What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

Broncos vs Patriots pregame chatter. Broncos 3.5pt favorites (1 Viewer)

Wow, a lot of overconfident Pats fans here. The only thing that can keep them in the game (besides an injury to a key Denver player) is the weather. Strong winds probably not good for Peyton.
Another thing that could keep them in the game is the fact that they win almost 90% of their games at home under BB & Brady.

That isn't a joke statistic, Brady is 87/100 last 100 home games...
What's really bizarre is, for as dominant as the Patriots have been at home, they have three home playoff losses in the last five playoff seasons, two of which were double digit losses. Weird.

 
Wow, a lot of overconfident Pats fans here. The only thing that can keep them in the game (besides an injury to a key Denver player) is the weather. Strong winds probably not good for Peyton.
Another thing that could keep them in the game is the fact that they win almost 90% of their games at home under BB & Brady.

That isn't a joke statistic, Brady is 87/100 last 100 home games...
What's really bizarre is, for as dominant as the Patriots have been at home, they have three home playoff losses in the last five playoff seasons, two of which were double digit losses. Weird.
The earlier loss to the Ravens NE had to play without Welker, who tore his ACL the week before. The second loss to BAL, the Pats had to play without Gronk. The loss in the middle to the Jets . . . I got nothing.

What has killed NE in 11, 12, and 13 was not having Gronk healthy in the game that they were eliminated. He makes that much difference to the offense.

 
Wow, a lot of overconfident Pats fans here. The only thing that can keep them in the game (besides an injury to a key Denver player) is the weather. Strong winds probably not good for Peyton.
Another thing that could keep them in the game is the fact that they win almost 90% of their games at home under BB & Brady.

That isn't a joke statistic, Brady is 87/100 last 100 home games...
What's really bizarre is, for as dominant as the Patriots have been at home, they have three home playoff losses in the last five playoff seasons, two of which were double digit losses. Weird.
The earlier loss to the Ravens NE had to play without Welker, who tore his ACL the week before. The second loss to BAL, the Pats had to play without Gronk. The loss in the middle to the Jets . . . I got nothing.

What has killed NE in 11, 12, and 13 was not having Gronk healthy in the game that they were eliminated. He makes that much difference to the offense.
that's partly true -- I won't say it's untrue, but the loss to baltimore was mostly about defensive line injuries.

gronk can't help on defense.

anyway, that's all excuses -- we don't want to turn ourselves into broncos fans here.

ON TO DENVER!

 
Its funny how people talk themselves into actually thinking this game is going to be close.
Why wouldn't it be? What's your reasoning?
If the wind isn't that much of a factor then Denver rolls NE.

INDIANAPOLIS has performed bad in NE in the past. Sure, Manning didn't have strong outings but most of these games were played outside in cold conditions. In games where you would tend to lean on a strong run game and good defense. Brady has had a strong run game and great defense to lean on in the cold but Manning typically has not. With Hillman running well and Denver's defense playing better I don't think BB is going to be able to scheme his way out of this one.

 
Indy/Den didn't run so much because of the conditions, they did it because the Pats were intentionally trying to minimize Peyton's abilities. Typically late in those games if it was close, or Indy/Denver was losing, they seemed almost reluctant to change their gameplan - for whatever the actual reason is, I think its because Peyton didn't wanna take responsibility and force it, choosing instead to play it safe - which pretty much falls in line with the bend-not-break mentality of the recent Pats defenses.

Let em run all day, don't give up the big plays and always go for the takeaway.

 
Devine Intervention said:
Its funny how people talk themselves into actually thinking this game is going to be close.
Why wouldn't it be? What's your reasoning?
If the wind isn't that much of a factor then Denver rolls NE.

