Illegal Pants Downfield
Footballguy
When you read it aloud, that almost sounds like a drunk chick talking about the symptoms of her STD...Brister-Hoge-Lipps

When you read it aloud, that almost sounds like a drunk chick talking about the symptoms of her STD...Brister-Hoge-Lipps
Montana-Craig-Rice.
My first thought was Young/Rice/Watters in '94 in terms of fantasy seasonsWatters: 1600 total yards, 11 TDRice: 112/1499/15 TDYoung: 3969 yards, 42 TD, 11 INTMontana-Craig-Rice.
CalBear said:Montana >> AikmanRice >> IrvinCraig << SmithWhile I agree that Craig is not on the level of many of the RBs in these triplet discussions, I think he's fairly near to Aikman and Irvin in terms of talent and impact. He had 6 years in a row ranked as no lower than the #11 RB, and in two of those he ranked #2 in the league. Irvin had 6 years ranked no lower than #11 and one where he ranked #2; Aikman ranked in the top 10 only twice, #4 was his best ever.jerseydevil20 said:Roger Craig was a good RB that performed well in the 9er offence. However, he isn't included in any discussion of top RBs, nor should he. Most revealing, he will likely never give an acceptance speech in Canton. On the other hand:Manning/Harrison/James have a great shot. Aikman/Irvin/Smith have a great shot. Montana and Rice were a dominant pair, but Craig does not belong in this debate. There are others "close."
If you measure "talent and impact" in terms of fantasy production, then I agree. There's nothing in the original post to indicate that's what we're judging on.CalBear said:Montana >> AikmanRice >> IrvinCraig << SmithWhile I agree that Craig is not on the level of many of the RBs in these triplet discussions, I think he's fairly near to Aikman and Irvin in terms of talent and impact. He had 6 years in a row ranked as no lower than the #11 RB, and in two of those he ranked #2 in the league. Irvin had 6 years ranked no lower than #11 and one where he ranked #2; Aikman ranked in the top 10 only twice, #4 was his best ever.jerseydevil20 said:Roger Craig was a good RB that performed well in the 9er offence. However, he isn't included in any discussion of top RBs, nor should he. Most revealing, he will likely never give an acceptance speech in Canton. On the other hand:Manning/Harrison/James have a great shot. Aikman/Irvin/Smith have a great shot. Montana and Rice were a dominant pair, but Craig does not belong in this debate. There are others "close."I think Craig is as good or better a RB than Irvin was a WR. I think the problem with the Cowboys trio is that other than Smith, they didn't post ridiculous numbers. Certainly their super bowl success puts them in the discussion however.
Montana/Rice/Craig is my vote. IMO Emmitt basically carried those Cowboy teams (Aikman>Irvin prospered BECAUSE of Emmitt, not the other way around). On the 49er teams I think Montana/Rice basically carried those 49er teams (Craig prospered BECAUSE the passing game, not the other way around). IMO 2/3 great players to 1/3 great players gives it to the 49ers.Edit: I definetely think Manning/Edge/Harrison has to be in this conversation also, whether they won a super bowl or not. I only rule out Kelly/Thimas/Reed because I don't believe Reed belongs in this conversation.If you measure "talent and impact" in terms of fantasy production, then I agree. There's nothing in the original post to indicate that's what we're judging on.CalBear said:Montana >> AikmanRice >> IrvinCraig << SmithWhile I agree that Craig is not on the level of many of the RBs in these triplet discussions, I think he's fairly near to Aikman and Irvin in terms of talent and impact. He had 6 years in a row ranked as no lower than the #11 RB, and in two of those he ranked #2 in the league. Irvin had 6 years ranked no lower than #11 and one where he ranked #2; Aikman ranked in the top 10 only twice, #4 was his best ever.jerseydevil20 said:Roger Craig was a good RB that performed well in the 9er offence. However, he isn't included in any discussion of top RBs, nor should he. Most revealing, he will likely never give an acceptance speech in Canton. On the other hand:Manning/Harrison/James have a great shot. Aikman/Irvin/Smith have a great shot. Montana and Rice were a dominant pair, but Craig does not belong in this debate. There are others "close."I think Craig is as good or better a RB than Irvin was a WR. I think the problem with the Cowboys trio is that other than Smith, they didn't post ridiculous numbers. Certainly their super bowl success puts them in the discussion however.
