What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Best "triplets" (QB1-RB1-WR1) ever? (1 Viewer)

CalBear said:
jerseydevil20 said:
Roger Craig was a good RB that performed well in the 9er offence. However, he isn't included in any discussion of top RBs, nor should he. Most revealing, he will likely never give an acceptance speech in Canton. On the other hand:Manning/Harrison/James have a great shot. Aikman/Irvin/Smith have a great shot. Montana and Rice were a dominant pair, but Craig does not belong in this debate. There are others "close."
Montana >> AikmanRice >> IrvinCraig << SmithWhile I agree that Craig is not on the level of many of the RBs in these triplet discussions, I think he's fairly near to Aikman and Irvin in terms of talent and impact. He had 6 years in a row ranked as no lower than the #11 RB, and in two of those he ranked #2 in the league. Irvin had 6 years ranked no lower than #11 and one where he ranked #2; Aikman ranked in the top 10 only twice, #4 was his best ever.
:goodposting: I think Craig is as good or better a RB than Irvin was a WR. I think the problem with the Cowboys trio is that other than Smith, they didn't post ridiculous numbers. Certainly their super bowl success puts them in the discussion however.
 
CalBear said:
jerseydevil20 said:
Roger Craig was a good RB that performed well in the 9er offence. However, he isn't included in any discussion of top RBs, nor should he. Most revealing, he will likely never give an acceptance speech in Canton. On the other hand:Manning/Harrison/James have a great shot. Aikman/Irvin/Smith have a great shot. Montana and Rice were a dominant pair, but Craig does not belong in this debate. There are others "close."
Montana >> AikmanRice >> IrvinCraig << SmithWhile I agree that Craig is not on the level of many of the RBs in these triplet discussions, I think he's fairly near to Aikman and Irvin in terms of talent and impact. He had 6 years in a row ranked as no lower than the #11 RB, and in two of those he ranked #2 in the league. Irvin had 6 years ranked no lower than #11 and one where he ranked #2; Aikman ranked in the top 10 only twice, #4 was his best ever.
:goodposting: I think Craig is as good or better a RB than Irvin was a WR. I think the problem with the Cowboys trio is that other than Smith, they didn't post ridiculous numbers. Certainly their super bowl success puts them in the discussion however.
If you measure "talent and impact" in terms of fantasy production, then I agree. There's nothing in the original post to indicate that's what we're judging on.
 
CalBear said:
jerseydevil20 said:
Roger Craig was a good RB that performed well in the 9er offence. However, he isn't included in any discussion of top RBs, nor should he. Most revealing, he will likely never give an acceptance speech in Canton. On the other hand:Manning/Harrison/James have a great shot. Aikman/Irvin/Smith have a great shot. Montana and Rice were a dominant pair, but Craig does not belong in this debate. There are others "close."
Montana >> AikmanRice >> IrvinCraig << SmithWhile I agree that Craig is not on the level of many of the RBs in these triplet discussions, I think he's fairly near to Aikman and Irvin in terms of talent and impact. He had 6 years in a row ranked as no lower than the #11 RB, and in two of those he ranked #2 in the league. Irvin had 6 years ranked no lower than #11 and one where he ranked #2; Aikman ranked in the top 10 only twice, #4 was his best ever.
:goodposting: I think Craig is as good or better a RB than Irvin was a WR. I think the problem with the Cowboys trio is that other than Smith, they didn't post ridiculous numbers. Certainly their super bowl success puts them in the discussion however.
If you measure "talent and impact" in terms of fantasy production, then I agree. There's nothing in the original post to indicate that's what we're judging on.
Montana/Rice/Craig is my vote. IMO Emmitt basically carried those Cowboy teams (Aikman>Irvin prospered BECAUSE of Emmitt, not the other way around). On the 49er teams I think Montana/Rice basically carried those 49er teams (Craig prospered BECAUSE the passing game, not the other way around). IMO 2/3 great players to 1/3 great players gives it to the 49ers.Edit: I definetely think Manning/Edge/Harrison has to be in this conversation also, whether they won a super bowl or not. I only rule out Kelly/Thimas/Reed because I don't believe Reed belongs in this conversation.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
IMO Emmitt basically carried those Cowboy teams (Aikman>Irvin prospered BECAUSE of Emmitt, not the other way around).
IMO, the Offensive Line carried Emmitt.
Every great team has an extraordinary offensive line. Montana did what he did partly because he had time to throw. Troy had the same benefit. Emmitt did what he did partly because he had holes to hit. What's your point? The offensive line carried Montana so we should discount his and Rice's numbers? Is Emmitt the only RB in history that had a good line? Of course not. I'm not bashing the 9ers (although I'm not a fan) - they were phenominal and I miss routing against those guys. But on the basis of wins and Super Bowls - the bottom line - Aikman/Irvin/Smith are definately near the top of this debate. They led the resurrection of a 1-15 team to the playoffs just 2 seasons later and on to 3 Super Bowl victories in 4 years. That stands with anybody. Sorry Cowboy haters.
 