INDIANAPOLIS has performed bad in NE in the past. Sure, Manning didn't have strong outings but most of these games were played outside in cold conditions. In games where you would tend to lean on a strong run game and good defense. Brady has had a strong run game and great defense to lean on in the cold but Manning typically has not. With Hillman running well and Denver's defense playing better I don't think BB is going to be able to scheme his way out of this one.
Pats secondary is probably one of the best Manning has seen all season. Brady is the best QB the Broncos have played against all season. Manning is 2-6 at Foxboro and there will be 40-50mph winds with gusts up to 60mph. Gillette is a wind tunnel. Broncos are a good team, but I see the Pats coming out exactly like they did vs the Bengals and smashing them in the mouth. Pats are a different beast at home.

 
Devine Intervention said:
Its funny how people talk themselves into actually thinking this game is going to be close.
Why wouldn't it be? What's your reasoning?
If the wind isn't that much of a factor then Denver rolls NE.

INDIANAPOLIS has performed bad in NE in the past. Sure, Manning didn't have strong outings but most of these games were played outside in cold conditions. In games where you would tend to lean on a strong run game and good defense. Brady has had a strong run game and great defense to lean on in the cold but Manning typically has not. With Hillman running well and Denver's defense playing better I don't think BB is going to be able to scheme his way out of this one.
Pats secondary is probably one of the best Manning has seen all season. Brady is the best QB the Broncos have played against all season. Manning is 2-6 at Foxboro and there will be 40-50mph winds with gusts up to 60mph. Gillette is a wind tunnel. Broncos are a good team, but I see the Pats coming out exactly like they did vs the Bengals and smashing them in the mouth. Pats are a different beast at home.
If the winds are truly that high this could get very interesting. Do we know whether they are predicted to be blowing across the field or down the field? Could be field position game with no field goals and almost exclusively running on offense. Manning's dying duck ball, in particular, is not designed to cut the wind. Letting him throw in 40 mph winds would be inexcusable by a coach, there is no telling where his ball would end up.

 
Devine Intervention said:
Its funny how people talk themselves into actually thinking this game is going to be close.
Why wouldn't it be? What's your reasoning?
If the wind isn't that much of a factor then Denver rolls NE.

INDIANAPOLIS has performed bad in NE in the past. Sure, Manning didn't have strong outings but most of these games were played outside in cold conditions. In games where you would tend to lean on a strong run game and good defense. Brady has had a strong run game and great defense to lean on in the cold but Manning typically has not. With Hillman running well and Denver's defense playing better I don't think BB is going to be able to scheme his way out of this one.
Pats secondary is probably one of the best Manning has seen all season. Brady is the best QB the Broncos have played against all season. Manning is 2-6 at Foxboro and there will be 40-50mph winds with gusts up to 60mph. Gillette is a wind tunnel. Broncos are a good team, but I see the Pats coming out exactly like they did vs the Bengals and smashing them in the mouth. Pats are a different beast at home.
Where is this coming from? I can see a wind advisory in Foxboro for tonight, but everywhere I look, it shows calmer weather tomorrow afternoon (winds in the teens, not 40s-50s). Is there more accurate information somewhere?

 
The weather reports and potential implications are getting more exagerrated by the minute. The latest forecast is 35-40 degrees with winds 15-20 mph and 10% chance of precipitation. Occasional gusts of up to 30 mph. This will not be an epic, biblical storm by any means. Cross winds may impact the passing and FG kicking some, tail winds would impact the field position/range of kickers some. I don't expect the weather to have a huge impact on the game.

I would say the Pats have a 60% chance to win playing at home. If the game were in Denver, I would only give them a 10% chance. Like most games, the team that holds on to the football and gets TDs instead of FGs in the red zone should win. Even though DEN has more talent in their starters, I think depth and better coaching favors NE.

I also think Denver would win a rematch in Denver down the road, so NE needs to hope someone else can knock off the Broncos in their first playoff game (BAL? SD? KC?).

 
I think this one is pretty simple. If Denver can get pressure on Brady consistently, the Pats offense will struggle, and Denver should win by about a TD. If they can't, despite Denver having a very good secondary, Brady will eat them alive--and Gronk might top his output from last week. In this case, I see the Pats winning, I don't want to say with ease, but fairly comfortably. Looking forward to a great game! Good luck Pats fans!
:goodposting:

The second most important player in this game for Pats - behind Gronk and ahead of Brady - is rookie center Bryan Stork. If he can handle interior rush from whats-his-name (escapes me) on Denver DL who abused interior in AFCCG, then we have a very good ball game. If he is a turnstile this one is a laugher.

