joey said:
Vegas is my 3rd choice, after Oakland and LA.Sna
Antonio and San Diego are way below those 3.
And London is a nightmare scenario.
Vegas is my 1st choice now. I do not want to share a stadium with Kroenke and Kroenke does not want the Rams to share LA with the Raiders because he knows the fanbase will favor the Raiders. Any deal he would make with the Raiders would make us a second class citizen in our own stadium. To me, that is worst than having a third class crappy stadium shared with a baseball team. As I stated before, I think Vegas would breath a lot of new life into the franchise. The stadium would be better than anything else we will get anywhere else.
It is a tax friendly state so it helps in FA. It is an entertainment mecca that no other city has anything like. It is near enough to existing fan base, would capture the market easily, be the only pro team in town and be a great place to go see an out of town NFL game.
A new deal in Northern California. I don't think it has to be IN Oakland. Sacramento has been thrown out there but who knows if that sticks. I remember other Nor Cal locations being floated in the past. But somewhere in Nor Cal is my second choice.
SD is my next choice. Then SA. And I agree, a London move is down right nasty but I have never heard anyone use London and the Raiders in any kind of speculation that made any sense, so I am not worried about it.