What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

2014 Oakland Raiders Regular Season Thread (2 Viewers)

I would rather draft Watkins or Evans instead of overpaying Jackson.
Watkins yes. Evans no unless we got him on a tradedown. I think Evans is being ridiculously hyped for his limited skill set. If we paid Jackson the right money (talking Eric Decker money) he's not overpaid. He would give us flexibility to trade down and accumulate a lot of impact players in one draft. You only have that kind of draft leverage when you already have a Desean Jackson on your team. If he really wants to come here, great, welcome and we will pay you what you are worth. If you don't want to be here, then kick rocks Desean. But let's get rid of the passion and drama. This is a cold business decision.
I think Jackson will bring too much drama. I wouldn't be surprised at all if in a year or two he isn't whining that he wants more money. I would prefer a trade down but if stuck at the 5 spot I would roll with Watkins or grab a WR later in the draft. It's a deep WR draft this year.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I would rather draft Watkins or Evans instead of overpaying Jackson.
But would you prefer Khalil Mack and DeSean over just Watkins?
Your not reading what I typed. I wouldn't mind Jackson at all, I DON'T want to overpay to get him, plain and simple. If we get Jackson great but I'm not going to lose sleep over it.
What do you consider "overpaying"? Just so we know what a whiny headcase who wants more money in a year or two is worth?

 
I am not certain that Streater, Holmes or Moore are the answer at WR in Oakland. But at least they are young and cheap which is something.

 
I am not certain that Streater, Holmes or Moore are the answer at WR in Oakland. But at least they are young and cheap which is something.
I'm not sold that we have the right system or QB yet let alone coaches to say they are scrubs either. Put that group on the Patriots and I bet they'd be household fantasy football names. It took 2 yrs of housecleaning to get to this point, and we really don't know what we have in our WR corp until we put some real talent around them. That's what makes DJax intruiging. He's a wildcard that was never part of the Raiders free agent offseason plan and he falls from the sky with no draft pick required to get him. I'd like to think his addition to go along with Jones would light a fire under our young wideouts in training camp.

 
Raiderfan32904 said:
massraider said:
LawFitz said:
IMO, DJax is not a NFL WR1 and therefore not worth the headaches he'd bring with him. Now if this were Josh Gordon or Dez Bryant on the market I'd be singing a different tune. But it isn't.
I feel you, and I think I wouldn't have a problem with Oakland staying out of it.

But really, all he costs now is money. Which the Raiders have plenty of. In free agency next year, we are again going to have a ton of room.

He's free. No draft pick. No #1 WR to appease. He would completely open up the field for Streater and Moore and Jones.
you left out Holmes, who I think has a higher ceiling than Streater or Moore. If we draft Watkins as the fallback to losing out on the DJAX sweepstakes, we have ourselves a log jam w/ Criner and Butler fighting for a roster spot.
Holmes is an undrafted FA working on his third team, he hasn't really shown much to have any kind of feeling for his ceiling.

Streater was somewhat surprising last year with a terrible QB situation and I would be at least hopeful that he could build on that. Moore OTOH brings in the tough catches but he is wildly inconsistent and disappears for long stretches up to this point in his career. He had a 4,000 yard QB in 2012 and barely managed 714 yards as the presumptive #1 WR in Oak.

Still, in three seasons Holmes has done effectively nothing other than be tall and go deep.

A guy like Desean or Watkins could do a lot to take the pressure of these guys.

 
I would rather draft Watkins or Evans instead of overpaying Jackson.
But would you prefer Khalil Mack and DeSean over just Watkins?
Your not reading what I typed. I wouldn't mind Jackson at all, I DON'T want to overpay to get him, plain and simple. If we get Jackson great but I'm not going to lose sleep over it.
What do you consider "overpaying"? Just so we know what a whiny headcase who wants more money in a year or two is worth?
$10 million. I would be happy with $8 million dollar range.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I would rather draft Watkins or Evans instead of overpaying Jackson.
But would you prefer Khalil Mack and DeSean over just Watkins?
Your not reading what I typed. I wouldn't mind Jackson at all, I DON'T want to overpay to get him, plain and simple. If we get Jackson great but I'm not going to lose sleep over it.
What do you consider "overpaying"? Just so we know what a whiny headcase who wants more money in a year or two is worth?
$10 million. I would be happy with $8 million dollar range.
I agree. He's worth $8.5 mill to 9 mill per yr. imo.

