Ugh. If the Kliff stuff is true that's very disappointing and I'm not excited for Getsy.
He was highly regarded when hired in Chi, and got a number of OC considerations this cycle too. His offense improved this year vs. last and as this year progressed. I wouldn't be ready to be disappointed right off the bat. This does, on the surface, almost certainly nuke the Justin Fields talk though.
Getsy did not tailor the offense to Fields strengths. Hackett was highly regarded before he got to Denver too, as most guys that worked with Rodgers are. Getsy seems like a guy that won't adapt to the players he has.
Backup quarterback Trevor Siemian agreed Getsy is very clear about his expectations and standards but said the coach also allows some give and take with players about what they feel is best.
A criticism of Matt Nagy was that the coach was so married to his idea of what an offense should be that he didn’t take into account what worked best for his players. But Getsy has said from February that the Bears’ offensive identity would in large part be driven by what his players, and in particular his quarterback, do best. The Bears have shown glimpses of that so far with Fields, though a full game in better weather conditions could help give a better picture of the offense.
“It’s an interesting question for coaches, one I wonder too, is what’s the balance of input from players, and then falling back on the things you believe in and the principles you believe in,” Siemian said. “There is a balance there, and Luke does as a good job of anybody I’ve been around of striking that balance and getting feedback from players but also (maintaining) the standard, the expectations and the things he really believes in.”