arrington is going to be a 3rd round steal for someone. The number of guys who project to be productive NFL RBs in this draft is staggering - probably in the 12-15 range. 3 studs (benson, cadillac, brown)Write up to come later, I cant believe he is still available (I checked the list twice )
Eagles - JJ Arrington, RB Cal
I was really impressed with Cedric Houston in the Senior Bowl.Clarett and Sproles are interesting picks as well...arrington is going to be a 3rd round steal for someone. The number of guys who project to be productive NFL RBs in this draft is staggering - probably in the 12-15 range. 3 studs (benson, cadillac, brown)Write up to come later, I cant believe he is still available (I checked the list twice )
Eagles - JJ Arrington, RB Cal
stud talent (fason)
workhorses (morency, mcclendon, arrington)
power backs (harris, houston, jacobs)
RBBC studs in college with feature talent (shelton, barber)
elusive little guys (moats, sproles)
interesting gambles (clarett, gore, nash, davis)
This is definitely the year to be drafting at RB, no matter whether you're going for a new feature back, change of pace, depth - there's someone out there for everyone.
as far as dynasty picks go, this is the year to stack up some 2nd/3rd rounders if you looking for RBs. there will be RBs on the board around 20-25th pick that are 1st round dynasty talents.
i would put purify in a group with guys like ryan grant(ND), noah herron(northwestern) and walter reyes(syracuse), very productive college RBs in big time college football who just dont project to be good pros.purify is a sturdy(6'0" 215) chainmover, and decent receiver, but SLOW (4.75), and not the most durable in college. I see him as a competent backup in the NFL on a run first team that will take the holes that he's given and hit em hard, but never break away or make something out of nothing.herron is another very sturdy guy at 5'11" 230, and like purify, his rush/receiving game is well rounded. he'll dish out the hits and plays smart football, but like purify he's SLOW (4.75) and doesnt have the right skills to project as a FB. reyes is well-rounded and has a 5th gear(4.36), but a little smallish at 5'10 210, and he plays even smaller - doesnt run with power and authority, which you have to do in the NFL. unlike purify and herron, reyes could become a solid #1 RB if he bulks up a little and learns how to run stronger while preserving that track speed. grant is built well (6'1" 218) and knows how to see the hole and hit the hole. He's also got decent speed for his size (4.5). However, he is totally one-dimensional and doesnt really break tackles or make anything on his own. he's another one who will be very competent as a backup, but doesnt seem to have a future a #1.Interesting point on 2nd/3rd rounders in a dynasty draft. I was disappointed this year when I only picked up 2nd rounders but now it looks like I will be able to stock up on RB prospects. What do you guys think about Bobby Purify? IIRC, he used to push Chris Brown for time and now nobody talks about him. Does he fit anywhere on your list?
I'm guessing for the OG/OT they dealt them last season.. off the cuff I think the name is John Welbourne?? could be off there.I hate to hijack the thread, but where did the Eagles' get the Chiefs' 3rd round pick from?
No hijak...good ??....Fourth Round Philadelphia from Kansas City (OG John Welbourn/ could escalate to #3 if Welbourn plays 50% of Chiefs' snaps) linkI'm guessing for the OG/OT they dealt them last season.. off the cuff I think the name is John Welbourne?? could be off there.I hate to hijack the thread, but where did the Eagles' get the Chiefs' 3rd round pick from?
OG John Welbourn but I think it was for a 4th edited to add: good job bobcatI hate to hijack the thread, but where did the Eagles' get the Chiefs' 3rd round pick from?
I think Mike would be a great pick. He's going to help a team, no doubt.....and who better than Minn? He's going to be one of the best during his time.I could see them taking Ted Nugent...
He started 10 games. There's a Chiefs article on the articles page that says the pick's a 3rd.Muchos gracias! Next question, anyone know if he played half the snaps?
3rdI will second the Nugent nom for the Vike's pick.
