If the Cavs win tomorrow I'd bet on over 6.5 wins.Cavs only have 8 games left. Let's say they go 6-2.They are, but Sixers have the much tougher schedule, as he alludes to. Cavs could easily go 7-2 (if not better) which means Sixers going 4-7 would let Cleveland pass them. Sixers have no gimmes left. Still probably unlikely, but far from impossible.They're a lot closer to the 2 seed than the 4 seed.Given their schedules I don't think the 6ers are locked into the 3. Last week's L may end up being the difference maker even if the Cavs finish hot though.That attitude is fine in December, but not so much in late March with only 10 games left, and the difference between the 5/6 seeds is playing the Cavs or playing the Sixers...Meh. Better teams lose all the time. It’s a long season and **** happens.Dude finishes with 57 and they STILL lose to a Minnesota team playing without KAT and Ant. Inexcusable.He's gone cold now. Won't hit it.10 off Carmelo's record.
Philly has 10 games left and is 4 full games up on them. Philly would need to go 3-7. (I'm already counting tonight as a W)
7-1? I don't see it. But sure, then all Philly needs to do is go 4-6If the Cavs win tomorrow I'd bet on over 6.5 wins.Cavs only have 8 games left. Let's say they go 6-2.They are, but Sixers have the much tougher schedule, as he alludes to. Cavs could easily go 7-2 (if not better) which means Sixers going 4-7 would let Cleveland pass them. Sixers have no gimmes left. Still probably unlikely, but far from impossible.They're a lot closer to the 2 seed than the 4 seed.Given their schedules I don't think the 6ers are locked into the 3. Last week's L may end up being the difference maker even if the Cavs finish hot though.That attitude is fine in December, but not so much in late March with only 10 games left, and the difference between the 5/6 seeds is playing the Cavs or playing the Sixers...Meh. Better teams lose all the time. It’s a long season and **** happens.Dude finishes with 57 and they STILL lose to a Minnesota team playing without KAT and Ant. Inexcusable.He's gone cold now. Won't hit it.10 off Carmelo's record.
Philly has 10 games left and is 4 full games up on them. Philly would need to go 3-7. (I'm already counting tonight as a W)
...which is why I said last week's L may be the difference, but it is certainly in the range of potential outcomes. 6ers schedule is brutal. All moot if the Cavs suffer a 3 day hangover in NYC like they did in South Beach 2 weeks ago though.7-1? I don't see it. But sure, then all Philly needs to do is go 4-6If the Cavs win tomorrow I'd bet on over 6.5 wins.Cavs only have 8 games left. Let's say they go 6-2.They are, but Sixers have the much tougher schedule, as he alludes to. Cavs could easily go 7-2 (if not better) which means Sixers going 4-7 would let Cleveland pass them. Sixers have no gimmes left. Still probably unlikely, but far from impossible.They're a lot closer to the 2 seed than the 4 seed.Given their schedules I don't think the 6ers are locked into the 3. Last week's L may end up being the difference maker even if the Cavs finish hot though.That attitude is fine in December, but not so much in late March with only 10 games left, and the difference between the 5/6 seeds is playing the Cavs or playing the Sixers...Meh. Better teams lose all the time. It’s a long season and **** happens.Dude finishes with 57 and they STILL lose to a Minnesota team playing without KAT and Ant. Inexcusable.He's gone cold now. Won't hit it.10 off Carmelo's record.
