Biabreakable
Footballguy
Bump Finley.
Well it can't get any less. Law of averages says he'll catch a couple here and there. Save yourself the pain and drop this loser.Cook played 52% of GB's offensive snaps week 1, compared to 39% for Richard Rodgers.
I'm still hanging on to Cook in the league where I drafted him (which has a format where it makes sense to roster a backup TE), but if that number doesn't increase soon then I'll probably move on.
So 2 catchesKnowing Murphys law of attraction Jered Cook will likely have his best game of the season against the Vikings even though objective analysis of the situation and match up suggests he won't. Simply because I am talking smack about him.
Good man.If Cook has a bad game this week,almost everyone will be dumping him.Then he blows up in week 3,and everyone rushes to the waiver to get him again...the he sucks for 2-3 more weeks,gets dumped again,has another big game,get picked back up and so on...I think He'll be a hit or miss all year and a waste of a bench spot for a more productive TE on a weekly basis. Great athlete,just not a good football player! I'm not wasting my time on Cooks ever again. I've gotten suckered in too many times,thinking this might be the year. No Thanks!
The great ones attract their fair share of haters. Look at how people feel about guys like Brady or Kobe.Had no idea this dude was so polarizing. Wow.
Those players are actually good. We are talking about Jared Cook here.Ilov80s said:The great ones attract their fair share of haters. Look at how people feel about guys like Brady or Kobe.
Depends how you define good.Those players are actually good. We are talking about Jared Cook here.
Yeah that was terrible.Making a reception but then running backwards on 3rd down so that you only gain 9 yards instead of the 10 yards you needed and had before you ran backwards is something I would define as not good.
Great athlete, not good at football.
If I had ten seconds to explain Jared Cook to someone, I show then this video.Making a reception but then running backwards on 3rd down so that you only gain 9 yards instead of the 10 yards you needed and had before you ran backwards is something I would define as not good.
Great athlete, not good at football.
Week 2: Cook played 65% of the snaps and R Rodgers played 51%. 6 targets, which he turned into 4/31/0, on a day when the offense was struggling. Still seems worth holding on to in the league where I own him.Cook played 52% of GB's offensive snaps week 1, compared to 39% for Richard Rodgers.
I'm still hanging on to Cook in the league where I drafted him (which has a format where it makes sense to roster a backup TE), but if that number doesn't increase soon then I'll probably move on.
He doubled your reasonable prediction for this game. Glad I didn't say more bad stuff about him.Dude lol
Yep I venture he cost himself a lot of $$. Though if Dion Sims is pulling 6M per year who knows..Where does he end up now? Made a big mistake leaving Green Bay.
Bears liking that 1.01 next year.Yep I venture he cost himself a lot of $$. Though if Dion Sims is pulling 6M per year who knows..
Sounds like this might not be true.lod001 said:They offered Cook more than Bennett's contract. They got a better player for less and this moron now sees his value crater.
I'm not sure that Walford is a bust but he is not the player that I thought the Raiders were getting. He looks slow or at least lack quickness off the line. Obviously, the Cook signing indicates that the Raiders do not think he is their starting TE.Can we call Warford a bust? TEs take time to develop normally. Would like to see him get more reps, not fewer.
An excellent fit in Derek Carr's aerial attack, Cook is an exceptionally athletic seam-stretching tight end. Although Clive Walford was drafted to fill that role, he failed to consistently gain separation in a disappointing second season.
Yeah. This is an upgrade for the Raiders at TE but Cook isn't a great TE.Was a putz for pretty much his entire career. I'll root for him, but this is not my favorite signing.
I don't think that's what it means at all. There is no such thing as too many weapons for a QB like Carr. If Walford is 1A and Cook is 1B this is a great signing. $6 for a year or two isn't going to break the bank where or cap is right now.DocHolliday said:I'm not sure that Walford is a bust but he is not the player that I thought the Raiders were getting. He looks slow or at least lack quickness off the line. Obviously, the Cook signing indicates that the Raiders do not think he is their starting TE.
Until last year the guy had crap for QB's....Got hurt last year but when back played very well.Yeah. This is an upgrade for the Raiders at TE but Cook isn't a great TE.
They offered Cook more than Bennett's contract. They got a better player for less and this moron now sees his value crater.
Raiders coach Jon Gruden indicated he has been surprisingly impressed by Jared Cook at OTAs and minicamp.
Cook quietly set a career high with 54 catches last season. "Jared Cook has had a great camp," said Gruden. "I did not know Jared Cook moved like that. I knew he had really good pass receiving skills, but we can line him up at a lot of different places now. He’s been really sharp. We’ve asked him to do a lot." Cook is an undervalued TE2 toward the end of fantasy drafts.
Source: San Jose Mercury News
Jun 13 - 1:26 P