4th...3rdI will second the Nugent nom for the Vike's pick.
im thinking DE, jovan haye of vanderbilt looks like a good value here.I believe we've picked every Rams pick so far.Crowder LBMunoz OTThorpe WRWhat will Martzie do here?
2nd for Haye. The guy has some nice size. Swancutt might make sense as well.im thinking DE, jovan haye of vanderbilt looks like a good value here.I believe we've picked every Rams pick so far.Crowder LBMunoz OTThorpe WRWhat will Martzie do here?
If you had ever seen Aaron Brooks play, you would not think it is a strange idea. Add to that the Saints just lost their OC, who was high on Brooks, and I think a QB is a likely pick if one is there. Did I misread your post?Who picked for New Orleans? WTF?! A QB in the first round? I feel like I'm channeling Tom Benson here. Junior, do you have *any* idea what you're doing up there? Or are you just picking names that suit your fancy? I realize that this Fantasy Football but I had no idea it was Delusional & Pathological Fantasy Football...
you have a guy that could potentially go #1 overall, and you got him at #16. seems like a heck of a deal to me.same thing happened with Deuce...I bet plenty of people thought that pick was stupid and I'd say it turned out pretty nicely.I don't know what the contract situation is for Brooks off the top of my head, but if you could groom Smith for a year and then trade Brooks, that might not be too bad of an idea. It's obviously not a huge need for the Saints and unlikely to happen on draft day, but it would have been tough to ignore the value that Smith presented.Who picked for New Orleans? WTF?! A QB in the first round? I feel like I'm channeling Tom Benson here. Junior, do you have *any* idea what you're doing up there? Or are you just picking names that suit your fancy? I realize that this Fantasy Football but I had no idea it was Delusional & Pathological Fantasy Football...
Is Little gone? Or would Swancutt rotate in?Swancutt opposite Hargrove on 3rd downs is downright scary.I agree though, it may not be their biggest need, but Swancutt will be a player for someone, and is a value here.If the pick is DE, is Swancutt still available? Anyway, DE isn't the best value out there for the Rams right now. They probably have to replace 2 LBs (assuming they'd want to start 3 good ones if they could), so I would recommend McCune to play ILB. Crowder could play the outside. McCune got good press coming out of the senior bowl. The Rams also are pretty much out of safeties b/c the return to health for both Williams and Archuleta is up in the air. The Rams burnt through a lot of waiver wire DBs b/c of injuries this year. A safety like Atogwe from Stanford could make sense. If the pick is offense, a couple of good OL are out there still: Roos and Mankins.
Even if Brooks was a competent QB, take BPA. Trade one later when the need arises, but I like the pick.you have a guy that could potentially go #1 overall, and you got him at #16. seems like a heck of a deal to me.same thing happened with Deuce...I bet plenty of people thought that pick was stupid and I'd say it turned out pretty nicely.I don't know what the contract situation is for Brooks off the top of my head, but if you could groom Smith for a year and then trade Brooks, that might not be too bad of an idea. It's obviously not a huge need for the Saints and unlikely to happen on draft day, but it would have been tough to ignore the value that Smith presented.Who picked for New Orleans? WTF?! A QB in the first round? I feel like I'm channeling Tom Benson here. Junior, do you have *any* idea what you're doing up there? Or are you just picking names that suit your fancy? I realize that this Fantasy Football but I had no idea it was Delusional & Pathological Fantasy Football...
im happy to switch my pick to swancutt.I'm gonna go with Bill Swancutt DE Oregon State with this pick. Anyone else?