Philly has 10 games left and is 4 full games up on them. Philly would need to go 3-7. (I'm already counting tonight as a W)
I fully agree their schedule is brutal, and I'm not being over confident on them, but they're 9-1 in their last 10. I think they will manage 4-6....which is why I said last week's L may be the difference, but it is certainly in the range of potential outcomes. 6ers schedule is brutal. All moot if the Cavs suffer a 3 day hangover in NYC like they did in South Beach 2 weeks ago though.7-1? I don't see it. But sure, then all Philly needs to do is go 4-6If the Cavs win tomorrow I'd bet on over 6.5 wins.Cavs only have 8 games left. Let's say they go 6-2.They are, but Sixers have the much tougher schedule, as he alludes to. Cavs could easily go 7-2 (if not better) which means Sixers going 4-7 would let Cleveland pass them. Sixers have no gimmes left. Still probably unlikely, but far from impossible.They're a lot closer to the 2 seed than the 4 seed.Given their schedules I don't think the 6ers are locked into the 3. Last week's L may end up being the difference maker even if the Cavs finish hot though.That attitude is fine in December, but not so much in late March with only 10 games left, and the difference between the 5/6 seeds is playing the Cavs or playing the Sixers...Meh. Better teams lose all the time. It’s a long season and **** happens.Dude finishes with 57 and they STILL lose to a Minnesota team playing without KAT and Ant. Inexcusable.He's gone cold now. Won't hit it.10 off Carmelo's record.
Philly has 10 games left and is 4 full games up on them. Philly would need to go 3-7. (I'm already counting tonight as a W)
Apparently a ref said something to the effect of “Warriors ball, Mavs timeout”. Somehow the Mavs thought he indicated that it was Mavs ball/Mavs timeout. Because of that—they lined up on their offensive side of the court thinking that they would inbound it at half court. Of course—the Warriors knew it was their ball and took advantage of the Mavs being on the opposite end of the court. On the live cast—one of the commentators said that Mark Cuban mentioned that he would protest the game if the Mavs lost by 2 points or less. We’ll see if that ends up coming to fruition.What the heck? Gotta go down to the “Mavs don’t play defense” video.
Did they somehow just get totally confused and forget which basket they were defending or what?
He should protest his own coach being a moron.Apparently a ref said something to the effect of “Warriors ball, Mavs timeout”. Somehow the Mavs thought he indicated that it was Mavs ball/Mavs timeout. Because of that—they lined up on their offensive side of the court thinking that they would inbound it at half court. Of course—the Warriors knew it was their ball and took advantage of the Mavs being on the opposite end of the court. On the live cast—one of the commentators said that Mark Cuban mentioned that he would protest the game if the Mavs lost by 2 points or less. We’ll see if that ends up coming to fruition.What the heck? Gotta go down to the “Mavs don’t play defense” video.
Did they somehow just get totally confused and forget which basket they were defending or what?
Cuban went right to the Twitters: https://twitter.com/mcuban/status/1638726798698586116?cxt=HHwWiIC9herV9r0tAAAAone of the commentators said that Mark Cuban mentioned that he would protest the game if the Mavs lost by 2 points or less. We’ll see if that ends up coming to fruition
love it. hope the mavs end up lottery at #11.What the heck? Gotta go down to the “Mavs don’t play defense” video.
Did they somehow just get totally confused and forget which basket they were defending or what?
It seems like the refs did a horrible job communicating there, but why were there zero Mavs players on the Warriors side of the court? if it had been the Mavs ball they would have been inbounding from the same spot, right?
Correct. If it was their ball they would've had the option to move it to their half and likely expected to do so.It seems like the refs did a horrible job communicating there, but why were there zero Mavs players on the Warriors side of the court? if it had been the Mavs ball they would have been inbounding from the same spot, right?
I think the Mavs called a TO so it would have been inbounded from the front court?
Correct. If it was their ball they would've had the option to move it to their half and likely expected to do so.It seems like the refs did a horrible job communicating there, but why were there zero Mavs players on the Warriors side of the court? if it had been the Mavs ball they would have been inbounding from the same spot, right?
I think the Mavs called a TO so it would have been inbounded from the front court?
Mavs are gonna win this appeal IMO. There was one ref that was standing on the baseline on the same side of the court as the Mavs, so even the whole ref crew didn't know the call. No idea why the ref allowed the inbounds without at least pointing and indicating it was Warriors ball. Seems pretty stupid to me.
