hoyer than GB has been with Hundley, that's all. But of course losing Brady would hurt.But NE had the personnel to handle a Brady injury 2 weeks ago. Now they don't, by choice not circumstances. Bill gambled mightily on Brady staying healthy. He had as good a fall-back as anyone in the NFL had. Now he doesn't, again, by choice.
I don't think he would lead them to a SB. I think he could lead them to, say, a 3-1 record if Brady missed 4 games. That's probably enough to lock-up a bye at least, maybe home field throughout.totally disagree, no they didnt. i think youre drastically overstating the situation. if they lose brady for any length of time theyre done. jimmy g wasnt going to save them. you kinda sound like all the pats fans around here (i live in ct) who think hes the savior and are mad that new england 'only' got the #33ish pick for their backup qb.
i think belicheck made the correct play. if the only way you can win is by going all in on brady, then it doesnt really matter if you have a backup qb or not.
yeah i think thats fair.I don't think he would lead them to a SB. I think he could lead them to, say, a 3-1 record if Brady missed 4 games. That's probably enough to lock-up a bye at least, maybe home field throughout.
I agree with that. It just seems to me that while I think NE (with Brady or Garappolo or possibly Hoyer) beat Buffalo/Tennessee/Jax at home in the WC round, having to go to Pitt/KC in the divisional round looks a lot different than catching them at home.yeah i think thats fair.
the point i was trying to make is that the worse your team is without brady, the less you actually need a backup qb.
Best thing you have going for you is the 2 offenses playing tomorrow night. Butt-ugly football is absolutely in play for MNF.I guess I just figure Belichick would find a way to be more competitive with Hoyer than GB has been with Hundley, that's all. But of course losing Brady would hurt.
Anyway, I'm off topic... and only 11 points above the cut now :(
I'll take it... if I do get by, and it's a big if, it will be by decimal points.Best thing you have going for you is the 2 offenses playing tomorrow night. Butt-ugly football is absolutely in play for MNF.
I'd also take Belichick and Hundley over McCarthy and Hoyer.Because they don't have a viable backup. I'd take Belichick and Hoyer over McCarthy and Hundley.
I'm good 146.85. Good Luck all.I only have Kamara at rb next week. Its been fun. David Johnson And Dalvin Cook going to catch up with me.
I think you should be safe.Done at 127.25. I'm 10 pts up on the current cut and there are 426 owners between me at the cut. There are 278 owners in the within 10 pts of the cut line.
Looking at the 20 owners below the cut, 6 are done. Most of the rest have either Parker of CMac counting after 1.5 to 5 points.
Haven't run numbers but entirely possible he is my highest scoring non QB.I think Zuerlein has been my teams MVP.