PIK95
Footballguy
I mean, I warned ya.
MOTHER ####ER!
I mean, I warned ya.
MOTHER ####ER!
For sure. It was levied as a criticism, I just thought it was fascinating.Through 14 picks, only 5 of ESPN's top 10 players and 7 of the top 20 players have been taken (and 9 of top 46).![]()
Yeah the salary impact adds a lot more strategery than just a straight fantasy/rankings draft.For sure. It was levied as a criticism, I just thought it was fascinating.Through 14 picks, only 5 of ESPN's top 10 players and 7 of the top 20 players have been taken (and 9 of top 46).![]()
#2 on my list!Lauri Markkanen, Utah, $17,259,999
I was hopeful but not optimistic he would fall to me at 35 or whatever.Lauri Markkanen, Utah, $17,259,999
Yeah the salary impact adds a lot more strategery than just a straight fantasy/rankings draft.For sure. It was levied as a criticism, I just thought it was fascinating.Through 14 picks, only 5 of ESPN's top 10 players and 7 of the top 20 players have been taken (and 9 of top 46).![]()
Great pick! Short lister.Lauri Markkanen, Utah, $17,259,999
I drafted #1 last time and #5 this time, so the group strategy has kind of unfolded between my picks both drafts, but it seems like there is a little more push for lower salaried first rounders this year. Last year had a few, including Ball, but I feel like there was a bit more lean into best player available. I also feel like there was more tier 2/3 talent available for less than $10M than there is this year. Looking back at last year's teams, it doesn't seem like there was a huge correlation to money strategy and overall teambuilding success. It was more about not blowing your top 3-4 or so picks and finding a couple diamonds in the rough otherwise.Yeah the salary impact adds a lot more strategery than just a straight fantasy/rankings draft.For sure. It was levied as a criticism, I just thought it was fascinating.Through 14 picks, only 5 of ESPN's top 10 players and 7 of the top 20 players have been taken (and 9 of top 46).![]()
Yeah, I've never done this before, but it's pretty clear that getting bang for you buck is going to be important.
Noooo! Was all set to be my pick! Give me a minute to regroup.Team Trader Jake
1.17 CLE PF/C Evan Mobley $8.8 mil
Versatile young player on a cheap salary. He has upside on offense and should compete for the Defensive Player of the Year award this season.
1.18 MEM PF/C Jaren Jackson $27,102,202
Elite defender who can still provide above-average shooting/scoring for the position. Can play both the 4 and the 5 and will allow for some flexibility in building out the roster going forward.
@Jayrod is on the clock
Probably the constant foul trouble.1.18 MEM PF/C Jaren Jackson $27,102,202
Elite defender who can still provide above-average shooting/scoring for the position. Can play both the 4 and the 5 and will allow for some flexibility in building out the roster going forward.
@Jayrod is on the clock
I like this pick. He was one of the others I was looking at when I drafted Markkenen. Stud shot blocker for sure, but for a guy who is 6'11", you'd think he'd get more rebounds. Heck. Ja Morrant averaged almost as many rebounds as Jackson.
Probably the constant foul trouble.1.18 MEM PF/C Jaren Jackson $27,102,202
Elite defender who can still provide above-average shooting/scoring for the position. Can play both the 4 and the 5 and will allow for some flexibility in building out the roster going forward.
@Jayrod is on the clock
I like this pick. He was one of the others I was looking at when I drafted Markkenen. Stud shot blocker for sure, but for a guy who is 6'11", you'd think he'd get more rebounds. Heck. Ja Morrant averaged almost as many rebounds as Jackson.
Star?Didn’t expect to have to choose between a couple guys here. Going for a star 2-way player at the price of a third starter.
1.16 - Mikal Bridges - SG, Nets
$21,700,000
![]()
Yeah I said it.Star?Didn’t expect to have to choose between a couple guys here. Going for a star 2-way player at the price of a third starter.
1.16 - Mikal Bridges - SG, Nets
$21,700,000
![]()
You didn't say it loud enough when evaluating my team last year.Yeah I said it.Star?Didn’t expect to have to choose between a couple guys here. Going for a star 2-way player at the price of a third starter.
1.16 - Mikal Bridges - SG, Nets
$21,700,000
![]()
![]()
Probably the constant foul trouble.1.18 MEM PF/C Jaren Jackson $27,102,202
Elite defender who can still provide above-average shooting/scoring for the position. Can play both the 4 and the 5 and will allow for some flexibility in building out the roster going forward.
@Jayrod is on the clock
I like this pick. He was one of the others I was looking at when I drafted Markkenen. Stud shot blocker for sure, but for a guy who is 6'11", you'd think he'd get more rebounds. Heck. Ja Morrant averaged almost as many rebounds as Jackson.
Adams nearly doubled Jackson rebounds in one less minute per game. Of course, he didn't do much else, so there's that
Selective analysis.You didn't say it loud enough when evaluating my team last year.Yeah I said it.Star?Didn’t expect to have to choose between a couple guys here. Going for a star 2-way player at the price of a third starter.
1.16 - Mikal Bridges - SG, Nets
$21,700,000
![]()
![]()
I've had 2 of the guys from my team last season picked already (Markkanen).
I at least am just reacting to last year, knowing how many awesome guys were available in the 4/5/6/7/8 rounds because of price.I drafted #1 last time and #5 this time, so the group strategy has kind of unfolded between my picks both drafts, but it seems like there is a little more push for lower salaried first rounders this year. Last year had a few, including Ball, but I feel like there was a bit more lean into best player available. I also feel like there was more tier 2/3 talent available for less than $10M than there is this year. Looking back at last year's teams, it doesn't seem like there was a huge correlation to money strategy and overall teambuilding success. It was more about not blowing your top 3-4 or so picks and finding a couple diamonds in the rough otherwise.Yeah the salary impact adds a lot more strategery than just a straight fantasy/rankings draft.For sure. It was levied as a criticism, I just thought it was fascinating.Through 14 picks, only 5 of ESPN's top 10 players and 7 of the top 20 players have been taken (and 9 of top 46).![]()
Yeah, I've never done this before, but it's pretty clear that getting bang for you buck is going to be important.
The Sox got a gem with that guy. Wait, who?1.xx - jalen duren
Eric Bledsoe still available.Rats, most of the single digit $ guys on my short list got gobbled up by the jerks on the turn.
Nice - he would have been my choice if I decided to go cheaper.Scottie Barnes, TOR, $8,008,680
Nice - he would have been my choice if I decided to go cheaper.Scottie Barnes, TOR, $8,008,680
He was on the short list also. Driving, give me 5-10 mins.Scottie Barnes, TOR, $8,008,680
I was a bit surprised too. I probably wouldn't have had him in my top 12 or so due the stupid high salary, he would have been somewhere probably in my low teens.OK, now it’s time for a real star. Almost went with him last round. Surprised he’s still available.
2.05 - Kevin Durant - PF, Suns
$47,649,433
![]()