Dr. Octopus
Footballguy
luckily it was a fake report. Bleacher report sent it to my phone, then a few minutes later rescinded it.Oh, that's just awful.
luckily it was a fake report. Bleacher report sent it to my phone, then a few minutes later rescinded it.Oh, that's just awful.
Yeah, just checked google. Thanks for the clarification, though.luckily it was a fake report. Bleacher report sent it to my phone, then a few minutes later rescinded it.
According to ESPN's Adam Schefter, the Broncos have checked in on free agent Ryan Fitzpatrick but consider him too expensive.
The Jets have also been reluctant to meet Fitzpatrick's high salary demands. The Broncos added Mark Sanchez to their quarterback mix on Friday but he's just a placeholder. Denver is hoping to land Colin Kaepernick though the 49ers are in no rush to trade him and if they do, Kaepernick has already said his preference is to play for head coach Hue Jackson in Cleveland. Until the Jets or Broncos increase their contract offers, Fitzpatrick will continue to play the waiting game. Mar 13 - 9:50 AM
He was more of a project type when he was drafted - but he did have some moments during the preseason. I'd give him a chance to beat out Geno if it comes down to those two during training camp, but I don't see the team not adding a veteran even if it isn't Fitzpatrick.Bryce petty not an option??
Not sure that's even true.surprised that the Fitz stand off is taking this long......the longer it goes the less options Fitz has but....
The later it goes the less teams have cap room and it's that much longer that teams have gone through OTAs etc. and developed their schemes and players.BoltBacker said:Not sure that's even true.
If NY is only offering him backup $ then Fitz has all the time in the world to accept backup $ from some other team. IMO he would likely be the top backup in the NFL and the best backups make $7mil. NY "might be willing" to go as high as $9mil doesn't even sound like they are willing to make that as a concrete offer. More than 2/3rds the league have more than that much cap space left to add depth at QB. A lot of ticking time bomb QB positions around the NFL right now even assuming there won't be any injuries. Who will be ready to start in year one in the draft..... Goff and?
All it would really take is a horrible preseason by RGIII, Keenum, Sanchez, or Geno. Would that shock anyone? Some team would find the money even if they had to structure the deal so most of the cap hit took place next season. For that matter after the nightmare DAL/IND/CIN had to endure playing poor backups last year why wouldn't they want the best backup in the league?
Fitz will have plenty of opportunity to accept backup $ and may end up making much, much more simply by waiting this thing out. There just aren't enough servicable QB's to go around even when everyone is at 100% health and no help coming in the draft.
RGIII I guess is more of a place holder than a true backup, I suppose. That's assuming he makes it through the preseason. Not a hater, but based on what we have seen the past two years from him it's really not a given. The CLE situation is far from resolved imo. Those are the only two backups that come anywhere near Fitz in talent since the cap went up.The later it goes the less teams have cap room and it's that much longer that teams have gone through OTAs etc. and developed their schemes and players.
It's surely possible that some one signs him as a backup, but it's also less likely he gets paid big money to be a backup as well.
ETA: How many NFL backup QBs are making $7MM plus. Chase Daniels and who else?
I don't think RGIII was signed as a backup, but his contract is very reasonable (and frankly I'd rather take a chance on him than Fitz).RGIII I guess is more of a place holder than a true backup, I suppose. That's assuming he makes it through the preseason. Not a hater, but based on what we have seen the past two years from him it's really not a given. The CLE situation is far from resolved imo. Those are the only two backups that come anywhere near Fitz in talent since the cap went up.
And nobody is offering Fitz big $ now, so he isn't missing out on big $ either way. I don't see any FA's out there that are going to eat up much cap space. He has nothing to lose at this point by waiting.
I think a lot of fans just have a dated premise of what QB contracts are moving forward. Better than average backups are ~7mil(Daniels/RGIII) and below average starters are ~18mil(Osweiler/Bradford/Cutler). People act like paying Fitz or Kaep somewhere in between the two is outlandish but it really isn't based on what the market is telling us.
agreed - I dont think $7M per year is backup money.....Fitz was brought in to be a backup last year and was paid 25% of that....i dont see any team giving him $7M to be a backup....Chase is unique in that Bradford is made of glass and Eagles were hot for him....based on the lack of a market i'm not sure anyone is hot for Fitz.....now if he lowers his price to $7M Denver could very well jump back in the mix which would be real competition rather than teams looking for a backup.The later it goes the less teams have cap room and it's that much longer that teams have gone through OTAs etc. and developed their schemes and players.