This anti-Brooks sentiment is funny to me. It's completely irrational. Is QB really the position of need? Hardly. I won't argue that it's a value pick and that might say more about the people drafting in front of you than anything. However, the rationale behind drafting another QB is shoddy. Brooks had his least productive year with the Saints and you're ready to run him out. The allusion to the Ricky-Deuce situation is not truly applicable either. RW's was Ditka's choice. When Haslet took over, RW didn't suit the offense Has & Co wanted to install. Hence the drafting of Deuce. Brooks, like it or not, was Has & Co's choice and will likely remain so despite McCarthy's departure. Moreover, some may argue that the entire offense, and not just Brooks', inconsistencies can be attributed to McCarthy directly. Now, what has been the Achilles heel for the Saints for years now? Defense. And with picks available on defense, you draft a QB. It's not a bad chocie, given the value (not that you were drafting for that, it would seem), but there are were smarter plays to be made.you have a guy that could potentially go #1 overall, and you got him at #16. seems like a heck of a deal to me.same thing happened with Deuce...I bet plenty of people thought that pick was stupid and I'd say it turned out pretty nicely.I don't know what the contract situation is for Brooks off the top of my head, but if you could groom Smith for a year and then trade Brooks, that might not be too bad of an idea. It's obviously not a huge need for the Saints and unlikely to happen on draft day, but it would have been tough to ignore the value that Smith presented.Who picked for New Orleans? WTF?! A QB in the first round? I feel like I'm channeling Tom Benson here. Junior, do you have *any* idea what you're doing up there? Or are you just picking names that suit your fancy? I realize that this Fantasy Football but I had no idea it was Delusional & Pathological Fantasy Football...
First of all, your opinion is welcome but I just don't agree with it. I think that was a good pick at #16 for the Saints. Will it happen on draft day? Who knows, but it is possible. It is also very possible that Smith goes in the top 3. Anyways, instead of harping on the past, why don't you give us who you would take here for the Saints and why?Has the Saints owner been making the picks?This anti-Brooks sentiment is funny to me. It's completely irrational. Is QB really the position of need? Hardly. I won't argue that it's a value pick and that might say more about the people drafting in front of you than anything. However, the rationale behind drafting another QB is shoddy. Brooks had his least productive year with the Saints and you're ready to run him out. The allusion to the Ricky-Deuce situation is not truly applicable either. RW's was Ditka's choice. When Haslet took over, RW didn't suit the offense Has & Co wanted to install. Hence the drafting of Deuce. Brooks, like it or not, was Has & Co's choice and will likely remain so despite McCarthy's departure. Moreover, some may argue that the entire offense, and not just Brooks', inconsistencies can be attributed to McCarthy directly. Now, what has been the Achilles heel for the Saints for years now? Defense. And with picks available on defense, you draft a QB. It's not a bad chocie, given the value (not that you were drafting for that, it would seem), but there are were smarter plays to be made.you have a guy that could potentially go #1 overall, and you got him at #16. seems like a heck of a deal to me.same thing happened with Deuce...I bet plenty of people thought that pick was stupid and I'd say it turned out pretty nicely.I don't know what the contract situation is for Brooks off the top of my head, but if you could groom Smith for a year and then trade Brooks, that might not be too bad of an idea. It's obviously not a huge need for the Saints and unlikely to happen on draft day, but it would have been tough to ignore the value that Smith presented.Who picked for New Orleans? WTF?! A QB in the first round? I feel like I'm channeling Tom Benson here. Junior, do you have *any* idea what you're doing up there? Or are you just picking names that suit your fancy? I realize that this Fantasy Football but I had no idea it was Delusional & Pathological Fantasy Football...
Calling Brooks a "capable transition QB" seems arguable. But aside from that, the general strategy outlined above makes sense to me.My general strategy for the Saints is to target OL, LB, DB, & look for value at QB & TE. Even though QB wasn't a target position, I couldn't pass up Smith at 16. I'm one of those people who feel Aaron Brooks will never lead New Orleans to the promised land. They should start grooming somebody ASAP, IMO. That said, Brooks does give them a capable "transition" QB if they decide not to start the rookie right away.
Doesn't Kiper always say a line about getting back on the horse?..and to bring this back on subject regarding the Saints pick.. hey, maybe they'll take ANOTHER defensive lineman!? hahaha.. j/k and I cringe at the thought of another Sullivan pick.