jhib
Footballguy
But the new way would have still kept the first game pretty darn important, because it would have allowed Michigan to sit at home the first round while #7 Ohio State had to play #10 Penn State.Right. I'm the current system, Michigan vs Ohio state is everything. Have to win that game to win the big ten and move on to bigger things.I think under next year’s rules they would have been in as the 12 seed. I believe you’ve said before you preferred it the old way (pre-BCS era) and while I disagree I get it. The BCS and the CFP are both half measures for sure, but sometimes stuff like that has to happen before we can get to where we really want to be, which for me is the way FCS does it. Do you think the FCS champion is mythical? Put aside whether or not you even think major college athletics should exist (they shouldn’t). That cat is out of the bag for now so while we’re here we might as well come up with the best way to crown a champion, if you ask me. In 25 years, if major college football still exists, I think we’ll look on this BCS/CFP stuff as a necessary transitional era. It doesn’t make it any less frustrating in the here and now though.Well obviously, because winning all your games is the most important...oh waitThey chose the undefeated G5 team because they had less losses than the other team despite playing a weak schedule. Great system!Liberty ahead of SMU is the cherry on top - this committee did a horrible job
Liberty is 12-0 and sits more than ten spots removed from a 12 team playoff. The 10 teams ahead of Liberty all have 3 or 4 losses. It has always been and always will be a mythical national championship.
I think the FCS playoffs are a great system and have no problem with that. A 12 team football bracket will probably be fun in some ways, but I also think we have to agree the tradition and magic of college football is pretty much gone at that point. Things like conference championships and new years day bowl games are pretty much already a thing of the past and will have even less meaning next year. We could easily get 6 or 7 boring games and then a final like last year where a team lost by almost 60 points. I also think there will always be unintended consequences of changes like this that are hard for us to predict. For example, we've just seen an undefeated FSU left out of the playoff because their quarterback is injured. Imagine this year if Oregon and LSU are trying to make a 12 team tournament but everyone knows Daniels and Nix are not going to play? The issues we see as massive problems today will surely be replaced with similar problems when they go to 12, 32, etc.
Now, you lose that game, and it sucks. Until they play again next week in the big ten championship. And then they both make the new playoffs and might meet again in a few more weeks. Cheapens everything about the regular season.
And it might lessen some games in the regular season but also make more games more important.