IMO, the Offensive Line carried Emmitt.IMO Emmitt basically carried those Cowboy teams (Aikman>Irvin prospered BECAUSE of Emmitt, not the other way around).
Every great team has an extraordinary offensive line. Montana did what he did partly because he had time to throw. Troy had the same benefit. Emmitt did what he did partly because he had holes to hit. What's your point? The offensive line carried Montana so we should discount his and Rice's numbers? Is Emmitt the only RB in history that had a good line? Of course not. I'm not bashing the 9ers (although I'm not a fan) - they were phenominal and I miss routing against those guys. But on the basis of wins and Super Bowls - the bottom line - Aikman/Irvin/Smith are definately near the top of this debate. They led the resurrection of a 1-15 team to the playoffs just 2 seasons later and on to 3 Super Bowl victories in 4 years. That stands with anybody. Sorry Cowboy haters.IMO, the Offensive Line carried Emmitt.IMO Emmitt basically carried those Cowboy teams (Aikman>Irvin prospered BECAUSE of Emmitt, not the other way around).
My point was that the Offensive Line was the key to those Cowboy teams success, in contrast to what jerseydevil said (Emmitt was the key to the 90's Cowboys).I don't see how pointing out that the Cowboys success was due to having one of the very best(if not the best) Offensive Lines ever is "hating" on the Cowboys.What's your point?IMO, the Offensive Line carried Emmitt.IMO Emmitt basically carried those Cowboy teams (Aikman>Irvin prospered BECAUSE of Emmitt, not the other way around).
Speaking of Roy Green, didn't that guy play quite a bit in the secondary as well (both at CB and S)? Or am I thinking of someoe else?For one season, how about the 1984 Cardnials:Neil Lomax: 4614 yards passing, 31 TD, 16 IntOJ Anderson: 1174 yards rushing, 70 receptions for 611 yards receiving, 8 TD's Roy Green: 78 receptions, 1555 yards, 12 TD's (19.9 average)
hence my post. Best 6 offensive players on one team ever.JJ and Brooks didn't overlap either. I wouldn't hesitate to take Brooks and Chandler over Jefferson.JJ and Chandler didn't overlap, so you'd have to pick one or the other.No JJ? I loved that guy.Fouts-Muncie-Winslow-Joiner-Chandler-Brooks
If you are looking at fantasy stats...then both Irvin and Aikman were weak links. But if we're just talking NFL football, Irvin was an absolute stud. Everytime you hear a Cowboy talk about those great teams of the early '90s, they, to a man, say that Irvin was the leader and the 'heart and soul' of the team. He lived up to his Playmaker nickname and delivered clutch catch after clutch catch.I definitely think there were better ones than the Dallas triplets. Irvin was the weak link of that bunch.The first to have this title were QB Troy Aikman-RB Emmitt Smith-WR Michael Irvin. I think that QB Peyton Manning-RB Edgerrin James-WR Marvin Harrison and QB Johnny Unitas-RB Lenny Moore-WR Raymond Berry were better than the namesake triplets.Who composed the greatest QB-RB-WR combo ever?
Come on, no way. I'm assuming you mean skill-position offensive players? John Elway/Terrell Davis/Shannon Sharpe/Rod Smith/Ed McCaffrey/Anthony Miller down? And if you want to count the big boys, too, what about Dwayne Carswell, Gary Zimmerman, Tom Nalen, Tony Jones, Mark Schlereth, Dan Neil?hence my post. Best 6 offensive players on one team ever.JJ and Brooks didn't overlap either. I wouldn't hesitate to take Brooks and Chandler over Jefferson.JJ and Chandler didn't overlap, so you'd have to pick one or the other.No JJ? I loved that guy.Fouts-Muncie-Winslow-Joiner-Chandler-Brooks
Grossman-Jones-Muhhammad
Brady, Kevin Faulk, Troy Brown
I also agree completely.. 2 out of the 3 Montana and Rice are Goats at their position, and Craig was a top tier RB who was a trailblazer to all the versatile rush/receive backs to follow.. Add to that a couple of Superbowls with that combo and there really is no one that can compareI agree completely.Montana/Craig/Rice is a combo far superior to the rest. Montana and Rice are considered, by expert polls and fan polls, the two leading contendors for the best ever at their respective positions, and both are in the discussion for best football player of all time. I agree with the majority in that respect - Montana and Rice are the best QB and best WR ever, and the best QB/WR combo. Roger Craig was a dynamically talented back, the first RB ever to gain 1000 yards rushing and 1000 yards receiving in the same year. Since then, only Faulk has done it. He remains the only RB to ever lead the NFL in receptions in a season.
