Jump to content
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

☠ ☠ ☠ Official 2021 Las Vegas Raiders thread ☠ ☠ ☠ - only 3.5 more months of talking about draft reaches until real football arrives


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.7k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

This is why it pays to wait before passing judgement on all deals. Based on the breakdown you have here, I love the deal too. Drake is a fantastic compliment to Jacobs.

By position: QB - we're fine with Carr.  He's at least very good and possibly great.  He's closer to 2016 form than 2019 and that's a good thing.  I'd be ok if we took a shot at a true franchise

I hope not!   Stompin is one of the better posters on this board.  

1 hour ago, Faust said:

Rodgers for a 3rd rounder? Yes. As much as I back Carr.... Rodgers is an all time great and has many years left. 

Kind of funny how these unquestionably great QB's like Russell and Rodgers have LV on their short list of places they want to land.... you know, with Gruden and Mayock at the helm which if you listen to some Raider fans are horrible, no nothing and no one wants to play for them..... kind of odd, because, it seems, that some Raider fans just may be overly biased in their poo poo views. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Chadstroma said:

Rodgers for a 3rd rounder? Yes. As much as I back Carr.... Rodgers is an all time great and has many years left. 

Kind of funny how these unquestionably great QB's like Russell and Rodgers have LV on their short list of places they want to land.... you know, with Gruden and Mayock at the helm which if you listen to some Raider fans are horrible, no nothing and no one wants to play for them..... kind of odd, because, it seems, that some Raider fans just may be overly biased in their poo poo views. 

My bad.... I think I read that wrong.... I think it was the third overall they wanted and some more. 

That is different. 17 plus a slew of other value. I will stick with Carr. 

But my other point stands. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Chadstroma said:

Rodgers for a 3rd rounder? Yes. As much as I back Carr.... Rodgers is an all time great and has many years left. 
 

I thought it was for the 3rd overall pick, not a 3rd rounder. 

?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Chadstroma said:

My bad.... I think I read that wrong.... I think it was the third overall they wanted and some more. 

That is different. 17 plus a slew of other value. I will stick with Carr. 

But my other point stands. 

Ah - you caught it just as I was posting 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Hot Sauce Guy said:

I thought it was for the 3rd overall pick, not a 3rd rounder. 

?

 

Yea.... I think I read it wrong..... I was like "wow, why in the hell did the Niners not jump on that?!" now it makes sense. 

Rodgers is awesome but he is older and they were asking the 3rd overall and "more"

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
52 minutes ago, DA RAIDERS said:

as crazy as it sounds, i'll pass on rodgers.  way too many other holes to fill.  and the trade would only create more holes.

I don’t think it’s realistic regardless. If the Niners want him, that 1.03 is a trade chip the Raiders can’t realistically compete with. 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

While I may not have thought it was best idea for Raiders, I didn't want him in division:  

Cecil Lammey

@CecilLammey

19m.

@markschlereth

on @1043TheFan

NOW says #Broncos are not taking a QB in the #NFLDraft because they are close to trading for Aaron Rodgers per his sources. "As close to a done deal as it can be."

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
39 minutes ago, Hot Sauce Guy said:

I don’t think it’s realistic regardless. If the Niners want him, that 1.03 is a trade chip the Raiders can’t realistically compete with. 

Sounds like things are heating up with Denver. 
 

maybe the Niners said F it. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, raidergil said:

While I may not have thought it was best idea for Raiders, I didn't want him in division:  

Cecil Lammey

@CecilLammey

19m.

@markschlereth

on @1043TheFan

NOW says #Broncos are not taking a QB in the #NFLDraft because they are close to trading for Aaron Rodgers per his sources. "As close to a done deal as it can be."

That division would be brutal for the Raiders. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
30 minutes ago, raidergil said:

While I may not have thought it was best idea for Raiders, I didn't want him in division:  

Cecil Lammey

@CecilLammey

19m.

@markschlereth

on @1043TheFan

NOW says #Broncos are not taking a QB in the #NFLDraft because they are close to trading for Aaron Rodgers per his sources. "As close to a done deal as it can be."

That would SUCK

Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, DA RAIDERS said:

So far so good!!  Parsons may be available  :excited:

and i hope the stupid ### donkeys did mortgage their future, and traded everything for Rodgers. 

Long term it would be good but short term it would suck. Rodgers on the Donkeys makes them a lwadinge SB competitor for sure. Having two of those in our division will hurt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I knew all the Rodgers talk was a bunch of bull ####. 

For the raiders needs, this draft is unfolding nicely. Really hope someone trades up for a qb. Let’s go hoodie!

Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, DA RAIDERS said:

I knew all the Rodgers talk was a bunch of bull ####. 

For the raiders needs, this draft is unfolding nicely. Really hope someone trades up for a qb. Let’s go hoodie!

Bears just did

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Chadstroma said:

Except Cowboys.... going to be D..... I think taking Parsons is...... yup, they did

My daughter interrupted me when I was typing and as I was trying to finish they announced. lol

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, DocHolliday said:

F.  F.   F.   There goes Parsons.  

I knew it. Cowboys NEEDED D pretty much everywhere. One thing that the Cowboys do pretty often is take BPA regardless of need but in this case they needed him and prob the best defensive player period. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Chadstroma said:

I knew it. Cowboys NEEDED D pretty much everywhere. One thing that the Cowboys do pretty often is take BPA regardless of need but in this case they needed him and prob the best defensive player period. 

Yep.  Parsons is likely ROY on D.  

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, DocHolliday said:

Hey Chad.   I’m not happy.  Gruden reached again and left a lot of potential D players on the table.  Gruden cannot draft.  

Thanks for the update. 

🤣

  • Laughing 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Hankmoody changed the title to ☠ ☠ ☠ Official 2021 Las Vegas Raiders thread ☠ ☠ ☠ - only 3.5 more months of talking about draft reaches until real football arrives

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...