 
I think this one is pretty simple. If Denver can get pressure on Brady consistently, the Pats offense will struggle, and Denver should win by about a TD. If they can't, despite Denver having a very good secondary, Brady will eat them alive--and Gronk might top his output from last week. In this case, I see the Pats winning, I don't want to say with ease, but fairly comfortably. Looking forward to a great game! Good luck Pats fans!
:goodposting:

The second most important player in this game for Pats - behind Gronk and ahead of Brady - is rookie center Bryan Stork. If he can handle interior rush from whats-his-name (escapes me) on Denver DL who abused interior in AFCCG, then we have a very good ball game. If he is a turnstile this one is a laugher.
Terrance "Pot Roast" Knighton.

 
Devine Intervention said:
Its funny how people talk themselves into actually thinking this game is going to be close.
Why wouldn't it be? What's your reasoning?
If the wind isn't that much of a factor then Denver rolls NE.

INDIANAPOLIS has performed bad in NE in the past. Sure, Manning didn't have strong outings but most of these games were played outside in cold conditions. In games where you would tend to lean on a strong run game and good defense. Brady has had a strong run game and great defense to lean on in the cold but Manning typically has not. With Hillman running well and Denver's defense playing better I don't think BB is going to be able to scheme his way out of this one.
Pats secondary is probably one of the best Manning has seen all season. Brady is the best QB the Broncos have played against all season. Manning is 2-6 at Foxboro and there will be 40-50mph winds with gusts up to 60mph. Gillette is a wind tunnel. Broncos are a good team, but I see the Pats coming out exactly like they did vs the Bengals and smashing them in the mouth. Pats are a different beast at home.
Where is this coming from? I can see a wind advisory in Foxboro for tonight, but everywhere I look, it shows calmer weather tomorrow afternoon (winds in the teens, not 40s-50s). Is there more accurate information somewhere?
Weather Channel is where I looked. Forecast is now saying 20-30mph winds, and gusts could occasionally hit 40mph. It'll be windy regardless. Looks like rain in the afternoon now, with temps in the high 30s.

 
Devine Intervention said:
Its funny how people talk themselves into actually thinking this game is going to be close.
Why wouldn't it be? What's your reasoning?
If the wind isn't that much of a factor then Denver rolls NE.

INDIANAPOLIS has performed bad in NE in the past. Sure, Manning didn't have strong outings but most of these games were played outside in cold conditions. In games where you would tend to lean on a strong run game and good defense. Brady has had a strong run game and great defense to lean on in the cold but Manning typically has not. With Hillman running well and Denver's defense playing better I don't think BB is going to be able to scheme his way out of this one.
Pats secondary is probably one of the best Manning has seen all season. Brady is the best QB the Broncos have played against all season. Manning is 2-6 at Foxboro and there will be 40-50mph winds with gusts up to 60mph. Gillette is a wind tunnel. Broncos are a good team, but I see the Pats coming out exactly like they did vs the Bengals and smashing them in the mouth. Pats are a different beast at home.
Where is this coming from? I can see a wind advisory in Foxboro for tonight, but everywhere I look, it shows calmer weather tomorrow afternoon (winds in the teens, not 40s-50s). Is there more accurate information somewhere?
Weather Channel is where I looked. Forecast is now saying 20-30mph winds, and gusts could occasionally hit 40mph. It'll be windy regardless. Looks like rain in the afternoon now, with temps in the high 30s.
Interesting.

This is what I'm getting from weather channel for Foxboro tomorrow from 4-6:

4 PM 39°Cloudy PRECIP: 20% WIND: NW at 19 mph
5 PM38°Partly Cloudy
PRECIP: 10% WIND: NW at 17 mph
6 PM37°Partly Cloudy
PRECIP: 10% WIND: NW at 16 mph

 
Devine Intervention said:
Its funny how people talk themselves into actually thinking this game is going to be close.
Why wouldn't it be? What's your reasoning?
If the wind isn't that much of a factor then Denver rolls NE.