No one is close to Montana/Craig/Rice.
Ha Ha! Hilarious!When you read it aloud, that almost sounds like a drunk chick talking about the symptoms of her STD... :(Brister-Hoge-Lipps
Palmer/Johnson/Johnson. Call me in a few years.The first to have this title were QB Troy Aikman-RB Emmitt Smith-WR Michael Irvin. I think that QB Peyton Manning-RB Edgerrin James-WR Marvin Harrison and QB Johnny Unitas-RB Lenny Moore-WR Raymond Berry were better than the namesake triplets.Who composed the greatest QB-RB-WR combo ever?![]()
We are sorry the the number you have dialed is no longer in service.
+1Montana/Craig/Rice is a combo far superior to the rest. Montana and Rice are considered, by expert polls and fan polls, the two leading contendors for the best ever at their respective positions, and both are in the discussion for best football player of all time. I agree with the majority in that respect - Montana and Rice are the best QB and best WR ever, and the best QB/WR combo. Roger Craig was a dynamically talented back, the first RB ever to gain 1000 yards rushing and 1000 yards receiving in the same year. Since then, only Faulk has done it. He remains the only RB to ever lead the NFL in receptions in a season.
No one is close to Montana/Craig/Rice.
Hey SSOG, are you from Denver? I am just curious, not trying to be a smart ###.Come on, no way. I'm assuming you mean skill-position offensive players? John Elway/Terrell Davis/Shannon Sharpe/Rod Smith/Ed McCaffrey/Anthony Miller down? And if you want to count the big boys, too, what about Dwayne Carswell, Gary Zimmerman, Tom Nalen, Tony Jones, Mark Schlereth, Dan Neil?
This is the trio I would select as well.+1Montana/Craig/Rice is a combo far superior to the rest. Montana and Rice are considered, by expert polls and fan polls, the two leading contendors for the best ever at their respective positions, and both are in the discussion for best football player of all time. I agree with the majority in that respect - Montana and Rice are the best QB and best WR ever, and the best QB/WR combo. Roger Craig was a dynamically talented back, the first RB ever to gain 1000 yards rushing and 1000 yards receiving in the same year. Since then, only Faulk has done it. He remains the only RB to ever lead the NFL in receptions in a season.
No one is close to Montana/Craig/Rice.
Fixeder.1995, started 0-3, then went on a tear to finish 10-6 putting up some unheralded and unmatched offensive numbers, at least in the 16 game eraFixed.The year that both were over 1000 yards. If only we had a defense.....or if Mitchell didnt throw 4 interceptions vs. Philly.Mitchell - Sanders - Moore-Perriman- Morton
Didn't they have a couple of pretty good years? Not best ever, but they were some number machines...
And remeber also, this is the team that beat Aikman-Smith-Irvin in a playoff game.
Colorado Springs. Close enough.Hey SSOG, are you from Denver? I am just curious, not trying to be a smart ###.Come on, no way. I'm assuming you mean skill-position offensive players? John Elway/Terrell Davis/Shannon Sharpe/Rod Smith/Ed McCaffrey/Anthony Miller down? And if you want to count the big boys, too, what about Dwayne Carswell, Gary Zimmerman, Tom Nalen, Tony Jones, Mark Schlereth, Dan Neil?
Colorado Springs. Close enough.Hey SSOG, are you from Denver? I am just curious, not trying to be a smart ###.Come on, no way. I'm assuming you mean skill-position offensive players? John Elway/Terrell Davis/Shannon Sharpe/Rod Smith/Ed McCaffrey/Anthony Miller down? And if you want to count the big boys, too, what about Dwayne Carswell, Gary Zimmerman, Tom Nalen, Tony Jones, Mark Schlereth, Dan Neil?
For fantasy, I agree. Young also had 7 rushing TDs. If they hadn't been ahead by so much in so many games, it would've been even better.My first thought was Young/Rice/Watters in '94 in terms of fantasy seasonsWatters: 1600 total yards, 11 TDRice: 112/1499/15 TDYoung: 3969 yards, 42 TD, 11 INTMontana-Craig-Rice.
I was going to say thatFor an 11 week period:Favre/Peterson/MossToo soon?![]()