IMO Emmitt basically carried those Cowboy teams (Aikman>Irvin prospered BECAUSE of Emmitt, not the other way around).
IMO, the Offensive Line carried Emmitt.
What's your point?
My point was that the Offensive Line was the key to those Cowboy teams success, in contrast to what jerseydevil said (Emmitt was the key to the 90's Cowboys).I don't see how pointing out that the Cowboys success was due to having one of the very best(if not the best) Offensive Lines ever is "hating" on the Cowboys.
 
For one season, how about the 1984 Cardnials:

Neil Lomax: 4614 yards passing, 31 TD, 16 Int

OJ Anderson: 1174 yards rushing, 70 receptions for 611 yards receiving, 8 TD's

Roy Green: 78 receptions, 1555 yards, 12 TD's (19.9 average)

 
For one season, how about the 1984 Cardnials:Neil Lomax: 4614 yards passing, 31 TD, 16 IntOJ Anderson: 1174 yards rushing, 70 receptions for 611 yards receiving, 8 TD's Roy Green: 78 receptions, 1555 yards, 12 TD's (19.9 average)
Speaking of Roy Green, didn't that guy play quite a bit in the secondary as well (both at CB and S)? Or am I thinking of someoe else?
 
Favre to sharpe in 94 was solid -

Favre - 3882 passing, 33 tds, 14 ints, 202 rushing and 2 tds.

Sharpe - 94 recepts 1119 yds with 18 tds.

No real rb threat to match the other posts though- Bennett had just under 1200 total yds with 9 tds.

 
The first to have this title were QB Troy Aikman-RB Emmitt Smith-WR Michael Irvin. I think that QB Peyton Manning-RB Edgerrin James-WR Marvin Harrison and QB Johnny Unitas-RB Lenny Moore-WR Raymond Berry were better than the namesake triplets.Who composed the greatest QB-RB-WR combo ever?
I definitely think there were better ones than the Dallas triplets. Irvin was the weak link of that bunch.
If you are looking at fantasy stats...then both Irvin and Aikman were weak links. But if we're just talking NFL football, Irvin was an absolute stud. Everytime you hear a Cowboy talk about those great teams of the early '90s, they, to a man, say that Irvin was the leader and the 'heart and soul' of the team. He lived up to his Playmaker nickname and delivered clutch catch after clutch catch.
 
For the last 15 years or so, a British spread betting firm has offered a highly volatile "Triplets" market on every live game (we get two Sunday games plus MNF).

This originated with the Cowboys triplets and they carried it on by applying it to the perceived top QB/RB/WR combo of each team each wekk.

The system awards 1 point for each rush, pass and rec yard each of the three players gets, plus 10pts per TD, and -5pts per turnover. Thus a 20-yard TD pass from Aikman to Irvin would gain 60pts.

The better either buys or sells a la stock market and sets the stake and a typical quote would be something like 380-400. If the make up was 450 and you had bought at 400, you would win 50 times your stake, but if you had sold at 380, wou would lose 70 times your stake (I did say it was volatile!).

In the time this market has been running, the only two Triplet combinations that have habitually been quoted at above 500 have been the Rams (both with Bruce and Holt) in the late 90s and the Colts a couple of years ago. Usually quoted at 510-530 or 520-540. A brave man's buy considering that if just one of them gets hurt you're staring down the barrel of huge losses.

I can't remember what the lowest pre-match quote has been - probably around 230-250 for some team with a rookie QB and RBBC - but I remember a very nice quote when the Fiedler-led Dolphins were quoted at around 270-290 prior to that famous OT MNF game against the Jets.