I don’t recall what the standard is for winning an appeal but it’s way beyond “the refs screwed something up that affected the game.” IIRC the Kings appealed a game where the issue was whether a player had touched a ball on an inbounds pass on the last play of the game, and there was video evidence that a player had gotten a finger on it. Still lost.Correct. If it was their ball they would've had the option to move it to their half and likely expected to do so.It seems like the refs did a horrible job communicating there, but why were there zero Mavs players on the Warriors side of the court? if it had been the Mavs ball they would have been inbounding from the same spot, right?
I think the Mavs called a TO so it would have been inbounded from the front court?
Mavs are gonna win this appeal IMO. There was one ref that was standing on the baseline on the same side of the court as the Mavs, so even the whole ref crew didn't know the call. No idea why the ref allowed the inbounds without at least pointing and indicating it was Warriors ball. Seems pretty stupid to me.
Yeah, really low likelihood that he wins the appeal. It was a weird play, but to suggest that they would have won the game if not for this single play is dumb. For practical purposes, they lost by 5 points. The W’s let Reggie Bullock shoot a wide open 3 with < 1 second left in the game (thus closing the gap to 2 pts).Correct. If it was their ball they would've had the option to move it to their half and likely expected to do so.It seems like the refs did a horrible job communicating there, but why were there zero Mavs players on the Warriors side of the court? if it had been the Mavs ball they would have been inbounding from the same spot, right?
I think the Mavs called a TO so it would have been inbounded from the front court?
Mavs are gonna win this appeal IMO. There was one ref that was standing on the baseline on the same side of the court as the Mavs, so even the whole ref crew didn't know the call. No idea why the ref allowed the inbounds without at least pointing and indicating it was Warriors ball. Seems pretty stupid to me.
I don't think they win the appeal. The ref signals Warriors ball and timeout Mavs. I am sure there was some confusion after the timeout and the refs should have held up the inbounds when all the Mavs were on the wrong side of the court, but this is one play in the 3rd quarter and just taking that bucket away doesn't magically mean the game is tied, plus we have no idea if the Warriors would have still scored after a regular inbounds.
The last time a protest was actually won they had to go back and replay the game from that point. I just don't see them doing that here.
I think Cuban is a fantastic owner and great for the NBA, but he comes off bad here. Saying he would only protest the game if it was decided by 2 points and calling that play the worst miscall in NBA history.
Sixers need to be resting Embiid and Harden for the playoffs at this point. Why risk them if both are sore right now on this West Coast trip?
My hope is that the 3 seed is set in stone with a few games left and they rest everyone but who knows. I liked what they did with the bulls where embiid didn't play the 2nd half, but he surely couldn't have been happy with his per/game stats dropping. I think he wants MVP more than he says.Sixers need to be resting Embiid and Harden for the playoffs at this point. Why risk them if both are sore right now on this West Coast trip?
Ugh. Yeah, that Lamb play was absurd.Terrible job by the refs in the GS-Dallas game. Obviously the inbounds play was the worst, but shortly before that GS turned the ball over when Lamb got knocked down from behind and no foul was called.
There's been talk here in BOS of trading Jaylen Brown for Lillard. As a Celtics fan, I am generally not a huge fan of trading for a player 6 years older. Brown is back in the news this week for having given multiple interviews where he conveyed that he wasn't happy, didn't feel appreciated, and wasn't sure if he would commit to the Celtics long term.
Let the man go. Should have traded him last season but the rudderless team ownership group dawdled and did nothing but puke salary for little to nothing in return. It's a moribund franchise that is on the precipice of irrelevance and years of bleakness. We are going to be the new Orlando.
There's been talk here in BOS of trading Jaylen Brown for Lillard. As a Celtics fan, I am generally not a huge fan of trading for a player 6 years older. Brown is back in the news this week for having given multiple interviews where he conveyed that he wasn't happy, didn't feel appreciated, and wasn't sure if he would commit to the Celtics long term.