 
I am not certain that Streater, Holmes or Moore are the answer at WR in Oakland. But at least they are young and cheap which is something.
I'm not sold that we have the right system or QB yet let alone coaches to say they are scrubs either. Put that group on the Patriots and I bet they'd be household fantasy football names. It took 2 yrs of housecleaning to get to this point, and we really don't know what we have in our WR corp until we put some real talent around them. That's what makes DJax intruiging. He's a wildcard that was never part of the Raiders free agent offseason plan and he falls from the sky with no draft pick required to get him. I'd like to think his addition to go along with Jones would light a fire under our young wideouts in training camp.
I am not willing to put everything on the surrounding talent. In 2012 they had Carson Palmer throwing the ball (which is a lot better than many teams were putting out there. Palmer put up the ball 565 times for 4018 yards and the best Moore could muster, as the #1 WR was 51 for 741.

I am not saying Moore is a bad WR but if he were a legitimate #1 WR he would have managed better than that in the same circumstance. Last year guys like Gordon, Garcon,Torrey Smith & Kendall Wright managed great numbers with some awful QB play. Sure I don't expect anyone this side of Calvin to match Gordon but Garcon? Smith? Wright? Come on. If it was there I think it would have shown through for Moore at this point.

Streater is more intriguing to me, he put up 39 for 584 as a rookie with Palmer then managed to top that by a wide margin with significantly worse QB play in 2013.

I don't know enough about Holmes on the field so can only go on the fact that he's big, runs deep and this is his third team in three years.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Brian McIntyre‏@brian_mcintyre21 mins

Raiders announce the release of G Mike Brisiel. Move saves $4M in cash, $1.38M in cap space if he’s not designated a post-June 1 release

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I am not certain that Streater, Holmes or Moore are the answer at WR in Oakland. But at least they are young and cheap which is something.
I'm not sold that we have the right system or QB yet let alone coaches to say they are scrubs either. Put that group on the Patriots and I bet they'd be household fantasy football names. It took 2 yrs of housecleaning to get to this point, and we really don't know what we have in our WR corp until we put some real talent around them. That's what makes DJax intruiging. He's a wildcard that was never part of the Raiders free agent offseason plan and he falls from the sky with no draft pick required to get him. I'd like to think his addition to go along with Jones would light a fire under our young wideouts in training camp.
I am not willing to put everything on the surrounding talent. In 2012 they had Carson Palmer throwing the ball (which is a lot better than many teams were putting out there. Palmer put up the ball 565 times for 4018 yards and the best Moore could muster, as the #1 WR was 51 for 741.

I am not saying Moore is a bad WR but if he were a legitimate #1 WR he would have managed better than that in the same circumstance. Last year guys like Gordon, Garcon,Torrey Smith & Kendall Wright managed great numbers with some awful QB play. Sure I don't expect anyone this side of Calvin to match Gordon but Garcon? Smith? Wright? Come on. If it was there I think it would have shown through for Moore at this point.

Streater is more intriguing to me, he put up 39 for 584 as a rookie with Palmer then managed to top that by a wide margin with significantly worse QB play in 2013.

I don't know enough about Holmes on the field so can only go on the fact that he's big, runs deep and this is his third team in three years.
I'm really high on Streater. He has come a long way in just two seasons as an undrafted WR. Look at the numbers he put up last season with that awful QB situation.

 
I am not certain that Streater, Holmes or Moore are the answer at WR in Oakland. But at least they are young and cheap which is something.
I'm not sold that we have the right system or QB yet let alone coaches to say they are scrubs either. Put that group on the Patriots and I bet they'd be household fantasy football names. It took 2 yrs of housecleaning to get to this point, and we really don't know what we have in our WR corp until we put some real talent around them. That's what makes DJax intruiging. He's a wildcard that was never part of the Raiders free agent offseason plan and he falls from the sky with no draft pick required to get him. I'd like to think his addition to go along with Jones would light a fire under our young wideouts in training camp.
I am not willing to put everything on the surrounding talent. In 2012 they had Carson Palmer throwing the ball (which is a lot better than many teams were putting out there. Palmer put up the ball 565 times for 4018 yards and the best Moore could muster, as the #1 WR was 51 for 741.

I am not saying Moore is a bad WR but if he were a legitimate #1 WR he would have managed better than that in the same circumstance. Last year guys like Gordon, Garcon,Torrey Smith & Kendall Wright managed great numbers with some awful QB play. Sure I don't expect anyone this side of Calvin to match Gordon but Garcon? Smith? Wright? Come on. If it was there I think it would have shown through for Moore at this point.

Streater is more intriguing to me, he put up 39 for 584 as a rookie with Palmer then managed to top that by a wide margin with significantly worse QB play in 2013.