INDIANAPOLIS has performed bad in NE in the past. Sure, Manning didn't have strong outings but most of these games were played outside in cold conditions. In games where you would tend to lean on a strong run game and good defense. Brady has had a strong run game and great defense to lean on in the cold but Manning typically has not. With Hillman running well and Denver's defense playing better I don't think BB is going to be able to scheme his way out of this one.
Pats secondary is probably one of the best Manning has seen all season. Brady is the best QB the Broncos have played against all season. Manning is 2-6 at Foxboro and there will be 40-50mph winds with gusts up to 60mph. Gillette is a wind tunnel. Broncos are a good team, but I see the Pats coming out exactly like they did vs the Bengals and smashing them in the mouth. Pats are a different beast at home.
Where is this coming from? I can see a wind advisory in Foxboro for tonight, but everywhere I look, it shows calmer weather tomorrow afternoon (winds in the teens, not 40s-50s). Is there more accurate information somewhere?
Weather Channel is where I looked. Forecast is now saying 20-30mph winds, and gusts could occasionally hit 40mph. It'll be windy regardless. Looks like rain in the afternoon now, with temps in the high 30s.
Interesting.

This is what I'm getting from weather channel for Foxboro tomorrow from 4-6:

4 PM 39°CloudyPRECIP: 20% WIND: NW at 19 mph
5 PM38°Partly Cloudy
PRECIP: 10% WIND: NW at 17 mph
6 PM37°Partly Cloudy
PRECIP: 10% WIND: NW at 16 mph
That's what I am hearing, it is supposed to be very windy earlier in the day, but not nearly as bad later in the day. Hopefully similar to last week, the worst of it will pass before the game and we will have decent conditions.

 
Wow, a lot of overconfident Pats fans here. The only thing that can keep them in the game (besides an injury to a key Denver player) is the weather. Strong winds probably not good for Peyton.
Another thing that could keep them in the game is the fact that they win almost 90% of their games at home under BB & Brady.

That isn't a joke statistic, Brady is 87/100 last 100 home games...
What's really bizarre is, for as dominant as the Patriots have been at home, they have three home playoff losses in the last five playoff seasons, two of which were double digit losses. Weird.
The earlier loss to the Ravens NE had to play without Welker, who tore his ACL the week before. The second loss to BAL, the Pats had to play without Gronk. The loss in the middle to the Jets . . . I got nothing.

What has killed NE in 11, 12, and 13 was not having Gronk healthy in the game that they were eliminated. He makes that much difference to the offense.
The Patriots defense held them to 7 points in the first half in the AFC title game, but the Patriots also suffered several injuries on defense. They lost Talib to a thigh injury. The Patriots really couldn't get a lot of pressure on Flacco and he was able to move the ball.

 
I'd split the Brady era into the years with Richard Seymour and the years after he was traded. Seymour was the bona fide stud on the defense for them. He was first team all-pro in 2 of their super bowl wins. He was a very special talent and they've never replaced that.

To win Super Bowls you need a franchise QB and then you need to be able to hit the other team's QB. They had all of that in the Brady / Seymour years.

The Patriots have made at least three attempts to fix this. They signed Adalius Thomas in 2007 after his first-team all-pro year with the Ravens in 2006. They traded for Albert Haynesworth in 2011. Both of these moves were meant to help them dominate the line of scrimmage again. Neither worked out.

Then there's Chandler Jones. Chandler Jones has emerged as a force on the line (they used their first round pick on him in 2012), but he was lost for the season in week 7 to a hip injury.

LB Jamie Collins (first round pick in 2013) looked like he was about to break out and be a star but now he is hurt. He's not playing this week either.

 
I'd split the Brady era into the years with Richard Seymour and the years after he was traded. Seymour was the bona fide stud on the defense for them. He was first team all-pro in 2 of their super bowl wins. He was a very special talent and they've never replaced that.

