What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

Gay Bombs (1 Viewer)

Do you think any location has secretly had a gay bomb detonated on it?

  • Yes

    Votes: 14 21.9%
  • No

    Votes: 50 78.1%

  • Total voters
    64

Al O'Pecia

Footballguy
So I just read that a Turkish journalist has recently accused the United States government of planning on dropping bombs on Turkey that would turn Turks gay:

A columnist for a Turkish pro-government newspaper said the United States planned to drop bombs on its enemies that change their targets’ sexual preferences.

“When the United States is an enemy of a country and plans to go to war, it plans either to drop a bomb that will change the sexual preferences of that country’s population or one that will kill them all,” wrote Mehmet Barlas in his Monday column for the high-circulation Sabah newspaper.

The original “gay bomb” had been planned as an alternative to the atomic bombs dropped on the Japanese cities of Nagasaki and Hiroshima during World War Two, Barlas explained, quoting documents he said had been recently declassified.

LINK

This news seemed hilarious and preposterous so I Googled "gay bombs" and came up with this:

One doesn’t commonly associate the slogan “make love not war” with the U.S. military. Indeed, the United States military is feared and formidable precisely because it has proven so effective at conceptualizing clever and innovative ways to search, find and destroy, often with the simple push of a button. However, in a departure from these hostile traditions, in 1994 the Wright Laboratory, part of the U.S. Air Force, produced a three page proposal for a “gay bomb”.

Documentation obtained by the Sunshine Project, an anti-biological weapons non-governmental organization, found that the Ohio-based Wright Lab requested a 6 year, $7.5 million grant to create a variety of non-lethal weapons. The bluntly titled project, called “Harassing, Annoying and ‘Bad Guy’ Identifying Chemicals” reads like a bawdy proposal penned by a Bond Villian- Auric Goldfinger perhaps?

It proposed a bomb “that contained a chemical that would cause enemy soldiers to become gay, and to have their units break down because all their soldiers became irresistibly attractive to one another”. While the laboratory also came up with similarly questionable ideas, such as bad-breath bombs, flatulence bombs and bombs designed to attract swarms of stinging insects to enemy combatants, one has to admit that the gay bomb is certainly the most novel.

The Pentagon maintains that the love affair with the gay bomb idea was brief. However, the Sunshine Project thinks the Pentagon doth protest too much, finding that they “submitted the proposal to the highest scientific review body in the country for them to consider”. Indeed, the proposal’s information was submitted to the National Academy of Sciences in 2002.

The Pentagon certainly admits giving the project consideration, releasing a statement affirming: “The department of defence is committed to identifying, researching and developing non-lethal weapons that will support our men and women in uniform.”

LINK

 
This is really important to my answer.  By "the United States government" do you include "do you believe the Trump Administration has considered manufacturing a gay bomb?" Or does it have to be someone who is involved in these things and has some rudimentary understanding of science?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
This is really important to my answer.  By "the United States government" do you include "do you believe the Trump Administration has considered manufacturing a gay bomb?" Or does it have to be someone who is involved in these things and has some rudimentary understanding of science?
It can include the Trump Administration, but the dates associated with the alleged gay bomb plan have it originating during the Clinton Administration (1994) and running up through the Bush Administration (2002).

 
I know a guy from HS who was a Green Beret and could snap you like a twig if he wanted to.  But mention Madonna or Elton John and he's like "girrrrrrrrrrrrl.....".  

 
I started to take the poll giving it some thought and then realized “what the #### am I doing?” :lol:
I don't get it.  Released government documents show that the concept was considered (how seriously we don't know) so why is it so  :lol:  to at least consider questions about the feasibility and ethics of a considered plan?

 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Top