I don't know enough about Holmes on the field so can only go on the fact that he's big, runs deep and this is his third team in three years.
I'm really high on Streater. He has come a long way in just two seasons as an undrafted WR. Look at the numbers he put up last season with that awful QB situation.
He will get his chance this season.

 
I am not certain that Streater, Holmes or Moore are the answer at WR in Oakland. But at least they are young and cheap which is something.
I'm not sold that we have the right system or QB yet let alone coaches to say they are scrubs either. Put that group on the Patriots and I bet they'd be household fantasy football names. It took 2 yrs of housecleaning to get to this point, and we really don't know what we have in our WR corp until we put some real talent around them. That's what makes DJax intruiging. He's a wildcard that was never part of the Raiders free agent offseason plan and he falls from the sky with no draft pick required to get him. I'd like to think his addition to go along with Jones would light a fire under our young wideouts in training camp.
I am not willing to put everything on the surrounding talent. In 2012 they had Carson Palmer throwing the ball (which is a lot better than many teams were putting out there. Palmer put up the ball 565 times for 4018 yards and the best Moore could muster, as the #1 WR was 51 for 741.

I am not saying Moore is a bad WR but if he were a legitimate #1 WR he would have managed better than that in the same circumstance. Last year guys like Gordon, Garcon,Torrey Smith & Kendall Wright managed great numbers with some awful QB play. Sure I don't expect anyone this side of Calvin to match Gordon but Garcon? Smith? Wright? Come on. If it was there I think it would have shown through for Moore at this point.

Streater is more intriguing to me, he put up 39 for 584 as a rookie with Palmer then managed to top that by a wide margin with significantly worse QB play in 2013.

I don't know enough about Holmes on the field so can only go on the fact that he's big, runs deep and this is his third team in three years.
I'm really high on Streater. He has come a long way in just two seasons as an undrafted WR. Look at the numbers he put up last season with that awful QB situation.
He will get his chance this season.
Well he's earned it.

 
Eddie Borsilli‏@Borsilli2 hrs

Ohio State LB Ryan Shazier just told us he had a visit with the Raiders, among other teams so far in the pre-draft process

 
Aaron Wilson‏@RavensInsider1 hr

Attending Cumberlands WR Willie Gibson workout: Patriots, Raiders, Bengals, Seahawks, Panthers, Texans, Eagles. Raiders heavily interested

 
DJax just doesn't "fit" the FA signings that McKenzie has done this off-season. I'd prefer we pass, draft Clowney/OL/D at 1.05, draft QB or WR at 2.05 and move on from there.

 
DJax just doesn't "fit" the FA signings that McKenzie has done this off-season. I'd prefer we pass, draft Clowney/OL/D at 1.05, draft QB or WR at 2.05 and move on from there.
I'm just glad the whole DeSean Jackson thing is over with, now we can move on and add a piece or two to the roster and concentrate on the draft.

 
Just please don't use our 1.05 pick on someone who almost died in practice and it's an improvement over last year's draft to me.

ETA: I'm only half kidding. That's how freakin' low the bar is for me these days...

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Sniped from the Dudrick Carr thread...

http://www.rotoworld.com/articles/cfb/45952/349/out-of-the-box?pg=1

Click the article link above to see the charts described in the text.

Greg Peshek Out Of The Box
Select Another Column Peshek: DT Metrics 1.0 Peshek: RB Metrics 2.0 Peshek: RB Metrics 1.0 Donte Moncrief: Metric AllStar Peshek: Sack Study 1.0 Peshek: TE Metrics


2014's Quarterback Conundrum Thursday, January 09, 2014




[SIZE=small]With respect to quarterbacks in the draft, you’ll always hear pundits make observations such as, “this QB has a great deep ball” or “he always folds when he’s under pressure in the pocket.” But how do you know those are true and not bias from a small sample of observed snaps? The simple answer is that you don’t. What I’ve aimed to do this year (and in years past) is to quantify those observations in an effort complement film study and analysis of draft prospects. Instead of guessing about the potency of Manziel’s deep ball, you can pull up the legitimate statistic.[/SIZE]

[SIZE=small]To do that, I’ve hand charted every one of Teddy Bridgewater, Derek Carr, Johnny Manziel, and Blake Bortles’ attempts this year on everything from pass distance to throws against the blitz. The data here can’t render an opinion for you, but it can provide an effective complement to your knowledge on a prospect.[/SIZE]

Where Did They Throw the Ball?