It's surely possible that some one signs him as a backup, but it's also less likely he gets paid big money to be a backup as well.
ETA: How many NFL backup QBs are making $7MM plus. Chase Daniels and who else?
THIS JUST IN: Jets left tackle D'Brickashaw Ferguson is retiring after 10 seasons. (via@RichCimini)
His play was slipping but this is a still a huge hole to fill (with really know way of filling it post free agency)
It's April 8th and the jets have no qb, no left tackle and a pretty low draft pick. At this point, their only option may be to just bend over and let some team take advantage of them in a trade up.
Ferguson obviously has the right to retire whenever he wants but this really screws the team. He doesn't strike me as a guy who would do this out of spite because they asked him to take a cut. The organization was good to him for a decade
I do remember reading that, and you're right - combined with the pay cut, he probably thought it was a good a time to walk away.Well, this frees up $9MM in cap room so now they could pay Fitz, if they want to. Denver is looking to trade Ryan Clady after acquiring Okung so maybe that's a possibility. I'm not sure what the asking price would be.
I don't think it was out of spite, you're probably right about that, but maybe he figured why take more abuse if he has to take a significant pay cut to do so. He apparently was very concerned with the concussion issue and long term effects.
Yeah, same here. If he stays healthy, I can't think of a downside to it. Frees up cap room and is a legit left tackle.I thought it was a great move with little risk.
That whole schedule, uh, stinka like fish, as the MTV guy from the late '80s/early '90s would say.Knew the schedule was going to be tough but the first 7 games look brutal.
http://espn.go.com/nfl/team/schedule/_/name/nyj
If he had any hope of being a good NFL QB we'd still find that out whether or not they lost far more games this season. It's a very tough schedule overall for sure but only KC, SEA and ARI have great defenses and frankly SEA's isn't as intimidating as it was a few seasons ago.LOL.. NOW throw Geno in there VS those Beasts and Judge away...
You do realize that this was their plan all along correct?Also another reason why you play Geno last year and not a Placeholder journeyman...
If he had any hope of being a good NFL QB we'd still find that out whether or not they lost far more games this season. It's a very tough schedule overall for sure but only KC, SEA and ARI have great defenses and frankly SEA's isn't as intimidating as it was a few seasons ago.
At this point I'm a little intrigued by them grabbing Paxton Lynch (I grabbed him for them in the group mock on this board). He was consider to be the best QB in this class at one point and with the Rams moving up he could be there for them at 20.
I kind of agree that this could be a lost season - looking at the schedule a 2-4 start or worse looks realistic - so I'm ok with letting Fitzpatrick retire at this point and taking a look at Geno (who I have no faith in, but willing to give him one last chance), Lynch or even Petty. Eventually we need to solve the QB issues and taking a shotgun approach with three youngsters isn't the worst thing the team could do. It's just a shame that their offensive and defensive core is mostly aging vets though.
You do realize that this was their plan all along correct?
Geno got his jaw busted and the team played well with Fitzpatrick who was having a career year (albeit against a soft schedule). The guy set the team TD record and the team finished 10-6 and should have been a playoff team. Let's not act like last season was any kind of disaster just because they couldn't get your boy on the field to finally decide if he's the future or not (because the odds are strong that he's not).
Let's also not forget how poorly Geno played at the end of the one game where he did get to play - a bad loss which ended up being a huge part of the reason the team ultimately missed the playoffs. In that game Geno once again showed what a bonehead he is and how he can not handle the mental aspects of this game. He's physically gifted and I would have loved to have landed a franchise QB in Round 2 - but I have serious doubts that once he's gone we're going to regret letting him go while he lights up the league in another uniform.
It's not an insult and you have been a big supporter/defender right from the get go. You've also made him your avatar twice. It's hardly a stretch to conclude you're a fan.LOL @ "Your Boy"....
Just Develop a freaking QB !!!!!!!
It's not an insult and you have been a big supporter/defender right from the get go. You've also made him your avatar twice. It's hardly a stretch to conclude you're a fan.