 
Fouts-Muncie-Winslow-Joiner-Chandler-Brooks
No JJ? I loved that guy.
JJ and Chandler didn't overlap, so you'd have to pick one or the other.
JJ and Brooks didn't overlap either. I wouldn't hesitate to take Brooks and Chandler over Jefferson.
hence my post. Best 6 offensive players on one team ever.
Come on, no way. I'm assuming you mean skill-position offensive players? John Elway/Terrell Davis/Shannon Sharpe/Rod Smith/Ed McCaffrey/Anthony Miller down? And if you want to count the big boys, too, what about Dwayne Carswell, Gary Zimmerman, Tom Nalen, Tony Jones, Mark Schlereth, Dan Neil?
 
Starr - Horning/Taylor - Dowler.

If you talk championships forget the 3 of 4 the 'Boys won. This is the only team with 3 straight. Fantasy they wouldn't come close to being starters in any league today.

 
Okay, maybe not....how 'bout

Young/Watters/Rice

:goodposting:

After Dallas and Indy, the first thing that came to mind. Absolute gold in the early/mid-90's.

 
1983 Skins

Joe T/Riggins/C. Brown

Quarterbacks

+----------------------+----+-------------------------------+-------------+

| Name | G | CMP ATT PCT YARD Y/A TD IN | RSH YARD TD |

+----------------------+----+-------------------------------+-------------+

| Joe Theismann | 16 | 276 459 60.1 3714 8.1 29 11 | 37 234 1 |

+----------------------+----+-------------------------------+-------------+

Running Backs

+----------------------+----+-----------------------+----------------------+

| Name | G | RSH YARD AVG TD | REC YARD AVG TD |

+----------------------+----+-----------------------+----------------------+

| John Riggins | 15 | 375 1347 3.6 24 | 5 29 5.8 0 |

+----------------------+----+-----------------------+----------------------+

Wide Receivers

+----------------------+----+-----------------------+----------------------+

| Name | G | RSH YARD AVG TD | REC YARD AVG TD |

+----------------------+----+-----------------------+----------------------+

| Charlie Brown | 15 | 4 53 13.2 0 | 78 1225 15.7 8 |

+----------------------+----+-----------------------+----------------------+

 
1984 Skins

Joe T/Riggins/Monk

Quarterbacks

+----------------------+----+-------------------------------+-------------+

| Name | G | CMP ATT PCT YARD Y/A TD IN | RSH YARD TD |

+----------------------+----+-------------------------------+-------------+

| Joe Theismann | 16 | 283 477 59.3 3391 7.1 24 13 | 62 314 1 |

+----------------------+----+-------------------------------+-------------+

Running Backs

+----------------------+----+-----------------------+----------------------+

| Name | G | RSH YARD AVG TD | REC YARD AVG TD |

+----------------------+----+-----------------------+----------------------+

| John Riggins | 14 | 327 1239 3.8 14 | 7 43 6.1 0 |

+----------------------+----+-----------------------+----------------------+

Wide Receivers

+----------------------+----+-----------------------+----------------------+

| Name | G | RSH YARD AVG TD | REC YARD AVG TD |

+----------------------+----+-----------------------+----------------------+

| Art Monk | 16 | 2 18 9.0 0 | 106 1372 12.9 7 |

+----------------------+----+-----------------------+----------------------+

 
Montana/Craig/Rice is a combo far superior to the rest. Montana and Rice are considered, by expert polls and fan polls, the two leading contendors for the best ever at their respective positions, and both are in the discussion for best football player of all time. I agree with the majority in that respect - Montana and Rice are the best QB and best WR ever, and the best QB/WR combo. Roger Craig was a dynamically talented back, the first RB ever to gain 1000 yards rushing and 1000 yards receiving in the same year. Since then, only Faulk has done it. He remains the only RB to ever lead the NFL in receptions in a season.

No one is close to Montana/Craig/Rice.
I agree completely.
I also agree completely.. 2 out of the 3 Montana and Rice are Goats at their position, and Craig was a top tier RB who was a trailblazer to all the versatile rush/receive backs to follow.. Add to that a couple of Superbowls with that combo and there really is no one that can compare
 
The first to have this title were QB Troy Aikman-RB Emmitt Smith-WR Michael Irvin. I think that QB Peyton Manning-RB Edgerrin James-WR Marvin Harrison and QB Johnny Unitas-RB Lenny Moore-WR Raymond Berry were better than the namesake triplets.Who composed the greatest QB-RB-WR combo ever?
Palmer/Johnson/Johnson. Call me in a few years. :lmao:
We are sorry the the number you have dialed is no longer in service.
 
