I'm just glad the piping is gone. Overall I am very pleased, but I also had high hopes they'd reach further back into the vault. These are basically what they wore before the jerseys they were wearing last year.Glad the waist stripes are back.
I was actually going to ask what they changed, thought they've been wearing these for a little while.I'm just glad the piping is gone. Overall I am very pleased, but I also had high hopes they'd reach further back into the vault. These are basically what they wore before the jerseys they were wearing last year.Glad the waist stripes are back.
Ditto. It's a happy balance between not overhauling the current look and throwing respect to the past. Not exciting, but it doesn't have to be.Glad the waist stripes are back.
I actually like http://www.thehockeynews.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blues1.jpg best. I wish they'd go back to that.ItsOnlytheRiver said:I'm just glad the piping is gone. Overall I am very pleased, but I also had high hopes they'd reach further back into the vault. These are basically what they wore before the jerseys they were wearing last year.Raider Nation said:Glad the waist stripes are back.
Someone please explain how Toronto doesn't have another team or isn't in the mix?(they're still working on the arena that according to the owners has no interest in an NHL team)Had to figure the move to 32 was inevitable after the alignment was done. I wonder why LV is such a "done deal" ... aside from the fact that Bettman seems to be in love with continuing to put teams in warm-weather places.
As long as Seattle ends up with a team, I'm OK with it.
A guy I know who covers the NHL insists that a second team in Toronto isn't out of the question.GTBilly said:Someone please explain how Toronto doesn't have another team or isn't in the mix?(they're still working on the arena that according to the owners has no interest in an NHL team)Had to figure the move to 32 was inevitable after the alignment was done. I wonder why LV is such a "done deal" ... aside from the fact that Bettman seems to be in love with continuing to put teams in warm-weather places.
As long as Seattle ends up with a team, I'm OK with it.
Seems tough to believe anyone calling it a "done deal" for that reason alone.I keep seeing that an ownership group would need to be determined for the Vegas team. You're going to push an expansion team to a city without having an ownership group in place? This seems like a debacle waiting to happen.
I don't think it would hurt anything, but I'm not sure it would do much at the higher levels of hockey. They guys with their heads down are looking for the puck, battling along the boards. They already know where they are and the dangers surrounding it.
I don't see a downside.
I didn't either, but I am not a hockey guy, was not sure if the fear of future rules or the odd look would turn people offFatUncleJerryBuss said:I don't see a downside.B-Deep said:
seems like even if there is not a huge benefit at the nhl levle, if they did it everyone would follow and there probably is a huge benefit at lower levelsNo downside at all. Surprised USA hockey didn't embrace it right away.
i agree with Foos, at the nhl level this probably does very little. But for my 4, soon to be 5 year old mini mite this year, could make a huge difference even in cross ice gamesseems like even if there is not a huge benefit at the nhl levle, if they did it everyone would follow and there probably is a huge benefit at lower levelsNo downside at all. Surprised USA hockey didn't embrace it right away.
Not at all credible if I had to guess.Not sure how credible this guy is, but he tweeted this out last night during the Vegas commotion on twitter:
Howard Bloom
@sportsbiznews: NHL expansion four teams added by 2017, Quebec City, Toronto, Seattle, and Las Vegas $1.4b in expansion fees
10:00pm - 26 Aug 14
It doesn't make sense since the balance of teams would still be off with 2 more Eastern teams added, unless you add in a Panthers relocation out West. (Kansas City?)
Oilers GM Craig MacTavish described defenseman Justin Schultz as "a core player" with "Norris Trophy potential."But that doesn't mean MacTavish wanted to pay him like one.
Edmonton pumped up the praise in lieu of cash after coming to terms on a one-year, $3.675 million deal with the promising/frustrating blueliner.
It's one of those "show-me" bridge contracts that makes sense for both sides. Schultz settles for something less than the $3.775 million he earned with bonuses on his entry-level contract, but the money is guaranteed. And coming off a disappointing season during which the power play specialist scored 11 goals but only 33 points, he's better served waiting to negotiate a longer-term deal until he has a bit more leverage—something he hopes to earn by improving his all-around game this season.
That'll take some work. For what it's worth, Schultz's Corsi rating was a miserable 42.9% last season, primarily because he still struggles with his defensive reads. It's tough for a guy to make the magic happen when he spends most of his time chasing the puck.
As for the Oilers, they have Schultz wrapped up ahead of camp, they have kept his cap hit reasonable and, recognizing his deficiencies, they have avoided making a serious commitment until they have a better idea of what kind of player the former Wisconsin Badger will be.
That's a much more conservative approach than the team employed when signing other recent RFAs like Taylor Hall, Jordan Eberle and Ryan Nugent-Hopkins, and it's one that makes a lot of sense here. It could cost Edmonton in the long run—offensive defensemen aren't getting any cheaper—but with several promising blueliners in the system (Darnell Nurse, Oscar Klefbom and William Lagesson, among others), the Oilers don't want to overcommit to a player who might not have a place at the table.
That's not to say that Schultz won't develop into a top pairing, puck-moving possession demon, but it's equally likely that he will end up as a power-play specialist who skates with the third pair at even strength. That type of player is a big risk at big money.
Look around the league and you'll see a couple of unsigned players—the Predators' Ryan Ellis and the Bruins' Torey Krug—who fill that role. You can bet that neither of those restricted free agents will land a deal anywhere near what Schultz just got.
There are several factors at play here, but one of them is potential. We don't know yet if the high expectations are reflective of the hype that surrounded Schultz when he entered the league as an unrestricted free agent or a fair assessment of the player he can be. At this point, there was no reason for Edmonton to bet heavily either way.
I have a hard time considering Datsyuk as the most overrated player in the league. Still a fun read I guess.http://thehockeywriters.com/5-most-overrated-players-in-the-nhl-for-2014-15/
Northern Voice probably going to love seeing #5 on this list, and then hate seeing who is at #4.
Yeah the reasons are pretty silly really. Quite ironic that the author says "What fans seem to always miss is what’s behind the dazzle", and then he just references points, which is the most 'dazzling' statistic there is. Plus with his mention of irrelevant #### like 'soft'ness and EA sports player ratings, the author could just as well be pulling names out of his ###.I have a hard time considering Datsyuk as the most overrated player in the league. Still a fun read I guess.http://thehockeywriters.com/5-most-overrated-players-in-the-nhl-for-2014-15/
Northern Voice probably going to love seeing #5 on this list, and then hate seeing who is at #4.
How Eric and Jordan Staal are not leading this list, I have no idea.Yeah the reasons are pretty silly really. Quite ironic that the author says "What fans seem to always miss is what’s behind the dazzle", and then he just references points, which is the most 'dazzling' statistic there is. Plus with his mention of irrelevant #### like 'soft'ness and EA sports player ratings, the author could just as well be pulling names out of his ###.I have a hard time considering Datsyuk as the most overrated player in the league. Still a fun read I guess.http://thehockeywriters.com/5-most-overrated-players-in-the-nhl-for-2014-15/
Northern Voice probably going to love seeing #5 on this list, and then hate seeing who is at #4.
Datsyuk is probably overrated, but soft? No f'n way.http://thehockeywriters.com/5-most-overrated-players-in-the-nhl-for-2014-15/
Northern Voice probably going to love seeing #5 on this list, and then hate seeing who is at #4.