It's hard to call last season "a waste of time". I realize that finding and developing a quarterback is very important. Establishing a winning culture and getting your fanbase excited is also important. This team finished 10-6 and entertained us - I'm not going to apologize for that and Bowles or Mac shouldn't either.
I'm all for drafting and finally developing a franchise QB. We haven't had 1 for a long long long time. The "problem" though is that, as sad as it is to say for a non-playoff team with a tough schedule in 2016, we are in win now mode. Our offensive skill players are the best they've ever been, but are all also on the downslope of their careers. Our defensive core is aging (Revis and Harris namely)/won't be able to be held together much longer (Mo). With all of the positive steps the Jets took last year, it's hard to want to take a step back and throw a Geno or rookie into the game to see if they're capable of playing - while the rest of the core of the team gets a year older and a year closer to leaving/retiring. We're in a very purgatorial position right now - but why would we expect anything else? We're "#######" Jets fans after all!
Let's also not forget how poorly Geno played at the end of the one game where he did get to play - a bad loss which ended up being a huge part of the reason the team ultimately missed the playoffs. In that game Geno once again showed what a bonehead he is and how he can not handle the mental aspects of this game. He's physically gifted and I would have loved to have landed a franchise QB in Round 2 - but I have serious doubts that once he's gone we're going to regret letting him go while he lights up the league in another uniform.
I didn't say Geno was the only reason they lost the game. He actually played fairly decent for the most part, but showed his shortcomings when the game was on the line.Also - while out at lunch I was thinking - do ppl even remember the Oakland game for what it was or did it become the Icing on The Hate Geno cake?
1st off... Nick Freaking Mangold was out...... so, Geno comes in cold mid drive - Throws a strike to Kerely for FG range. Jets 3-0
Oak Marches down for an Easy TD 7-3
Jets 3 and out..... OAK Marches for another easy TD 14-3....
Jets 3 and out... OAK Marches down for an easy TD... 21-3
OAK Defense was home, for real and playing great VS a cold QB - JETS DEFENSE WAS COMPLETELY MIA
If the Jets came to this game with a Defense like ppl thought they had then they give the QB a chance instead of making the Offense 1 dimensional and Jets RBs rushed for under 30 yards... ALL GAME!!!!!
OAK gets the ball to start the 2nd half and Taiwan Jones scampers for a 60 yard TD where Jet D whiffs about 5 times and this guy almost gets half his career yards on 1 play making the Jets D look Silly.......28-3 GENO STINKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! C'mon Man!!!
The fact that Geno put up some TD and made the game close enough to think the end mattered so much is what blows me away.
The selective memory Kills me.....
Believe me.... Ryan Fitzpatrick was not winning this game - He won early games when the D was lights out was a huge plus in Takeaways... He was probably lucky to get injured early...
He ran towards the sideline and just stopped before going out of bounds - literally just stopped and stood there frozen. He was then tackled (sacked) in bounds letting valuable time slip away. He then also failed to get a snap off before the two minute warning (despite having time) wasting more clock time. He fell apart with the game on the line.I sort of remember that Oakland game. I remember the defense totally wetting the bed and I think geno had 1 absolutely horrible brain fart in the 4th quarter (did he take a really bad sack to kill a drive? For some reason that sticks out to me)
This is a weird situation. They seem to favor keeping Richardson, who is also a stud but not as impactful (in my eyes) as Wilkerson. Ricardson also has shown to be a character risk. I really can't see why this defense wouldn't be built around Wilkerson. He's more valuable than Revis at this point.aI have a bad feeling theyre gonna trade Wilkerson. Can't believe it had come to this. Dude should be a jet for life and they somehow screwed it up
Like you I'm against moving Wilkerson, but at this point I'd be surprised if it didn't happen. It does make some sense since they don't believe they can sign him long term. I've seen talk of moving up to pick 7 in a trade with San Fran and I would be ok with that. I'm really starting to warm up to the idea of adding Paxton Lynch and at this point he isn't dropping to pick 20. I don't think that precludes bringing back Fitzpatrick for a season or two. At this point I am thinking the two sides will reach an amicable solution - he obviously wants to be back (like you said he's everywhere with teammates recently).Let's here some thoughts on how this will play out....