Montana/Craig/Rice is a combo far superior to the rest. Montana and Rice are considered, by expert polls and fan polls, the two leading contendors for the best ever at their respective positions, and both are in the discussion for best football player of all time. I agree with the majority in that respect - Montana and Rice are the best QB and best WR ever, and the best QB/WR combo. Roger Craig was a dynamically talented back, the first RB ever to gain 1000 yards rushing and 1000 yards receiving in the same year. Since then, only Faulk has done it. He remains the only RB to ever lead the NFL in receptions in a season.

No one is close to Montana/Craig/Rice.
+1
 
Come on, no way. I'm assuming you mean skill-position offensive players? John Elway/Terrell Davis/Shannon Sharpe/Rod Smith/Ed McCaffrey/Anthony Miller down? And if you want to count the big boys, too, what about Dwayne Carswell, Gary Zimmerman, Tom Nalen, Tony Jones, Mark Schlereth, Dan Neil?
Hey SSOG, are you from Denver? I am just curious, not trying to be a smart ###.
 
The Triplets

3 SB's, all HOFers.

you can say what you want about Aikmans' numbers, but the dude was clutch, period.

Irvin was the emotional leader of the those Cowboys teams. goes beyond numbers. it's about the will to win and the ability to get your teammates up.

Emmitt is just simply a true warrior. one of my favorites of all time, and one of the best football players of all time.

 
Montana/Craig/Rice is a combo far superior to the rest. Montana and Rice are considered, by expert polls and fan polls, the two leading contendors for the best ever at their respective positions, and both are in the discussion for best football player of all time. I agree with the majority in that respect - Montana and Rice are the best QB and best WR ever, and the best QB/WR combo. Roger Craig was a dynamically talented back, the first RB ever to gain 1000 yards rushing and 1000 yards receiving in the same year. Since then, only Faulk has done it. He remains the only RB to ever lead the NFL in receptions in a season.

No one is close to Montana/Craig/Rice.
+1
This is the trio I would select as well.
 
Mitchell - Sanders - Moore-Perriman- Morton

Didn't they have a couple of pretty good years? Not best ever, but they were some number machines...
Fixed.The year that both were over 1000 yards. If only we had a defense.....or if Mitchell didnt throw 4 interceptions vs. Philly.

And remeber also, this is the team that beat Aikman-Smith-Irvin in a playoff game.
Fixeder.1995, started 0-3, then went on a tear to finish 10-6 putting up some unheralded and unmatched offensive numbers, at least in the 16 game era

Mitchell 4338-32-12

Barry 314-1500-11 with another 48-398-1 on the receiving end

Moore 123-1686-14

Perriman 108-1488-9

Morton 44-590-8 as well as a ton of return yards.

That's a top 6 QB season, a top 3 RB season and two top 5 WR seasons, as well as a boom or bust flex type player.

No TE production tho...yes, a Lions fan. Yes, it's been that long since we had something to be proud about.

 
Come on, no way. I'm assuming you mean skill-position offensive players? John Elway/Terrell Davis/Shannon Sharpe/Rod Smith/Ed McCaffrey/Anthony Miller down? And if you want to count the big boys, too, what about Dwayne Carswell, Gary Zimmerman, Tom Nalen, Tony Jones, Mark Schlereth, Dan Neil?
Hey SSOG, are you from Denver? I am just curious, not trying to be a smart ###.
Colorado Springs. Close enough.
 
Come on, no way. I'm assuming you mean skill-position offensive players? John Elway/Terrell Davis/Shannon Sharpe/Rod Smith/Ed McCaffrey/Anthony Miller down? And if you want to count the big boys, too, what about Dwayne Carswell, Gary Zimmerman, Tom Nalen, Tony Jones, Mark Schlereth, Dan Neil?
Hey SSOG, are you from Denver? I am just curious, not trying to be a smart ###.
Colorado Springs. Close enough.
:lol: I think Denver deserves to be mentioned, but i dont they would fair very well in a poll. As far as the top 6 skill players, i would take the 80's Chargers all day. I do agree with you about the Oline though, they were one of the best units i have ever seen. The Hogs, and the early 90's Cowboys are probably the only olines i can think off hand that were better.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top