[SIZE=small]The ‘zones’ in the chart represent where the QB threw the ball on the field, that is exactly the spot the receiver caught the ball. This is to make sure yards after the catch don’t influence our opinion on the QBs.[/SIZE]

[SIZE=small]
wyizzs0.jpg
[/SIZE]

[SIZE=small]- Most notable for Bridgewater is the lack of screens incorporated in the offense. Some have said that Bridgewater throws a high quantity of short passes, however the screens a QB normally utilizes have become short throws so that Bridgewater throws 53% of his passes in the 1-10 yard zones.[/SIZE]

[SIZE=small]- Derek Carr is the complete opposite, throwing 33% of his passes behind the line of scrimmage, but few in the 1-10 yard range. The high number of short attempts means that he throws the deep ball less than average 11.35% of the time. In addition he throws to the important intermediate zone (11-20 yards) 18.3% of the time which means overall he pushes the ball down the field less than normal.[/SIZE]

[SIZE=small]- Similar to Carr, Bortles doesn’t throw the deep ball as much as average, but makes up for it by hitting intermediate routes more often - throwing from 6-20 yards 40% of the time.[/SIZE]

[SIZE=small]- In an era of screen passes, Manziel threw the deep ball far more than the other QBs he’s compared to here. Manziel targeted his WRs nearly 19% of the time on passes deeper than 20 yards and still went to his intermediate targets 19% of the time.[/SIZE]

How Accurate Were They?

[SIZE=small]This requires a bit of explaining. The chart below represents each QBs accuracy in the individual target zones when adjusting for drops by their receivers. The colors represent how that accuracy compares to the ‘Average QB’, green is better than average, yellow average, red is below-average. Let’s get to it.[/SIZE]

[SIZE=small]
UFWnqVj.jpg
[/SIZE]

[SIZE=small]- It’s pretty clear that Bridgewater cleans up in every zone except the deep ball. He’s excellent throwing the short ball where he’s about 6-7% above average for the two zones. Some have criticized Bridgewater’s deep ball, and while not bad - his completion percentage of about 51% is about average.[/SIZE]

- Having a big arm is a trait that every scout desires, but that doesn’t matter if it’s not particularly effective. Derek Carr’s accuracy on 20+ yard throws is poor, coming in nearly 7% below-average. In addition, his accuracy on NFL type throws (11-20 yards) is just about as expected at 64%. His only redeeming category is in the 6-10 yard range where he is slightly above average.

[SIZE=small]- There's an interesting dichotomy in Bortles’ throw ability. His 55% completion percentage on deep throws is extremely positive, but he’s only average on the intermediate throws hitting 64% of his total targets. However, he’s above average in the 6-10 range as well, so it’s likely that hitting that intermediate zone is just a matter of getting the touch down.[/SIZE]

[SIZE=small]- For all the criticism Manziel gets, he’s extremely good at hitting his targets downfield. His ‘NFL type’ throws in the 11-20 yard range is the highest in the top 8 QBs in this class at 70.5% and he’s slightly better than Bortles at hitting the 20+ yard throws.[/SIZE]

[SIZE=small]- Before we start getting into the debates about Manziel scrambling around the heaving it up for Mike Evans…his accuracy was similar when throwing solely from the pocket, hitting 67% of his 11-20 yard passes and 59% of his 20+ yard passes[/SIZE]

How Do They Do Under Pressure?

[SIZE=small]I’ve got quite a few stats for these QBs, but for the sake of brevity I’ve picked their completion percentage while being blitzed and under pressure to highlight. For reference, a blitz counts regardless of whether the O-line picks it up, but under pressure is when the QB is moved off his spot or has to get rid of the ball quicker than anticipated.[/SIZE]

[SIZE=small]
db0HWPQ.jpg
[/SIZE]

[SIZE=small]- Upon first glance it’s pretty clear that Carr is lacking in both categories. His 50% completion percentage when under pressure is the worst among the top 8 QBs in this class and he’s not setting the world ablaze against the blitz either.[/SIZE]

[SIZE=small]- When looking at both categories, Bridgewater is the clear winner. He and Bortles both complete about 63% of their passes when under pressure, but Bridgewater is heads above the other QBs against the blitz – nearly matching his ability when there are no extra rushers.[/SIZE]

[SIZE=small]- Bortles has been noted for his success when under pressure and it shows here, hitting 63% of his passes when the defense is bearing down. He has the second highest completion percentage against the blitz at 71.05%.[/SIZE]

[SIZE=small]- Manziel’s just about average in both categories where he’s just about where you’d expect a top notch college QB to be.[/SIZE]

How Did Their Systems Affect Them?

