You used your question to report him. And I believe you can.Was just a question. You can't react to posts while banned.
You used your question to report him. And I believe you can.Was just a question. You can't react to posts while banned.
Wrong on both points. Have a good one.You used your question to report him. And I believe you can.
Yes, if they take posting privileges away instead of a timeout you can still use the like emojis.Wrong on both points. Have a good one.
I think that was a side effect for letting people on timeouts continue to view the forum. They can still log in and do other things, just not post.Yes, if they take posting privileges away instead of a timeout you can still use the like emojis.
This is a thing?Yes, if they take posting privileges away instead of a timeout you can still use the like emojis.
I’m not at all in favor of shutting the PSF down but should it ever get to this point, close the doors and turn out the lights.I don't think we're going to police likes or other reactions.
Sounds like a recent change.I think that was a side effect for letting people on timeouts continue to view the forum. They can still log in and do other things, just not post.Yes, if they take posting privileges away instead of a timeout you can still use the like emojis.
You don't have to. Just eliminate this new like/reaction emoji now being used IMO to troll and the problem is solved. Seriously, if someone uses it 13 times in a thread, do you honestly believe it is because they repeatedly found what the person(s) said hilarious or were they instead ridiculing them? So far when asked to explain what they have found so funny the response has been :crickets: (for obvious reasons).I don't think we're going to police likes or other reactions.
Seriously? You were the main reason the laughing emoji can’t be used alone and now you want to eliminate the like laughing emoji. The fact it bothers some of you is astounding.You don't have to. Just eliminate this new like/reaction emoji now being used IMO to troll and the problem is solved. Seriously, if someone uses it 13 times in a thread, do you honestly believe it is because they repeatedly found what the person(s) said hilarious or were they instead ridiculing them? So far when asked to explain what they have found so funny the response has been :crickets: (for obvious reasons).
The laughing emoji was eliminated? I don't think so...here it is for you...Seriously? You were the main reason the laughing emoji was eliminated and now you want to eliminate the like laughing emoji. The fact it bothers some of you is astounding.
You know what I meant. You complained over and over that it shouldn’t be used alone and reported it.The laughing emoji was eliminated? I don't think so...here it is for you...
Impossible to believe such a thing exists.Let's talk about something less inconsequential.
How about just ignoring it.You don't have to. Just eliminate this new like/reaction emoji now being used IMO to troll and the problem is solved. Seriously, if someone uses it 13 times in a thread, do you honestly believe it is because they repeatedly found what the person(s) said hilarious or were they instead ridiculing them? So far when asked to explain what they have found so funny the response has been :crickets: (for obvious reasons).
It is not as yet an ignore function feature.How about just ignoring it.
How about just ignoring it? Like non message board terminology ignoring it. Like sticks and stones kinda stuff.It is not as yet an ignore function feature.
You need a ignore feature to ignore something? I think we’ve identified part of the problemIt is not as yet an ignore function feature.
That’s your problem that you pay attention to likes and let it offend you.It is not as yet an ignore function feature.
I disagree. If we get to that point I would prefer to see Joe hire a drill sergeant to show up at posters' houses and say, "WIPE THAT SMILE OFF YOUR FACE, PRIVATE!"I’m not at all in favor of shutting the PSF down but should it ever get to this point, close the doors and turn out the lights.
Interesting. The other day I reported a post for what I believe was the first time since I joined the site, for what seemed to me to be homophobic language toward Mayor Pete. I guess that would fall into your first category of posts that should be removed ASAP -- and I saw someone mention in another thread that that poster had been punished for it -- but I wondered afterward whether it would have been better to report him or simply respond and ask him what he meant by that phrase. So this is helpful guidance. Report it if it's bad, ignore it otherwise, but don't drag out the argument.If you absolutely can't bring yourself to ignore a post like that, reporting it is a much better option that responding to it. Jackstraw's response was every bit as off-topic as jon's post was, and he probably should have been suspended as well.
For the record i only gave this the crying emoji because i felt that best represented a smile being wiped off of somebodys face.I disagree. If we get to that point I would prefer to see Joe hire a drill sergeant to show up at posters' houses and say, "WIPE THAT SMILE OFF YOUR FACE, PRIVATE!"
ReportedFor the record i only gave this the crying emoji because i felt that best represented a smile being wiped off of somebodys face.
That's the only shtick you noticed? No other shtick by anyone else? Really?@Opiegiving that a smiley is pretty good shtick, gotta admit.
It’s always rich how up in arms they get if someone on their side gets pinched. This thread goes wild with rule change requests, hard to keep up with.That's the only shtick you noticed? No other shtick by anyone else? Really?
But It's the emoji that sent you over the top?
I can’t disagree.It’s always rich how up in arms they get if someone on their side gets pinched. This thread goes wild with rule change requests, hard to keep up with.
Odd this seems the opposite of reality given what gets posted in the Trump thread if a Trump poster gets suspended.It’s always rich how up in arms they get if someone on their side gets pinched. This thread goes wild with rule change requests, hard to keep up with.
Yeah, I would like to know that too.Odd this seems the opposite of reality given what gets posted in the Trump thread if a Trump poster gets suspended.
Who here on the other side is up it arms because someone “ got pinched”?
Only one thread matters? That seems more odd than anythingOdd this seems the opposite of reality given what gets posted in the Trump thread if a Trump poster gets suspended.
Who here on the other side is up it arms because someone “ got pinched”?
I would suggest that you take a look at the sentences I bolded and see if they represent any kind of pattern. Good luck!I see things are still getting better in here. It wouldn't matter if everyone but two people left, or were perma banned. Those two people will still find reason to disagree on politics.
