What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

2015 ACC Basketball - CLOSED (use 2016 thread now) (2 Viewers)

I'm assuming UNC will still climb a spot or two after the loss.

I miss MD in our conference.

Will Cuse take back their self ban?
Yeah, I hate it when UNC gets overrated.

By the way, is Duke safely locked into their traditional "lose to a 4 seed in the Sweet 16" spot, or do you think there's a chance they'll fall into their new era "lose to a 15 seed in the first round" seeding?
Oh damn...Tobias tries to take me out with a one punch Haymaker after my love tap.

#DomesticAbuse

#WeHurtTheOnesWeLove

 
tdoss said:
TobiasFunke said:
tdoss said:
I'm assuming UNC will still climb a spot or two after the loss.

I miss MD in our conference.

Will Cuse take back their self ban?
Yeah, I hate it when UNC gets overrated.

By the way, is Duke safely locked into their traditional "lose to a 4 seed in the Sweet 16" spot, or do you think there's a chance they'll fall into their new era "lose to a 15 seed in the first round" seeding?
Oh damn...Tobias tries to take me out with a one punch Haymaker after my love tap.

#DomesticAbuse

#WeHurtTheOnesWeLove
Forgive me. My formerly very good basketball teams are a combined 4-13 since the end of January and its cold and miserable and I hate everything. You know I'd never want to hurt you :wub:

 
TLEF316 said:
State has been really impressive to me. They've got a lot of really nice pieces. Bracketology from last week had them as a 12 but if they climb into that 7-10 range range they could be a terrifying 2nd round matchup for a 1 or 2 seed.
State update:

Record = 17-11 (8-7)

RPI = 38

SOS = 2

3-4 vs. Top 25

6-9 vs. Top 50

Big wins: Duke (4), at UNC (17), at Louisville (18)

Bad losses: I would argue none, as their only loss to a team with RPI higher than 85 was to a long-time conference rival on the road -- Wake (127)

They should be solidly in as a 10 seed IMO, with opportunity to improve that seed.

Heck, they still have a shot at 4th place in the conference regular season. State has an easier remaining schedule (@BC, @Clemson, Syracuse) than UNC (@MIA, GT, Duke), Louisville (@FSU, ND, UVA), and Syracuse (@Duke, UVA, @NCSU). If State wins out, they will have 11 wins, with head to head tiebreaker over Louisville and Syracuse. Not sure how tiebreakers work if they end up tied with UNC, since they split their games.

(I'm not saying those games are easy wins for State. State fans know that no wins can be taken for granted. Ever.)

They seem to be peaking at the right time. And Cat Barber has transformed into the best PG in the conference. He showed that on the floor last night.

 
Barber best in the conference? Let's not go crazy here. Hes had some big games but tyus Jones is a much better player

 
Barber best in the conference? Let's not go crazy here. Hes had some big games but tyus Jones is a much better player
Keep in mind, I said he has transformed into that. He is finally fulfilling the potential that made him a McD AA.

Over his last 6 games, he has averaged 18 ppg and has 25 assists, 10 steals, and 8 turnovers. And that stretch includes games against UVA, Louisville, and UNC. More importantly, he is doing a great job running the offense and continues to play outstanding defense.

It's like a switch flipped or something. I wouldn't take Tyus Jones over Cat.

 
TLEF316 said:
State has been really impressive to me. They've got a lot of really nice pieces. Bracketology from last week had them as a 12 but if they climb into that 7-10 range range they could be a terrifying 2nd round matchup for a 1 or 2 seed.
State update:

Record = 17-11 (8-7)

RPI = 38

SOS = 2

3-4 vs. Top 25

6-9 vs. Top 50

Big wins: Duke (4), at UNC (17), at Louisville (18)

Bad losses: I would argue none, as their only loss to a team with RPI higher than 85 was to a long-time conference rival on the road -- Wake (127)

They should be solidly in as a 10 seed IMO, with opportunity to improve that seed.