[SIZE=small]My goal here was to take out the variability of systems they all played in. Thus, how would Derek Carr have performed in an average system? This is imperfect, but it gives you a feel for how the systems helped or harmed them.[/SIZE]

[SIZE=small]What I’ve done is taken out drops and then used the data to create an average system. The result is what their overall completion percentage would have been if they had played in an average system and the difference between the actual and adjusted completion percentages.[/SIZE]

[SIZE=small]
97DoRoS.jpg
[/SIZE]

[SIZE=small]- Bridgewater, Bortles and Manziel’s systems had a limited effect on their results from the 2013 season. As you can see in the first section, none of them played in a system that put them in a position to artificially increase their production.[/SIZE]

[SIZE=small]- Derek Carr on the other hand would lose 3.5% off his completion percentage for the season. When you decrease his number of screens which are a high percentage pass and increase the number of below-average deep passes – it shows how much effect the system had on his production.[/SIZE]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Looks like it's a long, cold month until the draft. Free agency has been picked clean, and believe it or not, the Raiders already have 70+ guys under contract.

I am sure I will love Watkins if we take him, I just dislike taking WRs in the 1st round. I don't like the miss rate, and every year late round guys emerge. That doesn't happen at DE, or DT, or QB. For a while, I was concerned that he doesn't have that 6'3", 220 lb ideal, but man, the scouting reports are glowing like you don't read often about college WRs. Just really smooth, really polished, really natural WR. Seems like he has habits some good WRs in the NFL never even acquire. Hard to imagine him busting. And he seems like a good egg-another rarity at the position. Heck, it'll be worth drafting him just to see how it gets spun nationally that the Raiders screwed up the pick. :D

Best draft site I have seen for prospect videos: Watkins

I don't think it will happen, but Clowney being there is a dream scenario. The most likely trade down team is the Rams, and I really find it hard to believe they would be so cavalier about passing on him. Long and Quinn are both really good, Quinn more-so, but geez, the Rams can't use the best player in the draft? Sounds absurd that Clowney could fall, but a month ago, it was impossible that Teddy would be there. Clowney

.

Khalil Mack I am warming up to, doesn't seem to have too many holes, and would look good on either side at LB (I always thought Sio should be a WLB). Putting him at DE on passing downs, and sliding Tuck next to Antonio Smith seems pretty sexy as well (don't get me started on what that would look like with Clowney next to Tuck :thumbup: ). I happen to feel like true OLB are no longer the impact players they used to be, in the current NFL, but there doesn't seem to be much wrong with Mac. He's big, strong, and fast. Heard an interview with him on the Draft Countdown podcast, and he thinks 3-4 OLB is his best spot--he really likes to rush the passer. Mack

I feel like those are considered the bluest of the blue chip guys in the draft, and if you take Reggie at his word that they will take the best guy available, if one of these three are there, it'd be hard to pass on one, barring a trade down. Counting on, or even hoping for, a trade down, in the first round is an exercise in futility. A trade down in later rounds, I would say, is likely. They traded down three times last year.

It's funny, if it's true the QBs slide, it might be bad news for Oakland, if they aren't looking at QB at #5. Because if they fall, it means teams at 1-5 took the best players at other positions. Bortles to Houston and Manziel to Cleveland is my ideal scenario. Teddy or Carr in round 2, or even in a small trade-up? I am in. I don't think either falls to the 2nd round, tho.

I have a sick, unhealthy love for defensive tackles, so if they were to trade down, I would be hoping for Aaron Donald. If Dominique Easley fell to the 3rd round, I would be fine with the risk there, for a guy that has blown out both ACLs. (I know, I know, DJ Hayden).

I'm also hoping for another TE. Rivera is definitely a nice receiver, and Kasa is the blocker, but neither is a lock to be anything.

 
Nice posting and thanks for those links. We didn't land Desean Jackson as was being rumored, but he didn't want to be here, so wish him well or wish him to kick rocks. Either way, he's not our problem. I agree with you about Watkins being our best choice at #5. But I'd be hard pressed not to take Teddy there. The real reason I think we don't have the Jared Allens or Desean Jacksons of the world beating down our door is that we don't have a franchise QB. We really don't have an identity without a good QB. Teddy may have his warts and may tumble down the draft, but I think there's a world of difference between him and Derek Carr. I'm not interested in the time it will take to coach up Carr from his fundamental flaws. Let the Browns or somebody else take that project on. Give me Teddy or Sammy.

 
By the way, Carr has been talking much sheet in this pre-draft process, at his pro day he said people won't be able to get him in the 20's, and said recently he is the best QB in the draft.