I've spent the last few weeks on other message boards. I've come to the realization that posters are not the problem, the problem is ownership and moderation. Joe admits that the Shark Pool, the FFA and the PSF are all treated differently. Then he states that 90% of the reporting is coming from the PSF. No ####. If you enforced the rules consistently in the Shark Pool, you'd see similar problems across the entire board.I did the research . People make the same comments in the SP that they do in the PSF. The only difference is that it's about a coach, a team or a player and not about something that really effects our every day lives like taxes, health care, or war.
Sorry Joe, since stepping away, Ive gained some clarity on the issue. It's you. You have this idea of a message board Utopia that exists no where else but here. That's admirable at best, delusional at worst. You're asking everyone to change to accommodate you. Instead of you accommodating them. It's a terrible message to send, especially if some of those people are your customers.
I would like to thank Maurile. If he hadn't censored my comments here by hiding posts, I never would have achieved this enlightenment. Him telling me to Get over it , or find another board, was excellent advice. Ive done exactly that. I'm not interested in posting on a board where a random moderator gets sole decision on determining my value. This is just another example of how Joe chooses his friends over business, and then wonders why his business struggles. You can't have it both ways. Moderation has been a problem the entire time I've been on this board. And I suspect it will continue to be so.
Good luck. I suspect the PSF will disappear in the near future. The problems will just move to the FFA and Joe will be stuck with the decision of giving up, or shutting the FFA down as well. You can't change people. Especially random people on the internet. So, don’t waste your time.
Slapdash said:@Joe Bryant/ @Maurile Tremblay Not wanting to talk about other people posting in a topic thread, but this seems like it falls under the "you know it when you see it"
To be clear, I wasn't looking for anyone to be banned. I personally don't think anyone should be given a TO unless it's something pretty vile but not my board or rules. Anyhow, I have a lot of family and friends that served and serve. I don't paint everyone that puts on the uniform with the same brush as "heroes" but these are some of the best people you would ever want to meet. I don't know Vindman personally but after listening to his testimony it's pretty clear that he would fall into this same category. For he and his brother to loser their job, be reassigned, whatever, should be alarming to every American. All we know is that Trump was mad Vindman followed the law and testified, his brother did nothing that we know of, then all of a sudden this is reported. This isn't what's supposed to happen in America. This isn't what our troops have fought and given their lives for.I don't think we're going to police likes or other reactions.
It’s rather shocking to me that you stepped away to gain clarity and came back still not understanding that exchange.I see things are still getting better in here. It wouldn't matter if everyone but two people left, or were perma banned. Those two people will still find reason to disagree on politics.
I've spent the last few weeks on other message boards. I've come to the realization that posters are not the problem, the problem is ownership and moderation. Joe admits that the Shark Pool, the FFA and the PSF are all treated differently. Then he states that 90% of the reporting is coming from the PSF. No ####. If you enforced the rules consistently in the Shark Pool, you'd see similar problems across the entire board. I did the research. People make the same comments in the SP that they do in the PSF. The only difference is that it's about a coach, a team or a player and not about something that really effects our every day lives like taxes, health care, or war.
Sorry Joe, since stepping away, I've gained some clarity on the issue. It's you. You have this idea of a message board Utopia that exists no where else but here. That's admirable at best, delusional at worst. You're asking everyone to change to accommodate you. Instead of you accommodating them. It's a terrible message to send, especially if some of those people are your customers.
I would like to thank Maurile. If he hadn't censored my comments here by hiding posts, I never would have achieved this enlightenment. Him telling me to get over it, or find another board, was excellent advice. I've done exactly that. I'm not interested in posting on a board where a random moderator gets sole decision on determining my value. This is just another example of how Joe chooses his friends over business, and then wonders why his business struggles. You can't have it both ways. Moderation has been a problem the entire time I've been on this board. And I suspect it will continue to be so.
Good luck. I suspect the PSF will disappear in the near future. The problems will just move to the FFA and Joe will be stuck with the decision of giving up, or shutting the FFA down as well. You can't change people. Especially random people on the internet. So, don't waste your time.
Thanks for the feedback and of course, I totally agree with you. I've realized from the get this was an unorthodox idea swimming against the stream of what's allowed on most boards. No argument there. Also no argument that I could be completely wrong and this won't work. Wouldn't be the first time.Sorry Joe, since stepping away, I've gained some clarity on the issue. It's you. You have this idea of a message board Utopia that exists no where else but here. That's admirable at best, delusional at worst. You're asking everyone to change to accommodate you. Instead of you accommodating them. It's a terrible message to send, especially if some of those people are your customers.
only 9 more months to go.
also, cav has been banned for 1 year.
hope you chodes are happy.
Joe being the customer service biz my whole life I applaud the way you handle yourself and your responses. You’re a class act Joe. Pure class.Thanks for the feedback and of course, I totally agree with you. I've realized from the get this was an unorthodox idea swimming against the stream of what's allowed on most boards. No argument there. Also no argument that I could be completely wrong and this won't work. Wouldn't be the first time.
Best to you in finding a place that works for you.
100% agree... Dealing with a group of personalities this diverse, especially in the politics forum can't be easy.Joe being the customer service biz my whole life I applaud the way you handle yourself and your responses. You’re a class act Joe. Pure class.
I agree the thread is mostly ridiculous, but every once in a while an interesting discussion about how to have a civil online discussion of politics pokes its head out. My strategy is to participate in that discussion and ignore all the whining, finger pointing and score settling.I can’t believe this is a real life thread. People willingly do this every single day
So YOU’RE the one to blame.My strategy is to participate in that discussion and ignore all the whining, finger pointing and score settling.
Just like at Thanksgiving and with friends all the time, it's probably better not to discuss politics if you value the relationship you have with either.KiddLattimer said:100% agree... Dealing with a group of personalities this diverse, especially in the politics forum can't be easy.