To win Super Bowls you need a franchise QB and then you need to be able to hit the other team's QB. They had all of that in the Brady / Seymour years.

The Patriots have made at least three attempts to fix this. They signed Adalius Thomas in 2007 after his first-team all-pro year with the Ravens in 2006. They traded for Albert Haynesworth in 2011. Both of these moves were meant to help them dominate the line of scrimmage again. Neither worked out.

Then there's Chandler Jones. Chandler Jones has emerged as a force on the line (they used their first round pick on him in 2012), but he was lost for the season in week 7 to a hip injury.

LB Jamie Collins (first round pick in 2013) looked like he was about to break out and be a star but now he is hurt. He's not playing this week either.
:confused:

 
Collins is fine. Losing Mayo is a bigger loss than Jones, their defensive line is fine. Thin at LB already lost their best one, a future HOFer. Fortunately Hightower and Collins are both great, and Ayers signs and registers 5 tackles and a sack the same week for a team he never played for and three weeks since hes been on a field.

 
I'd split the Brady era into the years with Richard Seymour and the years after he was traded. Seymour was the bona fide stud on the defense for them. He was first team all-pro in 2 of their super bowl wins. He was a very special talent and they've never replaced that.

To win Super Bowls you need a franchise QB and then you need to be able to hit the other team's QB. They had all of that in the Brady / Seymour years.

The Patriots have made at least three attempts to fix this. They signed Adalius Thomas in 2007 after his first-team all-pro year with the Ravens in 2006. They traded for Albert Haynesworth in 2011. Both of these moves were meant to help them dominate the line of scrimmage again. Neither worked out.

Then there's Chandler Jones. Chandler Jones has emerged as a force on the line (they used their first round pick on him in 2012), but he was lost for the season in week 7 to a hip injury.

LB Jamie Collins (first round pick in 2013) looked like he was about to break out and be a star but now he is hurt. He's not playing this week either.
:confused:
Oh I see he's back. Rotoworld had him as injured and I missed the date on the report.

 
there are a lot of guys on a team --- there's not really even any point talking about injuries.

there are always injuries, every team has them, it's just a question of who and how much time they miss.

of course I'm not happy about losing chandler and mayo --- and chandler should be back, I think, but what are you supposed to do about it?

team still looking better stocked than in recent years, so I'm not complaining.

I remember days when they were rolling edelman out there as a db.

 
there are a lot of guys on a team --- there's not really even any point talking about injuries.

there are always injuries, every team has them, it's just a question of who and how much time they miss.

of course I'm not happy about losing chandler and mayo --- and chandler should be back, I think, but what are you supposed to do about it?

team still looking better stocked than in recent years, so I'm not complaining.

I remember days when they were rolling edelman out there as a db.
Injuries can derail seasons.

The Chargers @ Patriots AFC championship game saw a Charger team hit with key injuries. Rivers had a bum knee and had arthroscopic surgery on it the day before the game and was hobbling around. Tomlinson only had a handful of plays because he sprained his knee. Gates had dislocated his left big toe and could barely run. Even with all that, the Patriots only won by 9 and lost the Giants in the Super Bowl.

 
yeah, I remember when brady had a bum knee

edit: and btw, I remember that sd game very well --- it was awesome.

that was the game rivers supposedly had some ligament removed or something, so he could play.

you seem to think it was a little more competitive than it actually was, so let me check some stats on that narrow 9 point win, because I don't remember sd putting up much of a fight.

they pretty much lay down while tomlinson sulked on the end of the bench.

it was 'only' 9 points because the pats sat on the ball in the 2nd half, running 20x in the half and holding the ball 21.5 min to only 8.5 for the chargers, and that's with brady gifting them a couple picks ----- so tomlinson, gates, and rivers play defense in your imagination now?

pats closed out a dominant half with a 9 min drive starting on their own 13 and finishing with brady kneeling on the sd 20 --- so gfy with your 9 points

maybe you were blacked out by then.

that's the game that inspired tomlinson's action figure --- maybe order one to remember it a little better

more edits: hey, while we're fondly reminiscing --- who will ever forget this game against the 14-2 superbowl bound chargers?

awesome

if I remember right, that's the game that prompted this revenge match

tomlinson 18/43/0

what was hurt that week --- his feelings?