I didn't mind that.

 
Nice posting and thanks for those links. We didn't land Desean Jackson as was being rumored, but he didn't want to be here, so wish him well or wish him to kick rocks. Either way, he's not our problem. I agree with you about Watkins being our best choice at #5. But I'd be hard pressed not to take Teddy there. The real reason I think we don't have the Jared Allens or Desean Jacksons of the world beating down our door is that we don't have a franchise QB. We really don't have an identity without a good QB. Teddy may have his warts and may tumble down the draft, but I think there's a world of difference between him and Derek Carr. I'm not interested in the time it will take to coach up Carr from his fundamental flaws. Let the Browns or somebody else take that project on. Give me Teddy or Sammy.
Hey, man, agree all the way. it's all window dressing till you get the franchise QB. I truly don't know which one is the guy to take, tho.

 
By the way, Carr has been talking much sheet in this pre-draft process, at his pro day he said people won't be able to get him in the 20's, and said recently he is the best QB in the draft.

I didn't mind that.
take a look at this link I posted in the Derek Carr thread that's new today. http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2009298-why-are-experts-so-hot-or-cold-on-derek-carr#articles/2009298-why-are-experts-so-hot-or-cold-on-derek-carr

mechanics are flawed and at times he's relying on his arm completely. doesn't open his hips as he releases toward LOS under duress. he looks like a million bucks when he's got a clean pocket though. how often do you envision him having a clean pocket in Oakland?

 
The Raiders wouldn't take Carr at #5...would they? At 2.5 I would have no problem with the pick but 1.5 seems like insanity.

 
The Raiders wouldn't take Carr at #5...would they? At 2.5 I would have no problem with the pick but 1.5 seems like insanity.
When Oakland Raiders general manager Reggie McKenzie dealt the third overall selection to the Miami Dolphins, then sweated out nine picks before landing Houston cornerback D.J. Hayden, the scouts and coaches in the team's war room championed the move with far less certainty than their Niners counterparts.

The rebuilding Raiders, after all, may have more needs than any NFL team, and Hayden was hardly an obvious pick: Given that he hasn't played a down of football since suffering a near-death experience after a freak practice collision last November, he is somewhat of a medical risk.

And given that Hayden, as one Raiders source put it, "was taken that high in exactly zero mock drafts," there didn't seem to be much danger of him being snatched up by another team selecting in the top 11.

The fact that McKenzie came within two minutes of using the No. 3 pick on Hayden – before the Dolphins (seeking Oregon defensive end Dion Jordan) called to save the day, making the deal that gave Oakland its second-round selection – made for some tense moments in the war room.
IMO, anywhere before round 4 is a mistake to pick a guy like Carr. Especially in a deep draft like this one. Seriously, is this guy that much different than Tyler Wilson??? 1.5 we can get an elite super prospect and 2.5 there will be left over first round talent too.

But based on last year's draft, I wouldn't put it past Reggie Mac to take Carr at 1.5 if he gets horny enough.

 
Carr has horrible mechanics and struggles under pressure more than the other QB prospects, what's not to like? Seriously I hope he is not the QB Reggie takes. If QB is not the pick at 5 I would much rather take a guy like Garoppolo later in the draft.

 
Darren Connolly IV‏@DConnollyNFL56 mins

Nothing has changed since yesterday, as I reported, barring a major collapse, DeSean Jackson will be joining the #Raiders enjoy the show
Still looks like Raiders are favored to land DJAX.
Who is Darren Connolly???
Levi Damien ‏@LeviDamien 13hUpdate: The fraud I warned of named Darren Connolly IV whose claims included DJax to #Raiders was done deal has deleted his Twitter acct.
LOL

 
Anthony Spencer

Jermichael Finley

O'Brien Schofield

Doug Baldwin

Davin Joseph

Santonio Holmes

Brian De La Puente

Travelle Wharton

Josh Freeman

Slim pickens indeed. Baldwin is a nice player and a good safety net receiver. He's a winner, seems to be a good teammate, runs good routes and has reliable hands which is something the current WR corps cannot say. To bad the 'Hawks can match any offer.

 
Just an observation, I'm not a Carr guy.

Funny how we aren't even talking about Bortles.
I mentioned Bortles in a previous post. I would be extremely please if he landed with the Raiders. Same with Manzel or Teddy.

I agree with those that have expressed concerns about Carr. Pass and wait. Get Mack, a tackle or trade down, then get Fales or Grapo later.

 
Just an observation, I'm not a Carr guy.