Heck, they still have a shot at 4th place in the conference regular season. State has an easier remaining schedule (@BC, @Clemson, Syracuse) than UNC (@MIA, GT, Duke), Louisville (@FSU, ND, UVA), and Syracuse (@Duke, UVA, @NCSU). If State wins out, they will have 11 wins, with head to head tiebreaker over Louisville and Syracuse. Not sure how tiebreakers work if they end up tied with UNC, since they split their games.

(I'm not saying those games are easy wins for State. State fans know that no wins can be taken for granted. Ever.)

They seem to be peaking at the right time. And Cat Barber has transformed into the best PG in the conference. He showed that on the floor last night.
Agree with everything except the last sentence. Duke fan or not, can't deny how great Tyus Jones has been. Flat out filthy. ESPECIALLY in the biggest games they have played. We call him Tyus STONES Jones for a reason :D

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Agreed. Would have been better if someone would have let him dribble 15 minutes off the clock Dean style. Gregory is gone, right?
Texted a buddy this afternoon that I would give anything if they would fire him today and they pay Shaka anything he wants. Still doubt he would come but we could always hope. I can't believe that Gregory has made Hewitt look not so bad.
Shaka accepted a contract at State a few years ago but his wife forced him to stay at VCU. Supposedly because she wanted to stay in Richmond, nothing to do with the job itself.

To get him to GT will require that she has had a change of heart.
Yep, I see little to no chance he would do that but I'd rather the AD try than do nothing. Either way I'm pretty sure I'm ready for the Gregory era to be over.

 
Preview of Dukes tournament. Just waiting for a guy to tear them apart on the dribble.
That's a given. The difference this season may be that the Blue Devils have a post player who can score down low in addition to a pair/trio of scoring guards, plus Winslow to boot, so it will be harder for Duke's offense to go into hibernation. That sort of deep freeze plus the set-your-watch late-season defensive woes, aggravated as always by fatigue, is typically what contributes to their exit from the NCAAs. The 2010 and 2013 editions had the well-established scoring threat down low and the outside game too, which IMO is why they went farther than recent Duke teams have. This season, though, there's the added problem of being a terrible FT shooting team despite having two of the top percentage makers in the country on the roster: but then they're playing 45 minutes a game, so they'll be tired too.

All depends on the draw, but an exit before the Sweet Sixteen would surprise me, as would making the Final Four. I guess I'm envisioning another Elite Eight like two seasons ago or a Sweet Sixteen bowout to a four/five seed. But who knows. One thing I really don't care about is the ACC-T. I'd like to see Grayson Allen, Pagliuca and Kelly play 25-30 minutes apiece throughout those festivities.

 
Aerial Assault just curious why you would be "surprised" if Duke made it to the final four? Those 2 first round losses in the last 3 years were on 2 completely different teams. We now have as good a starting 5 as any team in the nation. We have the best player in the nation. Not saying the Final Four is an automatic thing for ANY team, but a #1 or probably at worst #2 seeded team who has won big games on the road all year making the Final Four shouldn't be a shock to anyone. I think Duke has as good a shot making the Final Four as any other team in this tournament. :)

 
Aerial Assault just curious why you would be "surprised" if Duke made it to the final four? Those 2 first round losses in the last 3 years were on 2 completely different teams. We now have as good a starting 5 as any team in the nation. We have the best player in the nation. Not saying the Final Four is an automatic thing for ANY team, but a #1 or probably at worst #2 seeded team who has won big games on the road all year making the Final Four shouldn't be a shock to anyone. I think Duke has as good a shot making the Final Four as any other team in this tournament. :)
I like the optimism, man. :) I just have seen one too many recent vintage Krzyzewski teams ground down by fatigue and lack of depth and this one seems like a prime candidate. I get that the Chokies were fired up as usual for their Super Bowl, but OT against them, even at Cassell? Oof.