LOVE the pats!!!! :wub: :wub: :wub:

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Collins is fine, and Jones isn't necessarily done for the season. I wouldn't be surprised to see him back in another month.

Should be a great game today regardless of the outcome.

 
Looks like the rain will have mostly stopped by game time and I don't think the wind will be all that bad but it will swirl. Going to be cold, definitely will be in the 30s by kick off.

 
Wow, a lot of overconfident Pats fans here. The only thing that can keep them in the game (besides an injury to a key Denver player) is the weather. Strong winds probably not good for Peyton.
Another thing that could keep them in the game is the fact that they win almost 90% of their games at home under BB & Brady.

That isn't a joke statistic, Brady is 87/100 last 100 home games...
What's really bizarre is, for as dominant as the Patriots have been at home, they have three home playoff losses in the last five playoff seasons, two of which were double digit losses. Weird.
Not really "bizarre" as play-off competition, especially conference championship, is much better than the average NFL team.

I haven't seen anyone really slow the Broncos yet this season - and I doubt this NE defense will have answers for an offense as talented as Denver's. And the Patriot's offense seems to be finding a rhythm but isn't as scary or consistent as years past.

Obviously, weather and/or turnovers could be a factor. Interested in how NE approaches the game. I think they're too proud to do a ball control, "keep away" game (think Chargers here). They probably lack the ground game to execute it as well. A shoot-out is more likely but I see NE faltering early. Denver gets a big lead and wins by 10 (34-24).

Every prediction needs a caveat or two. The NFL is unpredictable week to week. No one thought the Bengals would be embarrassed in NE earlier this year. The Colt's defense pitches a shut-out against the Bengals and gives up 51 points the next week.

 
I'm guessing I should drop McManus and grab a different kicker then due to the weather?
:yes:

Plus, the fact that he is only 6 for 8 on field goals in seven games. The Broncos are converting most scoring chances into touchdowns, and even if drives bog down today, there is no guarantee that he'll hit them in what might be not ideal conditions. I jumped ship everywhere I had him.

 
BB set the weather dominator to butthurt.

Please based football gods, preserve our DB's knees.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Could OP please make some type of update the title to include the impact of the blizzard like weather on the game? Thanks.

 
Tool said:
Dimenna said:
Oddsmakers are begging for Public to bet on the Pats with this line. Denver 34 Pats 20
Not so sure about that. Public is usually on the favorite.
Right, so they post a line of 3.5. People thinking it's a close matchup think, "Aww yeah, 3.5! They can lose by a field goal and cover."

Lines like 3.5, 6.5, 2.5 etc. always make me take another look.

 
Tool said:
Dimenna said:
Oddsmakers are begging for Public to bet on the Pats with this line. Denver 34 Pats 20
Not so sure about that. Public is usually on the favorite.
Right, so they post a line of 3.5. People thinking it's a close matchup think, "Aww yeah, 3.5! They can lose by a field goal and cover."

Lines like 3.5, 6.5, 2.5 etc. always make me take another look.
Sometimes it works out that way. Not always.

 
god helping broncos fans out with their excuses
I like you Larry, and as a result, I'm going to love giving you the business if we win. Please, let us win. And for the record, most of us Broncos fans haven't made any excuses - at least any more than Pats fans have in the past.

 
At this point kinda hoping the Pats win in OT after Peyton turns it over and Gostkowski kicks a 64 yard field goal with time expiring in OT.

 
At this point kinda hoping the Pats win in OT after Peyton turns it over and Gostkowski kicks a 64 yard field goal with time expiring in OT.
The only thing worse would be if our kicker, McManus, who we let go Prater for, missed a kick to win the game right before the scenario you listed.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top