What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

2013 Off Season Dynasty Trade Thread (for completed trades) (1 Viewer)

12 team PPR. 1 QB, 1 RB, 1 WR, 3 FLEX, 1 TE.

Gave: Percy Harvin

Received: Russell Wilson, Danny Amendola
Love it. I'm a huge Amendola guy though.

Out of curiosity, who was your starting QB before this?
I have Cam. I'll probably trade one of the two QBs at some point this season.
That would have been a decent deal if harvin was healthy, let alone now.
I have my doubts as to whether Amendola can stay in one piece for part of the year, let alone the entire year. In the long run the guy getting Harvin will win this trade. Has Amendola ever been healthy for very long?

 
12 team PPR. 1 QB, 1 RB, 1 WR, 3 FLEX, 1 TE.

Gave: Percy Harvin

Received: Russell Wilson, Danny Amendola
Love it. I'm a huge Amendola guy though.

Out of curiosity, who was your starting QB before this?
I have Cam. I'll probably trade one of the two QBs at some point this season.
That would have been a decent deal if harvin was healthy, let alone now.
I have my doubts as to whether Amendola can stay in one piece for part of the year, let alone the entire year. In the long run the guy getting Harvin will win this trade. Has Amendola ever been healthy for very long?
That thought crossed my mind. The worst case scenario from my perspective is that Amendola goes down in week one and Harvin returns at 100% later this season. In that case I'll consider this trade a loss, but I like Wilson enough that it still wouldn't be catastrophic IMO. If Amendola stays healthy, there's considerable upside. Thought it was worth a punt. Harvin is a great player and the best asset in this deal if healthy, but he has some durability issues in his own right.

 
12 team, non-ppr, keep 12 league. start 1QB/1RB/3Rec/1Flex/K/D

Team A gave: Ridley, Vereen

Team B gave: LMiller, DThomas

 
12 team PPR. 1 QB, 1 RB, 1 WR, 3 FLEX, 1 TE.

Gave: Percy Harvin

Received: Russell Wilson, Danny Amendola
Love it. I'm a huge Amendola guy though.

Out of curiosity, who was your starting QB before this?
I have Cam. I'll probably trade one of the two QBs at some point this season.
That would have been a decent deal if harvin was healthy, let alone now.
I have my doubts as to whether Amendola can stay in one piece for part of the year, let alone the entire year. In the long run the guy getting Harvin will win this trade. Has Amendola ever been healthy for very long?
Has Harvin?

 
12 team PPR. 1 QB, 1 RB, 1 WR, 3 FLEX, 1 TE.

Gave: Percy Harvin

Received: Russell Wilson, Danny Amendola
Love it. I'm a huge Amendola guy though.

Out of curiosity, who was your starting QB before this?
I have Cam. I'll probably trade one of the two QBs at some point this season.
That would have been a decent deal if harvin was healthy, let alone now.
I have my doubts as to whether Amendola can stay in one piece for part of the year, let alone the entire year. In the long run the guy getting Harvin will win this trade. Has Amendola ever been healthy for very long?
I agree with JU. I'll take the Harvin side. Superior talent wins in the long run.

 
12 team PPR. 1 QB, 1 RB, 1 WR, 3 FLEX, 1 TE.

Gave: Percy Harvin

Received: Russell Wilson, Danny Amendola
Love it. I'm a huge Amendola guy though.

Out of curiosity, who was your starting QB before this?
I have Cam. I'll probably trade one of the two QBs at some point this season.
That would have been a decent deal if harvin was healthy, let alone now.
I have my doubts as to whether Amendola can stay in one piece for part of the year, let alone the entire year. In the long run the guy getting Harvin will win this trade. Has Amendola ever been healthy for very long?
Has Harvin?
Yes. Outside of last year's injury he had only missed 2 games prior to last year. His injuries are exaggerated.
 
10 team PPR....1QB 1RB 2 WR 1TE 2 RB/WR/TE

Team A trades

Lamar Miller

Rob Gronkowski

Team B trades

CJ Spiller

Kyle Rudolph

Not really sure who won this one.