 
Preview of Dukes tournament. Just waiting for a guy to tear them apart on the dribble.
That's a given. The difference this season may be that the Blue Devils have a post player who can score down low in addition to a pair/trio of scoring guards, plus Winslow to boot, so it will be harder for Duke's offense to go into hibernation. That sort of deep freeze plus the set-your-watch late-season defensive woes, aggravated as always by fatigue, is typically what contributes to their exit from the NCAAs. The 2010 and 2013 editions had the well-established scoring threat down low and the outside game too, which IMO is why they went farther than recent Duke teams have. This season, though, there's the added problem of being a terrible FT shooting team despite having two of the top percentage makers in the country on the roster: but then they're playing 45 minutes a game, so they'll be tired too.

All depends on the draw, but an exit before the Sweet Sixteen would surprise me, as would making the Final Four. I guess I'm envisioning another Elite Eight like two seasons ago or a Sweet Sixteen bowout to a four/five seed. But who knows. One thing I really don't care about is the ACC-T. I'd like to see Grayson Allen, Pagliuca and Kelly play 25-30 minutes apiece throughout those festivities.
Fair enough. Their offense this year really is out of this world. Not sure how last year's O was more efficient. Imagine it has to do with FT shooting. Only 4% worse than last year but I agree this team can score in plenty of ways. Probably just selective memory but Hood/Parker weren't great at getting their shot whenever. Now Duke has 4 guys who can seemingly get their shot whenever.

No doubt it depends on the draw but usually I'm not afraid of mid-majors because Duke is usually just as well coached. I fear a team like the Northern Iowa team that upset Kansas. Shoots the ball well beyond the arc. Has a guy or two who can penetrate at will. And most importantly, has a 4-year big who can push Okafor around. Add in good team defense and rotation and Duke could be in trouble. Not sure if this team exists but a game like last night where the refs let the guy just push Okafor in the back, and it could be a different ending. It'll be interesting but trying to outscore the other team never seems to end well.

 
So who makes 1st team All ACC besides Okafor, Grant, Hanlan, and Christmas?
Senior Quinn Cook deserves it. Coming into the season, not a single Duke fan I know would have said or guessed that, but if you look at his numbers, he's been outstanding. Can't give that kid enough credit, he has grown up in a major way this year.

Quick stats- 47% FG shooting, 42% 3PT, 87% FT, 3 Rebs, 3 Assists, 16 pts per game. And he's been on fire as of late. Over the last 5 games, he's averaging 23.6 ppg, 3.4 rpg, 3.0 apg on .535 FG & .488 3FG.

And when you just look at conference play, he has the highest offensive rating in the entire league (Grant is 2nd, Okafor is 4th). When you look at the entire country, he's 3rd on the list.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
So who makes 1st team All ACC besides Okafor, Grant, Hanlan, and Christmas?
You could argue Brogdon is the POTY. I think he's a lock.
Right on cue the Wolfpack go up to BC and lay an egg
I told you Gott is just an okay coach. Nothing special
You are so predictable. Gott is the best coach State has had in the past 25 years. And nobody better is walking through that door. Get over it.
:goodposting: He is never around when State wins, but as soon as they lose he is here to bash Gott. Some people are just drags.
Keep forgetting........ Is he the guy that wanted State's AD fired before she was hired?

I'll 2nd Wreck's choice of Brogdon as ist Team ACC. He won't win POY because he doesn't play for Duke or UNC and doesn't have huge numbers, though he should be in serious consideration.

 
Right on cue the Wolfpack go up to BC and lay an egg
I told you Gott is just an okay coach. Nothing special
You are so predictable. Gott is the best coach State has had in the past 25 years. And nobody better is walking through that door. Get over it.
:goodposting: He is never around when State wins, but as soon as they lose he is here to bash Gott. Some people are just drags.
none of that changes the fact that Gott is an average coach. Try arguing that

 
I think a Duke/MD Sweet 16 matchup would be fun for old times' sake. Okafor would score 50 because the Terps have no inside presence. Duke has no one who can cover Dez Wells and Melo Trimble.