Funny how we aren't even talking about Bortles.
I mentioned Bortles in a previous post. I would be extremely please if he landed with the Raiders. Same with Manzel or Teddy.

I agree with those that have expressed concerns about Carr. Pass and wait. Get Mack, a tackle or trade down, then get Fales or Grapo later.
Bortles has been my favorite QB in this crop of QB's. I was on the Bortles hype-train even before he declared. I would be ecstatic if he fell to the Raiders and they drafted him. I haven't been saying much about him lately because I just assumed he will be gone before the Raiders pick.

 
Just an observation, I'm not a Carr guy.

Funny how we aren't even talking about Bortles.
I mentioned Bortles in a previous post. I would be extremely please if he landed with the Raiders. Same with Manzel or Teddy.

I agree with those that have expressed concerns about Carr. Pass and wait. Get Mack, a tackle or trade down, then get Fales or Grapo later.
Bortles has been my favorite QB in this crop of QB's. I was on the Bortles hype-train even before he declared. I would be ecstatic if he fell to the Raiders and they drafted him. I haven't been saying much about him lately because I just assumed he will be gone before the Raiders pick.
From what ive heard on tv he`s the most pro ready QB in the draft

 
Seems the Raiders dodged a cancerous bullet

Numerous sources tell CBS Philly that DeSean Jackson was "blatantly insubordinate" and "not very well liked by his teammates" with the Eagles, leading to his release before signing with Washington.
CBS Philly reports Jackson threw "temper tantrums cussing out (Chip) Kelly several times in front of the team," and was "more concerned with his rap label" than winning football games. The dislike among teammates would seem to be confirmed by their dispassionate reactions to his departure. "I’ll put it this way, when it came out last Friday that [Jackson] was released," said one source, "more than a few guys were happy it happened. They said ‘good riddance.’"
 
Seems the Raiders dodged a cancerous bullet

Numerous sources tell CBS Philly that DeSean Jackson was "blatantly insubordinate" and "not very well liked by his teammates" with the Eagles, leading to his release before signing with Washington.

CBS Philly reports Jackson threw "temper tantrums cussing out (Chip) Kelly several times in front of the team," and was "more concerned with his rap label" than winning football games. The dislike among teammates would seem to be confirmed by their dispassionate reactions to his departure. "I’ll put it this way, when it came out last Friday that [Jackson] was released," said one source, "more than a few guys were happy it happened. They said ‘good riddance.’"
Can't believe Reggie would even consider this guy. I am disappoint.

 
Can you imagine how much Al Davis would have paid DeSean Jackson?

Seriously, it would have made the Javon Walker deal look like chump change.

It's truly a new era.

 
Can you imagine how much Al Davis would have paid DeSean Jackson?

Seriously, it would have made the Javon Walker deal look like chump change.

It's truly a new era.
Difference is no one has any doubts that DeSean Jackson can still play. He is 27 coming off 82-1,332-9. I would not have minded signing him, but I also understand not wanting to bring him in here.

 
Can you imagine how much Al Davis would have paid DeSean Jackson?

Seriously, it would have made the Javon Walker deal look like chump change.

It's truly a new era.
Difference is no one has any doubts that DeSean Jackson can still play. He is 27 coming off 82-1,332-9. I would not have minded signing him, but I also understand not wanting to bring him in here.
Valid point.

Still smells like DeAngelo Hall; plenty left in the tank, but the former team has no interest in keeping them.

 
Garrett said:
ICON211 said:
Garrett said:
Can you imagine how much Al Davis would have paid DeSean Jackson?

Seriously, it would have made the Javon Walker deal look like chump change.

It's truly a new era.
Difference is no one has any doubts that DeSean Jackson can still play. He is 27 coming off 82-1,332-9. I would not have minded signing him, but I also understand not wanting to bring him in here.
Valid point.

Still smells like DeAngelo Hall; plenty left in the tank, but the former team has no interest in keeping them.
you know hes a problem child if the Pats didnt want him (R.Moss-C.Dillon ect;)

 
Andrew Brandt was on Ross Tucker's podcast, and he had was discussing free agency in broad terms, and his big point was that the great majority of the deals, no matter what they list, are basically two year deals.

The multi-year deals are designed to give a good amount up front, and allow the team to get out of the contract with little cap hit. Everyone agrees with this, so I guess my question is: So then why were the Raiders skewered for signing solid vets to two year deals? I look at Michael Johnson and Jairus Byrd, and most would have been thrilled with signing them.

