Don't Noonan
Footballguy
@SaintsInDome2006 Still waiting to hear what he lied about. ??He didn't lie. He said he hadn't seen the whistle blower report which was true.
@SaintsInDome2006 Still waiting to hear what he lied about. ??He didn't lie. He said he hadn't seen the whistle blower report which was true.
Ok to answer this. Believing the SOS was not informed of the WB complaint when he was personally mentioned in it and when WH counsel and AG Barr were looped in beyond ridiculous.He didn't lie. He said he hadn't seen the whistle blower report which was true.
2nd inspector general.Steve Linick, the inspector general at State
Yup - this is now State, not just the IC - presumably covering their ###, and getting in front of anything Rudy is going to spew.2nd inspector general.
I have no doubt he had heard of the whistle blower report. However, he didn't say that he hadn't heard of it. He carefully said he hadn't seen it which was true. He did not lie.Ok to answer this. Believing the SOS was not informed of the WB complaint when he was personally mentioned in it and when WH counsel and AG Barr were looped in beyond ridiculous.
But getting past that he clearly deceived on the question by pretending he had no idea what Radditz was speaking about.
I'm going to need to see something less than a week old. The polls I'm seeing gathered on Forbes say that most of the polls are 47-55% in favor of either impeachment or the process of starting it.
Your position is that Barr, Trout, and Maguire saw it, and it was released to the public, before Pompeo, who is discussed in it, had gotten to read it, is that right?I have no doubt he had heard of the whistle blower report. However, he didn't say that he hadn't heard of it. He carefully said he hadn't seen it which was true. He did not lie.
The White House has had the complaint for a lot longer than the public - count me as surprised if the Sec of State had not seen the actual whistleblower report.I have no doubt he had heard of the whistle blower report. However, he didn't say that he hadn't heard of it. He carefully said he hadn't seen it which was true. He did not lie.
There are only two data points, of course it bumps up after last week's media frenzy, let's see this drag on for a few weeks or months and see what happens.I'm going to need to see something less than a week old. The polls I'm seeing gathered on Forbes say that most of the polls are 47-55% in favor of either impeachment or the process of starting it.
If/when they find more on Trump, it'll spike it, but I wouldn't be surprised to see it settle north of 50% for the duration.There are only two data points, of course it bumps up after last week's media frenzy, let's see this drag on for a few weeks or months and see what happens.
WutBREAKING
The State Department’s Inspector General is expected to brief staffers from several House and Senate committees on Wednesday afternoon about documents obtained from the department’s Office of the Legal Adviser concerning documents related to the State Department and Ukraine, sources familiar with the planned briefing told ABC News.
No, I am saying Pompeo hadn't seen whistle blower report when he answeredYour position is that Barr, Trout, and Maguire saw it, and it was released to the public, before Pompeo, who is discussed in it, had gotten to read it, is that right?
This place is full of fortune tellers.If/when they find more on Trump, it'll spike it, but I wouldn't be surprised to see it settle north of 50% for the duration.
All right. He did not lie. He carefully said. He omitted mentioning the fact that he had been privy to the phone conversation, which was at the heart of the whistleblower affair. He implied he knew nothing about it. But he was careful and he did not lie.I have no doubt he had heard of the whistle blower report. However, he didn't say that he hadn't heard of it. He carefully said he hadn't seen it which was true. He did not lie.