Let the man go. Should have traded him last season but the rudderless team ownership group dawdled and did nothing but puke salary for little to nothing in return. It's a moribund franchise that is on the precipice of irrelevance and years of bleakness. We are going to be the new Orlando.
Let the man go. Should have traded him last season but the rudderless team ownership group dawdled and did nothing but puke salary for little to nothing in return. It's a moribund franchise that is on the precipice of irrelevance and years of bleakness. We are going to be the new Orlando.
Let the man go. Should have traded him last season but the rudderless team ownership group dawdled and did nothing but puke salary for little to nothing in return. It's a moribund franchise that is on the precipice of irrelevance and years of bleakness. We are going to be the new Orlando.
Not really. Orlando has been to two finals the last 30 years.
Let the man go. Should have traded him last season but the rudderless team ownership group dawdled and did nothing but puke salary for little to nothing in return. It's a moribund franchise that is on the precipice of irrelevance and years of bleakness. We are going to be the new Orlando.
Not really. Orlando has been to two finals the last 30 years.
That's fair. And Chet's coming.
We are the new Charlotte.
Blazers should have moved on from his era as far back as Jrue/Rondo running him and CJ off the court in the playoffs many years ago.
Blazers should have moved on from his era as far back as Jrue/Rondo running him and CJ off the court in the playoffs many years ago.
Guess the catalyst is finishing behind 2 teams that came into season in full tank mode and 4 teams (NO/LAL/MN/GS) who have missed their franchise players for much of the season. The second they inked Simons long term, Dame should have been out of town.
We get it. No one wants to live in Portland. That doesn't mean you should continue to be a poverty team refusing to rebuild. Milwaukee / Sacramento aren't exactly hotbeds and are contenders in their conferences.
Portland has had PLENTY of complimentary talent come through through Lillard's tenure. Who has Lillard ever made better........
No one.
Isn’t that only the last two minutes of the game?Correct. If it was their ball they would've had the option to move it to their half and likely expected to do so.It seems like the refs did a horrible job communicating there, but why were there zero Mavs players on the Warriors side of the court? if it had been the Mavs ball they would have been inbounding from the same spot, right?
I think the Mavs called a TO so it would have been inbounded from the front court?
Mavs are gonna win this appeal IMO. There was one ref that was standing on the baseline on the same side of the court as the Mavs, so even the whole ref crew didn't know the call. No idea why the ref allowed the inbounds without at least pointing and indicating it was Warriors ball. Seems pretty stupid to me.
Sorry Instinctive. Saw all the same problematic things (specifically structural defensive collapses) with Jason Kidd in his second year as head coach in Milwaukee. All I can say ...it only gets worse.Any percentage chance above "<1%" for the Mavericks feels overly optimistic to me. Hate this team. And I'm usually an optimist (may have been the only person who said "WCF" last year.
Severely short-handed tanking team on the second night of a back to back. Tough loss.Mavs look like they continued their protest into tonight’s game against the Hornets. Oof.
Hornets legend Svi Mykhailiuk leading the team in minutesSeverely short-handed tanking team on the second night of a back to back. Tough loss.Mavs look like they continued their protest into tonight’s game against the Hornets. Oof.
And of course Dennis Smith Jr hit the dagger 3.
I hardly get to watch the Kings, but I did catch their entire game against the Celtics the other night. Murray only looked ok to me going 3-10 from behind the line. I caught the other SAC / BOS game back in November and Murray didn't do much offensively (1-6 from three with only 3 points total). I get it, those are only 2 games out of many, and he's done much better in other games.Not saying he should win ROY or anything, but Keegan Murray is about to break the rookie record for three pointers and ranks 4th among *all* NBA players with 400+ attempts in 3P%. Pretty awesome that he’s been able to step in as a rookie and contribute to winning at a high level on a good team (yes, I can’t believe I typed that last sentence about the Kings). If he can take another step and become either an above average defender or shot creator, he’ll be a star level player.