But are they any more part of the long term than the guys we signed? A quick look at 2012 free agent deals finds very little expected 2014 impact. The moves that would get good grades were the non-sexy deals, the short term deals signed by "2nd tier" free agents. Players that are hungry, and want to earn another year. Guys like Phillip Wheeler, and Michael Bennett in Seattle (signed a lousy one year deal last year)

Granted, it would have been tough for the Raiders to get the benefit of the doubt after letting Houston and Veldheer go, and the Saffold mess. And we will have to wait and see on Houston and Veldheer. It remains to be seen if those moves wind up being a huge mistake. I have a feeling if one deal winds up being a wise move, it's letting Houston go. Tough to see Veldheer's price being a problem. Seemed like a very fair deal.

Houston was such a bright light on a bad defense, and maybe that contributes to him being overrated. He's probably never going to be a top sack threat, and you are paying him as a guy that gets sacks.

Having said that, i would have signed both of them to the deals they signed.

But for 2014, with the sheer number of starters needed, I think one could argue that the team would be worse with them signed. Their numbers would have prevented at least a few of the free agent deals the Raiders made.

We could have re-signed 2 B+ players, but with their money we signed what, 5 or 6 C+ to B- players? The Raiders need SO MANY players that could start right away.

Their probably never has been a team with as many starting holes to fill in one offseason, it's actually fascinating to watch what the front office machinations, and what the team can do with little long term commitments.

 
Garrett said:
ICON211 said:
Garrett said:
Can you imagine how much Al Davis would have paid DeSean Jackson?

Seriously, it would have made the Javon Walker deal look like chump change.

It's truly a new era.
Difference is no one has any doubts that DeSean Jackson can still play. He is 27 coming off 82-1,332-9. I would not have minded signing him, but I also understand not wanting to bring him in here.
Valid point.

Still smells like DeAngelo Hall; plenty left in the tank, but the former team has no interest in keeping them.
you know hes a problem child if the Pats didnt want him (R.Moss-C.Dillon ect;)
Djax situation not at all similar to Moss and Dillon.

 
Garrett said:
ICON211 said:
Garrett said:
Can you imagine how much Al Davis would have paid DeSean Jackson?

Seriously, it would have made the Javon Walker deal look like chump change.

It's truly a new era.
Difference is no one has any doubts that DeSean Jackson can still play. He is 27 coming off 82-1,332-9. I would not have minded signing him, but I also understand not wanting to bring him in here.
Valid point.

Still smells like DeAngelo Hall; plenty left in the tank, but the former team has no interest in keeping them.
you know hes a problem child if the Pats didnt want him (R.Moss-C.Dillon ect;)
Djax situation not at all similar to Moss and Dillon.
With the whole Hernandez thing they probably could not even sniff around a guy with any mention of gang ties anyway.

 
‏@AdamSchefter

Fresh off his appearance at Saturday's Final Four, Texas A&M QB Johnny Manziel is flying to Oakland to spend tonight and Monday with Raiders

 
Johnny Manziel visiting Oakland RaidersBy Dan Parr

After a short respite Saturday night at the Final Four in Dallas, Johnny Manziel is shifting his attention back to football.

Manziel will visit with the Oakland Raiders over the next two days, NFL Media Insider Ian Rapoport reported Sunday, per a source aware of the quarterback's plans.

The Raiders, who hold the draft's fifth overall pick, traded for Matt Schaub last month and reportedly have "a massive crush" on former Fresno State QB Derek Carr, but it isn't stopping them from doing their due diligence on Manziel, a likely top-10 pick.

Raiders general manager Reggie McKenzie has holes that need to be filled -- wide receiver and offensive line leading among them -- in addition to the pressing need of finding a long-term answer at quarterback, so some project the club will wait to draft a signal-caller until the second round or later.

Head coach Dennis Allen said Schaub, 32, is not just a stopgap and could start for the next three or four seasons, but Schaub's restructured contract suggests the team is much more in wait-and-see mode than Allen's comments suggest. Schaub's new deal doesn't include any guaranteed money beyond the 2014 season -- if he fails to bounce back from a disappointing 2013 season, the Raiders could cut him after next season to clear the way for a prized draft pick without taking a hit.

That said, if Manziel is the player the Raiders are targeting in the first round, they have done a pretty good job of hiding their intent.

NFL Media analyst Daniel Jeremiah has Oakland drafting UCF QB Blake Bortles with the fifth pick while fellow analysts Bucky Brooks and Charles Davis both have Auburn OT Greg Robinson going to the Raiders in their latest mock drafts.

As for why the Raiders have decided it's worth taking a closer look at Manziel with an official visit, maybe McKenzie and Allen recently had a chat with Hulk Hogan.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top