Duke 76 - MD 69

 
So who makes 1st team All ACC besides Okafor, Grant, Hanlan, and Christmas?
You could argue Brogdon is the POTY. I think he's a lock.
You're right. I knew I was forgetting someone. There really should be zero drama about 1st team All ACC. Can anyone make a legit argument for someone other than Okafor, Grant, Hanlan, Christmas, and Brogdon? If you make an argument for someone else, please select who from this group you would drop to 2nd team.

No, I don't think Cook deserves it over any of these other guys. Without looking into it further, I seriously doubt Cook even deserves 2nd team and maybe not 3rd team, either.

There are a lot of good players in the ACC. The five guys named above means the best players on UNC, Louisville, N.C. State, Pitt, Miami, FSU, Wake, GT, Clemson, and VT are not included. I realize some of those teams may not have anyone deserving of 2nd (or 3rd) team, but it still illustrates how tough it is for one team to place 2 players in the top 2 teams, much less 2 players on 1st team.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Right on cue the Wolfpack go up to BC and lay an egg
I told you Gott is just an okay coach. Nothing special
You are so predictable. Gott is the best coach State has had in the past 25 years. And nobody better is walking through that door. Get over it.
thats not saying very much.

Gott is an average coach, how can you argue that?
No, he is not an average coach. Before State, he was OVC COY and SEC COY. That is not average.

At State, he is 87-50 (.635), 43-34 (.558). That is above average.

At State, he has led his team to 3 out of 3 NCAA bids, and should make it 4 of 4 this season. That is above average.

At State, his teams are 6-3 in the ACC tournament and 3-3 in the NCAA tournament. That is above average.

His recruiting is above average.

He is one of 14 coaches all time to coach two different schools to wins over the #1 ranked team. That is a bit of a footnote, but it is also true that he has shown at State that his teams can compete with and beat the best teams in basketball. That is above average.

If you want to insist he is average, make an intelligent case for it. Otherwise, you just come off as a biased poster.

 
I find this fascinating - since 1991, NC State has 13 wins over UNC and has won the next ACC game just once - and has lost the lost 10 straight.

That spans four coaches and at least five complete roster turnovers.

 
Hoo boy

Yet another reminder that it's never a good idea to pass moral judgments on other programs and athletes. Seems to always have a way of coming back to bite you.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I find this fascinating - since 1991, NC State has 13 wins over UNC and has won the next ACC game just once - and has lost the lost 10 straight.

That spans four coaches and at least five complete roster turnovers.
And if you add Duke wins into the mix, it's worse. :wall:

 
I thought that all high-end D1 programs get a pass on cheating and/or morally questionable actions these days? Isn't that just how it's done?

 
I thought that all high-end D1 programs get a pass on cheating and/or morally questionable actions these days? Isn't that just how it's done?
Yup. But some fans like to pretend they're above it.

Sometimes it seems like the more the fans think they're above it, the harder the fall. Some UNC fans certainly thought their program above the sleazy business of NCAA revenue sports, but they're not, as we all now know. Certainly Penn State and Duke fans are among the worst in this respect, and now it looks like they have something else in common.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Well, Duke has been pretty sleazy for decades now (Boozer, Magette, etc.), so any Duke fans pretending otherwise are really just kidding themselves. Regardless, schools getting a pass on this stuff isn't exactly uncommon at this point. If we want to rail against it, great, but I think the railing should be directed at the NCAA in general rather than any particular school.

 
New AP poll

2. UVA

3. Duke

10. Maryland (for old times sake)

12. ND

16. Louisville

19. UNCheats (with 9 losses yet still in the top 20 :lmao: )

 
New AP poll

2. UVA

3. Duke

10. Maryland (for old times sake)

12. ND

16. Louisville

19. UNCheats (with 9 losses yet still in the top 20 :lmao: )
Maybe it's because I watch them the most and see their warts more, but Maryland doesn't FEEL like the #10 team to me. Just look at their last dozen or so games - they either got blown out or won relative squeakers. However, they do some things really well that may bode well come tourney time:

Very good PG

Good upperclassmen

Make their FTs

 
Grayson Allen has a nice stroke.

Is it just me or does Matt Jones have a rather odd looking stroke?

Something off about it to me.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top