i guess mccardell is the manPasquerelli just reported on ESPNEWS than Key has been "De-activated" by the Bucs in order to release him at a later date.According to Pasquerelli De-activation means that Key is not required to report to ANY team meetings, functions, games, etc. for the remainder of the 2003 season.Bizzaro...
Link?Meshawn put his house up for sale last week...he must have known something was up
look in the other threadAny links yet. This wold be huge news. I just don't see the Bucs doing that unless something has happened behind the scenes. Could this possibly be inactive as in injury instead of "Deactivated". You think Gruden saw my post on not being able to handle the Volatile team
LinkAny links yet. This wold be huge news. I just don't see the Bucs doing that unless something has happened behind the scenes. Could this possibly be inactive as in injury instead of "Deactivated". You think Gruden saw my post on not being able to handle the Volatile team
I don't know where there's a link, but I read that in the L.A. Times this weekend.Link?
Wow, wish I would have seen that report. You know something is going on then.JAA - the house thing was on the FOX pregameApparently he has been DEACTIVATED for the rest of the season instead of RELEASED outright so that a wild card contender couldn't snatch him now and hurt TB
What do you mean? Do they save cap room by deactivating him as opposed to cutting him?Also, the Bucs won't release him because it's too big of a salary cap hit.
Yes, all they have to do is drop Keyshawn, and they can use that roster slot on any FA.Fantasy implication:If he is deactivated and unable to sign with other teams, would it be appropriate to allow Keyshawn owners a free replacement, as you would in the case of an injury to a player?
Kyle Johnson (RB-Broncos) better watch his back!Not a good couple of weeks for K. Johnsons in the NFL. Are there any more of them?
That is the funniest thing I am going to see today! :rotflmao:GDB tankers.
Right...If they released Keyshawn today, the remainder of his pro rated signing bonus would accelerate into this year's cap, and they don't have the $8 million in cap room for that to happen. As a result, they would have to cut other players to make that move.By deactivating him, they are essentially paying him to stay away from the team, but won't cut him until the offseason when they can properly plan for the cap implications. Also, by waiting until mid summer next year, they can spread the cap hit over two seasons.CheersWhat do you mean? Do they save cap room by deactivating him as opposed to cutting him?