The public had it when the question was asked.No, I am saying Pompeo hadn't seen whistle blower report when he answered
https://www.state.gov/biographies/marik-string/>>The inspector general's office obtained the Ukraine-related documents "from the acting legal advisor of the Department of State,” the letter said.<<
- Wapo
Government!>>The inspector general's office obtained the Ukraine-related documents "from the acting legal advisor of the Department of State,” the letter said.<<
- Wapo
The legal adviser is in charge of interpreting and making sure the good ol’ U, S, of A follows and enforces international laws and runs State’s GCs office.>>The inspector general's office obtained the Ukraine-related documents "from the acting legal advisor of the Department of State,” the letter said.<<
- Wapo
I may be mis-remembering the timeline. But, we were at the point where discussions about impeaching a sitting President was being discussed. Do to this whistle blower report. And you expect anyone to believe that the Pompeo hadn't read the whistle blower report when every main stream media outlet and a significant percentage of the population had?No, I am saying Pompeo hadn't seen whistle blower report when he answered
I'm an electrician, not a fortune teller. That's where the real power is. Give me a switch big enough, I can rule the world.This place is full of fortune tellers.
More from twittersphere:>>The inspector general's office obtained the Ukraine-related documents "from the acting legal advisor of the Department of State,” the letter said.<<
- Wapo
That would be ####### hilarious - if true.Am I interpreting this correctly that Pompeo came out today and said they would not comply with subpoenas from Congress and the State Dept Legal Counsel and IG are saying "Eff this. Here you go?"
He is not even from 'Murica
This would make sense.Could this be another whistleblower with a complaint against Pompeo? IG takes it directly to Congress instead of Pompeo because it’s about him.
I think it’s likely he’s bringing it to the House and Senate because he and all the other little people in DC have jobs and families to look after. A 100k/year employee with 30 working years left until retirement gives no ####s about Trump or his small circle of criminals.Could this be another whistleblower with a complaint against Pompeo? IG takes it directly to Congress instead of Pompeo because it’s about him.
That depends on what your definition of is is.I have no doubt he had heard of the whistle blower report. However, he didn't say that he hadn't heard of it. He carefully said he hadn't seen it which was true. He did not lie.
I'm looking to hire one in a couple weeks, not that I couldn't do it myself but, I don't want to void my warranty on a new hot tub.I'm an electrician, not a fortune teller. That's where the real power is. Give me a switch big enough, I can rule the world.
It came right after Pompeo said that he wasn’t going to cooperate. Maybe he threatened the State employees with retaliation if anyone cooperated with the committee requests.This would make sense.
I don’t want to let this go. I find it highly amusing that the same people who swore up and down to the rest of us that an impeachment inquiry would result in a huge backlash, and guarantee both Trump’s re-election and the loss of the House for the Democrats, are now a week later citing the single outlier poll in which a majority doesn’t quite yet favor impeachment (even though it’s close, 49-47.) Well damn they were right all along lol.Trump’s approval rating drops to low, but Americans still oppose impeachment, survey finds
https://www.cnbc.com/2019/10/01/trumps-approval-rating-drops-to-new-low-but-most-still-oppose-impeachment-cnbc-survey-finds.html
That’s all right. That number will go up.Only 40% of Republicans believe Trump talked to Ukraine President about Biden according to new poll.
This is from NYT:INBOX: Pelosi *and Schiff to hold a press conference tomorrow at 10:45AM ET
Probably just announcing Schiff's arrest for Treason, and resignation from Congress.
It’s a little too early to make this judgment. How about we wait and see if they actually move forward with impeachment.I don’t want to let this go. I find it highly amusing that the same people who swore up and down to the rest of us that an impeachment inquiry would result in a huge backlash, and guarantee both Trump’s re-election and the loss of the House for the Democrats, are now a week later citing the single outlier poll in which a majority doesn’t quite yet favor impeachment (even though it’s close, 49-47.) Well damn they were right all along lol.
You got me all hot and then said you were going to the bathroom and took a cab home.This is from NYT:
What to expect this week
Speaker Nancy Pelosi will hold a news conference Wednesday to outline the immediate steps Democrats plan to take during the House’s two-week break, which lasts until Oct. 15.
So, I suspect this simply includes Schiff since he is leading the inquiry. No breaking news expected, imo. Volker will be in on Thursday, and Atkinson (IG) will testify in closed session on Friday.
My bad.You got me all hot and then said you were going to the bathroom and took a cab home.