 
10 team PPR....1QB 1RB 2 WR 1TE 2 RB/WR/TE

Team A trades

Lamar Miller

Rob Gronkowski

Team B trades

CJ Spiller

Kyle Rudolph

Not really sure who won this one.
In a start 1 RB league, Gronk is worth more than this by himself, in my opinion. In a 10 team league with 7 starters - 2 flex - it's harder to get a consistant advantage. Gronk is just that. Spiller is an average, perhaps below average RB1. Gronk/Graham would both be top 5-6 players in this format, in my opinion.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
10 team PPR....1QB 1RB 2 WR 1TE 2 RB/WR/TE

Team A trades

Lamar Miller

Rob Gronkowski

Team B trades

CJ Spiller

Kyle Rudolph

Not really sure who won this one.
In a start 1 RB league, Gronk is worth more than this by himself, in my opinion. In a 10 team league with 7 starters - 2 flex - it's harder to get a consistant advantage. Gronk is just that. Spiller is an average, perhaps below average RB1. Gronk/Graham would both be top 5-6 players in this format, in my opinion.
I think I agree with this...Spiller is a top notch RB but in a TE mandatory..Gronk can put you over the top.

 
Another Harvin trade:

14 team ppr, devy league, 1.5 for TE

Team A Gives: Gordon, Wheaton, 2014 #1

Team B Gives: Harvin, Dickson

 
I have my doubts as to whether Amendola can stay in one piece for part of the year, let alone the entire year. In the long run the guy getting Harvin will win this trade. Has Amendola ever been healthy for very long?
Has Harvin?? It's not like it's Harvin for amendola straight up (which if I had Harvin I would consider), we are also talking about adding Wilson here.

 
12 team, non-ppr, keep 12 league. start 1QB/1RB/3Rec/1Flex/K/D

Team A gave: Ridley, Vereen

Team B gave: LMiller, DThomas
DThomas better mean Daniel and not Demaryius
Yeah, sorry. Daniel for sure.

Seems pretty even to me swapping the NE backfield (haven't had back-to-back 1000 yd RBs in forever so that may lower opinion on Ridley repeating last year's stats, plus questions about NE offense being so in flux) for up-and-comer Miller in the Miami backfield (shiny new toy with upside syndrome).

 
A lot of people are high on Michael long term. I understand why but there are risks. I'd say he HAS to pan out as a future #1RB for that trade to favor the side landing #####cat harvin.

 
Not a bad exchange to me. I like Harvin/Michael by a good bit, but its all about who reaches potential and who doesn't. Lots of speculation in this swap.

 
As far as market value, Gio has the most value of the players involved.

Gio > Harvin

Randle < Michael

A lot of people are taking a stance on Michael that he is worth as much as Gio, and that's fine. You can make a similar stance on Randle, really, and assume Nicks will get signed by the Panthers next offseason and Randle becomes a top 15 WR.

The main bet here is Gio's share of the offense in 2014 vs. Harvin's share of the offense in 2014.

 
As far as market value, Gio has the most value of the players involved.

Gio > Harvin
Are you talking post hip surgery? Because I don't think anyone would have traded Harvin for the 1.01 this year and Gio didn't even go 1.01 in some leagues.

I'm still not sure that Harvin for Gio would be a "no-brainer" even after the injury. Bernard may not have a major impact this season if BJGE is still in the mix, and Harvin is projected to be back by Week 13.

 
Michael, Christine SEA RB

Harvin, Percy SEA WR

For

Bernard, Giovani CIN RB

Randle, Rueben NYG WR
Oooooooooof.
I'm not seeing which side is supposed to be winning by that much. Which side do you think won? I'll see if we agree on which side got the better end.
Seriously?

Gio and Michael are close to a wash. Harvin and Randle certainly aren't.
Well, then we agreed. But I don't think it's by as much as you are implying. I guess it depends on where you value Michael vs Gio. Because I don't think they are a wash and have Gio > Michael.

I do prefer the side getting Harvin, but not by a ton. Suppose I'm just higher on Gio then most.

 
As far as market value, Gio has the most value of the players involved.

Gio > Harvin
Are you talking post hip surgery? Because I don't think anyone would have traded Harvin for the 1.01 this year and Gio didn't even go 1.01 in some leagues.

I'm still not sure that Harvin for Gio would be a "no-brainer" even after the injury. Bernard may not have a major impact this season if BJGE is still in the mix, and Harvin is projected to be back by Week 13.
Yes, I'm talking about current value. I am assuming the trade happened post-injury-disclosure as it was posted today.

Bernard's ADP is 36 according to DLF. Maybe we can agree he is overvalued at that ADP but it would cost a lot to acquire him. Taking a step back, I'm mainly responding to the "oof" classification. It's reasonable to say you'd rather have Harvin but I think Bernard carries more value right now. I think this trade reflects that as Michael has more value than Randle IMO.

Gio's 2013 production is 2ndary. He's a young RB. He just has to show he belongs this year to solidify his value. Similarly I think we expect Harvin to not be 100% even if he comes back this year. He doesn't have to be a useful player this year either. As I said, the bet is on who is more of a focus of the offense in 2014.

 
As far as market value, Gio has the most value of the players involved.

Gio > Harvin

Randle < Michael

A lot of people are taking a stance on Michael that he is worth as much as Gio, and that's fine. You can make a similar stance on Randle, really, and assume Nicks will get signed by the Panthers next offseason and Randle becomes a top 15 WR.

The main bet here is Gio's share of the offense in 2014 vs. Harvin's share of the offense in 2014.
Gio > Harvin and Randle > Michael.

 
As far as market value, Gio has the most value of the players involved.

Gio > Harvin
Are you talking post hip surgery? Because I don't think anyone would have traded Harvin for the 1.01 this year and Gio didn't even go 1.01 in some leagues.

I'm still not sure that Harvin for Gio would be a "no-brainer" even after the injury. Bernard may not have a major impact this season if BJGE is still in the mix, and Harvin is projected to be back by Week 13.
Yes, I'm talking about current value. I am assuming the trade happened post-injury-disclosure as it was posted today.

Bernard's ADP is 36 according to DLF. Maybe we can agree he is overvalued at that ADP but it would cost a lot to acquire him. Taking a step back, I'm mainly responding to the "oof" classification. It's reasonable to say you'd rather have Harvin but I think Bernard carries more value right now. I think this trade reflects that as Michael has more value than Randle IMO.

Gio's 2013 production is 2ndary. He's a young RB. He just has to show he belongs this year to solidify his value. Similarly I think we expect Harvin to not be 100% even if he comes back this year. He doesn't have to be a useful player this year either. As I said, the bet is on who is more of a focus of the offense in 2014.
Sure young RBs are gold in dynasty circles so I can buy it (Gio > Harvin) - even if I wouldn't peronally adhere to it.

 
12 team ppr

HA lineup requirements

Kaunas Buckeyes gave up:

Lynch, Marshawn SEA RB

Tate, Golden SEA WR

Olsen, Greg CAR TE

Year 2014 Round 2 Draft Pick from Kaunas Buckeyes

RedBlueRadio gave up:

Lloyd, Brandon FA* WR

Pettis, Austin STL WR

Graham, Jimmy NOS TE

 
12 team ppr

HA lineup requirements

Kaunas Buckeyes gave up:

Lynch, Marshawn SEA RB

Tate, Golden SEA WR

Olsen, Greg CAR TE

Year 2014 Round 2 Draft Pick from Kaunas Buckeyes

RedBlueRadio gave up:

Lloyd, Brandon FA* WR

Pettis, Austin STL WR

Graham, Jimmy NOS TE
I'm not sure what HA lineups requirements are, but I'd think you could get more for Graham then that. So I'd say the guy getting Graham "won" this by quite a bit

 
Gio, Michael, and Randle are all pretty similar -- good young prospects that could go either way. None of them are elite prospects, but the NFL thought highly enough of all three to invest high picks in them. Ranking them is a matter of personal preference, team need, league specifics, etc.

We do know exactly what Harvin is -- assuming PPR he has two top 10 PPG finishes in a row under his belt and a well run NFL franchise (that also offers a massive QB upgrade) just made a huge long term investment in him.

Non-elite prospects are darts -- I like Giovanni Bernard personally, but he is what he is, a high 2nd round RB, and realistically his chances of becoming a Percy Harvin level difference maker in FF are waaaaaaaay below 50%.

 
We know what Harvin was. We don't know how Seattle will use him. We don't know if this episode will affect how Seattle will use him. We don't know how he will react to the surgery recovery. We don't know how he will react to future injuries the team doctors view as minor that he should play through. I don't expect Gio to become a RB1, which is pretty much what he has to do to be what Harvin was one month ago. But Harvin isn't necessarily that. As an owner you want him to be but it's not guaranteed. Value can be fleeting even at a position where it's supposed to be more stable.

 
We know what Harvin was. We don't know how Seattle will use him. We don't know if this episode will affect how Seattle will use him. We don't know how he will react to the surgery recovery. We don't know how he will react to future injuries the team doctors view as minor that he should play through. I don't expect Gio to become a RB1, which is pretty much what he has to do to be what Harvin was one month ago. But Harvin isn't necessarily that. As an owner you want him to be but it's not guaranteed. Value can be fleeting even at a position where it's supposed to be more stable.
Agree to disagree. IMO the picks Seattle gave up and the contract they gave Harvin say quite a bit about their plans re: his involvement in the offense. And I'm also a big believer in modern medicine, particularly when the guy in question is a 25 year old elite athlete. Guess time will tell.

I will say that I don't see that Harvin's value has changed too much in any of my leagues -- I've been trying to buy him everywhere since the trade and sent out another round of offers after the injury -- no luck whatsoever.

 
We know what Harvin was. We don't know how Seattle will use him. We don't know if this episode will affect how Seattle will use him. We don't know how he will react to the surgery recovery. We don't know how he will react to future injuries the team doctors view as minor that he should play through. I don't expect Gio to become a RB1, which is pretty much what he has to do to be what Harvin was one month ago. But Harvin isn't necessarily that. As an owner you want him to be but it's not guaranteed. Value can be fleeting even at a position where it's supposed to be more stable.
Agree to disagree. IMO the picks Seattle gave up and the contract they gave Harvin say quite a bit about their plans re: his involvement in the offense. And I'm also a big believer in modern medicine, particularly when the guy in question is a 25 year old elite athlete. Guess time will tell.

I will say that I don't see that Harvin's value has changed too much in any of my leagues -- I've been trying to buy him everywhere since the trade and sent out another round of offers after the injury -- no luck whatsoever.
Seattle also signed Zach Miller to a large contract and haven't really got him too involved in the offense. Granted they didn't give up any draft picks but it was, and is, a pretty big contract for an average of 33 catches per year. Personally, I think they had big plans for Harvin and lean to the Harvin side of the trade but the perception of being injury prone seems to have dampened his value somewhat.

 
Another Harvin trade:

Team A gave Harvin

Team B gave Mark Ingram
I can see moving Harvin if you really need the points to compete. I can see moving him at a discount. I bought at a discount in one league, might sell at a discount in another.

But this is silly. Just hold onto Harvin if all you can get is Ingram.

 
Another Harvin trade:

Team A gave Harvin

Team B gave Mark Ingram
I can see moving Harvin if you really need the points to compete. I can see moving him at a discount. I bought at a discount in one league, might sell at a discount in another.

But this is silly. Just hold onto Harvin if all you can get is Ingram.
for a guy who has played 1 full season in 4 year...5 if you count this season and never having over 1000 yards receiving or more than 6 receiving TD's this guy gets a lot of love...

 
Another Harvin trade:

Team A gave Harvin

Team B gave Mark Ingram
I can see moving Harvin if you really need the points to compete. I can see moving him at a discount. I bought at a discount in one league, might sell at a discount in another.

But this is silly. Just hold onto Harvin if all you can get is Ingram.
for a guy who has played 1 full season in 4 year...5 if you count this season and never having over 1000 yards receiving or more than 6 receiving TD's this guy gets a lot of love...
I guess it depends on your type of league. The ones that I play in also give points for rushing yards, all TDs and receptions. He's money!
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top